The cost of everything and the value of nothing

The experience of epilepsy in later life: A qualitative exploration of illness representations

The objective of this study was to explore how older people living with epilepsy appraise their condition through their lived-experience. The common-sense model of illness representations (CSMIR) provides a framework to explain how individuals make sense of and manage health threats. Semi-structured in-depth interviews based on the CSMIR were conducted with ten people with epilepsy who were above the age of 65. The results were analyzed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Three overarching themes emerged from the analysis: 'the power of epilepsy', 'they say you can live a normal life but you can't' and 'attempts to adjust and cope'. Epilepsy was described as a threatening, persistent, and unpredictable condition associated with distressing experiences. Participants described a process of balancing negative psychosocial consequences including stigma, loss of control, and reliance on other people and medication with parallel co-existing coping strategies. These attempts to manage the condition were characterized by a desire for acceptance and increased awareness of epilepsy, strategies to restore loss of control, and strength derived from supportive relationships. We conclude that there is large scope for psychosocial interventions in healthcare provision for this patient group. The roles of specialist nursing, relationship-centered models, psychotherapy, educational, and self-management programs are highlighted.

A structured, nurse-led intervention program improves quality of life in patients with epilepsy: a randomized, controlled trial

We tested the hypothesis that structured epilepsy nursing improves quality of life (QOL). One hundred fourteen adult patients with uncontrolled epilepsy were randomly assigned to either an intervention group or a control group. The intervention group was offered an interactive, 1-day group education program followed by extended nurse follow-up and counseling. The nurse was present at as many outpatient consultations as possible and performed repeated consultations by telephone. All patients completed the QOLIE-89 before randomization and after 2 years. QOL was significantly improved from inclusion to completion of study in the intervention group (P=0.019), mainly in the subitems for Health Discouragement (P=0.01), Medication Effects (P=0.035), and Physical Role Limitations (P=0.05). To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate a significant effect of a structured nurse-led intervention program in QOL of patients with epilepsy.

Clinical skills: practical guide for managing adults with epilepsy

This article concentrates on the practical management of those with seizures by general nurses. It focuses on the role of the hospital nurse in secondary care and the practice nurse in primary care. Both need to be conversant and practically competent to deal with the first-aid management of a seizure. They also need to know when medical assistance is required and how to act in an emergency. Epilepsy is a chronic long-term condition in adults and the main function of the nurse is advisory and educational. It is to act as a facilitator, and to assist adults to self-manage their epilepsy. Where the nurse is unable to provide this advice, appropriate referrals or contacts should be given.

Economic evaluation of specialist cancer and palliative nursing: a literature review

Little progress has been made in economic evaluation of specialist cancer and palliative care nursing. A literature review of economic studies of clinical nurse specialists (CNSs) was undertaken to assess how the measurement of economic outcomes has been tackled in the literature to date. The initial search found 400 studies. Abstracts from all the studies were reviewed but only 17 studies met the basic criteria for inclusion, reporting primary cost and outcomes data, and clearly specifying the role of a CNS. All of the studies but one focused on direct patient care rather than other CNS roles and were undertaken alongside effectiveness studies. The economic evaluations considered only a narrow range of costs, but a wide range of outcomes. Specific nursing outcomes were only reported in a minority of studies. None of the studies reported cost-effectiveness ratios. However, CNS interventions were reported to be both less costly and more effective than alternative forms of care, negating the need for further cost-effectiveness analysis. Overall, the papers were not of good quality, reducing the validity of the findings. Robust economic evaluations of the CNS role need to be undertaken. These should involve nursing researchers and practitioners so that evaluations reflect the complex and multidimensional nature of CNS care and meet the required standard of evidence to influence practice.