Laparoscopic repair of epiphrenic diverticulum

Thoracoscopic approach as surgical management of esophageal epiphrenic diverticulum

BACKGROUND

Management of diverticulum of the lower esophagus or epiphrenic diverticulum can be performed using the abdominal or thoracic approach. In some cases, the thoracic approach is preferred, but few studies have described thoracoscopic resection. The objective of the present study was to investigate the thoracoscopic approach for management of epiphrenic esophageal diverticulum.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From 2008 to 2018, all patients undergoing surgery for epiphrenic esophageal diverticulum by the thoracoscopic approach were included in this single-center, retrospective, observational study. Data on diverticulum, surgery and follow-up were assessed.

RESULTS

During the study period, 14 patients underwent surgery. Two patients had two diverticula. The mean location of the superior edge of the diverticulum was 7cm (2-14cm) above the gastro-esophageal junction. The mean size of the diverticulum was 39 millimeters (20-60). Thoracoscopic approach was used in all patients. No conversion to thoracotomy was required. Mean operative time was 168min (120-240). No postoperative mortality occurred. The overall complication rate was 40% (6 complications out of 15 resections), with three major complications including leaks (n=2) and a case of bronchoesophageal fistula (n=1). Median length of hospital stay was 12 days (8-40). At a mean postoperative follow-up of 20.7 months (5-71), 85% of patients had complete disappearance of preoperative symptoms without recurrence of the diverticulum on the barium swallow study test.

CONCLUSION

Thoracoscopic approach as management of epiphrenic diverticulum is feasible, with acceptable short-term morbidity. The thoracoscopic approach is also effective in resolving preoperative symptoms.

[Esophageal diverticula (excluding cricopharyngeal diverticula)]

Diverticula of the middle and lower third of the esophagus are commonly associated with esophageal motility disorders. The increase of intraluminal pressure leads to an outpouching of the mucosal and submucosal layers through the esophageal muscle coat. These pouches are also called false diverticula, because they only consist of the mucosal and submucosal esophageal layers. In contrast, the more rarely encountered true diverticula that retain the complete esophageal wall are generally associated with periesophageal granulomatous lymph node disease. Treatment of both true and false diverticula is generally indicated in symptomatic patients; however, even state of the art minimally invasive surgery is accompanied by considerable perioperative morbidity and should only be performed in carefully selected patients. This aim of this article is to summarize the available scientific evidence and to provide the reader with an updated guide to best clinical practice in the treatment of esophageal diverticula.

Surgical management of epiphrenic diverticulum: A single-center experience and brief review of literature

BACKGROUND

We present single-center experience of surgery for primary epiphrenic diverticulum (PED) over a 12-year period.

METHODS

Prospectively maintained database was queried to identify patients who underwent PED surgery. Preoperative and postoperative symptoms, operative data, perioperative complications, and follow-up were reviewed.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients (14 females; mean age-67-years) underwent PED surgery. The most common primary presenting symptoms were dysphagia and regurgitation (mean duration-3.6-years). 82% patients underwent laparoscopic procedures (one conversion), 11% operated via left thoracotomy and 7% via combined laparoscopy-right trans-thoracic approach. All patients received myotomy, all but one received diverticulectomy. Five-patients experienced intraoperative complications that were managed intraoperatively without sequelae. There was no perioperative mortality. Morbidity was seen in 3-patients, including one staple-line leak managed with endoscopic washes and stent placement. 90% patients with ≥1-year follow-up reported "excellent" satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive surgery for PED is both feasible and safe. We observed low morbidity, short hospital stay, and excellent patient-reported outcomes.

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of SurgicalTreatment of Non-Zenker's Oesophageal Diverticula

BACKGROUND

Oesophageal diverticula are rare outpouchings of the oesophagus which may be classified anatomically as pharyngeal (Zenker's), mid-oesophageal and epiphrenic. While surgery is indicated for symptomatic patients, no consensus exists regarding the optimum technique for non-Zenker's oesophageal diverticula. The aim of this study was to determine the outcome of surgery in patients with non-Zenker's oesophageal diverticula.

METHODS

PubMed, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library (January 1990 to January 2016) were searched for studies which reported outcomes of surgery in patients with non-Zenker's oesophageal diverticula. Primary outcome measure was the rate of staple line leakage.

RESULTS

Twenty-five observational studies involving 511 patients (259 male, median age 62 years) with mid-oesophageal (n = 53) and epiphrenic oesophageal (n = 458) diverticula who had undergone surgery [thoracotomy (n = 252), laparoscopy (n = 204), thoracoscopy (n = 42), laparotomy (n = 5), combined laparoscopy and thoracoscopy (n = 8)] were analysed. Myotomy was performed in 437 patients (85.5%), and anti-reflux procedures were performed in 342 patients (69.5%). Overall pooled staple line leak rates were reported in 13.3% [95% c.i. (11.0-15.7), p < 0.001] and were less common after myotomy (12.4%) compared with no myotomy (26.1%, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

No consensus exists regarding the surgical treatment of non-Zenker's oesophageal diverticula, but staple line leakage is common and is reduced significantly by myotomy.

Esophageal surgery in minimally invasive era

The widespread popularity of new surgical technologies such as laparoscopy, thoracoscopy and robotics has led many surgeons to treat esophageal diseases with these methods. The expected benefits of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) mainly include reductions of postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and pain and better cosmetic results. All of these benefits could potentially be of great interest when dealing with the esophagus due to the potentially severe complications that can occur after conventional surgery. Moreover, robotic platforms are expected to reduce many of the difficulties encountered during advanced laparoscopic and thoracoscopic procedures such as anastomotic reconstructions, accurate lymphadenectomies, and vascular sutures. Almost all esophageal diseases are approachable in a minimally invasive way, including diverticula, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, achalasia, perforations and cancer. Nevertheless, while the limits of MIS for benign esophageal diseases are mainly technical issues and costs, oncologic outcomes remain the cornerstone of any procedure to cure malignancies, for which the long-term results are critical. Furthermore, many of the minimally invasive esophageal operations should be compared to pharmacologic interventions and advanced pure endoscopic procedures; such a comparison requires a difficult literature analysis and leads to some confounding results of clinical trials. This review aims to examine the evidence for the use of MIS in both malignancies and more common benign disease of the esophagus, with a particular emphasis on future developments and ongoing areas of research.

Thoracic Esophageal Diverticula: A 15-Year Experience of Minimally Invasive Surgical Management

BACKGROUND

Thoracic esophageal diverticula are uncommon, and controversies exist regarding their management. The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of a relatively large cohort of patients with thoracic esophageal diverticula treated with minimally invasive surgical techniques.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent minimally invasive surgical treatment for symptomatic esophageal diverticula during a 15-year period. The primary end point was 30-day mortality. In addition, we evaluated the morbidity, improvement in dysphagia (score: 1, best to 5, worst), and quality of life (Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health-Related Quality of Life score: 0, best to 50, most symptoms).

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients underwent minimally invasive surgical treatment of symptomatic thoracic esophageal diverticula. The most common symptom was dysphagia (45 of 57; 79%). A motility disorder or distal mechanical obstruction was identified in 49 patients (86%). Approaches used included video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (n = 33), laparoscopy (n = 18), and combined video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and laparoscopy (n = 6). The most common procedure performed was diverticulectomy and myotomy (47 of 57 patients; 82.5%). The 30-day mortality was 0%. There were 4 patients (7%) with postoperative leaks requiring reoperation. During follow-up, the median dysphagia score improved from 3 to 1 (p < 0.001). The median Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health-Related Quality of Life score after surgery was 5 (excellent).

CONCLUSIONS

A minimally invasive surgical approach for the management of thoracic esophageal diverticula is safe and effective during intermediate-term follow-up when performed by surgeons experienced in esophageal surgery and minimally invasive techniques. Further follow-up is required to assess the durability of these results. The optimal approach and procedures performed should be determined on an individualized basis after a thorough investigation.

Minimally invasive therapy for epiphrenic diverticula: Systematic review of literature and report of six cases

INTRODUCTION:

Epiphrenic diverticula (ED) are infrequent and conventional surgical treatment entails aggressive open or transthoracic surgery. Minimally invasive treatment has changed the surgical approach but some surgical controversies are not resolved.

OBJECTIVE:

The objective of this study is to describe our experience in minimally invasive treatment of the ED and to perform a systematic review of the current literature in this subject.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

We reviewed all data from the Hospital de Sant Pau, focusing on patients that underwent minimally invasive treatment for an ED since 1998 to date. Furthermore, we performed a systematic literature review focused on the minimally invasive approach for ED.

RESULTS:

A total of 6 patients have been treated (5 transhiatal and 1 with abdominal and thoracic approach). We found a predominance of males with a median age of 63. The diagnosis was made with an endoscopy, barium swallow and manometry. Half of the manometry results were pathologic. The surgical technique involved a diverticulectomy, myotomy and a Dor partial founduplication. Two patients that presented suture line leakage (SLL) were treated conservatively. No mortality was reported. The systematic review was carried out under the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses scheme, with a total of 20 studies where 189 patients were found. No comparative or prospective randomised trials were found. Overall morbidity was 24%, with a SLL rate of 12%, hospital stay of 5 days and mortality of 1.5%. After a median follow-up of 42 months, 81.5% of the patients were asymptomatic.

CONCLUSION:

The minimally invasive approach for ED is a safe and feasible procedure.

Objective assessment of the suture ligature method for the laparoscopic intestinal anastomosis model using a new computerized system

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to develop a new objective assessment system for the suture ligature method employed in the laparoscopic intestinal anastomosis model. Suturing skills were evaluated objectively using this system.

METHODS

This study compared 17 expert surgeons, each of whom had performed >500 laparoscopic procedures, with 36 novice surgeons, each of whom had performed <15 laparoscopic procedures. Each examinee performed a specific skill assessment task using an artificial model that mimics living tissue, which is linked with the Suture Simulator Instruction Evaluation Unit. The model used internal air pressure measurements and image processing to evaluate suturing skills. Five criteria were used to evaluate the skills of participants.

RESULTS

The volumes of air pressure leak in the expert and novice groups were 21.13 ± 6.68 and 8.51 ± 8.60 kPa, respectively. The numbers of full-thickness sutures in the expert and novice groups were 2.94 ± 0.24 pairs and 2.47 ± 0.77 pairs, respectively. Suture tensions in the expert and novice groups were 60.99 ± 11.81 and 80.90 ± 16.63 %, respectively. The areas of wound-opening in the expert and novice groups were 1.76 ± 2.17 and 11.06 ± 15.37 mm(2), respectively. The performance times in the expert and novice groups were 349 ± 120 and 750 ± 269 s, respectively. Significant differences between the expert and novice groups for each criterion were observed. The acceptable range of values for each criterion except for the number of full-thickness sutures was statistically defined by the performance of the expert group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our system is useful for the quantitative assessment of suturing skill in laparoscopic surgery. We believe that this system is a useful tool for training and assessment of laparoscopic surgeons.