Pure class III antiarrhythmic drugs: focus on dofetilide

Prediction of drug pro-arrhythmic cardiotoxicity using a semi-physiologically based pharmacokinetic model linked to cardiac ionic currents inhibition

Drug-induced torsades de pointes (TdP) risks are responsible for the withdrawal of many drugs from the market. Nowadays, assessments of drug-induced TdP risks are mainly based on maximum effective free therapeutic plasma concentration (EFTPCmax) and cardiac ionic current inhibitions using the human ventricular myocytes model (Tor-ORd model). Myocytes are targets of drug-induced TdP. The TdP risks may be directly linked to myocyte drug concentrations. We aimed to develop a semi-physiologically based pharmacokinetic (Semi-PBPK) model linked to cardiac ionic current inhibition (pharmacodynamics, PD) (Semi-PBPK-PD) to simultaneously predict myocyte drug concentrations and their TdP risks in humans. Alterations in action potential duration (ΔAPD90) were simulated using the Tor-ORd model and ionic current inhibition parameters based on myocyte or plasma drug concentrations. The predicted ΔAPD90 values were translated into in vivo alterations in QT interval(ΔQTc) induced by moxifloxacin, dofetilide, or sotalol. Myocyte drug concentrations of moxifloxacin, dofetilide, and sotalol gave better predictions of ΔQTc than plasma. Following validating the developed semi-PBPK-PD model, TdP risks of 37 drugs were assessed using ΔAPD90 and early afterdepolarization occurrence, which were estimated based on 10 × EFTPCmax and 10 × EFTMCmax (maximum effective free therapeutic myocyte concentration). 10 × EFTMCmax gave more sensitive and accurate predictions of pro-arrhythmic cardiotoxicity and the predicted TdP risks were also closer to clinic practice than 10 × EFTPCmax. In conclusion, pharmacokinetics and TdP risks of 37 drugs were successfully predicted using the semi-PBPK-PD model. Myocyte drug concentrations gave better predictions of ΔQTc and TdP risks than plasma.

Class III effects of dofetilide and arrhythmias are modulated by [K+]o in an in vitro model of simulated-ischemia and reperfusion in guinea-pig ventricular myocardium

To evaluate class III effects of clinically relevant concentrations of dofetilide (5 and 10 nmol/l) and the effects of extracellular potassium [K+]o modulation of arrhythmias onset at the level of the "border zone," we used a previously reported in vitro model whereby normoxic and ischemic/reperfused zones were studied. Guinea-pig right ventricular strips (driven at 1 Hz at 36.5+/-0.5 degrees C) were superfused with Tyrode's solution in oxygenated (HCO3- 25 mmol/l, K+ 4 mmol/l, pH 7.35+/-0.05, glucose 5.5 mmol/l: normal zone) and ischemia-simulating conditions (HCO3- 9 mmol/l, pH 6.90+/-0.05, no oxygen and no glucose: altered zone) having either [K+]o 4 (n=20), 8 (n=20) or 12 (n=20) mmol/l. Action potentials in normal and altered zones were recorded simultaneously during 30 min of simulated-ischemia and after 30 min of reperfusion with oxygenated Tyrode's solution. Each preparation served as control for successive phases of dofetilide studies (at 5 and 10 nmol/l) and action potential values were normalized to those present at the beginning of the experiment. During simulated-ischemia, the higher the [K+]o the worse were action potential changes, although full recovery was seen upon 30 min of reperfusion in all [K+]o groups. A high incidence of ischemia/reperfusion arrhythmias was observed in 4 and 12 mmol/l [K+]o groups as opposed to a low incidence of arrhythmias in 8 mmol/l [K+]o group. Dofetilide at 5 and 10 nmol/l with all [K+]o explored: (i) exhibited class III effects, (ii) was effective (or neutral) against ventricular arrhythmias during both simulated-ischemia and reperfusion, and (iii) did not globally increase the dispersion of action potential durations between normal and altered zones. Different arrhythmogenic mechanisms are involved in this model at different [K+]o with 8 mmol/l providing relative protection. Class III effects of dofetilide are evident in the normal zone when in the ischemic-like zone [K+]o ranges from 4 to 12 mmol/l. Thus dofetilide did not increase dispersion of repolarization and had either an antiarrhythmic or a neutral effect during ischemia/reperfusion.

A Benefit-Risk Assessment of Class III Antiarrhythmic Agents

With beta-blockers as the exception, increasing doubt is emerging on the value of antiarrhythmic drug therapy following a series of trials that have either shown no mortality benefit or even an excess mortality. Vaughan Williams class I drugs are generally avoided in patients with structural heart disease, and class IV drugs are avoided in heart failure. Unfortunately, arrhythmias are a growing problem due to an increase in the incidence of atrial fibrillation and sudden death. The population is becoming older and more patients survive for a longer time period with congestive heart failure, which again increases the frequency of both supraventricular as well as ventricular arrhythmias. Class III antiarrhythmic drugs act by blocking repolarising currents and thereby prolong the effective refractory period of the myocardium. This is believed to facilitate termination of re-entry tachyarrhythmias. This class of drugs is developed for treatment of both supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. Amiodarone, sotalol, dofetilide, and ibutilide are examples of class III drugs that are currently available. Amiodarone and sotalol have other antiarrhythmic properties in addition to pure class III action, which differentiates them from the others. However, all have potential serious adverse events. Proarrhythmia, especially torsade de pointes, is a common problem making the benefit-risk ratio of these drugs a key question. Class III drugs have been evaluated in different settings: primary and secondary prevention of ventricular arrhythmias and in treatment of atrial fibrillation or flutter. Based on existing evidence there is no routine indication for antiarrhythmic drug therapy other than beta-blockers in patients at high risk of sudden death. Subgroup analyses of trials with amiodarone and dofetilide suggest that patients with atrial fibrillation may have a mortality reduction with these drugs. However, this needs to be tested in a prospective trial. Similarly, subgroups that will benefit from prophylactic treatment with class III antiarrhythmic drugs may be found based on QT-intervals or - in the future - from genetic testing. Class III drugs are effective in converting atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm and for the maintenance of sinus rhythm after conversion. This is currently by far the most important indication for this class of drugs. As defined by recent guidelines, amiodarone and dofetilide have their place as second-line therapy except for patients with heart failure where they are first line therapy being the only drugs where the safety has been documented for this group of high risk patients.