Research using clinical registries in children's surgical care

Analysis of Physeal Fractures from the United States National Trauma Data Bank

Background: Pediatric long-bone physeal fractures can lead to growth deformities. Previous studies have reported that physeal fractures make up 18–30% of total fractures. This study aimed to characterize physeal fractures with respect to sex, age, anatomic location, and Salter–Harris (SH) classification from a current multicenter national database. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed using the 2016 United States National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB). Patients ≤ 18 years of age with a fracture of the humerus, radius, ulna, femur, tibia, or fibula were included. Results: The NTDB captured 132,018 patients and 58,015 total fractures. Physeal fractures made up 5.7% (3291) of all long-bone fractures, with males accounting for 71.0% (2338). Lower extremity physeal injuries comprised 58.6% (1929) of all physeal fractures. The most common site of physeal injury was the tibia comprising 31.8% (1047), 73.9% (774) of which were distal tibia fractures. Physeal fractures were greatest at 11 years of age for females and 14 years of age for males. Most fractures were SH Type II fractures. Discussion and Conclusions: Our analysis indicates that 5.7% of pediatric long-bone fractures involved the physis, with the distal tibia being the most common. These findings suggest a lower incidence of physeal fractures than previous studies and warrant further investigation.

Using a 3 stage process to create a consumer research contact list in a paediatric health setting: the PARTICIPATE project

The impact of child health research can be far reaching; affecting children's immediate health, their adult health, the health of future generations and the economic wellbeing of countries. Consumer and community involvement is increasingly recognised as key to successful research recruitment. Systematic approaches to research recruitment include research registries or research contact lists.

OBJECTIVE

Develop a process of creating a consumer research contact list for participating in future research opportunities at a children's health service.

METHODS

A healthcare improvement approach using a 3 stage framework; 1) evidence review and consultation 2) co-production of a research communications plan with stakeholders (including consumers), including a draft research information brochure 3) prototyping involved iteratively testing the brochure, surveying parents or carers who attended outpatient clinics or the hospital Emergency Department, and conducting follow up telephone calls.

RESULTS

There was overall support for the creation of a research contact list, but some unknowns remain. 367 parents or carers completed the survey and 36 participated in a follow up telephone call. Over half would be willing to join a research contact list and more than 90% of the children of parents or carers surveyed were not currently participating in research. Several potential barriers identified by health service staff were dispelled. Research communications and a future contact list should be available in electronic form.

CONCLUSIONS

There was strong support for creating a research contact list. The approach will inform our future directions including creation of an electronic research contact list easily accessible by consumers of the children's health service. Recruiting enough children to participate in research studies can be challenging. Establishing a registry or list of young people willing to be contacted to participate in research is one way of addressing this problem. At our children's health service, we wanted to explore the idea of developing a research contact list and we were particularly keen to involve consumers and community members in this process, which involved: 1.Reviewing other examples of research contact lists and consulting with a range of people, including consumers and community members, 2. Co-producing a research communications plan with parents, young people, health service staff and research staff, including a draft research information brochure for families, and 3. Testing the acceptability of the brochure by surveying parents or carers who attended outpatient clinics or the hospital Emergency Department, and conducting follow up telephone calls with them. 367 parents or carers completed a survey and 36 participated in a follow up telephone call. Over half were willing to join a research contact list and more than 90% of the children of parents or carers surveyed were not currently participating in research. Several potential barriers raised by consumers and health professionals in the first stage of the project were not found to be a concern for the parents or carers surveyed. Responses showed research communications and a future contact list should be available in electronic form. These findings will inform the future creation of an electronic research contact list, easily accessible by consumers of the children's health service.

The influence of prematurity on neonatal surgical morbidity and mortality

BACKGROUND

As survival rates amongst premature infants have improved, prematurity remains a leading contributor to neonatal surgical morbidity and mortality. This study aims to better assess the influence of prematurity on surgical outcomes.

METHODS

The NSQIP-Pediatric database was used to compare outcomes between preterm and term infants undergoing surgical repair of select congenital anomalies from 2012 to 2017. Prematurity was categorized as extremely preterm (EP) (<29 weeks), very preterm (VP) (29-32 weeks), moderate to late preterm (MLP) (33-36 weeks), and term (≥37 weeks). Significance was determined using Chi-square tests, Fisher exact tests and adjusted logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

4852 infants were identified with 45 (0.9%) EP, 211 (4.3%) VP, 1492 (30.8%) MLP, and 3104 (64.0%) term. Compared to term, preterm infants have increased odds of surgical morbidity (EP Odds Ratio (OR) 3.2 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.6-6.4, VP OR 1.2 95%CI 0.9-1.7, and MLP OR 1.2 95%CI 1.0-1.4). 30-day mortality decreased as neonatal age increased from 22.2% EP to 2.9% term (p < 0.001). Premature populations had higher rates of sepsis, pneumonia, bleeding requiring transfusion and 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Prematurity increases morbidity and mortality amongst neonates undergoing surgery. Risk-adjustment for prematurity is needed and premature infants may have unique quality improvement targets.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.