How Safe Is it to Train Residents to Perform Coronary Surgery With Multiple Arterial Grafting? Nineteen Years of Training at a Single Institution

In-Hospital Outcomes Following Surgical Revascularization of Chronic Total Coronary Occlusions

Background and Objectives: Patients with chronic total occlusions of the coronary arteries are either treated with PCI or referred for surgical revascularization. We analyzed the patients with chronic occluded coronary arteries that were surgically treated and aimed to describe the anatomical characteristics, revascularization rates, and in-hospital outcomes achieved with coronary artery bypass grafting. Methods: Angiographic data of 2005 patients with coronary artery disease treated in our institution between January 2005 and December 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 1111 patients with at least one coronary total occlusion were identified. We reviewed the preoperative coronary angiograms and surgical protocols to determine the presence, localization, and revascularization of coronary occlusions. We also evaluated the perioperative data and in-hospital outcomes. Results: The median age of the study population was 68 years (25th-75th percentiles, 61.0-74.0). Three-vessel disease was present in 94.8% of patients and the rest (5.8%) had a two-vessel disease. The localizations of the occlusions were as follows: 68.4% in the RCA system, 26.4% in the LAD, and 28.5% in the LCX system. Multiple occlusions were present in 22.6% of the patients. Complete coronary total occlusion revascularization was achieved in 86.1% of the patients. The overall in-hospital mortality was 2.3%. The median in-hospital stay was 14.0 days. After logistic regression analysis, age (odds ratio 3.44 [95% confidence interval, 1.81-6.53], p < 0.001, for a 10-year increase) and the presence of peripheral artery disease (odds ratio 3.32 [1.39-7.93], p = 0.007) were the only statistically significant independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. Conclusions: A high revascularization rate and favorable in-hospital outcomes are achieved with coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with multi-vessel diseases and coronary total occlusions. Older age and the presence of peripheral artery disease are independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. A long-term follow-up and the type of graft (arterial vs. venous) used would bring more useful data for this type of revascularization.

Are there differences in cardiothoracic surgery performed by trainees versus fully trained surgeons?

OBJECTIVES

We sought to assess the safety of training in cardiothoracic surgery comparing outcomes of cases performed by trainees versus fully trained surgeons.

METHODS

EmBase, Scopus, PubMed, and OVID MEDLINE were searched in August 2021 independently by two authors. A third author arbitrated decisions to resolve disagreements. Inclusion criteria were articles on cardiothoracic surgery reporting on outcomes for trainees. Studies were assessed for appropriateness as per CBEM criteria. Eight hundred and ninety-two results were obtained, 27 represented best evidence (2-meta-analyses, 1-RCT, and 24 retrospective cohort studies).

RESULTS

In all 474,160 operative outcomes were assessed for 434,535 coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (431,329 on-pump vs. 3206 off-pump), 3090 AVR, 1740 MVR/repair, 26,433 mixed, 3565 congenital, and 4797 thoracic procedures. In all 398,058 cases were performed by trainees and 75,943 by consultants. One hundred fifty-nine cases were indeterminate. There were no statistically significant differences in the patients' preoperative risk scores. All studies excluded extreme high-risk patients in emergency setting, patients with poor left ventricular function, and reoperation cases that were undertaken by consultants. There were no differences in cardiopulmonary bypass and clamp times for CABG. Times for valve replacement and repair cases were longer for trainees. There were no differences in the postoperative outcomes including perioperative myocardial infarction, resternotomy for bleeding, stroke, renal failure, intensive therapy unit length of stay, and total length of stay. One study reported no differences on angiographic graft patency at 1 year. There were no differences in in-hospital or midterm mortality out to 5-years.

DISCUSSION

Trainees can perform cardiothoracic surgery in dedicated high-volume units with outcomes comparable to those of fully trained surgeons.

Outcomes of cardiac surgical procedures performed by trainees versus consultants: A systematic review with meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Cardiac surgery is highly demanding and the ideal teaching method to reach competency is widely debated. Some studies have shown that surgical trainees can safely perform full operations with equivocal outcomes compared with their consultant colleagues while under supervision. We aimed to compare outcomes after cardiac surgery with supervised trainee involvement versus consultant-led procedures.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, Google Scholar) and reference lists of relevant articles for studies that compared outcomes of cardiac surgery performed by trainees versus consultants. Primary end points included: operative mortality, coronary events, neurological/renal complications, reoperation, permanent pacemaker implantation, and sternal complications. Secondary outcomes included cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp times and intensive care/in-hospital length of stay. Random effects meta-analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Thirty-three observational studies that reported on a total of 81,616 patients (trainee: 20,154; consultant: 61,462) were included. There was a difference favoring trainees in terms of operative mortality in the main analysis and in an analysis restricted to propensity score-matched samples, whereas other outcomes were not consistently different in both analyses. Overall cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp times were longer in the trainee group but did not translate in longer intensive care unit or hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

In the right conditions, good outcomes are possible in cardiac surgery with trainee involvement. Carefully designed training programs ensuring graduated hands-on operative exposure as primary operator with appropriate supervision is fundamental to maintain high-quality training in the development of excellent cardiac surgeons.

Training for Multiple Arterial Grafting: A Thoracic Surgery Resident Survey

BACKGROUND

Utilization of multiple arterial grafting (MAG) in the United States is less than 10%. Trainee experience with MAG has not previously been examined.

METHODS

A total of 497 thoracic surgery residents in accredited training programs in March 2019 and 115 who completed residency in 2018 were electronically surveyed regarding their experience with MAG using a radial artery (RA) graft or bilateral internal mammary artery (BIMA) grafts with a skeletonized mammary (SM).

RESULTS

Eighty-four (14%) trainees responded: 54% had completed 2+ years of training and 87% declared their focus as cardiac, undecided, or both cardiac and thoracic (CUB). Of all 84 respondents, 76% (n = 64 of 84) had no experience with RA harvest. A total of 35% (n = 29 of 84) had no experience with SM harvest. The majority, 68% (n = 57 of 84), used BIMA grafting in 0% to 5% of cases. A total of 61% (n = 51 of 84) used RA conduit in 0% to 5% of cases. Among trainees with 2+ years of experience, 56% (n = 25 of 45) had performed more than 6 SM takedowns, 18% (n = 8 of 45) had no experience. In trainees with 2+ years, 20% (n = 9 of 45) performed more than 5 RA harvests, while 80% (n = 36 of 45) had no experience. Examining integrated 6-year residents with greater than 3 years of experience, only 33% (n = 5 of 15) performed more than 5% RA grafting. A total of 90% of CUB trainees wanted to perform MAG in practice and 75% felt prepared to do so.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite substantial variation in MAG training, respondents expressed an overwhelming interest in performing MAG. These data and the reality of MAG utilization in the United States indicate that a more rigorous, standardized approach to MAG training may be required.

Absence of perioperative excessive bleeding in on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting cases performed by residents

OBJECTIVES

On-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is associated with elevated bleeding risk. Our aim was to evaluate the role of surgical experience in postoperative blood loss.

METHODS

A propensity score-matched analysis was employed to compare on-pump CABG patients operated on by residents and specialists. End points included drainage volume and bleeding severity, as assessed by the Universal Definition of Perioperative Bleeding in cardiac surgery and E-CABG scale.

RESULTS

A total of 212 matched pairs (c-statistics 0.693) were selected from patients operated on by residents (n = 294) and specialists (n = 4394) between October 2012 and May 2018. Patients did not differ in bleeding risk. There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative 6-, 12- and 24-h drainages between subjects operated on by residents and specialists, and there was no between-group difference in rethoracotomy or transfusion rate. There were no differences in Universal Definition of Perioperative Bleeding or E-CABG grades. In June 2018, after a median follow-up of 2.8 years (range 0.1-5.7 years), the overall survival was 94%, with no differences between the patients operated on by residents (95%) and specialists (92%) (P = 0.27).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing on-pump CABG, when operated on by a resident, are not exposed to an elevated bleeding risk, as compared with patients operated on by experienced surgeons.