Spontaneous Heterotopic Pregnancy as an Uncommon Clinical Problem

Should expectant management of heterotopic pregnancy be considered?

KEY MESSAGE

Both expectant and interventional managements are acceptable in selected cases, when heterotopic pregnancy is diagnosed, with high ongoing intra-uterine pregnancy rate and term deliveries.

PURPOSE

Heterotopic pregnancy, though relatively rare, is potentially a life-threatening condition. The aim of the study is to compare expectant versus interventional management of heterotopic pregnancies.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study including all women diagnosed with heterotopic pregnancy on ultrasound from March 2011 to December 2020 in a single medical center. Expectant and interventional management outcomes were compared. Primary outcome was defined as live birth.

RESULTS

Forty-one women were diagnosed with heterotopic pregnancy during the study period. Management was expectant in 10 (24.4%) and interventional in 31 (75.6%) of the women. Expectant management was considered when the patient was stable, and the attending physician decided that the ectopic pregnancy did not continue to develop. Interventions included laparoscopic salpingectomy (n = 26), laparoscopic cornual resection (n = 2), laparotomic cornual resection (n = 1) and gestational sac aspiration (n = 2). The intra-uterine pregnancy continued to develop in 6 (60.0%) and 22 (81.5%) of the women in the expectant and interventional groups, respectively (p = 0.52). All women managed expectantly reached term delivery, as opposed to 17/22 (77.3%) in the intervention management group (p = 0.60). Multivariate analysis found serum β-hCG level as the only independent parameter associated with ongoing pregnancy rate (B = 0.001, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Both expectant and interventional management were found to be acceptable when heterotopic pregnancy was diagnosed, with high ongoing intra-uterine pregnancy rate and term deliveries.

Spontaneous Heterotopic Pregnancy with Unaffected Intrauterine Pregnancy: Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes

Background and objective: Spontaneous heterotopic pregnancy (SHP) is a rare condition represented by the synchronous coexistence of an intrauterine and an ectopic pregnancy. It rarely occurs with natural conception and is usually a consequence of assisted reproductive techniques. Diagnosis of SHP can be a challenge for the clinician. The evolution of the intrauterine pregnancy is dependent on many factors, such as the location of the heterotopic pregnancy, gestational age at the time of diagnosis, the surgical procedure, the presence of other risk factors, early or delayed management. The aim of this systematic review of the literature was to extract existing evidence on spontaneous heterotopic pregnancy with otherwise unaffected intrauterine pregnancy. Materials and Methods: From a total of 1907 database entries identified in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane reviews, we selected 18 papers for narrative synthesis, for which we explored the diagnostic options, treatment, and outcome of these extremely rare epidemiologic occurrences. Manuscripts were assessed using the CARE guidelines for reporting case reports. Results: The main symptom was abdominal pain, and the preferred treatment approach was surgical, more precisely, using a laparoscopic approach. Most cases presented no risk factors, and the diagnosis was mostly made in the first semester. Conclusions: Normal follow-up and evolution of intrauterine pregnancy have been observed regardless of surgical approach (open or laparoscopic). Early diagnosis and treatment are advised, as they impact maternal and fetal outcomes. Evidence on this topic is scarce, predominantly comprised of case reports with variable degrees of adherence to dissemination guidelines. More studies on this topic are required to optimize care protocols for this type of pregnancy.