Cardiac PET and SPECT During the COVID-19 Pandemic

[Nuclear Cardiology in the COVID-19 pandemic]

SARS-CoV-2 infection has a very important relationship with cardiovascular disease. Since the beginning of the pandemic, a close relationship has been observed between cardiovascular comorbidity and a worse prognosis in COVID-19 patients. The study of the pathophysiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection and cardiovascular disease suggests several concomitant hypotheses: direct myocardial damage by the virus, hypoxemia secondary to respiratory failure, inflammatory response to infection and/or thromboembolic phenomena. Cardiovascular damage can manifest in the acute phase of infection with acute myocardial infarction, myocarditis, arrhythmias..., during this phase Nuclear Cardiology procedures have not played a determining role in the diagnosis and management of these patients. On the other hand, in the subacute phase of the infection and in the post-acute COVID syndrome, Nuclear Cardiology seems to shed light on what happens in the cardiovascular system in this phase of the disease.The COVID-19 pandemic has represented a great challenge for health systems, with a significant reduction in non-urgent diagnostic procedures with the aim of reducing the risk of transmission to patients and health personnel. Nuclear Cardiology has not been an exception. In addition to the prioritization of urgent/non-deferrable procedures and general screening, hygiene and distance measures, the main organizations and scientific societies of Nuclear Medicine and Nuclear Cardiology released recommendations and guidelines for safe practice, introducing significant changes in myocardial perfusion SPECT protocols.

The Clinical Utility of Molecular Imaging in COVID-19: An Update

The novel pathogen severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was first discovered in Wuhan, China in late 2019 with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) declared a global pandemic in March 2020. Primarily involving the lungs, conventional imaging with chest radiography and CT can play a complementary role to RT-PCR in the initial diagnosis, and also in follow up of select patients. As a broader understanding of the multi-systemic nature of COVID-19 has evolved, a potential role for molecular imaging has developed, that may detect functional changes in advance of standard cross-sectional imaging. In this review, we highlight the evolving role of molecular imaging such as fluorine-18 (18F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) with PET/CT and PET/MRI in the evaluation of both pulmonary and extra-pulmonary COVID-19, ventilation and perfusion scan with SPECT/CT for thromboembolic disease, long term follow-up of COVID-19 infection, and COVID-19 vaccine-related complications.

Oncology and cardiology positron emission tomography/computed tomography faced with COVID-19: A review of available literature data

The COVID-19 pandemic has forced people to significantly change their lifestyles and attitudes, and has greatly burdened healthcare delivery systems worldwide. The redistribution of the medical delivery system to maintain normal medical care while responding generously to COVID-19 is a continuing challenge that weighs heavily on medical institutions. Among imaging modalities, chest X-rays and computed tomography (CT) examinations have clearly made a large contribution to treatment of COVID-19. In contrast, it is difficult to express the standpoint of nuclear medicine examinations in a straightforward manner, as the greatest emphasis in this modality has been on how necessary medical care can continue to be provided. Many clinical reports of nuclear medicine examinations related to COVID-19 have been published, and knowledge continues to accumulate. This review provides a summary of the current state of oncology and cardiology positron emission tomography (PET) examinations related to COVID-19, and includes preparation of the nuclear medicine department, trends in PET examinations, specific imaging findings on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT, imaging of complications of COVID-19, PET tracers other than FDG, and the effects of vaccines on PET imaging findings.