Gastrointestinal maturation and feeding

Management of Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes in the Late Preterm Period

Importance

For patients who present with prelabor rupture of membrane (PROM) in the late preterm period (34 to 36 6/7 weeks), management remains unclear due to lack of consensus. However, recent guidelines have suggested that shared decision-making may be used and expectant management can be considered up to 37 0/7 weeks.

Objective

In this article, we review the contemporary studies comparing the risks and benefits of immediate delivery versus expectant management for patients with late preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM).

Evidence Acquisition

Original research articles, review articles, and guidelines on management of late PPROM.

Results

Three randomized clinical trials and 2 meta-analyses comparing expectant management and immediate delivery outcomes in late PPROM showed no significant difference in neonatal sepsis rates between groups. Expectant management increased the likelihood that pregnancies reached term while decreasing the rate of cesarean delivery. However, data suggest an increased risk of antepartum hemorrhage among patients in the expectant management groups, as well as higher rates of histologic chorioamnionitis.

Conclusions and Relevance

We recommend that clinicians offer expectant management as an alternative to immediate delivery in the setting of late PPROM through a shared decision-making process that clearly outlines the risks and benefits.

A highly efficient hybrid peptide ameliorates intestinal inflammation and mucosal barrier damage by neutralizing lipopolysaccharides and antagonizing the lipopolysaccharide-receptor interaction

Intestinal inflammatory disorders, such as inflammatory bowel disease, are major contributors to mortality and morbidity in humans and animals worldwide. While some native peptides have great potential as therapeutic agents against intestinal inflammation, potential cytotoxicity, anti-inciting action, and suppression of anti-inflammatory activity may limit their development as anti-inflammatory agents. Peptide hybridization is an effective approach for the design and engineering of novel functional peptides because hybrid peptides combine the advantages and benefits of various native peptides. In the present study, a novel hybrid anti-inflammatory peptide that combines the active center of Cecropin A (C) and the core functional region of LL-37 (L) was designed [C-L peptide; C (1-8)-L (17-30)] through in silico analysis to reduce cytotoxicity and improve the anti-inflammatory activity of the parental peptides. The resulting C-L peptide exhibited lower cytotoxicity than either C or L peptides alone. C-L also exerted a protective effect against lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammatory responses in RAW264.7 macrophages and in the intestines of a mouse model. The hybrid peptide exhibited increased anti-inflammatory activity compared to the parental peptides. C-L plays a role in protecting intestinal tissue from damage, LPS-induced weight loss, and leukocyte infiltration. In addition, C-L reduces the expression levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-1β, and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), as well as reduces cell apoptosis. It also reduced mucosal barrier damage caused by LPS. The anti-inflammatory effects of the hybrid peptide were mainly attributed to its LPS-neutralizing activity and antagonizing the activation of LPS-induced Toll-like receptor 4-myeloid differentiation factor 2 (TLR4/MD2). The peptide also affected the TLR4-(nuclear factor κB) signaling pathway, modulating the inflammatory response upon LPS stimulation. Collectively, these findings suggest that the newly designed peptide, C-L, could be developed into a novel anti-inflammatory agent for animals or humans.

Late preterm: a new high risk group in neonatology

Late preterm infants are those infants born between 34 0/7 weeks through 36 6/7 week of gestation. These are physiologically less mature and have limited compensatory responses to the extrauterine environment compared with term infants. Despite their increased risk for morbidity and mortality, late preterm newborns are often cared in the well-baby nurseries of hospital after birth and are discharged from the hospital by 2-3 days of postnatal age. They are usually treated like developmentally mature term infants because many of them are of same birth weight and same size as term infants. There is a steady increase in the late preterm birth rate in last decade because of either maternal, fetal, or placental/uterine causes. There has been shift in the distribution of births from term and post-term toward earlier gestations. Although late preterm infants are the largest subgroup of preterm infants, there has been little research on this group until recently. This is mainly because of labeling them as "near-term". Such infants were being looked upon as "almost mature", and were thought as neonate requiring either no or minimal concern. In the obstetric and pediatric practice, late preterm infants are often considered functionally and developmentally mature and often managed by protocols developed for full-term infants. Thus, limited efforts are taken to prolong pregnancy in cases of preterm labor beyond 34 weeks, moreover after 34 weeks most centers do not administer antenatal prophylactic steroids. These practices are based on previous studies reporting neonatal mortality and morbidity in the late preterm period to be only slightly higher in comparison with term infants and whereas in the current scenario the difference is significant. Late preterm infants have 2-3-fold increased risk of morbidities such as hypothermia, hypoglycemia, delayed lung fluid clearance, respiratory distress, poor feeding, jaundice, sepsis, and readmission rates after initial hospital discharge. This leads to huge impact on the overall health care resources. In this review, we cover various aspects of these late preterm infants like etiology, immediate and long-term outcome.

Feeding the Late and Moderately Preterm Infant: A Position Paper of the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Committee on Nutrition

Nutritional guidelines and requirements for late or moderately preterm (LMPT) infants are notably absent, although they represent the largest population of preterm infants. The European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) Committee on Nutrition (CoN) performed a review of the literature with the aim to provide guidance on how to feed infants born LMPT, and identify gaps in the literature and research priorities.Only limited data from controlled trials are available. Late preterm infants have unique, often unrecognized, vulnerabilities that predispose them to high rates of nutritionally related morbidity and hospital readmissions. They frequently have feeding difficulties that delay hospital discharge, and poorer rates of breastfeeding initiation and duration compared with term infants. This review also identified that moderately preterm infants frequently exhibit postnatal growth restriction.The ESPGHAN CoN strongly endorses breast milk as the preferred method of feeding LMPT infants and also emphasizes that mothers of LMPT infants should receive qualified, extended lactation support, and frequent follow-up. Individualized feeding plans should be promoted. Hospital discharge should be delayed until LMPT infants have a safe discharge plan that takes into account local situation and resources.In the LMPT population, the need for active nutritional support increases with lower gestational ages. There may be a role for enhanced nutritional support including the use of human milk fortifier, enriched formula, parenteral nutrition, and/or additional supplements, depending on factors, such as gestational age, birth weight, and significant comorbidities. Further research is needed to assess the benefits (improved nutrient intakes) versus risks (interruption of breast-feeding) of providing nutrient-enrichment to the LMPT infant.

Medically indicated late preterm delivery and its impact on perinatal morbidity and mortality: a retrospective population-based cohort study

Objective: In the last few decades, attention has been focused on morbidity and mortality associated with late preterm delivery (34-36 + 6/7 weeks), accounting for 60-70% of all preterm births. This study is aimed to determine (1) the prevalence of late preterm deliveries (spontaneous and medically indicated) in our population; and (2) the rate of neonatal morbidity and mortality as well as maternal complications associated with the different phenotypes of late preterm deliveries. Study design: This retrospective population-based cohort study, included 96,176 women who had 257,182 deliveries, occurred between 1988 and 2011, allocated into three groups: term (n = 242,286), spontaneous (n = 10,063), and medically indicated (n = 4833) late preterm deliveries. Results: (1) Medically indicated late preterm deliveries were associated with increased maternal morbidity, as well as neonatal morbidity and mortality, in comparison with other study groups (p < .01 for all comparisons); (2) medically indicated late preterm delivery was an independent risk factor for composite neonatal morbidity (low Apgar score at 5', seizures, asphyxia, acidosis) after adjustment for confounding factors (maternal age and ethnicity and neonatal gender) and stratification according to gestational age at delivery; and (3) the proportion of medically indicated late preterm deliveries affected the neonatal mortality rate. Below 35% of all late preterm deliveries, indicated late preterm birth were associated with a reduction in neonatal mortality; however, above this threshold medically indicated late preterm deliveries were associated with an increased risk for neonatal death. Conclusions: (1) Medically indicated late preterm deliveries were independently associated with adverse composite neonatal outcome; and (2) to benefit in term of neonatal outcome from the tool of medically indicated late preterm birth, their proportion should be kept below 35% of all late preterm deliveries, while exceeding this threshold increases the risk of neonatal mortality.

The microbiome during pregnancy and early postnatal life

We are changing our concept that the newborn infant emerges from a sterile environment. In-utero colonization may have major impacts on the developing mammal in terms of development of immunity and metabolism that, with epigenetic modifications, will lead to diseases in later life. In addition, the microbial profile that develops during and after birth depends on mode of delivery, type of feeding (human milk versus formula) and various other environmental factors to which the newborn is exposed. The goal of this review is to clarify that the microbiome in the maternal fetal unit as well as the immediate changes that occur as new microbes are acquired postnatally play major roles in subsequent health and disease. Rapidly developing technologies for multi-omic analyses and systems biology are shifting paradigms in both scientific knowledge and clinical care.

Physiologic underpinnings for clinical problems in moderately preterm and late preterm infants

This article highlights some of the important developmental characteristics that underpin common problems seen in moderate and late preterm infants. Preterm birth is associated with an increased prevalence of clinical problems caused by functional immaturities in a wide variety of organ systems, acquired problems, and problems associated with inadequate monitoring and/or follow-up plans. There are variations in the degree of maturation among infants of similar gestational ages because the developmental process is nonlinear. Therefore, different organ systems mature at rates and trajectories that are specific to their functions. A better understanding of these principles can help guide optimal treatment strategies.

Early term birth: understanding the health risks to infants

Early term birth, which occurs at 37 to 38 weeks gestation, is often elective and can carry significant health risks to infants, including short-term and long-term health outcomes. Nurses and other health care providers involved in the care of pregnant women and infants need to be aware of these infants' physiologic vulnerability and potential short- term and long-term care requirements. Nurses can educate patients and raise awareness of the risks associated with early term birth.

Transitions in the early-life of late preterm infants: vulnerabilities and implications for postpartum care

The focus of this article is on the transition of late preterm infants from hospital to home. The current state of literature related to mortality, morbidities, emergency department visits, and rehospitalization underscores the vulnerability of late preterm infants following discharge from hospital. Universal provision of postpartum care to late preterm infants is viewed as an environmental support intended to facilitate transition of these vulnerable infants from hospital to home. Gaps in provision of postpartum care of late preterm infants are situated within the discussion of guidelines and models of postpartum care (home vs clinic) of late preterm infants.

Neonatal morbidity in singleton late preterm infants compared with full-term infants

AIM

The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that singleton late preterm infants (34 0/7 to 36 6/7 weeks of gestation) compared with full-term infants have a higher incidence of short-term morbidity and stay longer in hospital.

METHODS

In this retrospective, multicentre study, electronic data of children born at five hospitals in Switzerland were recorded. Short-term outcome of late preterm infants was compared with a control group of full-term infants (39 0/7 to 40 6/7 weeks of gestation). Multiple gestations, pregnancies complicated by foetal malformations, maternal consumption of illicit drugs and infants with incomplete documentation were excluded. The results were corrected for gender imbalance.

RESULTS

Data from 530 late preterm and 1686 full-term infants were analysed. Compared with full-term infants, late preterm infants had a significant higher morbidity: respiratory distress (34.7% vs. 4.6%), hyperbilirubinaemia (47.7% vs. 3.4%), hypoglycaemia (14.3% vs. 0.6%), hypothermia (2.5% vs. 0.6%) and duration of hospitalization (mean, 9.9 days vs. 5.2 days). The risk to develop at least one complication was 7.6 (95% CI: 6.2-9.6) times higher among late preterm infants (70.8%) than among full-term infants (9.3%).

CONCLUSION

Singleton late preterm infants show considerably higher rate of medical complications and prolonged hospital stay compared with matched full-term infants and therefore need more medical and financial resources.

Colonization of the Gastrointestinal Tract in Neonates

Bacterial colonization of the neonatal gastrointestinal tract has emerged as an issue involving nutrition, immunity, and overall mortality. Bacterial organisms colonizing the gastrointestinal tract play a vital role in maintaining intestinal homeostasis, including digestion, nutrient absorption, and immunological mechanisms. In neonates, these bacteria are essential in postnatal development of intestinal mucosa and gut-associated lymphoid tissue critical for immunological protection. Colonization of bacteria is thought to occur over the first 1 to 2 weeks of life. Delivery mode, feeding method, and environment affect the succession and establishment of the beneficial bacteria in the neonate. Neonates delivered vaginally are colonized by the bacteria from the mother, whereas neonates delivered via caesarean section initially colonize with bacteria from the environment. Feeding method is another factor; Bifidobacterium species are believed to dominate the microflora of breastfed infants by day of life 2 to 3 and are thought to be critical in postnatal immunology. Formula-fed infants often have a more diverse microflora and a less obvious presence of the Bifidobacterium. Compared with healthy, term neonates, preterm infants have a significant delay in bacterial colonization. The effects of an immature gastrointestinal track, lack of enteral feeding, and the frequent use of antibiotic therapy are believed to contribute to the delay and imbalance in the microflora of preterm infants. Prolonged exposure to hospital bacteria increases the risk of colonization with strains specific to hospital flora.

An overview of morbidity, mortality and long-term outcome of late preterm birth

BACKGROUND

Preterm birth rate continues to rise around the world mainly at the expense of late preterm newborns, recently defined as births between the gestational age of 34 weeks and 36-6/7 weeks. Late preterm infants are considered to have significantly more short-term and longterm adverse outcomes than term infants.

DATA SOURCES

Articles concerning morbidity, mortality and long-term outcomes of late preterm infants were retrieved from PubMed/MEDLINE published during the period of 2000-2010.

RESULTS

Late preterm infants are the fastest growing subgroup of neonates, comprising the majority of all preterm births. Compared with term infants, they have significantly higher risk of morbidity, mortality and adverse long-term outcomes well beyond infancy into adulthood. However, epidemiology and etiology of late preterm births, the magnitude of their morbidity, the long-term life quality, and public health impact have not been well studied.

CONCLUSIONS

The growing number of late preterm neonates substantiates the importance to better understand and medically approach this special preterm subgroup. A long-term evaluation, monitoring and follow-up of late preterm infants are needed to optimize neonatal care and improve human health status.

Maternal and neonatal profile of late-preterm survivors in a poorly resourced country

OBJECTIVE

To determine maternal indicators and adverse perinatal outcomes among late-preterm infants during birth hospitalization in a low-income country.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study of late-preterm and term survivors in a tertiary maternity hospital in southwest Nigeria using multivariable logistic regression analysis and population attributable risk (PAR) percentage. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of significant factors are stated.

RESULTS

Of 4176 infants enrolled, 731 (17.5%) were late preterm and 3445 (82.5%) were full-term. Late-preterm delivery was independently associated with mothers who were unmarried (OR: 1.71, CI: 1.06-2.75), lacked formal education (OR: 1.75, CI: 1.06-2.89), human immunodeficiency virus positive (OR: 1.61, CI: 1.17-2.20), with hypertensive disorders (OR: 3.07, CI: 2.32-4.08), antepartum hemorrhage (OR: 3.66, CI: 1.97-6.84), and were unlikely to have induced labor (OR: 0.010, CI: 0.01-0.69). Hypertensive disorders and antepartum hemorrhage had a combined PAR of 48.4%. Infants born late preterm were more likely to have low 5-min Apgar scores (OR: 1.70, CI: 1.01-2.83), sepsis (OR: 1.62, CI: 1.05-2.50), hyperbilirubinemia (OR: 1.56, CI: 1.05-2.33), admission into special care baby unit (OR: 1.85, CI: 1.38-2.48), and nonexclusive breast-feeding (OR: 1.49, CI: 1.49, CI: 1.18-1.89).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that late-preterm infants in low-resource settings are at risk of severe morbidity and suboptimal feeding. Education and close monitoring of high-risk mothers are warranted to prevent avoidable late-preterm delivery and facilitate the proactive management of unavoidable late-preterm births.

Clinical issues in the management of late preterm infants

Prematurity is defined as birth before 37 weeks of gestation and is the major determinant of morbidity and mortality in newborns. The gestational ages known as near term or late preterm represent about 75% of preterm births and are the fastest growing subgroups of premature infants. These infants range in gestational age from 34 0/7 to 36 6/7 weeks and are at greater risk of morbidity, such as respiratory complications, temperature instability, hypoglycemia, kernicterus, feeding problems, neonatal intensive care unit admissions, and adverse neurological sequelae when compared with term infants. Long-term neurological and school-age outcomes of late preterm infants are concerns of major public health importance because even a minor increase in the rate of neurological disability and scholastic failure in this group can have a huge impact on the health care and educational systems. There is an urgent need to educate health care providers and parents about the vulnerability of late preterm infants, who are in need of diligent monitoring and care during the initial hospital stay and a comprehensive follow-up plan for post neonatal and long-term evaluations. Clinicians involved in the day-to-day care of late preterm infants, as well as those developing guidelines and recommendations, would benefit from having a clear understanding of the potential differences in risks faced by these infants, compared with their more mature counterparts.

Late preterm birth is a risk factor for growth faltering in early childhood: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

Rates of preterm birth are increasing worldwide and this increase is mostly due to infants born between 34 and 36 weeks of gestational age, the so-called "late preterm" births. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of late preterm birth over growth outcomes, assessed when children were 12 and 24 months old.

METHODS

In 2004, all births taking place in Pelotas (Southern Brazil) were recruited for a cohort study. Late preterm (34/0-36/6 weeks of gestational age) and term children (37/0-42/6 weeks) were compared in terms of weight-for-age, length-for-age and weight-for-length z-scores. Weight-for-age, length-for-age and weight-for-length z-scores below -2 were considered, respectively, underweight, stunting and wasting. Singleton newborns with adequate weight for gestational age at birth, successfully followed-up either at 12 or 24 months of age were analyzed and adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals calculated through logistic regression.

RESULTS

3285 births were included, 371 of whom were late preterm births (11.3%). At 12 months, prevalence of underweight, stunting and wasting were, respectively, 3.4, 8.7 and 1.1% among late preterm children, against 1.0, 3.4 and 0.3% among term children. At 24 months, correspondent values were 3.0, 7.2 and 0.8% against 0.8, 2.9 and 0.4%. Comparing with the term children, adjusted odds of being underweighted among late preterm children was 2.57 times higher (1.27; 5.23) at 12 months and 3.36 times higher (1.56; 7.23) at 24; of being stunted, 2.35 (1.49; 3.70) and 2.30 (1.40; 3.77); and of being wasted, 3.98 (1.07; 14.85) and 1.87 (0.50; 7.01). Weight gain from birth to 12 and 24 months was similar in late preterm and term children, whereas length gain was higher in the former group in both periods.

CONCLUSION

Late preterm children grow faster than children born at term, but they are at increased risk of underweight and stunting in the first two years of life. Failure to thrive in the first two years may put them at increased risk of future occurrences of serious morbidity in late childhood and of chronic disease development in adult life.

Late preterm birth: how often is it avoidable?

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to describe indications for late preterm birth (LPTB) and estimate the frequency of potentially avoidable LPTB deliveries.

STUDY DESIGN

Singleton pregnancies delivered between 34(0/7)-36(6/7) weeks over a 1-year period at a tertiary care medical center were studied. Indications for delivery were categorized as spontaneous (spontaneous preterm birth or premature rupture of membranes) or iatrogenic (elective or medically indicated). Potentially avoidable deliveries were defined as those with elective or medical stable, but high-risk indications.

RESULTS

During the study period there were 514 LPTB (spontaneous preterm birth 36.2%, preterm premature rupture of membranes 17.7%, medically indicated 37.9%, and elective 8.2%). Potentially avoidable LPTB accounted for 17% of LPTB and were associated with later gestational age (odds ratio [OR], 4.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5-8.6), nonfaculty physician status (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.5-5.1), and prior cesarean delivery (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.0-2.1).

CONCLUSION

At our institution, <10% of LPTB are purely elective and >80% are clearly unavoidable.

Earlier initiation of enteral nutrition is associated with lower risk of late-onset bacteremia only in most mature very low birth weight infants

OBJECTIVE

To examine the temporal relationship between early enteral nutrition (EN) and coagulase-negative staphylococcal (CoNS)-related late-onset bacteremia (LOB) in very low birth weight (VLBW) neonates.

STUDY DESIGN

Multivariate analyses performed on a large retrospective cohort of neonates admitted to a tertiary care neonatal unit.

RESULTS

Due to the predominance and particular timing of CoNS, LOB occurred mostly during a critical period peaking at 9 days of age. This period also corresponded to a gestational maturation-dependent breakpoint in time to achieve full EN, associated with significant reduction in incidence of bacteremia (adjusted OR 0.15; 95%CI [0.10-0.20]; P<0.05). In subgroup analyses, more 'mature' (i.e. >or=28 and <32 weeks) preterm neonates reached full EN before this critical period and consequently, earlier EN in this group was associated with a shorter duration of PN and reduced incidence of CoNS bacteremia. In contrast, most 'immature' preterm neonates (i.e. <28 weeks) generally received PN beyond this critical period and therefore, did not appear to benefit from earlier initiation of EN. Even though EN was usually initiated earlier when formula milk was used as a complement to breast-milk, this practice was not associated with a reduction in the incidence of CoNS in any preterm gestational groups tested.

CONCLUSION

A reduction in incidence of bacteremia was observed only in more mature VLBW neonates who achieved full EN before the second-week of life critical period for CoNS, These results provide important endpoints for future trials evaluating changes in nutritional interventions potentially effective in reducing neonatal LOB.

The influence of obstetric practices on late prematurity

In this article, the authors review the standard management of several maternal and fetal complications of pregnancy and examine the effect these practices may have on the late preterm birth rate. Given the increasing rate of late preterm birth and the increased recognition of the morbidity and mortality associated with delivery between 34 and 37 weeks, standard obstetric practices and practice patterns leading to late preterm birth should be critically evaluated. The possibility of expectant management of some pregnancy complications in the late preterm period should be investigated. Furthermore, prospective research is warranted to investigate the role of antenatal corticosteroids beyond 34 weeks.

"Late-preterm" infants: a population at risk

Late-preterm infants, defined by birth at 34(0/7) through 36(6/7) weeks' gestation, are less physiologically and metabolically mature than term infants. Thus, they are at higher risk of morbidity and mortality than term infants. The purpose of this report is to define "late preterm," recommend a change in terminology from "near term" to "late preterm," present the characteristics of late-preterm infants that predispose them to a higher risk of morbidity and mortality than term infants, and propose guidelines for the evaluation and management of these infants after birth.

Optimizing care and outcome for late-preterm (near-term) infants: a summary of the workshop sponsored by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

In 2003, 12.3% of births in the United States were preterm (< 37 completed weeks of gestation). This represents a 31% increase in the preterm birth rate since 1981. The largest contribution to this increase was from births between 34 and 36 completed weeks of gestation (often called the "near term" but referred to as "late preterm" in this article). Compared with term infants, late-preterm infants have higher frequencies of respiratory distress, temperature instability, hypoglycemia, kernicterus, apnea, seizures, and feeding problems, as well as higher rates of rehospitalization. However, the magnitude of these morbidities at the national level and their public health impact have not been well studied. To address these issues, the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health invited a multidisciplinary team of experts to a workshop in July 2005 entitled "Optimizing Care and Outcome of the Near-Term Pregnancy and the Near-Term Newborn Infant." The participants discussed the definition and terminology, epidemiology, etiology, biology of maturation, clinical care, surveillance, and public health aspects of late-preterm infants. Knowledge gaps were identified, and research priorities were listed. This article provides a summary of the meeting.