[Is the Bavarian Population Open for Teledermatology? A Cross-Sectional Study in Rural and Urban Regions of Bavaria, Germany]

Community Dermatology: Current Status and the Way Forward

Community health interventions in dermatology have the potential to deliver healthcare to large populations. Such interventions can bridge the gap between increasing demands from vast populations and limited availability and asymmetric geographical distribution of specialist doctors. This narrative review aims to delineate various areas in which community dermatology initiatives are useful, the different approaches used, and the factors which could determine their effectiveness. We did a PubMed search using the search terms, "Community Health Services"[Mesh]) AND "Dermatology"[Mesh]. A further literature search was performed by cross-referencing these articles. In addition to its primary purpose of increasing access, community involvement can augment medical education, foster research, and help to develop more patient-centered clinical guidelines, understand disease trends and influences of the environment on various diseases, and formulate population-centered health policy. Task shifting, development of culture-sensitive and gender-sensitive community healthcare teams, disease-specific patient support groups, and use of advances in technology such as telemedicine are some of the important methods used in community dermatology. Task shifting may be performed at different levels - general practitioners, pharmacists, nurses, and community health workers. Community interventions harness volunteerism among health professionals as well as various stakeholders in the community. Partnering with non-governmental organizations, involving members of the community, and being a part of a long-term public health program help to sustain community interventions. The interventions should adapt to the ethical and cultural norms of the community. Continuity of care, fidelity, and evidence support are crucial for the success of community interventions in dermatology.

Teledermatology versus Face-to-Face Dermatology: An Analysis of Cost-Effectiveness from Eight Studies from Europe and the United States

(1) Background: The aim of this systematic review was to compare the cost-effectiveness of two follow-up methods (face-to-face and telemedicine) used in dermatology in the last ten years. (2) Methods: A search for articles that included economic analyses was conducted in August 2021 in the databases PubMed, Medline, Scielo and Scopus using the following keywords: "Cost-Benefit Analysis", "Dermatology", "Telemedicine", "Primary Health Care", as well as other search terms and following the PICOS eligibility criteria. (3) Results: Three clinical trials and five observational studies were analyzed, providing information for approximately 16,539 patients (including four cost-minimization or saving analyses, three cost-effectiveness analyses, and one cost-utility analysis) in Europe and the United States. They describe the follow-up procedures in each of the cases and measure and analyze the direct and indirect costs and effectiveness. All the articles indicate that teledermatology lowers costs and proves satisfactory to both patients and professionals. (4) Conclusions: Although it has been found that follow-up via teledermatology can be more efficient than traditional hospital follow-up, more work is needed to establish evaluation protocols and procedures that measure key variables more equally and demonstrate the quality of the evidence of said studies.

Teledermatologie: Fluch oder Segen?

Teledermatologische Dienste haben sich insbesondere während der COVID-19-Pandemie als Alternative zu „Echt“visiten verbreitet. Der Mangel an Dermatologen und die Möglichkeit einer präzisen Diagnose auch bei unterversorgten Regionen macht diese Alternative für alle Beteiligten besonders attraktiv. Trotzdem ist der Bedarf an Schulungen des Personals und der Anwender hoch. Ebenfalls können Implementierungs-, Instandhaltungs- und Wartungskosten der notwendigen Ausrüstung und die Heterogenität der unterschiedlichen Anbieter nachteilig für Patient und Arzt sein. In diesem Artikel werden wesentliche Vorteile und Nachteile der Teledermatologie zusammengefasst.