Imaging features following transarterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma

MRI features of treated hepatocellular carcinoma following locoregional therapy: a pictorial review

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer death worldwide and within the United States. Liver transplant or partial liver resection is the definitive treatment of choice for HCC; however, the majority of cases are detected in advanced stages due to its early-stage asymptomatic nature, often precluding surgical treatment. Locoregional therapy plays an essential role in HCC management, including curative intent, as a bridge to transplant, or in some cases palliative therapy. Radiologists play a critical role in assessing tumor response following treatment to guide further management that may potentially impact transplantation eligibility; therefore, it is important for radiologists to have an understanding of different locoregional therapies and the variations of imaging response to different therapies. In this review article, we outline the imaging response to ablative therapy (AT), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT), and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). We will also briefly discuss the basic concepts of these locoregional therapies. This review focuses on the imaging features following locoregional treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma following AT, TACE, SIRT, and SBRT.

Post Locoregional Therapy Treatment Imaging in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: A Literature-based Review

Imaging plays a crucial role in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as well as in determining treatment efficacy, or complications, following therapy. Unlike other cancers, HCC is most commonly treated by locoregional therapies (LRTs) such as thermal ablation, transarterial chemoembolization, and transarterial radioembolization. These treatments can lead to changes on imaging that make determination of residual/recurrent disease difficult. This literature-based review discusses the expected postimaging findings following LRT.

Imaging evaluation of residual cancer after radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma

Primary liver cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in the world, and only a few patients have the chance of surgical resection. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a good treatment for patients with unresectable liver cancer. The existence of residual cancer after radiofrequency ablation has a direct impact on the prognosis of patients, so it is important to accurately determine whether there is residual cancer after RFA treatment in order to reduce the local recurrence and prolong the survival time of patients. In this paper, we discuss the evaluation of residual cancer after radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma by ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and nuclear medicine modalities.

Hepatic imaging following intra-arterial embolotherapy

PURPOSE

To discuss guidelines and salient imaging findings of solid tumors treated with common intra-arterial procedures used in interventional oncology.

METHODS

A meticulous literature search of PubMed-indexed articles was conducted. Key words included "imaging + embolization," "imaging + TACE," "imaging + radioembolization," "imaging + Y90," "mRECIST," and "EASL." Representative post-treatment cross-sectional images were obtained from past cases in this institution.

RESULTS

Intra-arterial therapy (IAT) in interventional oncology includes bland embolization, chemoembolization, and radioembolization. Solid tumors of the liver are the primary focus of these procedures. Cross-sectional CT and/or MR are the main modalities used to image tumors after treatment. Traditional size-based response criteria (WHO and RECIST) alone are of limited utility in determining response to IAT; tumoral necrosis and enhancement must be considered. Specifically for HCC, the EASL and mRECIST guidelines are becoming widely adopted response criteria to assess these factors. DWI, FDG-PET, and CEUS are modalities that play an adjunctive but controversial role.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiologists must be aware that the different forms of intra-arterial therapy yield characteristic findings on cross-sectional imaging. Knowledge of these findings is integral to accurate assessment of tumor response and progression.