Analysis of Lymph Node Sampling Minimums in Early Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Provider and procedural factors associated with guideline-concordant lymph node sampling in lung cancer resection

OBJECTIVE

The American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer Standard 5.8 requires sampling of 3 mediastinal and 1 hilar lymph node stations during lung cancer resection. This study explores provider and procedural factors associated with guideline-concordant lymph node sampling during lung cancer resection.

METHODS

Prospectively collected statewide quality collaborative data were queried for adult patients undergoing lung cancer resection between July 1, 2021, and June 30, 2024. Guideline concordance was defined per American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer Standard 5.8. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the likelihood of guideline-concordant sampling across surgeon volume, practice distribution, resection type, and procedural approach. Rates of nodal upstaging and postoperative complications were compared between guideline-concordant and nonconcordant sampling cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 3031 patients were analyzed. Of 43 surgeons, 26 were general thoracic surgeons and 17 were mixed-practice cardiothoracic surgeons. 77.8% of cases demonstrated guideline-concordant sampling. Patients treated by highest-volume surgeons were more likely to receive concordant sampling than patients treated by lowest-volume surgeons (odds ratio, 2.27 [1.03-5.01], P = .042) with no significant difference between general thoracic surgeons and cardiothoracic surgeons. Patients undergoing wedge resection were less likely to receive concordant sampling (odds ratio, 0.17 [0.13-0.23], P < .001), as were patients undergoing open (odds ratio, 0.46 [0.33-0.66], P < .001) or video-assisted thoracic surgery (odds ratio, 0.35 [0.25-0.48], P < .001) resection compared with robotic resection. No differences in nodal upstaging or complications were found between the guideline-concordant and nonconcordant cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Guideline-concordant lymph node sampling is associated with surgeon volume, resection type, and operative approach. These findings inform initiatives to improve performance in lymph node sampling during lung cancer resection.

Early compliance with lung cancer lymph node standard 5.8: An analysis of 2022 and 2023 Commission on Cancer site reviews

OBJECTIVE

To address variability in nodal staging during curative-intent lung cancer resections, the Commission on Cancer implemented Standard 5.8 in 2021, requiring lymph nodes be sampled from ≥3 mediastinal stations and ≥1 hilar station and documented in a synoptic pathology report. We assessed compliance data from recent site reviews to evaluate the early implementation of Standard 5.8 through a federally funded collaborative.

METHODS

Hospital compliance rates with Standard 5.8 were extracted from a repository of site reviewers' documentation of Commission on Cancer site visits performed during 2022 and 2023. Each review included up to 7 randomly selected pathology reports eligible for the standard. For a site to be compliant, 5 of 7 pathology reports reviewed in 2022 must have met Standard 5.8, which increased to 6 of 7 reports in 2023 and beyond.

RESULTS

Overall, 652 site visits occurred in 2022 and 2023. Sites without eligible cases (n = 148 [23%]) were excluded. Among 504 eligible sites, 272 (54%) were found compliant, and 232 (46%) were found noncompliant. Of noncompliant sites, the median percentage of pathology reports meeting the standard was 29%. From 2022 to 2023, the median percentage of adherent pathology reports increased; however, overall compliance rates dipped in 2023 as the threshold needed for site compliance rose.

CONCLUSIONS

With almost half of Commission on Cancer-accredited sites noncompliant, there is a real opportunity to improve the quality of surgical lymph node evaluations. This aligns with growing efforts to support hospitals and surgeons with quality improvement tools and resources for Standard 5.8.

Robotic-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Versus Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: Which Is the Preferred Approach for Early-Stage NSCLC?

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality among both men and women worldwide, underscoring the need for an effective treatment strategy. For early-stage non-small cell lung cancer [NSCLC], surgical resection is the standard treatment. Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery [RATS] and video-assisted thoracic surgery [VATS] are better than open thoracotomy because they are less invasive. Recent lung cancer screening programs are detecting NSCLC at earlier stages, which is expected to result in an increase in the number of NSCLC surgeries as early-stage cases are diagnosed. A limited number of randomized controlled trials have compared RATS and VATS in operable NSCLC. We conducted a literature review to summarize the available evidence on these two surgical techniques. The purpose of this study is to compare the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of RATS and VATS in early-stage NSCLC patients. RATS shows lower conversion rates to thoracotomy (6.3% vs. 13.1% p < 0.01) and more thorough lymph node dissection than VATS (e.g., 7.5 vs. 5.6 stations, p < 0.001). However, RATS is linked to considerably higher costs (USD 22,582 vs. USD 17,874, p < 0.05) and longer operative times (median 241.7 vs. 214.4 min, p = 0.06). The two techniques exhibited minimal differences in postoperative complications and pain, while RATS patients experienced shortened hospital stays (4-5 vs. 5-6 days, p < 0.006). While the accuracy of staging and treatment planning is improved by the improved lymph node retrieval in RATS, the long-term survival rate is still uncertain.

Prognostic value of upper paratracheal lymph node resection in stage IB right‑sided lung cancer: A retrospective cohort study

The aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of upper paratracheal lymph node resection on the prognosis of patients with stage IB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A retrospective analysis of 339 patients with upper lobe stage IB NSCLC who underwent surgery at Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center (Guangzhou, China) between 1999 and 2009 was conducted. The Cox regression model was used to investigate prognostic factors. Variables with P<0.1 in univariate analysis were incorporated into multivariate analysis. A 1-to-1 propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to decrease potential bias when comparing the impact of upper paratracheal lymph node resection on survival outcomes. Following PSM, 202 cases were identified. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test were used to assess recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Of the 339 patients identified, 152 did not undergo resection of upper paratracheal lymph node, while 187 did undergo the surgery. Cases were separated into two groups based on the resection of the upper paratracheal lymph node. Cox regression analysis demonstrated that a family history of malignant tumors and smoking were considered significant prognostic variables for OS. Age and family history of malignant tumors were significant independent prognostic variables for RFS. Resection of the upper paratracheal lymph node was not significantly associated with OS and RFS. Additionally, resection of the upper paratracheal lymph node was not significantly associated with OS and RFS. In conclusion, there was no statistical association between upper paratracheal lymph node resection and OS or RFS for patients with stage IB NSCLC. Therefore, upper paratracheal lymph node resection may not be necessary for patients with early stage NSCLC, and application of this knowledge could reduce unnecessary surgical trauma and decrease lymph node-related complications.

Commission on Cancer Standards for Lymph Node Sampling and Oncologic Outcomes After Lung Resection

BACKGROUND

The newest Commission on Cancer standards recommend sampling 3 mediastinal and 1 hilar lymph node stations, 3 (N2) 1 (N1), for lung cancer resections. However, the relationship between the Commission on Cancer standards and outcomes has not been thoroughly investigated.

METHODS

A prospective institutional database was queried for clinical stage I-III lung resections before the implementation of the new standards. The relationship between the 3 (N2) 1 (N1) standard ("guideline concordant") and outcomes (upstaging, complications, receipt of adjuvant therapy, locoregional/distant recurrence, and survival) was assessed with multivariable models and stratified by stage.

RESULTS

Of 9289 pulmonary resections, 3048 (33%) were guideline concordant and 6241 (67%) were not. Compared with nonconcordant, those that were guideline concordant had higher rates of nodal upstaging (21% vs 13%; odds ratio [OR], 1.32 [95% CI, 1.14-1.51]; P < .001) and in-hospital complications (34% vs 27%; OR, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.05-1.30]; P = .004) but similar adjuvant systemic therapy administration (19% vs 13%; OR, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.95-1.24]; P = .2; 98% chemotherapy). Locoregional and distant recurrences were not significantly improved with guideline concordance across clinical stage I, II, and III subsets. Overall survival was similar in clinical stages I and II, but improved survival was observed for guideline concordant clinical stage III patients (hazard ratio, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.74-0.97]; P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

Sampling 3 (N2) 1 (N1) was associated with increased upstaging and complications but not with decreased recurrence or mortality in clinical stage I or II patients. Survival was improved for concordant, clinical stage III patients. Further study is indicated to determine the ideal lymph node sampling strategy across heterogeneous lung cancer patients.

Should sampling of three N2 stations be a quality metric for curative resection of stage I lung cancer?

OBJECTIVE

In 2022, the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer issued standard 5.8 quality metric for curative lung cancer resections requiring nodal resection from 3 N2 stations. In this report, we compare oncologic outcomes after resection of 3 N2 stations versus 2 N2 stations in stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective review from a single institution database was conducted from 2011 to 2020 to identify patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Patients with a history of lung cancer, carcinoid tumors, and ground-glass lesions less than 50% solid component were excluded. The primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes included disease-free survival, recurrence patterns, and nodal upstaging.

RESULTS

A total of 581 patients were identified and divided into 2 groups based on the number of N2 stations examined: Group A had 2 N2 stations examined (364 patients), and group B had 3 or more N2 stations examined (217 patients). Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between groups. In group A, N1 and N2 positive nodal stations were present in 8.2% (30/364) and 5.2% (19/364) of patients versus 7.4% (16/217) and 5.5% (12/217), respectively, in group B. Five-year overall survival and disease-free survival were 89% and 74% in group A versus 88% and 78% in group B, respectively. Recurrence occurred in 56 patients (15.4%) in group A (6.6% local and 8.8% distant) and 29 patients (13.4%) in group B (5.1% local and 8.3% distant; P = .73).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in oncological outcomes in stage I non-small cell lung cancer resections that included 2 N2 stations compared with at least 3 N2 stations examined.

Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of recurrence and metastasis of different surgical techniques for non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer remains the primary cause of cancer-related deaths on a global scale. Surgery is the main therapeutic option for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the optimal surgical approach for lymph node assessment in NSCLC resection remains controversial, and it is still uncertain whether lymph node dissection (LND) is more effective in reducing recurrence and metastasis rates in NSCLC compared with lymph node sampling (LNS). Therefore, we will conduct a meta-analysis to evaluate the recurrence and metastasis of LND versus LNS in patients with NSCLC.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This systematic review and meta-analysis will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis: The PRISMA Statement. According to the predefined inclusion criteria, we will conduct a comprehensive search for randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies examining the recurrence and metastasis of LND compared with LNS in patients with NSCLC. A literature search from inception in PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, SINOMED, VIP and Web of Science will be done. There will be no limitations on language, and the search will be undertaken on 30 August 2024, with regular search for new studies. Additionally, relevant literature references will be retrieved and hand-searching of pertinent journals will be conducted. The main outcomes include overall recurrence rate, local recurrence rate and distant metastasis rate. The supplementary outcomes encompass the rates of regional recurrence and lymph node metastasis. Two independent reviewers will perform screening, data extraction and quality assessment. Our reviewers will perform subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis and publication bias analysis to evaluate the heterogeneity and robustness. Review Manager 5.4 will be applied in analysing and synthesising. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation will be used to assess the quality of evidence for the whole study.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is dispensable for this study since no private information of the participants will be involved. The findings of the present study will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed journal or conference presentation.

STUDY REGISTRATION

The protocol of the systematic review has been registered on Open Science Framework, with a registration doi: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/S2FT5.

Impact of number of dissected lymph nodes on recurrence and survival following thoracoscopic segmentectomy for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify the impact of number of dissected lymph nodes during thoracoscopic segmentectomy on recurrence and survival of clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analysed data from prospectively collected consecutive thoracoscopic segmentectomies conducted between June 2008 and September 2023 at a single institution. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test assessed OS. Fine-Gray's test assessed specific death in a competing risk model. The logistic regression model was utilized to predict recurrence, while the Cox regression model was employed to analyse overall survival (OS). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 227 patients were included in the final analyses. The mean follow-up was 38.4 months (standard deviation 35.8). Among all patients, 37 patients (16.3 %) experienced recurrence and 51 (22.5 %) deceased during the follow-up period. The median number of dissected lymph nodes was 9 (interquartile range (IQR) 6-12). No statistical difference in recurrence rate and 5-year OS was observed between cases with dissected lymph nodes > 9 and ≤ 9 (14.6 % vs. 17.6 %, p = 0.549; 75.5 % vs. 69.5 %, p = 0.760). On multivariable analysis, body mass index (odds ratio [OR] 1.15, p = 0.002), Charlson Comorbidity index (OR 1.28, p = 0.002), synchronous pulmonary cancer (OR 3.05, p = 0.019), and tumour size (OR 1.04, p = 0.044) increased of the recurrence rate, while percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (hazard ratio (HR) 1.09, p = 0.048), history of smoking (HR 1.02, p = 0.009), and solid nodule (HR 1.56, p = 0.010) was related to poorer survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, number of dissected lymph nodes did not impact recurrence rate or overall survival after thoracoscopic segmentectomy for clinical stage I NSCLC.

Prognostic factors and predictive model construction in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study

Objective

The purpose of this study was to construct a nomogram model based on the general characteristics, histological features, pathological and immunohistochemical results, and inflammatory and nutritional indicators of patients so as to effectively predict the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after surgery.

Methods

Patients with NSCLC who received surgical treatment in our hospital from January 2017 to June 2021 were selected as the study subjects. The predictors of OS and PFS were evaluated by univariate and multivariable Cox regression analysis using the Cox proportional risk model. Based on the results of multi-factor Cox proportional risk regression analysis, a nomogram model was established using the R survival package. The bootstrap method (repeated sampling for 1 000 times) was used to internally verify the nomogram model, and C-index was used to represent the prediction performance of the nomogram model. The calibration graph method was used to visually represent its prediction compliance, and decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the application value of the model.

Results

Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify independent prognostic factors and to construct a nomogram of postoperative survival and disease progression in operable NSCLC patients, with C-index values of 0.927 (907-0.947) and 0.944 (0.922-0.966), respectively. The results showed that the model had high predictive performance. Calibration curves for 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year OS and PFS show a high degree of agreement between the predicted probability and the actual observed probability. In addition, the results of the DCA curve show that the model has good clinical application value.

Conclusion

We established a predictive model of survival prognosis and disease progression in patients with non-small cell lung cancer after surgery, which has good predictive performance and can guide clinicians to make the best clinical decision.

Limited resection is comparable to lobectomy for tumor size ≤ 2 cm pulmonary invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (IMA) has a rare incidence with better prognosis than nonmucinous adenocarcinoma. We aimed to investigate the prognosis between limited resection and lobectomy for patients with clinical stage IA IMA ≤ 2 cm.

METHODS

Data were taken from two cohorts: In Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital (SPH) corhort, we identified 403 patients with clinical stage IA IMA who underwent surgery. In the SEER corhort, 480 patients with stage T1 IMA who after surgery were included. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) for SPH corhort, lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) for the SEER corhort and overall survival (OS) for both corhort were compared between patients undergoing lobectomy and limited resection by Log-rank and Cox proportional hazard regression model.

RESULTS

In SPH corhort, patients who underwent limited resection had equivalent prognosis than those underwent lobectomy (5-year RFS: 79.3% versus. 82.6%, p = 0.116; 5-year OS: 86.2% versus. 88.3%, p = 0.235). However, patients with IMA > 2 to 3 cm had worse prognosis than those with IMA ≤ 2 cm (5-year RFS: 73.7% versus. 86.1%, p = 0.007). In the analysis of IMA > 2 to 3 cm subgroup, multivariate analysis showed that limited resection was an independent risk factor of RFS (hazard ratio, 2.417; 95% confidence interval, 1.157-5.049; p = 0.019), while OS (p = 0.122) was not significantly different between two groups. For IMA ≤ 2 cm, limited resection was not a risk factor of RFS (p = 0. 953) and OS (p = 0.552). In the SEER corhort, IMA ≤ 2 cm subgroup, limited resection was equivalent prognosis in LCSS (p = 0.703) and OS (p = 0.830).

CONCLUSIONS

Limited resection could be a potential surgical option which comparable to lobectomy in patients with clinical stage IA IMA ≤ 2 cm.

Lymph Node Yield in Lung Cancer Resection is Associated With Demographic and Institutional Factors

INTRODUCTION

Lymphadenectomy is routinely performed during surgical resection of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Lymph node yield and number of nodal stations sampled are important prognostic markers viewed as surrogates of surgical quality. The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with these quality metrics after resection of NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified NSCLC patients undergoing resection at a single institution from 2010 to 2021. Cases were matched to detailed pathologist reports, which included lymph node yield and number of stations sampled. Demographic and clinical characteristics were analyzed individually using unadjusted linear regression to identify factors associated with lymph node yield and number of stations sampled. Multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the same end points, using covariates determined through stepwise-backwards selection.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 836 patients. Multivariable regression demonstrated that male sex, history of cardiothoracic surgery, and individual pathologist were independently associated with lymph node yield. Among 18 pathologists, interpathologist coefficients with respect to lymph node yield varied from -5.61 to 11.25. Multivariable regression demonstrated White race and history of cardiothoracic surgery to be independently associated with number of nodal stations sampled, as well as individual surgeon and pathologist.

CONCLUSIONS

Lymph node yield and number of nodal stations sampled after NSCLC resection may vary based on patient demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as institutional factors. These factors should be accounted for when using these metrics as markers of surgical quality and prognosis of NSCLC.

Lymph node sampling-what are the numbers?

Lung cancer is a deadly disease. Lymph node staging is the most important prognostic factor, and lymphatic drainage of the lung is complex. Major advances have been made in this field over the last several decades, but there is much left to understand and improve upon. Herein, we review the history of the lymphatic system and the creation of lymph node maps, the evolution of tumor, node, and metastasis lung cancer classification, the importance of lung cancer staging, techniques for lymph node dissection, and our recommendations regarding a minimum number of nodes to sample during pulmonary resection.

Association of Lymph Node Sampling and Clinical Volume in Lobectomy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Sampling of ≥10 lymph nodes during lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was a previous surveillance metric and potential quality metric of the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer. We sought to determine guideline adherence and its relationship to hospital lobectomy volume within The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database.

METHODS

Participant centers providing elective lobectomy for NSCLC within The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database (2012-2019) were divided into tertiles according to annual volume. Average hospital nodal harvest of ≥10 nodes per lobectomy defined the primary outcome. Univariable analysis compared average patient and operative characteristics between the participant centers. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine independent factors associated with average clinical center nodal harvest of ≥10 nodes.

RESULTS

Median annual lobectomy volume was 6.2, 19.9, and 42.7 for low-, medium-, and high-volume participant centers. Among 305 centers and 43 597 patients, 5.6% of lobectomies occurred in low-volume centers, 24.0% in medium-volume centers, and 70.4% in high-volume centers. Average rates of ≥10 nodes per lobectomy were excised in 44.0% of low-volume centers, 70.6% of medium-volume centers, and 75.2% of high-volume centers (P < .001). On multivariable analysis, average nodal excision of ≥10 nodes was strongly associated with medium-volume (odds ratio, 2.94; CI, 1.57-5.50, P < .01) and high-volume (odds ratio, 3.82; CI, 1.95-7.46; P < .001) participant centers.

CONCLUSIONS

Although higher center volume and increased nodal harvest are associated, 25% of high-volume centers average a rate of <10 lymph nodes per lobectomy for NSCLC. Low nodal yield may underestimate stage, with implications for adjuvant therapy and long-term survival.

Assessment of Updated Commission on Cancer Guidelines for Intraoperative Lymph Node Sampling in Early Stage NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

The American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer recently updated its sampling recommendations for early stage NSCLC from at least 10 lymph nodes to at least one N1 (hilar) and three N2 (mediastinal) lymph node stations. Nevertheless, intraoperative lymph node sampling minimums remain subject to debate. We sought to evaluate these guidelines in patients with early stage NSCLC.

METHODS

We performed a cohort study using a uniquely compiled data set from the Veterans Health Administration. We manually abstracted data from operative notes and pathology reports of patients with clinical stage I NSCLC receiving surgery (2006-2016). Adequacy of lymph node sampling was defined using count-based (≥10 lymph nodes) and station-based (≥three N2 and one N1 nodal stations) minimums. Our primary outcome was recurrence-free survival. Secondary outcomes were overall survival and pathologic upstaging.

RESULTS

The study included 9749 patients. Count-based and station-based sampling guidelines were achieved in 3302 (33.9%) and 2559 patients (26.3%), respectively, with adherence to either sampling guideline increasing over time from 35.6% (2006) to 49.1% (2016). Adherence to station-based sampling was associated with improved recurrence-free survival (multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio = 0.815, 95% confidence interval: 0.667-0.994, p = 0.04), whereas adherence to count-based sampling was not (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.904, 95% confidence interval: 0.757-1.078, p = 0.26). Adherence to either station-based or count-based guidelines was associated with improved overall survival and higher likelihood of pathologic upstaging.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study supports station-based sampling minimums (≥three N2 and one N1 nodal stations) for early stage NSCLC; however, the marginal benefit compared with count-based guidelines is minimal. Further efforts to promote widespread adherence to intraoperative lymph node sampling minimums are critical for improving patient outcomes after curative-intent lung cancer resection.

Propensity score-matched comparison of robotic- and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, and open lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer patients aged 75 years or older

Introduction

Although robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) has been widely applied in treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), its advantages remain unclear for very old patients. The present study compared the perioperative outcomes and survival profiles among RATS, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), and open lobectomy (OL), aiming to access the superiority of RATS for NSCLC patients aged ≥75 years.

Methods

Pathological IA-IIIB NSCLC patients aged ≥75 years who underwent RATS, VATS, or OL between June 2015 and June 2021 in Shanghai Chest Hospital were included. Propensity score matching (PSM, 1:1:1 RATS versus VATS versus OL) was based on 10 key prognostic factors. The primary endpoints were perioperative outcomes, and the secondary endpoints were disease-free (DFS), overall (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CS).

Results

A total of 504 cases (126 RATS, 200 VATS, and 178 OL) were enrolled, and PSM led to 97 cases in each group. The results showed that RATS led to: 1) the best surgical-related outcomes including the shortest operation duration (p <0.001) and the least blood loss (p <0.001); 2) the fastest postoperative recoveries including the shortest ICU stay (p = 0.004), chest tube drainage duration (p <0.001), and postoperative stay (p <0.001), and the most overall costs (p <0.001); 3) the lowest incidence of postoperative complications (p = 0.002), especially pneumonia (p <0.001). There was no difference in the resection margins, reoperation rates, intraoperative blood transfusion, and volume of chest tube drainage among the three groups. Moreover, RATS assessed more N1 (p = 0.009) and total (p = 0.007) lymph nodes (LNs) than VATS, while the three surgical approaches dissected similar numbers of N1, N2, and total LN stations and led to a comparable incidence of postoperative nodal upstaging. Finally, the three groups possessed comparable DFS, OS, and CS rates. Further subgroup analysis found no difference in DFS or OS among the three groups, and multivariable analysis showed that the surgical approach was not independently correlated with survival profiles.

Conclusion

RATS possessed the superiority in achieving better perioperative outcomes over VATS and OL in very old NSCLC patients, though the three surgical approaches achieved comparable survival outcomes.

Lymph node metastases outside tumor-bearing lobes and/or segments in non–small cell lung cancer

Objective

Hilar and lung lymph node metastases (N1) are defined as ipsilateral bronchial and intrapulmonary lymph nodes. However, the cleaning standards for ipsilateral bronchial lymph nodes in different lobes and segments within the same lobe in segmentectomy are not clearly defined.

Materials and methods

Sixty-six patients undergoing pulmonary resection for the treatment of lung cancer were evaluated. Intraoperatively visible non-tumor-bearing lobe (NTBL) and post-operatively non-tumor-bearing segment (NTBS) lymph nodes were removed and analyzed. The associations between the NTBL LNs and clinicopathological characteristics were analyzed.

Results

Non-tumor-bearing lobe LNs metastases were found in 8 (12.1%) of the 66 patients, NTBS LNs metastasis were not found (0/13). The presence of NTBL metastases was significantly associated with age (&lt;60 years vs. ≥60 years, P = 0.037), differentiation (Grade 1 well differentiated vs. Grade 2 moderately differentiated vs. Grade 3 poorly differentiated, P = 0.012), CAT-scan-findings of Mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes metastasis (node-positive vs. node-negative, P = 0.022), pN stage (N0 vs. N1 vs. N2, P = 0.003) and p stage (I vs. II vs. III, P = 0.009). Multivariate logistic analysis showed that tumor differentiation (P = 0.048, HR 6.229; 95% CI 1.016–38.181) and pN (P = 0.024, HR 5.099; 95% CI 1.245–20.878) were statistically significant predictors.

Conclusions

Lobar lymph node metastasis of NTBL occurs frequently in patients with NSCLC, but lymph node metastases in NTBS LNs are rare. Advanced age, poorly differentiated and N1 and N2 status of CAT-scan-findings were independent risk factors for the involvement of the NTBL lobar lymph nodes. Although lymph node metastases in NTBS are rare, further investigation of the need to dissect is required.

Robotic-Assisted versus Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy: Short-Term Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial (RVlob Trial)

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether robotic-assisted lobectomy (RAL) affects perioperative outcomes and long-term efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, compared with traditional video-assisted lobectomy (VAL).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

RAL is a promising treatment for NSCLC. However, its efficacy has not been fully evaluated.

METHODS

A single-center, open-labeled prospective randomized clinical trial was launched in May 2017 to compare the efficacy of RAL and VAL. By May 2020, 320 patients were enrolled. The perioperative results of RAL and VAL were compared.

RESULTS

The 320 enrolled patients were randomly assigned to the RAL group (n = 157) and the VAL group (n = 163). Perioperative outcomes were comparable between the two groups, including the length of hospital stay (P = 0.76) and the rate of postoperative complications (P = 0.45). No perioperative mortality occurred in either group. The total amount of chest tube drainage (830 ml [IQR, 550-1130 ml] vs. 685 ml [IQR, 367.5-1160 ml], P = 0.007) and hospitalization costs ($12821 [IQR, $12145-$13924] vs. $8009 [IQR, $7014-$9003], P < 0.001) were significantly higher in the RAL group. RAL group had a significantly higher number of lymph nodes (LNs) harvested (11 [IQR, 8-15] vs. 10 [IQR, 8-13], P = 0.02), higher number of N1 LNs (6 [IQR, 4-8] vs. 5 [IQR, 3-7], P = 0.005), and more LN stations examined (6 [IQR, 5-7] vs. 5 [IQR, 4-6], P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Both RAL and VAL are safe and feasible for the treatment of NSCLC. RAL achieved similar perioperative outcomes, together with higher LN yield. Further follow-up investigations are required to evaluate the long-term efficacy of RAL. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03134534).