Oromandibular reconstruction using a third free flap in sequence in recurrent carcinoma

Multiple Sequential Free Flap Reconstructions of the Head and Neck: A Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Free flap reconstruction is the standard of care in extensive defects of the head and neck area, and although most patients may be treated sufficiently with one flap, recurrence of a malignant tumor or failure of a previous reconstruction may make the use of a second (or more) flap necessary. The aim of this study was to evaluate the indications and success rates of multiple consecutive reconstructive procedures in a large cohort of patients.

METHODS

Nine hundred ninety-six free flap reconstructions were retrospectively analyzed and cases of sequential reconstructions in the same patient were identified. Indications, success rates, perioperative procedures, and frequently used flaps were evaluated.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty cases of sequential microvascular reconstructions were identified, ranging from two to six flaps per patient. The overall flap success rate was 89.1 percent. A history of diabetes was identified as a risk factor for flap failure (p = 0.029). There was no association of flap loss with the number of reconstructive procedures per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of several free flaps in the same patient is a feasible option for patients suffering from recurrent tumors or to improve quality of life by a secondary reconstruction. A salvage free flap transfer to replace a lost transplant exhibits good success rates.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Recipient vessel selection for multiple free flap transfers in head and neck reconstruction at different periods

BACKGROUND

Treatment decisions can be challenging in patients undergoing multiple oropharyngeal microsurgical reconstructions at different periods by various causes. We, retrospectively, reviewed patients with at least three consecutive free flap reconstructions to determine the optimal strategy for selecting recipient vessels.

METHODS

Then, 36 patients (33 men and 3 women) who underwent at least 3 microsurgical reconstructions with a total of 51 free flap transfers for head and neck defects were included in this report. The most common reason for multiple microsurgical reconstructions was recurrent disease. For reconstructions, recipient vessel candidates on the same side of the head and neck were prioritized; if ipsilateral vessels were unavailable, contralateral recipient vessels, which might necessitate vein grafts, were used.

RESULTS

The most common reconstructions were anterolateral thigh flaps (19 cases). The most commonly used contralateral recipient vessels were the superior thyroid artery, facial artery, and external jugular vein. All vessel anastomoses were performed using the end-to-end method. Postoperative complications occurred at the sites of 26 free flap reconstructions. The overall flap reconstruction success rate in patients with at least three surgeries was 90.2%. The median follow-up duration was 25.8 months. During follow-up, 26 patients survived until the end of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing multiple free flap reconstructions, recipient vessels on the ipsilateral side that have not been subjected to radiation should be selected first. Recipient vessels contralateral to the reconstruction side can then be selected; however, they may require vein grafts. Finally, distant healthy recipient vessels can be selected through vein grafting.

Is sequential free flap safe in oral cancer reconstruction in the same patient? An outcome and complication analysis

BACKGROUND

Sequential free flap reconstruction in patient with head and neck cancer can provide reliable and effective wound coverage. Only a few studies have reported on the outcome and complications analysis but without consensus on the recipient vessels and flap chosen. Herein, we presented the outcome and analysed the risk factors for complications in sequential free flap reconstruction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who had sequential free tissue transfers due to cancer recurrence, second primary cancer, or secondary correction of the soft tissue contractures and volume deficits were all included. Variables extracted included demographics, comorbidities, free flap characteristics, infection, dehiscence and flap necrosis rates.

RESULTS

In total, 40 patients with 92 free flaps were analyzed; 42 initial and 50 sequential free flaps. The most common recipient vessels for sequential flap were contralateral superficial thyroid vessels (68%). The most common flap for both initial and sequential free flap was anterolateral thigh flap (64.3 and 62%). The success rate of sequential free flap was 92.0 compared to 92.9% for initial free flap, which showed no significant difference. Female was independently associated with delayed wound healing with an odds ratio of 90.91 (95% confidence interval 0.001-0.17, P = 0.001), as well as diabetes with an odds ratio of 31.14 (95% confidence interval 2.60-373.19, P = 0.007). Sequential free flap was not a risk factor for any complication.

CONCLUSIONS

Sequential free flap is a reliable method for head and neck surgery without more complication rate comparing to initial free flap reconstruction. More attentions should be paid on patients with preferential risk for certain complications.

Comparison of Internal Jugular Vein System Anastomosis and External Jugular Vein System Anastomosis in Free Flaps for Head and Neck Reconstruction: A Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the differences in postoperative thrombosis and flap failure between internal jugular vein (IJV) system anastomosis and external jugular vein (EJV) system anastomosis in free flaps for the reconstruction of head and neck defects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Chinese BioMedical Literature Database, and other databases until March 2019 for studies that had reported data for anastomosis for the 2 different venous systems in the microvascular free-flap reconstruction of head and neck defects. We assessed thrombosis and flap failure in patients undergoing anastomosis of the IJV system and patients undergoing anastomosis of the EJV system.

RESULTS

Nine studies with a total of 2051 patients with venous anastomosis were included in the present meta-analysis. IJV system anastomosis showed a significantly lower incidence of venous thrombosis than did the EJV system (relative risk [RR], 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37 to 0.82). Eight studies were included in the analysis of the flap failure rate, which showed a lower failure rate for the IJV system anastomosis than for the EJV system (RR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.35 to 1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of thrombosis and flap failure after venous anastomosis in the IJV system was lower than that in the EJV system. The results from the present study have shown that the IJV system should be the first choice for venous anastomosis in the reconstruction of free flaps.

Third Repeat Microvascular Reconstruction in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Aged 65 Years and Older: A Longitudinal and Sequential Analysis

Performing a sequential third free flap for reconstruction of a head and neck defect after cancer resection can be challenging, and the problem is further compounded in elderly patients. The outcomes in this clinical scenario are currently unknown and this study aims to compare the results in elderly patients with younger patients in a high-volume microsurgical unit. A retrospective review of 126 consecutive patients who had undergone three sequential free flap reconstructions after head and neck cancer was performed. The patients were divided into two groups – older or younger than 65 years old (n = 105 and n = 21, respectively). Patient demographics, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were noted and analyzed. The overall flap success in this patient cohort was 94.4% (7 flap losses in 126 patients). Cardiovascular complications were significantly more common in the older group (19% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.001). Delirium occurred more frequently in the older group compared with the younger group (23.8% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.023). There were no significant differences regarding surgical complications. With adequate planning, a sequential third free flap can be performed safely and successfully in patients who are more than 65 years of age. Particular attention to the perioperative morbidity in elderly patients is crucial for successful outcomes.

The retrograde transverse cervical artery as a recipient vessel for free tissue transfer in complex head and neck reconstruction with a vessel-depleted neck

BACKGROUND

Reconstruction in a vessel-depleted neck is challenging. The success rates can be markedly decreased because of unavailability of suitable recipient vessels. In order to obtain a reliable flow, recipient vessels away from the zone of fibrosis, radiation, or infection need to be explored. The aim of this report is to present our experience and clinical outcomes using the retrograde flow coming from the distal transverse cervical artery (TCA) as a source for arterial inflow for complex head and neck reconstruction in patients with a vessel-depleted neck.

METHODS

Between July 2010 and June 2016, nine patients with a vessel-depleted neck underwent secondary head and neck reconstruction using the retrograde TCA as recipient vessel for microanastomosis. The mean age was 49.6 years (range, 36 to 68 years). All patients had previous bilateral neck dissections and all, except one, had also received radiotherapy. Indications included neck contracture release (n = 3), oral (n = 1), mandibular (n = 3) and pharyngoesophageal (n = 2) reconstruction necessitating free anterolateral thigh (n = 3) and medial sural artery (n = 1) perforator flaps, fibula (n = 3) and ileocolon (n = 2) flaps respectively.

RESULTS

There was 100% flap survival rate with no re-exploration or any partial flap loss. One case of intra-operative arterial vasospasm at the anastomotic suture line was managed intra-operatively with vein graft interposition. There were no other complications or donor site morbidity during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

In a vessel-depleted neck, the reverse flow of the TCA may be a reliable option for complex secondary head and neck reconstruction in selected patients.

Feasibility and Outcomes of the Third or More Episodes of Sequential Microvascular Reconstruction for Recurrent or Second Primary Oral Cancer

BACKGROUND

This study was a robust examination of the clinical outcomes and technical feasibility of sequential microvascular reconstruction for recurrent or second primary oral cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of adult patients undergoing microvascular reconstruction of head and neck oncologic defects was performed at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, spanning 10 years. The patients were divided into three groups as follows: first episode, second episode, and third or more episodes of reconstruction. Demographics, operative details, and clinical outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 3186, 319, and 62 patients who respectively received first, second, and third or more episodes of reconstruction. The most common tumor sites were the tongue (36.9 %) and the buccal region (36.8 %), with squamous cell carcinoma as the prevalent histology. The anterior lateral thigh was the most popular donor site used (76.1 %). The third or more episodes of microvascular reconstruction were associated with an increased incidence of flap failure (8.1 %) relative to the first (1.9 %; p = 0.003) and the second (1.6 %; p = 0.01) episodes. Re-exploration of venous occlusion (9.7 vs. 3.2 %), neck wound infections (53.2 vs. 35.5 %), fistula (17.7 vs. 8.1 %), and hospital stay (28.9 ± 14.6 vs. 25.3 ± 10.1) also showed significantly higher values for the third or more episodes group than for the first episode group.

CONCLUSIONS

Sequential microvascular reconstruction for recurrent or second primary oral cancer is associated with an increased incidence of postoperative complications. However, in appropriate candidates for repeat ablation, microvascular reconstruction remains the gold standard for attaining functional and cosmetic outcomes.

The role of the internal mammary vessels as recipient vessels in secondary and tertiary head and neck reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Successful microsurgical free tissue transfer for head and neck reconstruction highly depends on the quality of the recipient vessels. In most cases, vessels near the site of resection are available; however, when the bilateral vascular network in the neck is compromised or inaccessible due to prior surgery and/or irradiation, alternatives have to be sought.

METHODS

Secondary or tertiary head and neck reconstruction was performed using the internal mammary vessels (IMVs) as recipient vessels in seven patients who had undergone previous neck dissection and radiation therapy. Indications were: tracheal-oesophageal fistula or stenosis (n = 4), oesophageal-cutaneous fistula (n = 1), saliva fistula (n = 1) and oral cancer (n = 1). Free flaps used for reconstruction were radial forearm flap (FRFF) (n = 5), anterolateral thigh flap (ALT) (n = 3) and transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap (TRAM) (n = 1). Within two patients an additional ALT flap was necessary for soft-tissue coverage and resurfacing of the neck. The IMVs were separately exposed in a standard fashion over the second or third rib. The pedicle of the flap was anastomosed anterograde and end-to-end to the recipient vessels in all cases. Mean pedicle length was 14.3 cm (11-20 cm), with a mean distance of 9.8 cm (7-13 cm) between the resection and recipient vessel site.

RESULTS

All patients were tumour free at time of re-operation and no sign of radiation injury was observed in the recipient vessels. All flaps survived and all patients healed without major complications. Mean follow-up time was 18 months. Four patients died of local recurrence or distant metastases during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

In the vessel-depleted neck, the IMVs are a reliable and easy accessible recipient area for microsurgical reconstruction of the head and neck. Surgical management and technique refinements for dissection of the vessels are discussed. In combination with free flaps with a long pedicle, especially perforator flaps, vein grafts are unnecessary and microsurgery can safely be performed outside the zone of injury.

Reconstruction of head and neck defects: a systematic approach to treatment

Reconstruction of composite maxillofacial defects after tumor excision or trauma is difficult. The role of the reconstructive surgeon is to have a diverse armamentarium of reconstructive options to enable an aesthetic and functional reconstruction while minimizing the morbidity to the patient. This article will present a systematic review of composite maxillofacial reconstruction with free tissue transfer.

Selection of recipient vessels in microsurgical free tissue reconstruction of head and neck defects

The development of microsurgical techniques has facilitated proper management of extensive head and neck defects and deformities. Bone or soft tissue can be selected to permit reconstruction with functional and aesthetic results. However, for free tissue transfer to be successful, proper selection of recipient vessels is as essential as the many other factors that affect the final result. In this article selection strategies for recipient vessels for osteocutaneous free flaps, soft tissue free flaps, previously dissected and irradiated areas, recurrent and subsequent secondary reconstructions, simultaneous double free flap transfers in reconstruction of extensive composite head and neck defects, and the selection of recipient veins are reviewed in order to provide an algorithm for the selection of recipient vessels for head and neck reconstruction.

Success of Multiple, Sequential, Free Tissue Transfers to the Head and Neck

INTRODUCTION

Free tissue transfer has become the primary reconstructive modality for significant ablative defects in the head and neck. The overall success rate is high, approaching 95% in most centers. The success rate of multiple sequential free flaps has been thought to be lower, based on the absence of optimal vessel availability and the presence of significant scar tissue in the previously operated patient. We evaluated a series of patients who underwent multiple free flaps at different time points to determine the overall success rate and to identify pitfalls encountered in this population.

METHODS

Retrospective review, tertiary care medical center.

RESULTS

From 1995 to 2002, 377 free flaps were performed by our reconstructive service. Of this group, 36 underwent multiple free flaps at different time points. Thirty-two had two flaps, and four had three flaps. Reasons for performing sequential free flap procedures were as follows: recurrent disease/new primary (18), need for further augmentation (10), failed previous flap (6), delayed mandibular reconstruction after plate fracture (2), mandibular osteoradionecrosis (3), and delayed pharyngoesophageal stenosis (1). The overall failure rate on the second and third flap was 2 of 32 and 0 of 4, respectively, with an overall success rate of 94%.

CONCLUSION

Multiple, sequential, free tissue transfer for reconstruction of head and neck defects is a safe and reliable procedure with success rates equal to that in patients undergoing initial free flap reconstruction. Careful preoperative planning can result in optimal outcomes even in this difficult patient population.

Chimeric flap in clinical use

With the development of modern microsurgical reconstruction, there are several alternative methods for the complicated head and neck defect or injured extremity. The double-paddled flap, double flaps, and double flap with vascular flow-through linkage are good tools for extensive wide, composite, and three-dimensional defects. When faced with a difficult reconstruction, the expense, morbidity of the donor site, and operative time must be taken into consideration. Compared with other combined composite flaps and other methods, the chimeric flap has many advantages including: easy three-dimensional insetting, acceptable aesthetic appearance, reduced donor site morbidity, design with the least effort and operation time, and one pair of recipient vessel. The disadvantages of the chimeric flaps include: the variation of perforators, the requirement of a learning curve, and, sometimes, the need for a second venous drainage or shifting to double flaps. Overall, in selected cases, the chimeric flap is a good option for the reconstruction of extensive, composite, and three-dimensional defects.

The outcome of failed free flaps in head and neck and extremity reconstruction: what is next in the reconstructive ladder?

The indications for free flaps have been more or less clarified; however, the course of reconstruction after the failure of a free flap remains undetermined. Is it better to insist on one's initial choice, or should surgeons downgrade their reconstructive goals? To establish a preliminary guideline, this study was designed to retrospectively analyze the outcome of failed free-tissue transfers performed in the authors hospital. Over the past 8 years (1990 through 1997), 3361 head and neck and extremity reconstructions were performed by free-tissue transfers, excluding toe transplantations. Among these reconstructions, 1235 flaps (36.7 percent) were transferred to the head and neck region, and 2126 flaps (63.3 percent) to the extremities. A total of 101 failures (3.0 percent total plus the partial failure rate) were encountered. Forty-two failures occurred in the head and neck region, and 59 in the extremities. Evaluation of the cases revealed that one of three following approaches to handling the failure was taken: (1) a second free-tissue transfer; (2) a regional flap transfer; or (3) conservative management with debridement, wound care, and subsequent closure by secondary intention, whether by local flaps or skin grafting. In the head and neck region, 17 second free flaps (40 percent) and 15 regional flaps (36 percent) were transferred to salvage the reconstruction, whereas conservative management was undertaken in the remaining 10 cases (24 percent). In the extremities, 37 failures were treated conservatively (63 percent) in addition to 17 second free flaps (29 percent) and three regional flaps (5 percent) used to salvage the failed reconstruction. Two cases underwent amputation (3 percent). The average time elapsed between the failure and second free-tissue transfer was 12 days (range, 2 to 60 days) in the head and neck region and 18 days (range, 2 to 56 days) in the extremities. In a total of 34 second free-tissue transfers at both localizations, there were only three failures (9 percent). However, in the head and neck region, seven of the regional flaps transferred (47 percent) and four cases that were conservatively treated (40 percent) either failed or developed complications that lengthened the reconstruction period because of additional procedures. Six other free-tissue transfers had to be performed to manage these complicated cases. Conservative management was quite successful in the extremities; most patients' wounds healed, although more than one skin-graft procedure was required in 10 patients (27 percent). In conclusion, a second free-tissue transfer is, in general, a relatively more reliable and more effective procedure for the treatment of flap failure in the head and neck region, as well as failed vascularized bone flaps in the reconstruction of the extremities. Conservative treatment may be a simple and valid alternative to second (free) flaps for soft-tissue coverage in extremities with partial and even total losses.