Factors predicting efficacy of oxaliplatin in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) +/- folinic acid in a compassionate-use cohort of 481 5-FU-resistant advanced colorectal cancer patients

Current and New Predictors for Treatment Response in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. The Role of Circulating miRNAs as Biomarkers

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most frequently diagnosed cancer in the world. More than half of all CRC patients will eventually develop metastases and require treatment accordingly, but few validated predictive factors for response to systemic treatments exist. In order to ascertain which patients benefit from specific treatments, there is a strong need for new and reliable biomarkers. We conducted a comprehensive search using the PUBMED database, up to December 2019, in order to identify relevant studies on predictive biomarkers for treatment response in metastatic CRC. We will herein present the currently used and potential biomarkers for treatment response and bring up-to-date knowledge on the role of circulating microRNAs, associated with chemotherapy and targeted therapy regimens used in metastatic CRC treatment. Molecular, tumor-related, disease-related, clinical, and laboratory predictive markers for treatment response were identified, mostly proposed, with few validated. Several circulating microRNAs have already proven their role of prediction for treatment response in CRC, but future clinical studies are needed to confirm their role as biomarkers across large cohorts of patients.

Decreased percentage of neutrophil is a predict factor for the efficacy of trifluridine and tipiracil hydrochloride for pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer

Background

The concentration of trifluridine in tumor DNA was strongly correlated with that of white blood cells in tumor-bearing nude mice administered trifluridine-tipiracil (TAS-102). Further, a phase I study of TAS-102 in patients with advanced solid tumors showed a significant correlation between decreased neutrophil count and the area under the concentration-time curve of trifluridine. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the association of decreased neutrophil count with the efficacy of TAS-102.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 40 patients with pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer who received TAS-102 at Yodogawa Christian Hospital between June 2014 and May 2018. To evaluate the association between the efficacy of TAS-102 and decreased neutrophil count, patients were grouped into 4 categories according to the decrease of neutrophil count during the first cycle of TAS-102 as follows: Category A, <25%; B, 25% to <50%; C, 50% to <75%; D, ≥75%.

Results

The rate of overall survival (OS) was significantly different between Category A and B (median: 4.1 vs. 10.1 months; P=0.04), between Category A and C (median: 4.1 vs. 10.5 months; P=0.04), and between Category A and D (median: 4.1 vs. 15.6 months; P=0.04). In the multivariate analyses, a ≥25% decrease of neutrophils [hazard ratio (HR): 0.28; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.12-0.72; P=0.01] and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 2 (HR: 3.79, 95% CI: 1.04-11.2; P=0.04) were independent prognostic factors for OS.

Conclusions

Decreased neutrophil count is a predict factor for the efficacy of TAS-102. TAS-102 treatment may be ineffective in patients with a decreased neutrophil count of <25%.

Predicting chemotherapeutic response and toxicity in colorectal cancer

SUMMARY While treatment for colorectal cancer has evolved significantly over the past 10 years with the introduction of active chemotherapeutic agents and targeted therapies, this has been at the cost of increased toxicity for patients; and significant financial burden for governments and patients. Predicting clinical outcomes, especially given the largely elderly patient population involved, is therefore paramount. This review seeks to summarize existing data regarding the prediction of response and toxicity to chemotherapy agents currently used in the treatment of colorectal cancer.

Relative effectiveness and safety of chemotherapy in elderly and nonelderly patients with stage III colon cancer: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy effectiveness in clinical practice may differ from the efficacy demonstrated in clinical trials, particularly among populations underrepresented in clinical trials, such as elderly patients with cancer. This review aims to examine the relative effectiveness of chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer in elderly versus nonelderly patients.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality approach. Literature searches were performed in Medline and Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews databases. Chemotherapy regimens approved for stage III colon cancer were reviewed. Four effectiveness and 15 safety outcomes were extracted.

RESULTS

From 708 identified articles, 25 articles provided data on the relative effectiveness and safety of chemotherapy among elderly versus nonelderly patients. Four of 14 studies showed lower overall survival treatment effects, whereas one of five and one of four studies indicated more favorable treatment effects for time to progression and overall response rate. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were higher among elderly patients for cardiac disorder (2/5 studies), leukopenia (1/5), neutropenia (4/16), thrombocytopenia (2/13), febrile neutropenia (1/4), infection (2/10), dehydration (2/6), diarrhea (6/20), and fatigue (6/13). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were lower for neutropenia (2/16 studies), nausea/vomiting (1/16), and neuropathy (1/9).

CONCLUSION

The majority of the evidence suggests that chemotherapy has similar relative effectiveness and safety for patients >65 years of age versus younger patients with stage III colon cancer. When differences are reported, treatment effects are more often worse among the elderly. This review suggests that without other reasons for withholding treatment, elderly patients should receive chemotherapy as often as nonelderly patients.

Secondary treatment and predictive factors for second-line chemotherapy after first-line oxaliplatin-based therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer

Two consecutive studies have evaluated the efficacy of oxaliplatin combined with the Nordic bolus schedule of 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid as first-line treatment in metastatic non-resectable colorectal cancer. One hundred and twelve patients were followed after end of first-line treatment and any secondary therapy registered. Fifty-three patients (47%) did not receive second-line irinotecan-based chemotherapy. The main reason was too poor performance status (59%). These patients had a median survival of only 1.7 months after progression of first-line therapy. The best predictive factors at start of first-line chemotherapy for receiving later second-line chemotherapy were performance status and alkaline phosphatase level. Fifty-nine patients (53%) received irinotecan-based second-line therapy. Four (7%) patients had a partial response, and 28 (52%) had stable disease. Median progression-free survival after second-line chemotherapy was 4.1 months and median survival 9.5 months. Median survival after first-line chemotherapy and secondary liver surgery was 34 months and five-year disease-free survival 8%. Survival among patients receiving both first- and second-line chemotherapy was 20.8 months, but only 8.9 months in patients not receiving second-line irinotecan-based chemotherapy. Poor performance status or elevated alkaline phosphatase level at start of first-line chemotherapy predicts whether second-line chemotherapy will be given or not.

Patient characteristics and stratification in medical treatment studies for metastatic colorectal cancer: A proposal for standardization of patient characteristic reporting and stratification

BACKGROUND

Prognostic factors have the potential to determine the survival of patients to a greater extent than current antineoplastic agents. Despite this knowledge, there is no consensus on, first, what patient characteristics to report and, second, what stratification factors to use in metastatic colorectal cancer trials.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seven leading oncology and medical journals were reviewed for phase II and III publications reporting on medical treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer patients during 2001-2005. One hundred and forty-three studies with 21 214 patients were identified. The reporting of patient characteristics and use of stratification was noted.

RESULTS

Age, gender, performance status, metastases location, sites and adjuvant chemotherapy were often reported (99-63%). Laboratory values as alkaline phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase and white blood cell count, repeatedly found to be of prognostic relevance, were rarely reported (5-9%). Stratification was used in all phase III trials; however, only study centre was used with any consistency.

CONCLUSION

There is considerable inconsistency in the reporting of patient characteristics and use of stratification factors in metastatic colorectal cancer trials. We propose a standardization of patient characteristics reporting and stratification factors. A common set of characteristics and strata will aid in trial reporting, interpretation and future meta-analyses.

Third-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The past years' therapy for colorectal cancer has evolved rapidly with the introduction of novel cytotoxic agents such as irinotecan, capecitabine and oxaliplatin. Further advances have been achieved with the integration of targeted agents such as bevacizumab, cetuximab and recently, panitumumab. As a result, third-line treatment is now a necessary step in the optimal treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a literature review of English language publications on third-line therapy for MCRC from January 2000 to April 2007. Data on median overall survival (mOS), median time to progression (mTTP) and response rate were recorded.

RESULTS

We found 27 articles and 22 abstracts to fulfil the criteria. Patients who received regimens containing oxaliplatin and infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) demonstrated mTTP up to 7 months and a mOS of 16 months. With irinotecan and 5-FU, mOS around 8 months were reported and with cetuximab combined with irinotecan, the highest mOS was 9.8 months.

CONCLUSION

Third-line therapy in advanced colorectal cancer may improve mOS for patients with MCRC. Therefore, randomized studies should be conducted in the future.

Prognostic factors predictive of response and survival to a modified FOLFOX regimen: importance of an increased neutrophil count

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to identify prognostic indicators of survival and response in a homogeneous population of chemotherapy-naive patients treated with oxaliplatin as part of 3 successive trials.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patient data were derived from 3 successive phase II trials evaluating modifications of the FOLFOX4 (oxaliplatin/5-fluorouracil/leucovorin) regimen. Clinical and laboratory prognostic factors were identified from the literature. Multifactor analyses stratified by treatment cohort were performed to identify independent prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and response rate.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-four patients were enrolled across all 3 studies. Reduced PFS (n = 128) was associated with patients with the following characteristics: no previous surgery (P = 0.003); previous adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.015); > 1 organ involvement (P = 0.001); baseline absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > or = upper limit of normal (P = 0.001); and time from diagnosis to metastases < 9 months (P = 0.043). Poor OS (n = 128) was associated with patients with the following characteristics: performance status > 1 (P < 0.001); > 1 organ involvement (P = 0.018); and baseline ANC > or = upper limit of normal (P < 0.001). Response rate was related to previous surgery (P = 0.017) and performance status (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

This analysis has identified the additional prognostic importance of an increased ANC for PFS and OS. Further consideration needs to be given to include markers of systemic inflammation such as ANC as well as relevant cytokine levels in a larger cohort of identically treated patients.

Prognostic factors in patients with recently diagnosed incurable cancer: a systematic review

GOALS OF WORK

To review the literature and develop a conceptual framework about prognostic factors for people presenting to medical oncologists with recently diagnosed incurable cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medline was searched from January 2000 to October 2003 to identify articles testing associations between clinical or laboratory variables and survival time in adults with advanced solid tumours and median survival of 3 to 24 months. We recorded how frequently prognostic factors were significantly associated with survival in univariable and multivariable analyses.

RESULTS

There were 53 studies included. The factors associated with survival were organised into four categories related to attributes of the host the tumour, the treatment and the interactions between host, tumour and treatment (symptoms, quality of life, performance status and laboratory tests). Co-morbidity was consistently associated with shorter survival. Age and gender were not consistently associated with survival duration, except in lung cancer where females survived longer. Tumour-related factors associated with shorter survival included primary tumour (lung), metastatic site (liver, brain and visceral) and disease extent. Symptoms associated with shorter survival included those of the anorexia-cachexia syndrome, dyspnoea, pain and impaired physical well being. Performance status was strongly associated with survival in most studies. Laboratory tests associated with shorter survival included anaemia, thrombocytopenia, hypoalbuminaemia and elevated serum levels of both alkaline phosphatase and lactate dehydrogenase.

CONCLUSION

Prognostic factors in patients with advanced cancer can be conceptualised as attributes of the host, tumour, treatment and interactions between the three reflected in symptoms, quality of life performance status and laboratory tests.

Predictive factors for response to chemotherapy in colorectal cancer patients

Colorectal cancer represents a major health problem in the western world. A lot of drugs have been employed in treatment of this disease, but only few data are available about predictive factors for response to anticancer treatments in colorectal cancer. Aim of this paper is to review the main data about this investigation field. Using a Medline database search (1966-2003) we reviewed all the relevant papers that investigate clinical and molecular predictors for response to the main drugs used in the treatment of colorectal cancer patients, both in adjuvant and in advanced setting. Moreover we comprehensively reviewed all the data published in abstract form during the most significant international meetings. Our review put in evidence the most important predictive factors for response in colorectal cancer patients treated with anticancer chemotherapy both in adjuvant and in advanced setting. The predictive factors are clustered on the basis of the different anticancer drugs. The results of this review provide the rationale basis for personalizing anticancer treatment in colorectal cancer patients by molecular and clinical features, aiming to improve response rate and reduce toxicities.