[Guideline for Long-Term Oxygen Therapy - S2k-Guideline Published by the German Respiratory Society]

Ambulatory Long-Term Oxygen Therapy in Patients with Severe COPD: A Randomized Crossover Trial to Compare Constant-Minute-Volume and Constant-Bolus Systems

Background and Methods

Constant-minute-volume and constant-bolus devices serve as two different means of portable oxygen conservation. A prospective randomised crossover study was conducted in COPD GOLD IV patients to investigate the effect of these two devices on dyspnea, oxygenation and 6-minute walking test (6MWT) distance. The primary endpoint was the final operating level required (operating level range 1-5 for both devices) by either device to meet the success criteria for mobile oxygen therapy, as outlined in the British Thoracic Society guidelines (SpO2 ≥90% throughout 6MWT; ≥10% increase in walking distance from baseline; improvement in BORG of at least 1 point from baseline).

Results

Twenty-five patients were enrolled in the study and randomly assigned to one of two sequences involving the use of each type of portable oxygen conservation device. 14 female, 67.9 years (±7.8); FEV1: 27.3%pred. (±8.4); PaO2 at rest without oxygen: 50.3mmHg (±5.9). For both systems, 24/25 patients (96%) were successfully recruited. The mean operating-level difference when success criteria were met was -0.58 in favor of the constant bolus device (95% CI: -0.88 to -0.28, P <0.001). Secondary endpoints (walking distance, respiratory rate and BORG dyspnea) showed no statistically significant or clinically relevant differences. An algorithm created especially for this study showed a high success rate in terms of titration for the required operating level.

Conclusion

Both portable oxygen-conserving devices met the success criteria in 96% of patients in the 6MWT when they were titrated to the correct level. The constant-bolus device required a significantly lower operating level to achieve the success criteria, hereby reducing energy consumption. Individual titration of the respective device is recommended, which can be facilitated by the novel titration algorithm described here.

[Neuralgic amyotrophy: a common cause of unilateral and bilateral diaphragmatic pareses]

There are several causes for unilateral or bilateral diaphragmatic paresis. The most common cause is an (intraoperative) injury to the phrenic nerve.However, in up to 20% of cases, no explanation can be found despite extensive workup. Neuralgic amyotrophy (NA, also known as Parsonage-Turner syndrome) is a common underdiagnosed multifocal autoimmune-inflammatory disease that predominantly affects proximal nerve segments of the upper extremities. Classic symptoms include acute onset of severe pain in the shoulder girdle with delayed onset of paresis of the shoulder and arm muscles. In at least 7% of cases, the phrenic nerve is also affected. Based on the annual incidence of NA of 1:1000, the entity as a cause of diaphragmatic dysfunction is probably not as uncommon as previously thought. However, clinical experience shows that this diagnosis is often not considered, and diaphragmatic paresis gets wrongly classified as idiopathic.This is particularly disastrous because in the early stage of NA, medical therapy with corticosteroids is mostly not considered and the possibility that surgical repair of the diaphragm may be performed prematurely, given that the condition may resolve spontaneously many months after symptom onset.The aim of the present article is to raise awareness of the entity of NA as a cause of diaphragmatic paresis and to establish a standardized approach to diagnosis and treatment.

[Latest news on RA-ILD]

Rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) is of high clinical relevance. It not only affects the quality of life but also makes a significant contribution to the mortality rate of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. RA-ILD can present with all known radiological and histopathological patterns seen in other interstitial pneumonias. Among these pneumonias, diffuse alveolar damage (DAD), followed by usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) has the worst prognosis. In addition, acute exacerbation of RA-ILD, which can occur at any time during the disease, is highly lethal. An algorithm for the diagnosis and treatment of RA-ILD is pending and will be addressed in the following article. In addition to immunosuppressants and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD), antifibrotics have recently gained importance in the therapy of RA-ILD.

[Treatment of lung fibrosis in systemic rheumatic diseases (new treatment)]

An interstitial lung disease represents a relevant organ manifestation in many systemic rheumatic diseases (connective tissue disease-interstitial lung disease, CTD-ILD). In 10% of the cases pulmonary fibrosis even results in an underlying systemic disease. The CTD-ILDs are frequently associated with a poor prognosis. Therefore, it is important to test patients with systemic rheumatic diseases timely and regularly for the presence of an ILD. Treatment decisions should be made together with pneumologists and rheumatologists, particularly with respect to the initiation of a specific treatment. Treatment is based on randomized studies only in a few cases and can mostly be derived from case control studies. For systemic sclerosis-associated ILD (SSc-ILD) antifibrotic treatment with nintedanib has also now been approved in addition to an immunosuppressive treatment. For other CTD-ILDs an antifibrotic treatment should be discussed in an interdisciplinary approach depending on the underlying disease corresponding to a progressively fibrosing ILD.

Living conditions and autonomy levels in COPD patients receiving non-invasive ventilation: impact on health related quality of life

BACKGROUND

Research on health-related quality of life (HRQL) has become increasingly important in recent decades. However, the impact of both living conditions and the level of autonomy impairments on HRQL in COPD patients receiving non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is still unclear.

METHODS

The Severe Respiratory Insufficiency Questionnaire (SRI) was used to measure HRQL in a prospective cohort of COPD patients in whom home NIV was already established. Data on sociodemographics, clinical characteristics and standardized levels of autonomy impairment were evaluated. A multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify the factors associated with a reduced HRQL.

RESULTS

A total of 137 patients (67.0 ± 7.8 years, 45% female) were assessed. The mean SRI Summary Score was 54.1 ± 16.9 (95%CI: 51.1-57.1; N = 127). Regular ambulatory care was provided in 76% of patients, but only 37% underwent pulmonary rehabilitation. Overall, 69% of patients lived with family members, while 31% lived alone (family situation). Autonomy impairment levels were most serious in 3%, serious in 14%, and significant in 29% of patients, while 54% had no impairments at all. Of note, higher levels of autonomy impairment were markedly associated with lower SRI scores (regression coefficient - 6.5 ± 1.1 per level; P < 0.001). In contrast, family situation (0.2 ± 3.0; P = 0.959), ambulatory care by a respiratory specialist (1.7 ± 3.6; P = 0.638), and pulmonary rehabilitation (- 0.8 ± 3.1; P = 0.802) did not appear to influence HRQL. Possible subgroup effects were evident for the factors "impaired autonomy" and "living in a nursing home" (P = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

A higher level of autonomy impairment has been identified as the major determinant of reduced HRQL in COPD-patients receiving long-term NIV, particularly in those living in a nursing home. Trial Registration German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00008759).