The Transition From Tube to Nipple in the Premature Newborn

Comparison of the Finger Feeding Method Versus Syringe Feeding Method in Supporting Sucking Skills of Preterm Babies

Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the efficiency of a new method called "finger feeding" with a well-known technique called syringe feeding for improving sucking skills and accelerating transition to breastfeeding in preterm infants. Materials and Methods: Totally 70 babies were included in this prospective randomized controlled study. Finger feeding method was applied in Group 1 (n = 35) and syringe feeding method was applied in Group 2 (n = 35). The COMFORTneo scale (CnS), oxygen saturation, pulse, respiratory rate, body temperature, amount of breast milk taken, and vomiting data were recorded before and after both applications. Hospitalization period and time elapsed for complete transition from both methods to breastfeeding were also recorded. Results: There was no statistical difference for birth weights, mean gestational age, and vital signs recorded before and after feeding between two groups. Predicted comfort and distress scores of Group 1 determined by the CnS were significantly lower than those of Group 2. This means that babies in the finger feeding group had better comfort than the those in Group 2 (p = 0.000). Time passed for transition to breastfeeding was significantly shorter than that in Group 2 (19.4 ± 15.0 days versus 29.7 ± 10.2 days, p = 0.000). Group 1 had lower amount of food leakage while feeding and their average weight gain at the end of 10th day was significantly higher (322.1 ± 82.3 g versus 252 ± 108.4 g, p = 0.004). They also were discharged earlier than Group 2 (25.8 ± 17.4 days versus 35.9 ± 13.0 days, p = 0.001). Conclusion: Finger feeding method is an effective way for increasing sucking abilities, accelerating transition to breastfeeding, and shortens duration of hospitalization in preterm infants.

Comparison of the finger-feeding versus cup feeding methods in the transition from gastric to oral feeding in preterm infants

OBJECTIVES

To assess the finger-feeding technique when compared with the cup feeding method during the early stage of preterm infant feeding transition regarding milk loss, milk ingestion period, and complications.

METHODS

Experimental, randomized, prospective study including 53 preterm infants with gestation age<37 weeks, clinically stable, and with a score of >28 points in the Oral Feeding Readiness Assessment Scale. The preterm babies were randomized to be included in the control group, which underwent the feeding transition using a cup or in the experimental group, which used the finger-feeding technique. The analysis of data was performed using Student's t-test to evaluate differences between mean values of the appointed variables, and Fischer's test for categorical variables; the asymmetric variables were assessed by the Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA test.

RESULTS

When compared with the control group, the experimental group showed lower milk loss, longer milk ingestion time, and a lower frequency of complications during feeding. The significance level was set at 5%, with a confidence interval of 90%.

CONCLUSION

The finger-feeding technique was shown to be a better feeding transition method regarding efficacy when compared with cup feeding method, due to lower milk loss and fewer complication episodes.

Instruments for assessing readiness to commence suck feeds in preterm infants: effects on time to establish full oral feeding and duration of hospitalisation

BACKGROUND

One of the most challenging milestones for preterm infants is the acquisition of safe and efficient feeding skills. The majority of healthy full term infants are born with skills to coordinate their suck, swallow and respiration. However, this is not the case for preterm infants who develop these skills gradually as they transition from tube feeding to suck feeds. For preterm infants the ability to engage in oral feeding behaviour is dependent on many factors. The complexity of factors influencing feeding readiness has led some researchers to investigate the use of an individualised assessment of an infant's abilities. A limited number of instruments that aim to indicate an individual infant's readiness to commence either breast or bottle feeding have been developed.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of using a feeding readiness instrument when compared to no instrument or another instrument on the outcomes of time to establish full oral feeding and duration of hospitalisations.

SEARCH METHODS

We used the standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review group to search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2016, Issue 1), MEDLINE via PubMed (1966 to 22 February 2016), EMBASE (1980 to 22 February 2016), and CINAHL (1982 to 22 February 2016). We also searched clinical trials' databases, conference proceedings, and the reference lists of retrieved articles for randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing a formal instrument to assess a preterm infant's readiness to commence suck feeds with either no instrument (usual practice) or another feeding readiness instrument.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The standard methods of Cochrane Neonatal were used. Two authors independently screened potential studies for inclusion. No studies were found that met our inclusion criteria.

MAIN RESULTS

No studies met the inclusion criteria.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is currently no evidence to inform clinical practice, with no studies meeting the inclusion criteria for this review. Research is needed in this area to establish an evidence base for the clinical utility of implementing the use of an instrument to assess feeding readiness in the preterm infant population.

Efeitos da estimulação da sucção não nutritiva com dedo enluvado na transição alimentar em recém-nascido prematuro de muito baixo peso

Objetivos analisar os efeitos da estimulação da sucção não nutritiva com a técnica do dedo enluvado, sobre o início e a transição alimentar da via gástrica para a via oral em prematuros de muito baixo peso. Métodos estudo aleatório, prospectivo, longitudinal, experimental e controlado, que incluiu 40 prematuros internados na UTI Neonatal do Hospital de Clínicas, com idade gestacional £ 32 semanas e peso de nascimento £ 1500g, clinicamente estáveis. Os prematuros foram distribuídos aleatoriamente, por meio de sorteio, em 2 grupos: grupo controle, sem SNN e grupo experimental, com SNN com dedo enluvado, 3 vezes ao dia, 3 dias na semana. Foram avaliados critérios quanto ao escore da avaliação da prontidão para início da alimentação oral, intercorrências durante a sucção nutritiva (SN) e o tempo de transição alimentar. Resultados quando comparado o grupo experimental em relação ao grupo controle observou-se um escore significantemente maior na avaliação da prontidão para início da alimentação via oral, uma menor frequência de sinais de estresse durante a sucção nutritiva e um menor tempo de transição alimentar da via gástrica para via oral. Conclusão a estimulação da sucção não nutritiva com a técnica do dedo enluvado melhorou a prontidão do prematuro para início da alimentação via oral, diminuiu a frequência dos sinais de estresse durante a alimentação via oral e reduziu o tempo de transição alimentar no grupo experimental quando comparado ao grupo controle.

Instruments for assessing readiness to commence suck feeds in preterm infants: effects on time to establish full oral feeding and duration of hospitalisation

BACKGROUND

One of the most challenging milestones for preterm infants is the acquisition of safe and efficient feeding skills. The majority of healthy full term infants are born with skills to coordinate their suck, swallow and respiration. However, this is not the case for preterm infants who develop these skills gradually as they transition from tube feeding to suck feeds. For preterm infants the ability to engage in oral feeding behaviour is dependent on many factors. The complexity of factors influencing feeding readiness has led some researchers to investigate the use of an individualised assessment of an infant's abilities. A limited number of instruments that aim to indicate an individual infant's readiness to commence either breast or bottle feeding have been developed.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of using a feeding readiness instrument when compared to no instrument or another instrument on the outcomes of time to establish full oral feeding and duration of hospitalisation.

SEARCH METHODS

We used the standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group, including a search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 2), MEDLINE via EBSCO (1966 to July 2010), EMBASE (1980 to July 2010), CINAHL via EBSCO (1982 to July 2010), Web of Science via EBSCO (1980 to July 2010) and Health Source (1980 to July 2010). Other sources such as cited references from retrieved articles and databases of clinical trials were also searched. We did not apply any language restriction. We updated this search in March 2012.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing a formal instrument to assess a preterm infant's readiness to commence suck feeds with either no instrument (usual practice) or another feeding readiness instrument.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group were used. Two authors independently screened potential studies for inclusion. No studies were found that met our inclusion criteria.

MAIN RESULTS

No studies met the inclusion criteria.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is currently no evidence to inform clinical practice, with no studies meeting the inclusion criteria for this review. Research is needed in this area to establish an evidence base for the clinical utility of implementing the use of an instrument to assess feeding readiness in the preterm infant population.

Using evidence to improve care for the vulnerable neonatal population

The facilitation of evidence-based practice (EBP) in the clinical setting is important to ensure patients receive the best care possible. This article highlights changes in open visitation and feeding readiness practices that occurred in a Magnet-designated facility neonatal ICU. The examples demonstrate ways to bring evidence to the bedside within an environment that supports EBP at all levels of nursing leadership.