Superficial vein surgery and SEPS for chronic venous insufficiency

Understanding Chronic Venous Disease: A Critical Overview of Its Pathophysiology and Medical Management

Chronic venous disease (CVD) is a multifactorial condition affecting an important percentage of the global population. It ranges from mild clinical signs, such as telangiectasias or reticular veins, to severe manifestations, such as venous ulcerations. However, varicose veins (VVs) are the most common manifestation of CVD. The explicit mechanisms of the disease are not well-understood. It seems that genetics and a plethora of environmental agents play an important role in the development and progression of CVD. The exposure to these factors leads to altered hemodynamics of the venous system, described as ambulatory venous hypertension, therefore promoting microcirculatory changes, inflammatory responses, hypoxia, venous wall remodeling, and epigenetic variations, even with important systemic implications. Thus, a proper clinical management of patients with CVD is essential to prevent potential harms of the disease, which also entails a significant loss of the quality of life in these individuals. Hence, the aim of the present review is to collect the current knowledge of CVD, including its epidemiology, etiology, and risk factors, but emphasizing the pathophysiology and medical care of these patients, including clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatments. Furthermore, future directions will also be covered in this work in order to provide potential fields to explore in the context of CVD.

Shortened protocol for radiofrequency ablation of perforator veins

BACKGROUND

Routine radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of an incompetent perforator vein (IPV) using the standard treatment protocol at 85°C has a treatment time of 6 minutes. To make treatment time more efficient, we sought to determine the effect of a shortened protocol for radiofrequency stylet (RFS) ablation by comparing the early success using three different temperatures: 85°C, 90°C, and 95°C.

METHODS

A retrospective study examined 642 procedures of IPV closures in 255 patients with varying degrees of venous insufficiency treated with RFA from 2009 to 2015. The Covidien (Mansfield, Mass) RFA system allows the operator to regulate temperature and allows increments in temperature of the RFS to 85°C, 90°C, and 95°C. The RFS probe was angled at four 90-degree angles at the mentioned temperatures with a shorter treatment time at 6, 4, and 3 minutes, respectively. The three different treatment protocols were compared. All patients had comparative preoperative and postoperative duplex ultrasound scans. Postoperative duplex ultrasound scans were performed 3 to 7 days after the procedure. Successful obliteration was defined as lack of color flow on postoperative duplex ultrasound scanning. Clinical correlation with age, gender, laterality, presenting symptoms (Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy, and Pathophysiology [CEAP] classification), location, and vein diameter was also performed.

RESULTS

Of the 255 patients who underwent RFS ablation, 138 were female, with a mean age of 65 years (standard deviation, ±14.6 years). These patients had CEAP presentations from C1 to C6 (0 C1, 1 C2, 57 C3, 118 C4, 4 C5, 75 C6). The location of the 642 IPVs was distributed as 472 in the calf and 170 in the ankle; 322 of these procedures were performed on the right leg. Use of a shortened protocol had no significant effect on the early obliteration rates with the 85°C, 90°C, and 95°C protocols, which were 66.1%, 61.8%, and 67.1%, respectively. Significant correlation was seen between location of targeted vein and successful obliteration (P < .001). There was a borderline inverse linear association between higher stylet temperature and successful obliteration in the proximal calf at 85°C. After accounting for within-patient correlation, the middle and distal calf continued to show higher nonobliteration compared with the ankle. No clinical correlation with age, gender, laterality, presenting symptoms of CEAP, or vein diameter was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The study showed that shortening the protocol time for RFA of the perforator did not make a significant difference in the early success rate, regardless of the temperature. The overall early success rate is still low (65.1%). RFA of perforator veins has a higher successful closure rate in proximal calf and ankle areas compared with the middle and distal calf.

Article Commentary: Chronic Venous Insufficiency: Current Management of Varicose Vein Disease

This review encompasses the basic pathophysiology, diagnosis, and current therapies for superficial venous insufficiency.

Impact of lower extremity venous ulcers due to chronic venous insufficiency on quality of life

Lower extremity venous ulcers comprise a complex medical and social issue. The conservative and/or surgical management of venous ulcers is often inadequate. In addition, the psychosocial aspect of the disease is often overlooked and most often undertreated. Common symptoms such as pain, low self-esteem and patient isolation are usually not recognized and therefore not adequately managed.This mini-review summarizes the current data on the management of lower extremity venous ulcers and their impact on the quality of life of these patients.

Integration of patient safety technologies into sclerotherapy for varicose veins

The American College of Surgeons, the Joint Commission, the Needlestick Safety and Prevention Act, and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration all direct surgical departments, including vascular surgeons who supply sclerotherapy services, to develop formal mechanisms to improve the safety of the patient and health care worker (HCW), including integration of new safety technologies. The purpose of the present study was to identify and evaluate new safety technologies for outpatient sclerotherapy for chronic venous disease. Using national resources for patient safety and literature review, the following safety technologies were identified: (1) a safety needle to reduce inadvertent needlesticks to workers, and (2) the reciprocating procedure device (RPD) to reduce iatrogenic injuries to patients. Both devices were evaluated in the clinic, and physician responses were determined. Although the safety sheath of the needle was somewhat bulky and could interfere with the ultrasound transducer, sclerotherapy could be performed with it. The RPD safety device required instruction to show how the RPD functioned ("push-push" to aspirate-inject with the RPD rather than the usual "push-pull" with the conventional syringe), but the RPD permitted better needle control and more precise injections. The RPD was well accepted by physicians who found it to be convenient, safer, and less painful. Subsequently, the involved services successfully integrated these safety technologies into their routine clinical practices. As recommended by the Joint Commission, safety technologies can be successfully evaluated and introduced into the clinic to improve patient and HCW safety during physician-performed syringe and needle procedures, including sclerotherapy.