Needle-knife fistulotomy vs. standard biliary sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis: common bile duct stone recurrence and complication rate

Suprapapillary Needle Knife Fistulotomy Versus Conventional Precut Sphincterotomy in Difficult Biliary Cannulation: A Retrospective Comparative Study

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an important therapeutic tool for many biliary diseases. Selective biliary cannulation is the first step of the treatment process. Needle knife fistulotomy (NKF) and conventional precut sphincterotomy (CPS) are widely used in difficult biliary cannulation. However, there are different results in their effectiveness and safety. This study aimed to compare both methods regarding cannulation success and adverse event profile.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All eligible consecutive patients with naive papillae who underwent biliary ERCP by a single experienced endoscopist over a 3-year period were included retrospectively. The standard cannulation method with a guidewire-loaded sphincterotome was initially used for biliary cannulation in all patients. Cannulation was accepted as difficult in the case of failure of standard cannulation within 5 minutes or despite 5 attempts or insertion of the guidewire to the pancreatic duct 5 times. Three modalities in patients with difficult biliary cannulation were employed according to the structure and configuration of the papillae in addition to unintentional pancreatic cannulation: (1) NKF, (2) CPS, (3) Double guidewire technique or guidewire orientation/precut following pancreatic stenting. Latter was excluded to enable direct comparison between NKF and CPS groups.

RESULTS

A total of 644 patients were recruited. Analyses were performed with 541 patients after the exclusion of 103 patients. Mean (SD) age was 60.4 (18.2) years, and 257 (47.5%) patients were male. While standard cannulation was successful in 366 (67.6%), difficult biliary cannulation was observed in 175 (32.4%) patients. NKF was performed in 101 (57.7%) patients, and cannulation success was 100% in the first ERCP session. In contrast, CPS was performed in 74 (42.3%) patients with a lower cannulation success rate (79.7%) than NKF ( P <0.001). Post-ERCP pancreatitis rate was higher in CPS (9.5%) than NKF group (3.0%, P =0.063). Bleeding and cholangitis were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with difficult biliary cannulation with appropriate papillary structure and configuration, NKF should be used as the first choice in experienced hands because of high biliary cannulation success and low Post-ERCP pancreatitis risk.

Predictive factors of needle-knife pre-cut papillotomy failure in patients with difficult biliary cannulation

Predictors of needle-knife pre-cut papillotomy (NKP) failure for patients with difficult biliary cannulation has not been reported. Between 2004 and 2016, 390 patients with difficult biliary cannulation undergoing NKP were included in this single-center study. Following NKP, deep biliary cannulation failed in 95 patients (24.4%, NKP-failure group) and succeeded in 295 patients (75.6%, NKP-success group). Patient and technique factors were used to identify the predictors of initial NKP failure. Compared with the NKP-success group, periampullary diverticulum (28.4% vs. 18%, p = 0.028), surgically altered anatomy (13.7% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.049), number of cases performed by less experienced endoscopists, and bleeding during NKP (38.9% vs. 3.4%, p < 0.001), were significantly more frequent in the NKP-failure group. On multivariate analysis, surgically altered anatomy (OR 2.374, p = 0.045), endoscopists’ experience (OR 3.593, p = 0.001), and bleeding during NKP (OR 21.18, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with initial failure of NKP. In conclusion, NKP is a highly technique-sensitive procedure, as endoscopists’ experience, bleeding during NKP, and surgically altered anatomy were predictors of initial NKP failure.

A pilot randomized trial to study the success rate of early precut fistulotomy and its effect on radiation dose in patients with difficult biliary cannulation

Background: Role of precut fistulotomy in reducing fluoroscopy time and the radiation dose in difficult selective biliary cannulation is unknown. Methods: We performed a randomized trial where patients with difficult biliary cannulation were randomized into 2 groups: early precut fistulotomy (precut five minutes after failed standard biliary cannulation) or late precut fistulotomy (precut fifteen minutes after failed standard biliary cannulation). We compared the success rates of selective biliary cannulation, fluoroscopy time, radiation dose, complication rates, need for repeat endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) and need for other interventions Results: Of the 130 eligible patients screened, 40 patients were randomized. The technical success was comparable between early and late group. The fluoroscopy time and radiation dose were significantly less in the early group [4 minutes (3, 6) vs 15 minutes (8, 28), p=0.001] and [1.35 mGy (0.90, 1.63) vs 2.40 mGy (1.58, 3.25), p=0.010] respectively. In the late group, 60% required need for rescue precut fistulotomy. One patient from late group developed post ERC pancreatitis while 1 from early group developed perforation. Three needed other interventions due to failed second attempt. Conclusion: Early precut fistulotomy has comparable technical success and reduces the radiation dose as compared to late precut fistulotomy for difficult biliary cannulation.

Cannulation procedure optimization for patients with duodenal papillary tumors

BACKGROUND

The goal of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of needle-knife fistulotomy (NKF) to that of conventional cannulation methods (CCMs) when used for primary biliary access in patients with duodenal papillary tumors.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who had duodenal papillary tumors and who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) were retrospectively enrolled. Successful cannulation rates, cannulation and procedure times, and the prevalence of adverse events were compared between the NKF and CCM groups.

RESULTS

A total of 404 patients (NKF, n = 124; CCM, n = 280) with duodenal papillary tumors were included. The primary and overall cannulation rates were 92.1% (372/404) and 96.0% (388/404), respectively. Compared to CCMs, NKF was associated with a significantly higher successful cannulation rate (99.2% versus 88.9%, P < 0.001) and significantly lower cannulation times (2.1 ± 2.0 min versus 4.7 ± 5.2 min), procedure times (8.8 ± 3.8 min versus 12.9 ± 7.6 min), and unintentional pancreatic duct cannulation rates (1.6% versus 20%), with P < 0.001 for all. Overall adverse events occurred less frequently in the NKF group (3.2% versus 10.7%, P = 0.011). Of these adverse events, post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) was significantly lower in the NKF group than in the CCM group (1.6% versus 6.8%, P = 0.03). Bleeding and cholangitis rarely occurred with either cannulation method (0.8% versus 2.1%, P = 0.681, and 0.8% versus 1.7%, P = 0.671, respectively).

CONCLUSION

NKF is a more effective and safer procedure than CCMs for patients with duodenal papillary tumors.