Robotic-Extended Rethymectomy for Refractory Myasthenia Gravis: A Case Series

Robot-assisted thoracic surgery versus video-assisted thoracic surgery for treatment of patients with thymoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Surgical resection of the thymus is indicated in the presence of primary thymic diseases such as thymoma. Video‐assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and robot‐assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) offer a minimally invasive approach to thymectomy. However, there is no clear conclusion whether RATS can achieve an equal or even better surgical effect when compared with VATS in treatment of thymoma. We performed this meta‐analysis to explore and compare the outcomes of RATS versus VATS for thymectomy in patients with thymoma.

Methods

PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Medline, and Web of Science databases were searched for full‐text literature citations. The quality of the articles was evaluated using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and the data analyzed using Review Manager 5.3 software. Fixed or random effect models were applied according to heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis was conducted.

Results

A total of 11 studies with 1418 patients, of whom 688 patients were in the RATS group and 730 in the VATS group, were involved in the analysis. Compared with VATS, RATS was associated with less blood loss in operation, lower volume of drainage, fewer postoperative pleural drainage days, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and fewer postoperative complications. There was no significant difference in operative time and patients with or without myasthenia gravis between the two groups.

Conclusions

RATS has more advantages over VATS, indicating that RATS is better than VATS in terms of postoperative recovery. We look forward to more large‐sample, high‐quality randomized controlled studies published in the future.

[Rethymectomy in patients with myasthenia gravis and recurrent thymoma]

OBJECTIVE

To analyze efficacy and safety of rethymectomy in patients with pathology of thymus.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Nine patients (2 males and 7 females) underwent rethymectomy in the thoracic surgery department of the Hertzen Research Institute of Oncology for the period from March 2009 to December 2019. Initial thymectomy for myasthenia gravis was performed in 6 patients, for thymoma without myasthenia - in 3 patients. Age of patients varied from 27 to 75 years (median 42.8 years). Myasthenia manifested at the age of 25-61 years (median 29.2 years). Period between manifestation and thymectomy varied from 6 to 24 months (median 12.6 months). MGFA grade IIIa was in 1 patient, grade IIIb - in 1, grade IVa - in 1, grade IVb - in 2, grade V - in 1 patient. Rethymectomy was performed via sternotomy in 4 cases, through thoracoscopy - in 5 patients.

RESULTS

Postoperative complications occurred in 2 (22.2%) patients. Biopsy revealed residual thymic tissue in all patients. Median follow-up after rethymectomy was 30.2 months (range 12-132 months). Complete stable remission was achieved in 3 (50.0%) patients, remission - in 2 cases, partial remission - in 1 patient. Median dose of steroids before rethymectomy was 40 mg (range 16-96 mg), median dose after rethymectomy - 8 mg (range 0-24 mg). Differences were significant (p=0.04). All patients operated on for thymoma or recurrence are alive within 12-124 months after rethymectomy.

CONCLUSION

Rethymectomy is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with refractory myasthenia gravis (especially in case of detected residual thymic tissue) or recurrent thymoma. Radical surgery for recurrent thymoma ensures favorable survival.