Bioequivalence between ready-to-use recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) in liquid formulation and rhGH for reconstitution

Powder filling of electrospun material in vials: A proof-of-concept study

The present paper reports the powder filling of milled electrospun materials in vials, which contained voriconazole and sulfobutylether-β-cyclodextrin. High-speed electrospinning was used for the production of the fibrous sample, which was divided into 6 parts. Each portion was milled using different milling methods and sizes of sieves to investigate whether the milling influences the powder and filling properties. Bulk and tapped density tests, laser diffraction and angle of repose measurements were applied to characterize the milled powders, while a vibratory feeder was used for the feeding experiments. The correlation between the material property descriptors and the feeding responses was investigated by multivariate data analysis. Based on the results, three samples were chosen for the vial filling, which was accomplished with 3400 mg electrospun material containing 200 mg voriconazole, representative of the commercial product. The feed rate was set to fit the 240 g/h production rate of the electrospinning and the relative standard deviation of three repeated vial filling was determined to see the accuracy of the process. This research shows that by applying a suitable milling method it is possible to process electrospun fibers to a powder, which can be filled into vials and used as reconstitution dosage forms.

Comparative pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation between a new biosimilar and reference recombinant human growth hormone

OBJECTIVE

To extend available dosing options in the treatment of growth hormone deficiency, a comparative pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic phase-1 clinical study involving subcutaneous administration of growth hormone was conducted.

DESIGN

The test formulation (biosimilar recombinant human growth hormone; r-hGH; Somatotropin) and reference formulation (Genotropin®) were tested in 38 adult healthy subjects after their subcutaneous administration of 12.8IU in an open label, single dose, randomized, two period cross over study separated with a washout period of 11days. Endogenous growth hormone release was suppressed by a continuous Octreotide infusion up to 24h after r-hGH administration. All the subjects were evaluated for local tolerance using Wong-Baker Faces pain rating scale and an injection site reaction (ISR) score. Detection of serum levels of r-hGH, insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) was done by suitable validated bio-analytical methods. Assessment of bioequivalence for pharmacokinetic parameters was done using log-transformed area under the curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (C_max) for r-hGH. The pharmacodynamic assessment was done by comparing the area under the effect-time curve (AUEClast) and maximum measured effect concentration (E_max) of IGF-1 and IGFBP-3.

RESULTS

The biosimilar formulation of recombinant human growth hormone fulfilled the predefined bioequivalence criteria for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters.

CONCLUSION

The new biosimilar recombinant human growth hormone bears the potential to become an alternative option for the treatment of growth hormone deficiency.

The safety of switching between therapeutic proteins

INTRODUCTION

The approval of several biosimilars in the past years has prompted discussion on potential safety risks associated with switching to and from these products. It has been suggested that switching may lead to safety concerns. However, data is limited on the clinical effects of switching.

AREAS COVERED

In this review we provide an overview of data related to switching between human recombinant growth hormones, erythropoietins and granulocyte colony stimulating agents. We reviewed data from clinical trials, pharmacovigilance databases and an overview of the literature on the frequency of switching between these products. The review covers both switching between innovator products within the same product class and switching to and from biosimilars.

EXPERT OPINION

Data on the frequency of switching in clinical practice is scarce, but it seems most frequent for erythropoietins. We have found no evidence from clinical trial data or post marketing surveillance data that switching to and from different biopharmaceuticals leads to safety concerns.

Circadian rhythm in serum iron levels

This study was aimed at assessing the circadian rhythm of serum iron levels in Chinese healthy subjects. The project was conducted in 19 healthy, Chinese male subjects following a 4-day diet equilibration. Blood samples were collected on day 5 at 0800, 1000, 1200, 1400, 1600, 1800, 2000, and 2400 hours to determine endogenous serum iron concentrations. Iron concentrations were determined using an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Iron concentration was decreased from morning to afternoon. The minimum value of iron level was 1,987 μg/L at 2000 hours while the maximum was 2,229 μg/L at 1000 hours, and 2,278 μg/L at 1400 hours, respectively, the amplitude was 291 μg/L. This study indicates that when assessing the bioequivalence of iron formulations, baseline levels of iron (obtained before dosing) should not be subtracted simply from the amount obtained on the drug dosing day to yield the net effect of iron formulation administration. More valid methods to optimize the design of such bioequivalence studies should be taken into consideration.

Bioequivalence studies for three formulations of a recombinant human growth hormone: challenges and lessons learned

Two bioequivalence (BE) studies in healthy volunteers comparing new formulations of the recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) Nutropin AQ (somatropin [rDNA origin] injection; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA) with the currently marketed formulation (5 mg/mL) were conducted to extend available dosing options. All formulations were administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection ranging in volume from 0.25 to 1.0 mL depending on the formulation concentration. Study A was a 2-period crossover design to assess the BE of 5 and 10 mg/mL. The estimate for relative bioavailability (AUC(0-24 h)) was within the prespecified BE interval (0.80-1.25). However, while the C(max) estimate (1.17) was contained within the range for BE, the 90% CI (0.986-1.38) extended beyond the prespecified BE interval. As a result, Study A failed to show BE between the 5 and 10mg/mL formulations. Review of the data showed unexpected increased variability in the observed C(max). Further review of individual data suggested that in 4 subjects, the GH concentration profile of 1 of the 2 injections closely resembled the absorption kinetics of an intramuscular injection rather than an SC injection. Because study conduct may have contributed to these results, we performed a second study, Study B. This study incorporated injection technique training, a defined injection site, and a larger sample size to accommodate variability. It also included a third formulation, creating a 3-period crossover design to assess the BE of 2.5, 5, and 10 mg/mL. Study B results demonstrated BE of the new 2.5- and 10-mg/mL formulations to the reference 5-mg/mL formulation, and BE to each other, with all 90% CIs within the BE range of 0.80 to 1.25. Thus the challenge of recognizing that design issues could affect outcomes gave us the tools to perform a second study, and the positive results taught us that demonstrating BE is an issue not only of pharmacology, but also of study methodology and execution.

Assessing the bioequivalence of analogues of endogenous substances ('endogenous drugs'): considerations to optimize study design

BACKGROUND

Assessment of the bioequivalence of generic versions of certain reference drugs is complicated by the presence of endogenous levels of said compounds which cannot be distinguished from externally derived compound levels following drug administration. If unaccounted for, the presence of endogenous compound biases towards equivalence in bioequivalence studies of these drugs. Bioequivalence assessments may be complicated further as disposition of the exogenous analogue can be subject to various endogenous processes resulting in nonlinear pharmacokinetics. To overcome these inherent biases a number of different strategies have been employed.

AIMS

To critically review methods used to overcome confounding biases in bioequivalence studies of 'endogenous' drugs.

METHODS

A literature search of the EMBASE and PubMed databases was performed.

RESULTS

The following strategies were identified: ablation/modulation of baseline endogenous substance levels; recruitment of 'substance-deficient' populations; restriction of dietary intake of the relevant substance; standardization of conditions with the potential to affect relevant homeostatic mechanisms; correction for baseline substance levels; and administration of supra-therapeutic drug doses.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of this review key study design concepts, intended to optimize the design of future bioequivalence studies of these so-called 'endogenous drugs', are described. The dual stable isotope method, which could be used in a specific context, is also discussed.

Bioequivalence between novel ready-to-use liquid formulations of the recombinant human GH Omnitrope and the original lyophilized formulations for reconstitution of Omnitrope and Genotropin

OBJECTIVE

Two strengths of a novel ready-to-use liquid preparation of the recombinant human GH (rhGH) Omnitrope were developed to increase the convenience for the patients.

DESIGN

Omnitrope 3.3 mg/ml solution or Omnitrope 6.7 mg/ml solution was compared to Omnitrope 5 mg/ml powder and Genotropin 5 mg/ml powder in terms of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and local tolerance after a single s.c. dose of 5 mg.

METHODS

Two randomized, double-blind, single-dose, three-way crossover studies were carried out in 36 young healthy volunteers each. Endogenous GH secretion was suppressed with a 25-h continuous i.v. infusion of octreotide (40 microg/h) starting 1 h before rhGH administration.

RESULTS

Pharmacokinetic parameters were similar for the three treatments in both studies respectively. Bioequivalence criteria were met for area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and C(max). Likewise, the pharmacodynamic parameters for IGF1, IGF-binding protein 3, and non-esterified fatty acid were similar for all preparations. No differences in adverse events were observed between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Omnitrope 3.3 mg/ml solution, 6.7 mg/ml solution, and 5 mg/ml powder, and Genotropin 5 mg/ml powder are bioequivalent, have similar pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles, and are equally safe. Overall, the products can be considered to be therapeutically interchangeable.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of growth hormone in patients on chronic haemodialysis compared with matched healthy subjects: an open, nonrandomized, parallel-group trial

BACKGROUND

GH may be beneficial in treating patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). However, the efficacy and safety of GH could be compromised by the potential for accumulation in the circulation.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to investigate the pharmacokinetics and safety of GH treatment in ESRD patients.

DESIGN

This was an open, nonrandomized, single-centre parallel-group study lasting 8-9 days.

SUBJECTS

Eleven adult ESRD patients and 10 matched healthy individuals received recombinant human GH (50 microg/kg/day for 7 days) by subcutaneous injection; there were two dose reductions (25%) from Day 5/7. ESRD patients underwent dialysis four times.

MEASUREMENTS

Serum concentrations of GH, insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), insulin-like growth factor binding protein-I (IGFBP-I), IGFBP-III and GHBP were measured. The primary end-point was GH exposure [area-under-the-curve (AUC) calculated from the 24-h profile] on Days 7-8.

RESULTS

GH AUC(0-24 h) was greater for patients (387.91 +/- 134.13 microg h/l) than healthy subjects (225.35 +/- 59.63 microg h/l) and the 90% confidence interval (CI) for the estimated patient : healthy subject ratio (1.40-2.07) was not within the acceptance interval (0.67-1.50). GH AUC(18-24 h) for patients and healthy subjects (3.03 +/- 2.71 microg h/l and 6.37 +/- 4.21 microg h/l) returned approximately to baseline (2.86 +/- 3.91 microg h/l and 1.09 +/- 1.43 microg h/l); terminal half-life (t(1/2,z)) was shorter for patients (2.28 +/- 00.43 h vs. 3.23 +/- 00.75 h). No major safety issues were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Results demonstrate a difference between patients and healthy subjects regarding GH AUC(0-24 h). However, GH concentrations for both groups were comparable to baseline by 20-22 h, thus GH was not retained in the circulation of ESRD patients.

High serum levels of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) during high-dose GH treatment in short children born small for gestational age

CONTEXT

Epidemiological studies have indicated that high serum levels of GH and IGF-I are associated with long-term risks.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to evaluate the changes in serum levels of GH during overnight profiles, IGF-I, and IGF binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3) in short small for gestational age (SGA) children during GH treatment with two doses.

PATIENTS

Thirty-six prepubertal short SGA children were the subjects of this study.

INTERVENTION

Subjects received 1 (group A) or 2 (group B) mg GH/m(2).d.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

At baseline and after 6 months of GH treatment, overnight GH profiles were performed, and serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels were measured.

RESULTS

After 6 months, group B had significantly higher GH levels during the profile (mean, maximum, and area under the curve above zero line) than group A (P < 0.009). In group B, maximum GH levels increased from 43.9-161 mU/liter (P < 0.0002), and in group A, from 57.2-104 mU/liter (P = 0.002). During the profile (i.e. 12 h per day), children of group B had mean GH levels of 64.4 vs. 34.8 mU/liter in group A (P = 0.001). The IGF-I and IGF-I to IGFBP-3 ratio sd scores increased significantly in both groups, but were higher in group B than A [1.5 vs. 0.2 (P = 0.002) and 1.4 vs. 0.3 (P = 0.007), respectively]. In group B, 74% of the children had IGF-I levels in the highest quintile during GH treatment compared with 19% in group A.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that high-dose GH treatment in short SGA children results in high serum GH and IGF-I levels in most children. We recommend monitoring IGF-I levels during GH therapy to ensure that these remain within the normal range.

Liquid Growth Hormone: Preservatives and Buffers

Growth hormone (GH) treatment is a successful medical therapy for children and adults with GH deficiency as well as for growth retardation due to chronic renal disease, Turner syndrome and in children born small for gestational age. For all of these conditions, treatment is long term and patients receive daily subcutaneous injections of GH for many years. Patient compliance is therefore of critical importance to ensure treatment benefit. One of the major factors influencing compliance is injection pain. Besides the injection device used, pain perception and local tissue reaction following injection are dependent on the preservative used in the formulation and the concentration of GH. Injection pain may also be related to the buffer substance and injection volume. A liquid formulation of GH, Norditropi SimpleXx, has been developed that dispenses with the need for reconstitution before administration. The formulation uses phenol (3 mg/ml) as a preservative (to protect product from microbial degradation or contamination) and histidine as a buffer. Alternative preservatives used in other GH formulations include m-cresol (9 mg/ml) and benzyl alcohol (3-9 mg/ml). Buffering agents include citrate and phosphate. Phenol has been successfully used as a preservative in drug formulations for more than 50 years and is considered a safe and effective agent which complies with strict international requirements for preservatives in drug formulations. In toxicological studies, no or only mild local reactions have been observed following subcutaneous administration of phenol (7.5 mg/ml), m-cresol (3-4 mg/ml) and benzyl alcohol (9 mg/ml). No general toxicity reactions were observed after subcutaneous administration of these agents. Clinical evaluation of the preservatives and buffers used in Norditropin SimpleXx showed that pain perception was similar between formulations containing phenol and benzyl alcohol, whereas m-cresol was associated with more painful injections than benzyl alcohol. Furthermore, patients reported more pain following injection of a citrate-buffered solution than after a histidine-buffered solution. More pain was also reported following large volume injections and following injections with solutions containing high protein concentrations. In summary, optimization of the preservative and buffer content of a liquid GH formulation may reduce injection pain and lead to improved patient compliance.