[Robot-assisted Mediastinal Mass Resection]

Impact of the expanded indication of robot-assisted thoracic surgery for mediastinal tumors

OBJECTIVE

Following the introduction of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) as a health insurance-covered treatment in Japan, we investigated the current status and impact of the expansion of the indications for RATS for mediastinal tumors.

METHODS

Between 2018 and 2022, 209 cases of total mediastinal tumor resection were performed in our hospital. The study period was divided into the first half (January 2018 to June 2020) and the second half (July 2020 to December 2022), and perioperative parameters were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Ninety-six surgical procedures were performed in the first half and 113 in the second half. The percentage of RATS approach was significantly higher in the second half compared with the first half (P < 0.001). Indications for RATS in the second half compared with the first half were significantly increased in patients with stage II (P < 0.001) and stage III (P = 0.026) thymomas, tumor diameter ≥ 50 mm (P < 0.011), and patients undergoing extended thymectomy for myasthenia gravis (P < 0.009). In respect of short-term postoperative parameters, the estimated intraoperative blood loss (P < 0.035), postoperative drain duration (P < 0.037), and postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.011) were significantly lower in the second half than in the first half.

CONCLUSIONS

RATS has recently been expanded for mediastinal tumors with improved short-term outcomes in our hospital after health insurance was applied in Japan. In the future, it will be necessary to discuss the further expansion of its indications by taking into account safety and long-term outcomes.

Advantages of robot-assisted resection of large mediastinal tumors: a single-center preliminary study

Current study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) for sizable mediastinal masses with a minimum diameter ≥6 cm, compared with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and open surgery. This study enrolled 130 patients with mediastinal tumors with no less than 6 cm diameter in Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University, including 33 patients who underwent RATS, 52 patients who underwent VATS and 45 patients who underwent open surgery. After classifying based on mass size and whether it has invaded or not, we compared their clinical characteristics and perioperative outcomes. There was no significant difference in age, gender, mass size, myasthenia gravis, mass location, pathological types (p > 0.05) in three groups. Patients undergoing open surgery typically presenting at a more advanced stage (p < 0.05). No obvious difference was discovered in the average postoperative length of stay, operation duration, chest tube duration and average postoperative day 1 drainage output between RATS group and VATS group (p > 0.05), while intraoperative blood loss in RATS group was significantly lower than VATS group (p = 0.046). Moreover, the postoperative length of stay, operation duration, chest tube duration and intraoperative blood loss in RATS group were significantly lower than open surgery group (p < 0.001). RATS is a secure and efficient approach for removing large mediastinal masses at early postoperative period. In comparison with VATS, RATS is associated with lower intraoperative blood loss. Compared with open surgery, RATS is also associated with shorter postoperative length of stay, operation duration, chest tube duration and intraoperative blood loss.

[Robot-assisted thoracic surgery-Areas of application and limitations]

The proportion of robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) is continuously increasing. The main areas of clinical application are anatomical lung resections with lymphadenectomy and resection of mediastinal tumors. Especially in the area of the thymus robot-assisted procedures can now be considered the gold standard. Overall, the limitations of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) can be overcome by the use of robot-assisted surgery and thus a larger proportion of patients can be treated with minimally invasive procedures. The safety of the RATS procedure has been repeatedly demonstrated, although it remains difficult to demonstrate scientifically measurable benefits. With the introduction of new systems on the market further technical evolution and improvement can be expected in the future.