Robotic Approach to Mitral Valve Surgery in Septo-Octogenarians

Robotic mitral surgery: recent advances and outcomes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review explores recent advancements in robotic cardiac surgery, specifically focusing on its application in diverse mitral valve surgeries. The aim is to provide an overview of current clinical practices and supporting evidence in this evolving field.

RECENT FINDINGS

A literature review indicates a 30% surge in robotic mitral valve repair from 2015 to 2021, paralleled by a decline in sternotomy-based repair per the STS database. Robotic mitral valve repair consistently shows effective and safe outcomes, with comparable mortality but lower morbidity risks than sternotomy and thoracotomy. The robotic approach exhibits lower conversion to valve replacement, shorter ICU stays, and reduced 30-day readmissions. For experienced programs, robotic techniques prove versatile in various pathologies, including rheumatic heart valve disease, infective endocarditis, ischemic cardiomyopathy, and mitral annular calcification necessitating valve replacement. Literature supports their selective use in high-risk scenarios, including redo surgeries and elderly patients.

SUMMARY

Recent evidence supports the growing use of robotic approaches in mitral valve surgery, highlighting their efficacy with comparable mortality rates but lower morbidity risks. Robotic techniques consistently yield positive outcomes across various pathologies and patient profiles, signaling a potential paradigm shift in mitral valve interventions.

Mitral valve surgery in octogenarians: long-term and hemodynamic results

BACKGROUND

Octogenarians are often denied mitral valve (MV) surgery secondary to concerns over increased perioperative morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study was to examine the outcomes of octogenarians undergoing mitral valve repair (MVr) and replacement (MVR).

METHODS

The outcomes of 139 patients between the ages of 80-90 who underwent MVR/MVr between 2004-2018 at the Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute (Edmonton, AB, Canada) were retrospectively analyzed. Follow-up was extended to a maximum of 15.8 years.

RESULTS

Following MVR, all-cause mortality at 30 days, 1 year, 5 years, 10 years, and the longest follow-up was 7%, 14%, 36.3%, 61.8%, and 67.7%, respectively. Post-MVr, all-cause mortality at the same time points was 1.9%, 7.6%, 22.5%, 55.5%, and 100%, respectively. During the Hospitalization Index, rates of new-onset atrial fibrillation, sepsis, acute kidney injury, superficial sternal wound infection, deep sternal wound infection, mediastinal bleeding, and permanent pacemaker insertion ranged from 22.1-34.0%, 3.8-11.0%, 7.6-22.0%, 1.9-2.4%, 0-1.2%, 0%, and 0-6.1%, respectively. Rates of overall rehospitalization, as well as readmission for heart failure, stroke, myocardial infarction, and MV reoperation ranged from 71.0-85.5%, 52.2-63.3%, 10.9-22.8%, 1.9-6.0%, and 0% during the follow-up period. There were significant reductions in peak MV gradient (P=0.042) and left ventricular internal diameter in diastole (LVIDd; P=0.008) post-MVR, as well as LVIDd (P<0.001) and Left Atrial (LA) Volume Index (P=0.019) post-MVr.

CONCLUSIONS

Octogenarians exhibit positive left atrial and left ventricular remodeling following MVR. Perioperative morbidity is low, late survival is reasonable, and long-term morbidity is considerable. Overall, these results add to the growing literature that MV surgery is relatively safe and effective in octogenarians.

Mitral Valve Intervention in Elderly or High-Risk Patients: A Review of Current Surgical and Interventional Management

Mitral regurgitation is a prevalent valvular disease, and its management has gained increasing importance because of the aging population. Although traditional surgery remains the gold standard, the field of transcatheter therapies, including transcatheter edge-to-edge repair and, more recently transcatheter mitral valve replacement are advancing and are being explored as viable alternatives, particularly for patients at high surgical risk. It is essential to emphasize the necessity of a multidisciplinary team approach, involving specialized valve teams, imaging experts, cardiac anaesthesiologists, and other relevant specialists, is crucial in achieving optimal outcomes. Furthermore, proper execution of procedures, postprocedural care, and diligent follow-up for these patients are essential components for successful results. It is essential to underscore that traditional mitral valve surgery continues to play a significant role. Simultaneously, it is important to acknowledge the expanding array of transcatheter interventions available for this specific patient population.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Robot-Assisted Mitral Valve Repair

OBJECTIVE

Robot-assisted surgery is a minimally invasive approach for repairing the mitral valve. This study aimed to assess its safety and clinical efficacy when compared with conventional sternotomy, partial sternotomy, and right minithoracotomy.

METHODS

A systematic review of peer-reviewed studies comparing robot-assisted mitral valve repair with conventional sternotomy, partial sternotomy, and right minithoracotomy was conducted following Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. Meta-analyses were performed where possible.

RESULTS

The search strategy yielded 15 primary studies, of which 12 compared robot-assisted with conventional sternotomy, 2 compared robot-assisted with partial sternotomy, and 6 compared robot-assisted with right minithoracotomy. The overall quality of evidence was low, and there was a lack of data on long-term outcomes. Individual studies and pooled data demonstrated that robotic procedures were comparable to conventional sternotomy and other minimally invasive approaches with respect to the rates of stroke, renal failure, reoperation for bleeding, and mortality. Robot-assisted mitral valve repair was superior to conventional sternotomy with reduced atrial fibrillation, intensive care unit and hospital stay, pain, time to return to normal activities, and physical functioning at 1 year. However, robot-assisted mitral valve repair had longer cardiopulmonary, aortic cross-clamp, and procedure times compared with all other surgical approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on current evidence, robot-assisted mitral valve repair is comparable to other approaches for safety and early postoperative outcomes, despite being associated with longer operative times. Ideally, future studies will be randomized controlled trials that compare between robot-assisted surgery, conventional surgery, and other minimally surgery approaches focusing on hard clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcomes.

Robotic mitral repair: maintaining quality at all levels of complexity

Over the last two decades, robotic mitral valve surgery has evolved from application of standard repair techniques for focal degenerative disease to a broad range of repair techniques navigating nearly all mitral pathologies at different complexity levels, the latter only performed in highly experienced robotic programs. The basic setup and steps of the operation have been standardized and many groups have reported reproducibility, excellent long-term durability and exceedingly rare mortality rates comparable to sternotomy. This has created a surge of interest in robotic cardiac surgery by patients, referring physicians and cardiac surgeons, all seeking the least invasive approach to mitral valve repair. In response, a growing number of major institutions have initiated robotic programs. This article discusses the gaps in practice before the widespread shift to a robotic approach as a standard treatment of mitral valve disease. In addition, we describe our techniques to approach complex mitral pathologies that transcend current, limited patient selection criteria.

Evaluation of robotic-assisted mitral surgery in a contemporary experience

AIMS

To evaluate the safety/effectiveness of a recently established robotic-assisted mitral surgery program.

METHODS

Cohort study with prospective collection of clinical data of 59 consecutive recipients (May 2019-August 2021) of robotic-assisted (fourth-generation platform, DaVinci X) mitral valve repair for degenerative disease, using a totally endoscopic technique. Patients' selection was based on defined anatomical and clinical criteria. We established a dedicated multidisciplinary protocol to facilitate postoperative fast-tracking, and a systematic in-house clinical and echocardiographic follow-up at 3, 6, and 12 postoperative months.

RESULTS

All patients (89.8% men, average age 58 ± 12 years) received mitral valve repair; there was no operative mortality, one conversion to sternotomy (1.7%) and one stroke (1.7%). Extubation within the operative theater occurred in 28.8%; average mechanical ventilation time and ICU stay was 2.8 ± 4.1 and 32.5 ± 15.8 h (after exclusion of one outlier, learning-curve period, suffering from perioperative stroke); average postoperative hospital stay was 6.8 ± 3.4 days and 96.6% of patients were discharged home. One patient was transfused (1.7%); there were no other complications. Follow-up revealed stability of the results of mitral repair, with one (1.7%) persistent (>2+/4+) mitral regurgitation, and stability of coaptation height over time. We observed optimal functional results (class I was 98% at 3 months and 96% at 12 months). Quarterly case load consistently increased during the experience.

CONCLUSION

This initial experience suggests the reliability and clinical safety of a recently established local robotic-assisted mitral surgery. This strategy can facilitate faster postoperative recovery, and its positioning in the therapeutic armamentarium needs to be defined.

The role of robotic technology in minimally invasive surgery for mitral valve disease

INTRODUCTION

Robotic mitral valve surgery has developed for more than 20 years. The main purpose of robotic assistance is to use multiwristed instruments for surgical endothoracic maneuvers on the mitral valve without opening the chest. The surgeon controls the instruments remotely from a console but is virtually immersed into the operative field.

AREAS COVERED

This review outlines indications and contraindication for the procedure. Intra- and postoperative results as available in the literature are reported. Further areas focus on the technological development, advances in surgical techniques, training methods, and learning curves. Finally we give an outlook on the potential future of this operation.

EXPERT OPINION

Robotic assistance allows for the surgically least invasive form of mitral valve operations. All variations of robotic mitral valve repair and replacement are feasible and indications have recently been broadened. Improved dexterity of instrumentation, 3D and HD vision, introduction of a robotic left atrial retractor, and adjunct technology enable most complex forms of minimally invasive mitral valve interventions through ports on the patient's right chest wall. Application of robotics results in significantly reduced surgical trauma while maintaining safety and outcome standards in mitral valve surgery.

Commentary: Robotic Techniques in Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery (Innovations, May/June 2020)

This is a response to the papers in the May/June issue of Innovations focused on robotic techniques in cardiac and thoracic surgery. Successful robotic surgery relies on a high level of preparation and communication from each member of the operating room. The lack of a team approach can result in not only failure to establish and/or sustain a robotic program, but more importantly, in serious consequences at the detriment to patient care and safety. While these are salient points, the authors of this commentary wish to highlight that the first robot-assisted mitral valve surgery in North America was performed at NYU Langone Health using the Zeus robotic surgical system. Although that robotic platform had several disadvantages that limited its clinical advancement, an appreciation for this history in robotic cardiac surgery is important if we as cardiothoracic surgeons seek to move toward a future of expanding robotic surgery within the ever-changing landscape of cardiac surgery.

Outcomes in minimally invasive double valve surgery

OBJECTIVE

To review current literature evidence on outcomes of minimally invasive double valve surgeries (MIS).

METHODS

A comprehensive electronic literature search was done from inception to 20th June 2020 identifying articles that discussed outcomes of minimally invasive approach in double valve surgeries either as a solo cohort or as comparative to conventional sternotomies. No limit was placed on time and place of publication and the evidence has been summarized in narrative manner within the manuscript.

RESULTS

Majority of current literature reported similar perioperative and clinical outcomes between MIS and conventional median sternotomy; except that MIS has better cosmetic effects and pain control. Nevertheless, minimal invasive techniques are associated with longer cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp times which may have impact on the reported outcomes and overall morbidity and mortality rates.

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive double valve surgery continues to develop, but scarcity in the literature suggests uptake is slow, possibly due to the learning curve associated with MIS. Many outcomes appear to be comparable to conventional sternotomy. There is need for larger, multi-center, and randomized trial to fully evaluate and establish the early, mid- and long-term morbidity and mortality rates associated with both techniques.