Clinical Activity, Toxicity, Biomarkers, and Future Development of CTLA-4 Checkpoint Antagonists

A multi-omics analysis of effector and resting treg cells in pan-cancer

Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are critical for maintaining the stability of the immune system and facilitating tumor escape through various mechanisms. Resting T cells are involved in cell-mediated immunity and remain in a resting state until stimulated, while effector T cells promote immune responses. Here, we investigated the roles of two gene signatures, one for resting Tregs (FOXP3 and IL2RA) and another for effector Tregs (FOXP3, CTLA-4, CCR8 and TNFRSF9) in pan-cancer. Using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), The Cancer Proteome Atlas (TCPA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), we focused on the expression profile of the two signatures, the existence of single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and copy number variants (CNVs), methylation, infiltration of immune cells in the tumor and sensitivity to different drugs. Our analysis revealed that both signatures are differentially expressed across different cancer types, and correlate with patient survival. Furthermore, both types of Tregs influence important pathways in cancer development and progression, like apoptosis, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and the DNA damage pathway. Moreover, a positive correlation was highlighted between the expression of gene markers in both resting and effector Tregs and immune cell infiltration in adrenocortical carcinoma, while mutations in both signatures correlated with enrichment of specific immune cells, mainly in skin melanoma and endometrial cancer. In addition, we reveal the existence of widespread CNVs and hypomethylation affecting both Treg signatures in most cancer types. Last, we identified a few correlations between the expression of CCR8 and TNFRSF9 and sensitivity to several drugs, including COL-3, Chlorambucil and GSK1070916, in pan-cancer. Overall, these findings highlight new evidence that both Treg signatures are crucial regulators of cancer progression, providing potential clinical outcomes for cancer therapy.

Transport Barriers Influence the Activation of Anti-Tumor Immunity: A Systems Biology Analysis

Effective anti-cancer immune responses require activation of one or more naïve T cells. If the correct naïve T cell encounters its cognate antigen presented by an antigen presenting cell, then the T cell can activate and proliferate. Here, mathematical modeling is used to explore the possibility that immune activation in lymph nodes is a rate-limiting step in anti-cancer immunity and can affect response rates to immune checkpoint therapy. The model provides a mechanistic framework for optimizing cancer immunotherapy and developing testable solutions to unleash anti-tumor immune responses for more patients with cancer. The results show that antigen production rate and trafficking of naïve T cells into the lymph nodes are key parameters and that treatments designed to enhance tumor antigen production can improve immune checkpoint therapies. The model underscores the potential of radiation therapy in augmenting tumor immunogenicity and neoantigen production for improved ICB therapy, while emphasizing the need for careful consideration in cases where antigen levels are already sufficient to avoid compromising the immune response.

The application of nanotechnology in enhancing immunotherapy for cancer treatment: current effects and perspective

Cancer immunotherapy is emerging as a promising treatment modality that suppresses and eliminates tumors by re-activating and maintaining the tumor-immune cycle, and further enhancing the body's anti-tumor immune response. Despite the impressive therapeutic potential of immunotherapy approaches such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and tumor vaccines in pre-clinical and clinical applications, the effective response is limited by insufficient accumulation in tumor tissues and severe side-effects. Recent years have witnessed the rise of nanotechnology as a solution to improve these technical weaknesses due to its inherent biophysical properties and multifunctional modifying potential. In this review, we summarized and discussed the current status of nanoparticle-enhanced cancer immunotherapy strategies, including intensified delivery of tumor vaccines and immune adjuvants, immune checkpoint inhibitor vehicles, targeting capacity to tumor-draining lymph nodes and immune cells, triggered releasing and regulating specific tumor microenvironments, and adoptive cell therapy enhancement effects.

Targeting CXCL12/CXCR4 Axis in Tumor Immunotherapy

Chemokines, which have chemotactic abilities, are comprised of a family of small cytokines with 8-10 kilodaltons. Chemokines work in immune cells by trafficking and regulating cell proliferation, migration, activation, differentiation, and homing. CXCR-4 is an alpha-chemokine receptor specific for stromal-derived-factor-1 (SDF-1, also known as CXCL12), which has been found to be expressed in more than 23 different types of cancers. Recently, the SDF-1/CXCR-4 signaling pathway has emerged as a potential therapeutic target for human tumor because of its critical role in tumor initiation and progression by activating multiple signaling pathways, such as ERK1/2, ras, p38 MAPK, PLC/ MAPK, and SAPK/ JNK, as well as regulating cancer stem cells. CXCL12/CXCR4 antagonists have been produced, which have shown encouraging results in anti-cancer activity. Here, we provide a brief overview of the CXCL12/CXCR4 axis as a molecular target for cancer treatment. We also review the potential utility of targeting CXCL12/CXCR4 axis in combination of immunotherapy and/or chemotherapy based on up-to-date literature and ongoing research progress.

CD47-signal regulatory protein α signaling system and its application to cancer immunotherapy

Tumor cells evade immune surveillance through direct or indirect interactions with various types of immune cell, with much recent attention being focused on modifying immune cell responses as the basis for the development of new cancer treatments. Signal regulatory protein α (SIRPα) and CD47 are both transmembrane proteins that interact with each other and constitute a cell-cell communication system. SIRPα is particularly abundant in myeloid cells such as macrophages and dendritic cells, whereas CD47 is expressed ubiquitously and its expression level is elevated in cancer cells. Recent studies have shown that blockade of CD47-SIRPα interaction enhances the phagocytic activity of phagocytes such as macrophages toward tumor cells in vitro as well as resulting in the efficient eradication of tumor cells in a variety of xenograft or syngeneic mouse models of cancer. Moreover, CD47 blockade has been shown to promote the stimulation of tumor-specific cytotoxic T cells by macrophages or dendritic cells. Biological agents, such as Abs and recombinant proteins, that target human CD47 or SIRPα have been developed and are being tested in preclinical models of human cancer or in clinical trials with cancer patients. Preclinical studies have also suggested that CD47 or SIRPα blockade may have a synergistic antitumor effect in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors that target the adaptive immune system. Targeting of the CD47-SIRPα signaling system is thus a promising strategy for cancer treatment based on modulation of both innate and acquired immune responses to tumor cells.

Anti-human SIRPα antibody is a new tool for cancer immunotherapy

Interaction of signal regulatory protein α (SIRPα) expressed on the surface of macrophages with its ligand CD47 expressed on target cells negatively regulates phagocytosis of the latter cells by the former. We recently showed that blocking Abs to mouse SIRPα enhanced both the Ab‐dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) activity of mouse macrophages for Burkitt's lymphoma Raji cells opsonized with an Ab to CD20 (rituximab) in vitro as well as the inhibitory effect of rituximab on the growth of tumors formed by Raji cells in nonobese diabetic (NOD)/SCID mice. However, the effects of blocking Abs to human SIRPα in preclinical cancer models have remained unclear given that such Abs have failed to interact with endogenous SIRPα expressed on macrophages of immunodeficient mice. With the use of Rag2^−/−γ_c^−/− mice harboring a transgene for human SIRPα under the control of human regulatory elements (hSIRPα‐DKO mice), we here show that a blocking Ab to human SIRPα significantly enhanced the ADCP activity of macrophages derived from these mice for human cancer cells. The anti‐human SIRPα Ab also markedly enhanced the inhibitory effect of rituximab on the growth of tumors formed by Raji cells in hSIRPα‐DKO mice. Our results thus suggest that the combination of Abs to human SIRPα with therapeutic Abs specific for tumor antigens warrants further investigation for potential application to cancer immunotherapy. In addition, humanized mice, such as hSIRPα‐DKO mice, should prove useful for validation of the antitumor effects of checkpoint inhibitors before testing in clinical trials.

Concurrent MEK targeted therapy prevents MAPK pathway reactivation during BRAFV600E targeted inhibition in a novel syngeneic murine glioma model

Inhibitors of BRAF^V600E kinase are currently under investigations in preclinical and clinical studies involving BRAF^V600E glioma. Studies demonstrated clinical response to such individualized therapy in the majority of patients whereas in some patients tumors continue to grow despite treatment. To study resistance mechanisms, which include feedback activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling in melanoma, we developed a luciferase-modified cell line (2341^luc) from a Braf^V600E mutant and Cdkn2a- deficient murine high-grade glioma, and analyzed its molecular responses to BRAF^V600E- and MAPK kinase (MEK)-targeted inhibition. Immunocompetent, syngeneic FVB/N mice with intracranial grafts of 2341^luc were tested for effects of BRAF^V600E and MEK inhibitor treatments, with bioluminescence imaging up to 14-days after start of treatment and survival analysis as primary indicators of inhibitor activity. Intracranial injected tumor cells consistently generated high-grade glioma-like tumors in syngeneic mice. Intraperitoneal daily delivery of BRAF^V600E inhibitor dabrafenib only transiently suppressed MAPK signaling, and rather increased Akt signaling and failed to extend survival for mice with intracranial 2341^luc tumor. MEK inhibitor trametinib delivered by oral gavage daily suppressed MAPK pathway more effectively and had a more durable anti-growth effect than dabrafenib as well as a significant survival benefit. Compared with either agent alone, combined BRAF^V600E and MEK inhibitor treatment was more effective in reducing tumor growth and extending animal subject survival, as corresponding to sustained MAPK pathway inhibition. Results derived from the 2341^luc engraftment model application have clinical implications for the management of BRAF^V600E glioma.

Combined immunotherapy with anti-PDL-1/PD-1 and anti-CD4 antibodies cures syngeneic disseminated neuroblastoma

Anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 blocking monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have shown potent anti-tumor effects in adult cancer patients and clinical studies have recently been started in pediatric cancers, including high-risk/relapsing neuroblastoma (NB). Therefore, we studied the effects of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 mAbs in two syngeneic models of disseminated NB generated by the injection of either Neuro2a or NXS2 cells, which express PD-L1. In addition, we tested the combination of these agents with the immune-enhancing cytokine IL-21, the Ecto-NTPDase inhibitor POM-1, an anti-CD25 mAb targeting Treg cells, or an anti-CD4 mAb. We previously showed that CD4-transient depletion removes CD4⁺CD25⁺ Treg cells and other CD4⁺CD25⁻ regulatory subsets. Here we show that mono-therapy with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 mAbs had no effect on systemic NB progression in vivo, and also their combination with IL-21, POM-1 or anti-CD25 mAb was ineffective. The combined use of anti-PD-1 with an anti-CD4 mAb mediated a very potent, CD8-dependent, synergistic effect leading to significant elongation of tumor-free survival of mice, complete tumor regression and durable anti-NB immunity. Similar results were obtained by combining the anti-PD-L1 and anti-CD4 mAbs. These findings indicate that both PD-1/PD-L1 and CD4⁺ T cell-related immune-regulatory mechanisms must be simultaneously blocked to mediate therapeutic effects in these models.

Cancer immunotherapy: Opportunities and challenges in the rapidly evolving clinical landscape

Cancer immunotherapy is now established as a powerful way to treat cancer. The recent clinical success of immune checkpoint blockade (antagonists of CTLA-4, PD-1 and PD-L1) highlights both the universal power of treating the immune system across tumour types and the unique features of cancer immunotherapy. Immune-related adverse events, atypical clinical response patterns, durable responses, and clear overall survival benefit distinguish cancer immunotherapy from cytotoxic cancer therapy. Combination immunotherapies that transform non-responders to responders are under rapid development. Current challenges facing the field include incorporating immunotherapy into adjuvant and neoadjuvant cancer therapy, refining dose, schedule and duration of treatment and developing novel surrogate endpoints that accurately capture overall survival benefit early in treatment. As the field rapidly evolves, we must prioritise the development of biomarkers to guide the use of immunotherapies in the most appropriate patients. Immunotherapy is already transforming cancer from a death sentence to a chronic disease for some patients. By making smart, evidence-based decisions in developing next generation immunotherapies, cancer should become an imminently treatable, curable and even preventable disease.

Carcinoma-associated fibroblasts: orchestrating the composition of malignancy

The tumor stroma is no longer seen solely as physical support for mutated epithelial cells but as an important modulator and even a driver of tumorigenicity. Within the tumor stromal milieu, heterogeneous populations of fibroblast-like cells, collectively termed carcinoma-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), are key players in the multicellular, stromal-dependent alterations that contribute to malignant initiation and progression. This review focuses on novel insights into the contributions of CAFs to disease progression, emergent events leading to the generation of CAFs, identification of CAF-specific biomarkers predictive of disease outcome, and recent therapeutic approaches aimed at blunting or reverting detrimental protumorigenic phenotypes associated with CAFs.

Combinatorial approach to cancer immunotherapy: strength in numbers

Immune-checkpoint blockade therapy with antibodies targeting CTLA-4 and PD-1 has revolutionized melanoma treatment by eliciting responses that can be remarkably durable and is now advancing to other malignancies. However, not all patients respond to immune-checkpoint inhibitors. Extensive preclinical evidence suggests that combining immune-checkpoint inhibitors with other anti-cancer treatments can greatly improve the therapeutic benefit. The first clinical success of the combinatorial approach to cancer immunotherapy was demonstrated using a dual-checkpoint blockade with CTLA-4 and PD-1 inhibitors, which resulted in accelerated FDA approval of this therapeutic regimen. In this review, we discuss the combinations of current and emerging immunotherapeutic agents in clinical and preclinical development and summarize the insights into potential mechanisms of synergistic anti-tumor activity gained from animal studies. These promising combinatorial partners for the immune-checkpoint blockade include therapeutics targeting additional inhibitory receptors of T cells, such as TIM-3, LAG-3, TIGIT, and BTLA, and agonists of T cell costimulatory receptors 4-1BB, OX40, and GITR, as well as agents that promote cancer cell recognition by the immune system, such as tumor vaccines, IDO inhibitors, and agonists of the CD40 receptor of APCs. We also review the therapeutic potential of regimens combining the immune-checkpoint blockade with therapeutic interventions that have been shown to enhance immunogenicity of cancer cells, including oncolytic viruses, RT, epigenetic therapy, and senescence-inducing therapy.

Regulation of Natural Killer Cell Function by STAT3

Natural killer (NK) cells, key members of a distinct hematopoietic lineage, innate lymphoid cells, are not only critical effectors that mediate cytotoxicity toward tumor and virally infected cells but also regulate inflammation, antigen presentation, and the adaptive immune response. It has been shown that NK cells can regulate the development and activation of many other components of the immune response, such as dendritic cells, which in turn, modulate the function of NK cells in multiple synergistic feed back loops driven by cell–cell contact, and the secretion of cytokines and chemokines that control effector function and migration of cells to sites of immune activation. The signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)-3 is involved in driving almost all of the pathways that control NK cytolytic activity as well as the reciprocal regulatory interactions between NK cells and other components of the immune system. In the context of tumor immunology, NK cells are a first line of defense that eliminates pre-cancerous and transformed cells early in the process of carcinogenesis, through a mechanism of “immune surveillance.” Even after tumors become established, NK cells are critical components of anticancer immunity: dysfunctional NK cells are often found in the peripheral blood of cancer patients, and the lack of NK cells in the tumor microenvironment often correlates to poor prognosis. The pathways and soluble factors activated in tumor-associated NK cells, cancer cells, and regulatory myeloid cells, which determine the outcome of cancer immunity, are all critically regulated by STAT3. Using the tumor microenvironment as a paradigm, we present here an overview of the research that has revealed fundamental mechanisms through which STAT3 regulates all aspects of NK cell biology, including NK development, activation, target cell killing, and fine tuning of the innate and adaptive immune responses.

Precision Medicine and Non-Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Fiction or Reality?

BACKGROUND

Non-colorectal liver metastases (nCRLM) constitute a variety of heterogeneous diseases and a considerable therapeutic challenge. Management is based on the primary tumor and the clinical course. In the era of precision medicine (PM) we know that cancer is heterogeneous within the tumor and across different sites.

METHODS

We give an overview of the path to PM through 'omics' beyond genomics. We refer to the experience gained to date from models such as colorectal cancer and we discuss the opportunity offered by PM for the management of nCRLM.

RESULTS

In order to best characterize and track tumor biological behaviors as well as to understand mechanisms of response to therapy and survival we suggest the application of novel clinical trial designs, a dynamic approach with serial monitoring involving evaluation of primary and metastatic sites. Quality and standardization of tissue acquisition and biobanking is a precondition for the reliability of this approach.

CONCLUSION

The application of PM is increasingly becoming a reality. Elucidating the mysteries of tumors in complex settings can only be achieved with the approach PM offers. nCRLM may serve as a model for the application of PM principles and techniques in understanding individual diseases and also cancer as an entity and therapeutic challenge.

Immunologic approaches to cancer prevention-current status, challenges, and future perspectives

The potential of the immune system to recognize and reject tumors has been investigated for more than a century. However, only recently impressive breakthroughs in cancer immunotherapy have been seen with the use of checkpoint inhibitors. The experience with various immune-based strategies in the treatment of late cancer highlighted the importance of negative impact advanced disease has on immunity. Consequently, use of immune modulation for cancer prevention rather than therapy has gained considerable attention, with many promising results seen already in preclinical and early clinical studies. Although not without challenges, these results provide much excitement and optimism that successful cancer immunoprevention could be within our reach. In this review we will discuss the current state of predominantly primary and secondary cancer immunoprevention, relevant research, potential barriers, and future directions.