Trainee participation during screening colonoscopy does not affect ADR at subsequent surveillance, but may result in early follow-up

Effectiveness of switching endoscopists for repeat surveillance colonoscopy: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Surveillance colonoscopy decreases colorectal cancer mortality; however, lesions are occasionally missed. Although an appropriate surveillance interval is indicated, variations may occur in the methods used, such as scope manipulation or observation. Therefore, individual endoscopists may miss certain areas. This study aimed to verify the effectiveness of performing repeat colonoscopies with a different endoscopist from the initial procedure.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a database of 8093 consecutive colonoscopies performed in the Omori Red Cross Hospital from January 1st 2018 to June 30th 2021. Data from repeat total colonoscopies performed within three months were collected to assess missed lesions. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether the two examinations were performed by different endoscopists (group D) or the same endoscopist (group S). The primary outcome in both groups was the missed lesion detection rate (MLDR).

RESULTS

Overall, 205 eligible patients were analyzed. In total, 102 and 103 patients were enrolled in groups D and S, respectively. The MLDR was significantly higher in group D (61.8% vs. 31.1%, P < 0.0001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis for the detection of missed lesions identified performance by the different endoscopists (odds ratio, 3.38; 95% CI, 1.81-6.30), and sufficient withdrawal time (> 6 min) (odds ratio, 3.10; 95% CI, 1.12-8.61) as significant variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, our study showed a significant improvement in the detection of missed lesions when performed by different endoscopists. When performing repeat colonoscopy, it is desirable that a different endoscopist perform the second colonoscopy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Omori Red Cross Hospital on November 28, 2022 (approval number:22-43).

You are not lab rats at teaching hospitals: A systematic review of resident and fellow participation leads to improved colonoscopy

BACKGROUND

Participation in colonoscopies is an essential aspect of endoscopic training. The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of fellow/trainee participation on colonoscopy outcomes.

METHODS

This meta-analysis was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). From database inception to July 2022, studies investigating fellow involvement and colonoscopy outcomes were searched across Cochrane library, PubMed, and other databases. The random-effects model was applied to generate more conservative estimates. Sensitive analysis was conducted to explore whether the result would depend on a particular study. Egger's test and Begg's test were used to estimate the potential for publication bias.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies including 30,062 participants were included. We found that fellow/trainee involvement enhanced the overall rates of adenoma detection and polyp detection (OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.14-1.40, p < 0.001; OR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.02-1.63, p = 0.020, respectively). The mean number of adenoma/polyps per colonoscopy was also higher with fellow/trainee participation (MD = 0.12, 95% CI = 0.08-0.17, p < 0.001; MD = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.02-0.28, p = 0.020, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In addition to its educational purpose, fellow or trainee involvement is associated with beneficial effects on colonoscopy outcomes.

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Performed by Trainees Is Not Associated with Increased Immediate Adverse Events or Technical Failure Rates

BACKGROUND/AIM

Training endoscopists to perform endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is critical to address the increasing patient population with pancreatobiliary diseases. Concerns remain about ERCP safety and success involving trainees. We compared the technical success and immediate adverse events between ERCP with and without trainee involvement.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 28,271 ERCP procedures in a national sample of the United States over 12 years. Demographics, procedure and fluoroscopy time, visualization and cannulation of main structures, adverse events, and technical success rates were compared between ERCP with and without trainees. Categorical variables were compared using Pearson's chi-square test and continuous variables using a standard t-test. Univariate and multivariate regressions were performed adjusting for age, gender, ethnicity, US region, ASA class and clinical setting.

RESULTS

Approximately 49.5% of ERCPs had a trainee involved. The ampulla was visualized in 97.4% with trainee vs. 97.3% without trainee involvement (P = 0.858). The common bile duct was visualized and cannulated in 90.4% with trainees vs. 91.7% without trainees involved (P < 0.001). The ERCP was incomplete in 5.9% of cases with trainees vs. 6.4% without trainees involved (P = 0.207). Trainee participation added 8.7 min to average procedure time (aOR: 1.02, P < 0.001) and 2.0 min to fluoroscopy time (aOR: 1.00, P = 0.796). Adverse events (aOR: 0.89, P = 0.704) and technical success (aOR: 0.83, P = 0.571) were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Trainee involvement leads to increased procedure duration but is not associated with increased immediate adverse events, or technical failure. Our study supports ERCP safety and success with trainee participation.

Impact of Fellow Participation During Colonoscopy on Adenoma Detection Rates

BACKGROUND

An endoscopist's adenoma detection rate (ADR) is inversely related to interval colorectal cancer risk and cancer mortality. Previous studies evaluating the impact of gastroenterology fellow participation in colonoscopy on ADR have generated conflicting results.

AIMS

We aimed to determine the impact of fellow participation, duration of fellowship training, and physician sex on ADR and advanced ADR (AADR).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed average-risk patients undergoing screening colonoscopy at Veterans Affairs New York Harbor Healthcare System Brooklyn Campus and Kings County Hospital Center. Review of colonoscopy and pathology reports were performed to obtain adenoma-specific details, including the presence of advanced adenoma and adenoma location (right vs. left colon).

RESULTS

There were 893 colonoscopies performed by attending only and 502 performed with fellow participation. Fellow participation improved overall ADR (44.6% vs. 35.4%, p < 0.001), right-sided ADR (34.1% vs. 25.2%, p < 0.001), and AADR (15.3% vs. 8.3%, p < 0.001); however, these findings were institution-specific. Year of fellowship training did not impact overall ADR or overall AADR, but did significantly improve right-sided AADR (p-value for trend 0.03). Female attending physicians were associated with increased ADR (47.1% vs. 37.0%, p = 0.0037). Fellow sex did not impact ADR.

CONCLUSIONS

Fellow participation in colonoscopy improved overall ADR and AADR, and female attending physicians were associated with improved ADR. Year of fellowship training did not impact overall ADR or AADR.