Single-Center Experience With the Senning Procedure in the Current Era

Anatomic and Physiologic Repair of Congenitally Corrected Transposition of the Great Arteries

BACKGROUND

Congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (ccTGA) is a rare cardiac anomaly. The management strategy historically consisted of physiologic repair, leaving the morphologic right ventricle to support the systemic circulation. More recently, anatomic repair has been implemented to bring the left ventricle into the systemic circulation. Uncertainty persists about which repair strategy has the best outcome.

OBJECTIVES

This meta-analysis aimed to summarize the long-term mortality risks following anatomic and physiologic repair of ccTGA.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Database were searched. Data were extracted using prespecified data forms. The primary outcome was the composite risk of all-cause mortality or heart transplantation during hospitalization and at 1, 5, and 10 years of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included reintervention risk.

RESULTS

Forty-seven studies totaling 2,844 patients were included. The incidence risk of mortality at 10 years was 11.7% (95% CI: 8.5%-15.3%) and 17.4% (95% CI: 12.4%-23.0%) in the anatomic and physiologic repair groups, respectively. The incidence risk of reintervention at 10 years was 24.5% (95% CI: 19.2%-30.1%) and 30.3% (95% CI: 23.5%-37.6%), respectively. The primary outcome was significantly lower at 10 years in anatomically repaired patients who had surgery at <5 years of age and who had preoperative pulmonary artery banding (Pheterogeneity < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomic repair of ccTGA patients results in higher overall and reintervention-free survival compared to physiologic repair. Specifically, patients who had anatomic repair at <5 years of age or who had preoperative pulmonary artery banding have better survival.

Outcomes After Anatomic Versus Physiologic Repair of Congenitally Corrected Transposition of the Great Arteries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Surgical treatment for congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries is widely debated, with both physiologic repair and anatomic repair holding advantages and disadvantages. This meta-analysis, which includes 44 total studies consisting of 1857 patients, compares mortality at different time points (operative, in-hospital, and post-discharge), reoperation rates, and postoperative ventricular dysfunction between these two categories of procedures. Although anatomic and physiologic repair had similar operative and in-hospital mortality, anatomic repair patients had significantly less post-discharge mortality (6.1% vs 9.7%; P = .006), lower reoperation rates (17.9% vs 20.6%; P < .001), and less postoperative ventricular dysfunction (16% vs 43%; P < .001). When anatomic repair patients were subdivided into those who had atrial and arterial switch versus those who had atrial switch with Rastelli, the double switch group had significantly lower in-hospital mortality (4.3% vs 7.6%; P = .026) and reoperation rates (15.6% vs 25.9%; P < .001). The results of this meta-analysis suggest a protective benefit of favoring anatomic repair over physiologic repair.

Congenitally Corrected Transposition of the Great Arteries: Anatomic, Physiologic Repair, and Palliation

Congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (ccTGA) is a lesion that rarely occurs in isolation. The presenting physiology of ccTGA is predominantly secondary to the concurrent cardiac lesions; however, as the child ages, unrepaired ccTGA results in progressive failure of the morphologic right ventricle under the strain of maintaining a systemic pressure. Repair of ccTGA was initially focused on rectification of the underlying physiologic aberrations, but in recent years, the focus of repair has shifted toward anatomic correction to avoid failure of the morphologic right ventricle. This anatomic repair is commonly associated with improved long-term mortality at the cost of increased short-term mortality. Key preoperative considerations such as morphologic left ventricular pressure, tricuspid valve competency, and out flow tract obstructions can assist in determining the optimal repair for individual patients. An alternative, single ventricle, pathway has been proposed for any patient without optimal preoperative anatomy to improve long-term survival. Adjunctive repair options including pulmonary artery banding and one-and-a-half ventricle repairs have also been proposed to augment the survival curves.