Outcomes of Conversion to Extrapleural Pneumonectomy From Pleurectomy/Decortication for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

Updated Postrecurrence Survival Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Pleurectomy/Decortication for Pleural Mesothelioma: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Pleural mesothelioma remains a challenging disease with a high recurrence rate despite multimodality treatment. We previously described clinical outcomes associated with recurrence after pleurectomy/decortication in pleural mesothelioma. In this study, we updated these results using data from a larger, more recent cohort and identified prognostic factors influencing postrecurrence survival after pleurectomy/decortication.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving 251 patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy with platinum plus pemetrexed, followed by pleurectomy/decortication from January 2012 to December 2022. We calculated survival and recurrence rates using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test, respectively. Multivariable analysis with the Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess clinical factors related to postrecurrence survival.

RESULTS

Of the 251 patients, 190 (75.7%) experienced recurrence (median follow-up, 30.9 months). The 2-year recurrence-free and overall survival rates were 37.3% (median, 21.1 months) and 72.3% (median, 44.1 months), respectively. The 1-year postrecurrence survival rate was 60.6% (median, 18.0 months). Multivariable analysis revealed that postrecurrence treatment (hazard ratio [HR], 0.12; 95% CI, 0.071-0.22; P < .0001), local recurrence (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.31-0.66; P < .0001), age at recurrence <70 years (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.37-0.76; P = .0007), and disease-free interval >12 months (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.28-0.65; P < .0001) were independent, favorable, and significant prognostic factors of postrecurrence survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Postrecurrence treatment, recurrence pattern, age at recurrence, and disease-free interval significantly influence postrecurrence survival, indicating favorable outcomes in patients undergoing pleurectomy/decortication.

Peritoneal Dissemination in Patients with Recurrence After Post-pleurectomy/decortication for Pleural Mesothelioma

BACKGROUND

In clinical practice, peritoneal dissemination after curative-intent surgery for pleural mesothelioma occasionally recurs. This study investigated the risk factors and prognosis associated with post-pleurectomy/decortication peritoneal dissemination in pleural mesothelioma, which are rarely reported.

METHODS

This retrospective review included 160 patients who experienced recurrence after pleurectomy/decortication for pleural mesothelioma between January 2011 and December 2021. Patients with recurrence were classified according to the initial recurrence pattern. The P group experienced recurrence with peritoneal dissemination, and the non-P group experienced recurrence without peritoneal dissemination. The analysis determined the risk factors for peritoneal dissemination using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Of the 160 patients, 20 (12.5%) exhibited peritoneal dissemination and were assigned to the P group, whereas 140 (87.5%) had recurrence without peritoneal dissemination and were assigned to the non-P group. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that diaphragm reconstruction (odds ratio [OR], 2.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-8.0; p = 0.048) and female sex (OR, 3.7; 95% CI 1.26-10.8; p = 0.017) were associated with the P group. Post-recurrence survival was worse in the P group than in the non-P group (1-year post-recurrence survival: 22.2% vs. 65.3%; median: 6.7 months vs. 19.4 months; p = 0.0013).

CONCLUSIONS

Peritoneal dissemination occurred in approximately one of every eight patients with recurrence after pleurectomy/decortication for pleural mesothelioma, and the incidence was significantly higher among females and patients undergoing diaphragm reconstruction. Moreover, postoperative recurrence of peritoneal dissemination was associated with a poor prognosis.

Impact of Operation on Disease Progression and Survival of Patients With Pleural Mesothelioma

BACKGROUND

The effects of surgery on the survival of patients with pleural mesothelioma remain poorly understood. We compared the therapeutic outcomes of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by surgery or refusing surgery, for pleural mesothelioma.

METHODS

This retrospective study included consecutive patients who were eligible for curative-intent surgery after 3 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with platinum plus pemetrexed at our hospital during January 2011 to December 2021. Patients were divided into 2 groups. The surgery group comprised patients who underwent curative-intent surgery for pleural mesothelioma. The refusal-of-surgery group comprised patients who were medically eligible for surgery but refused to consent to surgery. Overall survival and progression-free survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method with the generalized Wilcoxon test.

RESULTS

Of the 296 eligible patients for the study, 272 underwent surgery and 24 refused surgery. During the surgery, 204 patients (75.0%), 43 (15.8%), and 25 (9.2%) underwent pleurectomy/decortication, extrapleural pneumonectomy, and exploratory thoracotomy, respectively. The median follow-up length was 28.4 months. The median overall survival periods were 40.7 months (95% CI, 32.2-45.6 months) for surgery and 23.6 months (95% CI, 15.2-43.0 months) for refusal of surgery (P = .03). The median progression-free survival periods were 20.2 months (95% CI, 17.0-22.5 months) for surgery and 12.9 months (95% CI, 8.3-16.8 months) for refusal of surgery (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall survival and progression-free survival were significantly better in surgery than in refusal of surgery. Surgery may improve the survival outcomes of patients with pleural mesothelioma.

Nationwide prospective registry database of patients with newly diagnosed untreated pleural mesothelioma in Japan

Due to the scarcity of large-sized prospective databases, the Japanese Joint Committee for Lung Cancer Registry conducted a nationwide prospective registry for newly diagnosed and untreated pleural mesothelioma. All new cases diagnosed pathologically as any subtype of pleural mesothelioma in Japan during the period between April 1, 2017, to March 31, 2019, were included before treatment. Data on survival were collected in April 2021. The eligible 346 patients (285 men [82.3%]; 61 women [17.7%]; median age, 71.0 years [range, 44-88]) were included for analysis. Among these patients, 138 (39.9%) underwent surgery, 164 (47.4%) underwent non-surgical therapy, and the remaining 44 (12.7%) underwent best supportive care. The median overall survival for all 346 patients was 19.0 months. Survival rates at 1, 2, and 3 years for all patients were, 62.8%, 42.3%, and 26.5%, respectively. Median overall survival was significantly different among patients undergoing surgery, non-surgical treatment, and best supportive care (32.2 months vs. 14.0 months vs. 3.8 months, p < 0.001). The median overall survival of patients undergoing pleurectomy/decortication and extrapleural pneumonectomy was 41.8 months and 25.0 months, respectively. Macroscopic complete resection resulted in longer overall survival than R2 resection and partial pleurectomy/exploratory thoracotomy (41.8 months vs. 32.2 months vs. 16.8 months, p < 0.001). Tumor shape, maximum tumor thickness, and sum of three level thickness were significant prognostic factors. The data in the prospective database would serve as a valuable reference for clinical practice and further studies for pleural mesothelioma.

Efficacy and safety of nivolumab with ipilimumab for recurrent malignant pleural mesothelioma after primary surgical intervention

BACKGROUND

Treatment of recurrent malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) remains challenging. Our study examined the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of nivolumab with ipilimumab treatment for recurrent MPM after primary curative-intent surgery.

METHODS

Treatment comprised 360 mg nivolumab every 3 weeks and 1 mg/kg of ipilimumab every 6 weeks, both administered intravenously. Both were discontinued for progressive disease or serious adverse events (AEs). Additional post-treatment data were evaluated, including objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), post-treatment survival, progression-free survival (PFS), and AEs. Tumor response was assessed using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1). Survival analysis was estimated using a Kaplan-Meier plot. Feasibility analysis was performed using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AEs version 5.0.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients received nivolumab with ipilimumab for recurrent MPM after primary curative-intent surgery (median follow-up, 10.4 months; median treatment, 5.1 months). Overall, 18 patients exhibited partial response, 13 exhibited stable disease, and 10 had documented progressive disease. ORR and DCR were 43.9 and 75.6%, respectively. The 12-month post-treatment survival rate and PFS rate were 74.2 and 40.0%, respectively (median survival, not calculated; median PFS, 7.3 months). Further, 47 AEs were reported in 29 patients (70.7%), including grade 3-4 AEs in 14 patients (34.1%). Grade 4 hepatobiliary disorders were observed in 2 patients and grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 1.

CONCLUSION

Nivolumab with ipilimumab treatment in patients with recurrent MPM after primary surgical treatment may be clinically efficacious, although serious AEs may be frequently observed.

Long-term outcomes and risk factors of residual thoracic spaces after pleurectomy/decortication for mesothelioma

OBJECTIVES

The residual thoracic spaces (RTS) after pleurectomy/decortication (P/D) remain unexplored to date. Hence, this study aims to examine the details and risk factors of RTS during the 3 post-P/D months.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by P/D for malignant pleural mesothelioma from September 2012 to December 2020. The RTS group included cases of residual thoracic cavity unaccompanied by pleural effusion on 3 postoperative months computed tomography. We determined risk factors for RTS using univariable and multivariable analyses.

RESULTS

Of 170 patients examined, 58 (34.1%) were in the RTS group and 112 (65.9%) in the non-RTS group. In the RTS group, 43 patients recovered from RTS during the follow-up period; 4 patients developed chronic fistular empyema, while 2 required fenestration and 2 were thoracoscopic debridement. Besides, 11 patients exhibited RTS continuously. The univariable analysis revealed that compared with the non-RTS group, the RTS group reported a significantly longer postoperative air leak (>7 days; P < 0.01) and right P/D (P = 0.04). The multivariable analysis demonstrated that longer postoperative air leak (>7 days) remained a risk factor for RTS (odds ratio 2.5, 95% confidence interval: 1.3-4.9, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

RTS was a postoperative event that frequently observed in patients undergoing P/D. Overall, the current study findings suggest longer postoperative air leak (>7 days) as a significant risk factor for RTS.

New Era for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Updates on Therapeutic Options

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare malignancy with few treatment options. Recent advances have led to US Food and Drug Administration approvals and changes in the standard of care with a novel biomedical device approved for use with platinum-pemetrexed, and also for immunotherapy agents to be included as a frontline treatment option in unresectable disease. Although predictive biomarkers for systemic therapy are not currently in use in clinical practice, it is essential to correctly identify the MPM histology to determine an optimal treatment plan. Patients with nonepithelioid MPM may have a greater magnitude of benefit to dual immunotherapy checkpoint inhibitors and this regimen should be preferred in the frontline setting for these patients. However, all patients with MPM can derive benefit from immunotherapy treatments, and these agents should ultimately be used at some point during their treatment journey. There are ongoing studies in the frontline unresectable setting that may further define the frontline therapy space, but a critical area of research will need to focus on the immunotherapy refractory population. This review article will describe the new developments in the areas of biology with genomics and chromothripsis, and also focus on updates in treatment strategies in radiology, surgery, radiation, and medical oncology with cellular therapies. These recent innovations are generating momentum to find better therapies for this disease.

Neoadjuvant pemetrexed plus cisplatin followed by pleurectomy for malignant pleural mesothelioma

PURPOSE

Despite becoming the preferred surgical technique for malignant pleural mesothelioma, pleurectomy/decortication has received few prospective clinical trials. Therefore, the Japan Mesothelioma Interest Group conducted a prospective multi-institutional study to evaluate the feasibility of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by pleurectomy/decortication.

METHODS

Patients with histologically confirmed, resectable malignant pleural mesothelioma underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy comprising pemetrexed 500 mg/m² plus cisplatin 75 mg/m² for 3 cycles, followed by pleurectomy/decortication. The primary end point was macroscopic complete resection rate regardless of the surgical technique used.

RESULTS

Among the 24 patients enrolled, 20 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 18 proceeded to surgery, all of whom achieved macroscopic complete resection. Pleurectomy/decortication was performed in 15 patients. The trial satisfied the primary end point, with a macroscopic complete resection rate of 90% (18/20, 95% confidence interval, 68.3-98.8). No treatment-related 30- and 90-day mortality occurred. The overall survival after 1 and 2 years and median overall survival after registration were 95.0% (95% confidence interval, 69.5-99.3), 70.0% (95% confidence interval, 45.1-85.3), and 3.45 years (95% confidence interval, 1.64 to not available), respectively. The cumulative incidence of progression after 1 and 2 years and median time to progression were 33.3% (95% confidence interval, 17.3-64.1), 61.1% (95% confidence interval, 42.3-88.3), and 1.71 years (95% confidence interval, 1.00-2.99), respectively. The best postoperative value for forced expiratory volume was 78.0% of preoperative values.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by pleurectomy/decortication was feasible with acceptable survival and mortality/morbidity. Postoperative pulmonary function was approximately 80% of the preoperative pulmonary function.