Treating multilevel (three or four level) cervical myelopathy with ACDF or ACCF

Long-Term Outcomes of Modified Expansive Open-Door Laminoplasty Combined with Short-Level Anterior Cervical Fusion in Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

Background and Objectives: Multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM) presents complex challenges for surgical management, particularly in patients with kyphosis or significant anterior pathology. This study aimed to assess the long-term efficacy of modified expansive open-door laminoplasty (MEOLP) combined with short-level anterior cervical fusion (ACF) in providing decompression, preserving alignment, and maintaining range of motion (ROM) over a nine-year follow-up. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 124 MCSM patients treated with MEOLP combined with ACF between 2011 and 2015. MEOLP, a muscle-sparing posterior approach, was combined with ACF to correct sagittal misalignment and address anterior compression. Key outcome measures included the Pavlov ratio, C2-C7 angle, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for neck pain. Patients were monitored for adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) and other postoperative changes over the long-term follow-up. Results: At nine years post-surgery, patients demonstrated significant improvements in decompression and cervical alignment. The mean C2-C7 angle increased, reflecting enhanced lordotic curvature, while the Pavlov ratio showed maintained canal expansion. JOA scores improved significantly, indicating reduced myelopathy symptoms, and VAS scores for neck pain decreased, reflecting symptom relief. Despite these positive outcomes, ASD was noted, especially in patients with reduced preoperative disk height, highlighting the need for strategies to mitigate degeneration at adjacent segments. Conclusions: MEOLP combined with short-level ACF is a viable and durable option for managing complex MCSM cases, offering effective decompression, alignment correction, and ROM preservation. The limitations of this study, including its retrospective, single-center design and the lack of quality-of-life assessments, underscore the need for future multi-center studies with broader outcome measures. These findings support MEOLP with ACF as an alternative approach in cases where traditional laminoplasty may be insufficient.

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Laminoplasty for Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A National Administrative Database Analysis

BACKGROUND

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is effective for the treatment of single-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). However, the data surrounding multilevel CSM have remained controversial. One alternative is laminoplasty, although evidence comparing these strategies has remained sparse. In the present report, we retrospectively reviewed the readmission and reoperation rates for patients who had undergone ACDF or laminoplasty for multilevel CSM from a national longitudinal administrative claims database.

METHODS

We queried the MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database to identify patients who had undergone ACDF or laminoplasty for multilevel CSM from 2007 to 2016. The patients were stratified by operation type. Patients aged <18 years, patients with a history of tumor or trauma, and patients who had undergone anteroposterior approach were excluded from the present study.

RESULTS

A total of 5445 patients were included, of whom 1521 had undergone laminoplasty. A matched cohort who had undergone ACDF was identified. The overall 90-day postoperative complication rate was greater in the laminoplasty cohort (odds ratio, 1.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-1.86; P < 0.0001). The mean length of stay and 90-day readmission rates were greater in the laminoplasty cohort. The hospital and total payments of the index hospitalization were greater in the ACDF cohort, as were the total payments for ≤2 years after the index hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present administrative claims database study, no difference was found in the reoperation rate between ACDF and laminoplasty. ACDF resulted in fewer complications and readmissions compared with laminoplasty but was associated with greater costs. Additional prospective research is required to investigate the factors driving the higher costs of ACDF in this population and the long-term clinical outcomes.