S3-Leitlinie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten (DGVS) zur Prophylaxe, Diagnostik und Therapie der Hepatitis-B-Virusinfektion – (AWMF-Register-Nr. 021-11)

A Systematic Review of Predictor Composition, Outcomes, Risk of Bias, and Validation of COVID-19 Prognostic Scores

BACKGROUND

Numerous prognostic scores have been published to support risk stratification for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

METHODS

We performed a systematic review to identify the scores for confirmed or clinically assumed COVID-19 cases. An in-depth assessment and risk of bias (ROB) analysis (Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool [PROBAST]) was conducted for scores fulfilling predefined criteria ([I] area under the curve [AUC)] ≥ 0.75; [II] a separate validation cohort present; [III] training data from a multicenter setting [≥2 centers]; [IV] point-scale scoring system).

RESULTS

Out of 1522 studies extracted from MEDLINE/Web of Science (20/02/2023), we identified 242 scores for COVID-19 outcome prognosis (mortality 109, severity 116, hospitalization 14, long-term sequelae 3). Most scores were developed using retrospective (75.2%) or single-center (57.1%) cohorts. Predictor analysis revealed the primary use of laboratory data and sociodemographic information in mortality and severity scores. Forty-nine scores were included in the in-depth analysis. The results indicated heterogeneous quality and predictor selection, with only five scores featuring low ROB. Among those, based on the number and heterogeneity of validation studies, only the 4C Mortality Score can be recommended for clinical application so far.

CONCLUSIONS

The application and translation of most existing COVID scores appear unreliable. Guided development and predictor selection would have improved the generalizability of the scores and may enhance pandemic preparedness in the future.

[Liver transplantation in viral and autoimmune liver diseases]

BACKGROUND

Despite substantial progress in the management of viral and autoimmune liver diseases, these entities remain relevant indications for liver transplantation.

AIMS

To provide an overview of the current knowledge regarding the management of viral and autoimmune liver diseases before and after liver transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Selective literature search, including current guidelines and abstracts of key scientific meetings.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Viral and autoimmune liver disease can be effectively treated in most cases, which has resulted in an overall decline in liver transplantations for this indication group. However, hepatitis D infection and primary sclerosing cholangitis remain difficult-to-treat liver diseases in some patients and may progress to end-stage liver disease despite best possible management. Viral or autoimmune hepatitis can lead to fulminant liver failure requiring emergency liver transplantation. In patients who are transplanted due to viral or autoimmune liver disease, specific measures to prevent recurrence of these diseases after transplantation are mandatory. In view of effective treatment modalities for chronic hepatitis B and C, even liver grafts from donors infected with these viruses can be considered for liver transplantation under certain circumstances.

[Diagnosis and treatment of viral hepatitis B and D in 2024]

Despite the availability of vaccines, hepatitis B remains a significant cause of fulminant hepatitis, liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma worldwide. The increase in reported hepatitis B cases in Germany is attributed to factors such as immigration and the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) screening introduced in 2020 as part of health check-ups. The indication for treatment depends on various factors, including the level of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA and inflammatory activity. Nucleos(t)ide analogues are the preferred treatment option, but functional cure, defined as HBsAg loss, is rare. In principle, treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogues should usually be discontinued after loss of HBsAg, but can be stopped earlier under certain conditions and is currently the subject of ongoing research. Pregnancy and immunosuppression in the context of hepatitis B require special attention. In addition, a possible hepatitis D virus co-infection must always be taken into account, which is why every HBsAg-positive person should be tested for anti-HDV. Since 2020, the entry inhibitor bulevirtide has become a new treatment option alongside pegylated interferon alfa, which represents a significant advance in the treatment landscape.

Safety and efficacy of off-label bulevirtide monotherapy in patients with HDV with decompensated Child-B cirrhosis-A real-world case series

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Chronic hepatitis D is the most debilitating form of viral hepatitis frequently progressing to cirrhosis and subsequent decompensation. However, the HDV entry inhibitor bulevirtide is only approved for antiviral treatment of patients with compensated disease. We aimed for the analysis of real-world data on the off-label use of bulevirtide in the setting of decompensated liver cirrhosis.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

We conducted a retrospective study in patients with HDV with decompensated liver disease at German, Austrian, and Italian centers. We included 19 patients (47% male, mean age: 51 years) with liver cirrhosis Child-Pugh B. The median MELD score was 12 (range 9-17) at treatment initiation. The median observation period was 41 weeks. Virologic response was achieved in 74% and normal alanine aminotransferase was observed in 74%. The combined response was achieved by 42%. The most relevant adverse events included self-limited alanine aminotransferase flares, an asymptomatic increase in bile acids, and the need for liver transplantation. Despite bile acid increases, adverse events were considered unrelated. Clinical and laboratory improvement from Child-Pugh B to A occurred in 47% (n = 9/19). Improvements in the amount of ascites were observed in 58% of the patients initially presenting with ascites (n = 7/12).

CONCLUSIONS

This report on off-label bulevirtide treatment in patients with decompensated HDV cirrhosis shows similar virologic and biochemical response rates as observed in compensated liver disease. Significant improvements were observed in surrogates of hepatic function and portal hypertension. However, this improvement was not seen in all patients. Controlled trials are needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of bulevirtide in decompensated HDV cirrhosis.

[Influence of underlying disease and immunosuppression on the immunocompetence in inflammatory rheumatic diseases]

Patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases have a higher risk of infections in comparison to the general population. For this patient group, in addition to cardiovascular diseases, infections play an important role with respect to morbidity and mortality. Even if it is difficult to make concrete statements with respect to individual diseases, it can be assumed that there is a lower risk of infections in inflammatory joint diseases in comparison to connective tissue diseases and vasculitides. The increased risk of infections is determined by multiple factors, whereby the underlying factors are classified into three main categories: patient-related factors (age, comorbidities, lifestyle), disease-related factors (immunological dysfunction as part of the disease pathophysiology) and drug-related factors (type and dosage of the immunosuppression and/or immunomodulation). An improved understanding of the complexity of these associations enables the optimization of treatment and disease control taking the individual risk factors into account, with the aim of a significant reduction in the risk of infections.

Current Therapy of Chronic Viral Hepatitis B, C and D

The majority of chronic viral hepatitis cases are induced via infection with the hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), or hepatitis D virus (HDV). These patients are at increased risk for progressive liver disease leading to cirrhosis as well as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). HBV infection is well controlled by the currently available nucleosides as well as nucleotides, and the development of cirrhosis can be prevented. Additionally, it has been shown that HBV-induced liver fibrosis can regress during successful antiviral treatment; however, a "functional cure", i.e., loss of HBsAg, is a rare event when these drugs are used. Therefore, novel therapeutic strategies are aiming at the selective suppression of HBsAg levels in combination with immunostimulation. The development of directly acting antivirals (DAAs) has revolutionized HCV therapy, as almost all patients can be cured via this treatment. Additionally, DAA therapy has few, if any, side effects, and is generally well tolerated by patients. HDV remains the most challenging type of chronic viral hepatitis. Although novel therapeutic options have recently been approved, response rates are still less favorable compared to HBV and HCV. This review discusses current and future options for the treatment of chronic HBV, HCV, and HDV infection.

Hyperimmunplasma: Gewinnung, Verarbeitung und therapeutische Anwendungen

Das Prinzip der passiven Immunisierung ist seit dem 19. Jahrhundert bekannt und wird auch bei aktuellen Pandemien als Ansatz zur Prophylaxe und Therapie eingesetzt. Der Schutz wird hierbei übertragen durch Blut, Serum oder Plasma, welche Immunglobuline gegen spezifische Krankheitserreger, Bakterientoxine oder sonstige Antigene enthalten, sowie durch aus Humanplasma industriell aufgereinigte Immunglobuline. Die aktuell verwendeten Reinigungsverfahren für Immunglobuline aus Humanplasma beruhen auf der von Edwin J. Cohn entwickelten Fraktionierung von Plasma. Zur Gewinnung von Immunglobulinen mit hohen Antikörpertitern gegen spezifische Antigene, sogenannte Hyperimmunglobuline, muss zunächst Hyperimmunplasma gezielt von ausgewählten Spendern gewonnen werden. Diese Spender haben erhöhte Antikörpertiter gegen spezifische Krankheitserreger, Bakterientoxine oder sonstige Antigene, wenn sie im Rahmen einer vorangegangenen Infektion natürlich immunisiert wurden, einen zugelassenen Impfstoff zur Immunisierung erhalten haben oder gezielt zum Zweck der Plasmaspende immunisiert wurden. Aktuell sind in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz Hyperimmunglobulinprodukte für verschiedene Anwendungen im Patienten zugelassen, von denen die meisten aus humanem Blutplasma gewonnen werden. Um die Herstellung der Produkte und damit letztlich die Behandlung der Patienten gewährleisten zu können, werden resiliente Lieferketten benötigt. Hierzu bedarf es unter anderem Änderungen in den Rahmenbedingungen für die Spenderimmunisierung in Deutschland.

Evaluation of the Effect of CD70 Co-Expression on CD8 T Cell Response in Protein-Prime MVA-Boost Vaccination in Mice

Here, we investigate the potential of CD70 co-expression during viral vector boost vaccination to improve an antigen-specific T cell response. To determine the chance of activating antigen-specific T cells by CD70, we used the HBV core antigen as a model antigen in a heterologous protein-prime, Modified Vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) boost vaccination scheme. Both the HBV core and a CD70 expression cassette were co-expressed upon delivery by an MVA vector under the same promoter linked by a P2A site. To compare immunogenicity with and without CD70 co-expression, HBV-naïve, C57BL/6 (wt) mice and HBV-transgenic mice were prime-vaccinated using recombinant HBV core antigen followed by the MVA vector boost. Co-expression of CD70 increased the number of vaccine-induced HBV core-specific CD8 T cells by >2-fold and improved their effector functions in HBV-naïve mice. In vaccinated HBV1.3tg mice, the number and functionality of HBV core-specific CD8 T cells was slightly increased upon CD70 co-expression in low-viremic, but not in high-viremic animals. CD70 co-expression did not impact liver damage as indicated by ALT levels in the serum, but increased the number of vaccine-induced, proliferative T cell clusters in the liver. Overall, this study indicates that orchestrated co-expression of CD70 and a vaccine antigen may be an interesting and safe means of enhancing antigen-specific CD8 T cell responses using vector-based vaccines, although in our study it was not sufficient to break immune tolerance.

Distinct Type I Interferon Subtypes Differentially Stimulate T Cell Responses in HIV-1-Infected Individuals

The expression of type I interferons (IFNs) is one of the immediate host responses during most viral infections. The type I IFN family consists of numerous highly conserved IFNα subtypes, IFNβ, and some others. Although these IFNα subtypes were initially believed to act interchangeably, their discrete biological properties are nowadays widely accepted. Subtype-specific antiviral, immunomodulatory, and anti-proliferative activities were reported explained by differences in receptor affinity, downstream signaling events, and individual IFN-stimulated gene expression patterns. Type I IFNs and increased IFN signatures potentially linked to hyperimmune activation of T cells are critically discussed for chronic HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) infection. Here, we aimed to analyze the broad immunological effects of specific type I IFN subtypes (IFNα2, IFNα14, and IFNβ) on T and NK cell subsets during HIV-1 infection in vitro and ex vivo. Stimulation with IFNα14 and IFNβ significantly increased frequencies of degranulating (CD107a⁺) gut-derived CD4⁺ T cells and blood-derived T and NK cells. However, frequencies of IFNγ-expressing T cells were strongly reduced after stimulation with IFNα14 and IFNβ. Phosphorylation of downstream molecules was not only IFN subtype-specific; also, significant differences in STAT5 phosphorylation were observed in both healthy peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and PBMCs of HIV-infected individuals, but this effect was less pronounced in healthy gut-derived lamina propria mononuclear cells (LPMCs), assuming cell and tissue specific discrepancies. In conclusion, we observed distinct type I IFN subtype-specific potencies in stimulating T and NK cell responses during HIV-1-infection.

Microbial Spectra and Clinical Outcomes from Endoscopically Drained Pancreatic Fluid Collections: A Descriptive Cohort Study

Pancreatic pseudocyst (PC) and walled-off necrosis (WON) are dreaded complications of acute pancreatitis. Standard therapy consists of endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural placement of stents to expedite resolution through internal drainage of fluids or necrotic material. Either double pigtail plastic stents (DPPS) or lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS), or a combination of both, are available for this purpose. The objective of this study was to examine the impact of different stent types on infection rates in addition to clinical outcome measures such as periprocedural adverse events. We conducted a retrospective study comprising 77 patients who had undergone endoscopic drainage for PC or WON in a pancreatitis tertiary referral center. Analysis revealed that both bacterial and fungal infections occurred more frequently in patients treated with LAMS with or without DPPS compared to DPPS only. The use of antibiotics and antimycotics followed the same pattern. Furthermore, a prolonged length of hospital stay and a higher likelihood of transfer to an intermediate care unit were observed in patients with LAMS with or without DPPS. These differences were eliminated if only WON patients were analyzed. Our data imply that the clinical course is primarily influenced by the complexity of the pancreatic fluid collection (PFC) itself rather than the stent type. Prospective large-scale cohort studies are mandatory to underpin these findings.

[Treatment of parenterally transmittable viral hepatitis]

Die parenteral übertragbaren Hepatitiden B/D und C und deren Komplikationen sind sowohl weltweit als auch in Deutschland ein nicht zu unterschätzendes Problem. Aufgrund der hohen Dunkelziffer, einer weiteren Verbreitung, insbesondere durch Drogenmissbrauch, steigender Prävalenzen im Rahmen der Immigration sowie einer pandemiebedingten verzögerten Diagnostik stellt die Identifizierung der erkrankten und somit potenziell infektiösen Patienten eine große Herausforderung für das Gesundheitswesen dar. Therapeutisch stehen sowohl bei der Hepatitis B als auch der Hepatitis C hochwirksame, praktisch nebenwirkungsfreie Therapiekonzepte mit einer einmal täglichen Tabletteneinnahme zur Verfügung. Für die Hepatitis B handelt es sich in der Mehrzahl der Fälle um eine Dauertherapie zur Suppression der Replikation, während es bei der Hepatitis C innerhalb weniger Wochen zur Viruselimination kommt. Ein neues Therapiekonzept mit Hemmung der Virusaufnahme zur Behandlung der Hepatitis D steht seit September 2020 erstmals zur Verfügung. Für alle Patienten gilt, dass bei einem eingetretenen fortgeschrittenen Leberschaden oder gar einer Leberzirrhose langfristig eine weitere Überwachung insbesondere zum Ausschluss eines Leberzellkarzinoms notwendig ist.

[Epidemiology of viral hepatitis A to E in Germany]

Viral hepatitis A to E describes various infectious inflammations of the liver parenchyma that are caused by the hepatitis viruses A to E (HAV, HBV, HCV, HDV, and HEV). Although the clinical pictures are similar, the pathogens belong to different virus families and differ in terms of pathogenesis, transmission routes, clinical course, prevention, and therapy options. In Germany, there is mandatory reporting according to the Infection Protection Act (IfSG) for direct or indirect laboratory evidence and for suspicion, illness, and death of viral hepatitis. The data are transmitted to the Robert Koch Institute.In this article, on the basis of published studies and notification data, we describe the epidemiology of hepatitis A to E as well as current challenges and prevention approaches. In particular, the latter contains the improvement of existing vaccination recommendations (hepatitis A and B); improvement of access to prevention, testing, and care including therapy with antiviral drugs (hepatitis B, C, and D) and the detection and prevention of foodborne infections and outbreaks; and improvements in the field of food safety (hepatitis A and E).

[Chronic hepatitis B virus infection: current and future treatment strategies]

Zur Therapie der chronischen Hepatitis-B-Virus-(HBV-)Infektion stehen aktuell pegyliertes Interferon-Alpha und Nucleosid‑/Nucleotidanaloga (Entecavir und Tenofovir) zur Verfügung. Diese Medikamente ermöglichen eine Virussuppression und eine Normalisierung des Leberenzyms Glutamat-Pyruvat-Transaminase (GPT) und verhindern ein Fortschreiten der Lebererkrankung. Zahlreiche noch in klinischer Entwicklung befindliche Therapiestrategien haben jedoch eine funktionelle Heilung zum Ziel. Dabei soll erreicht werden, dass das HBV-Hüllprotein HBsAg im Blutserum nicht mehr nachweisbar ist („ausgeheilte“ Hepatitis B). Der vorliegende Beitrag gibt eine Übersicht über aktuelle und mögliche zukünftige antivirale Therapien gegen die chronische HBV-Infektion. Als Grundlage diente eine Literaturrecherche unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der aktuellen Leitlinien sowie aktueller Kongressbeiträge.

Die aktuell verfügbaren antiviralen Therapien führen nur sehr selten zur Elimination von HBsAg (funktionelle Heilung). Auch ist bisher weitgehend unklar, bei welchen Patienten ein Absetzen der Langzeittherapie mit Entecavir bzw. Tenofovir sinnvoll ist. Neue Therapiestrategien in klinischer Entwicklung führen bei einem höheren Anteil der Patienten zur funktionellen Heilung. Wahrscheinlich ist aber eine Kombination mehrerer antiviraler Strategien erforderlich, um die funktionelle Heilung für die Mehrheit der Patienten zu erreichen. Eine solche Therapie kann voraussichtlich in den nächsten 5–10 Jahren vorliegen.

[Hepatitis B vaccines-history, achievements, challenges, and perspectives]

Die ersten Impfversuche gegen das Hepatitis-B-Virus (HBV) erfolgten 1970, noch bevor die Natur des dafür verwendeten „Australia-Antigens“ bekannt war. Bald darauf wurde dieses Antigen als Hüllprotein des HBV erkannt (HBV Surface Antigen, HBsAg), dann aus HBV-haltigem Plasma gereinigt und später gentechnisch in Hefezellen hergestellt. Die hohe Wirksamkeit des HBsAg-Impfstoffs wurde vielfach bewiesen, insbesondere bei Neugeborenen von HBV-infizierten Müttern, die sonst fast immer chronische HBV-Träger werden. Auch bei älteren Kindern und Erwachsenen schützt die Impfung und wird seit 1984 weltweit angewendet, was zu einer ungefähr 10-fachen Abnahme der HBV-Infektionen bei den Geimpften geführt hat.

Es gibt dennoch verschiedene Herausforderungen bei der Hepatitis-B-Impfung. Bei Neugeborenen von hochvirämischen Müttern kann die Impfung versagen. Bei verringerter Immunkompetenz kann die Bildung schützender Antikörper ausbleiben, aber auch bei Risikofaktoren wie höherem Alter, Rauchen oder Übergewicht. Frühe Impfstudien belegten, dass Impfstoffe mit dem HBsAg-Subtyp adw2 auch gegen HBV mit anderen HBsAg-Subtypen schützen, neuere Beobachtungen zeigen aber, dass die Schutzwirkung gegen heterologe Subtypen schwächer ist. Gelegentlich werden auch Escape-Mutationen beobachtet.

Die meisten jetzigen Impfstoffe beruhen auf dem Kenntnisstand vor 40 Jahren und könnten wesentlich verbessert werden. Eine Einbeziehung der bislang fehlenden PräS-Domänen der HBV-Hülle in die Impfstoffe würde die wichtigsten schützenden T‑ und B‑Zellepitope einbringen. Die Expression in Säugerzellkulturen verbessert die native Faltung der neutralisierenden HBsAg-Epitope und die Verwendung von regional vorherrschenden HBsAg-Subtypen würde die Schutzwirkung erhöhen. Optimale Adjuvanzien oder Epitopträger könnten die Immunogenität auch für eine HBV-Immuntherapie steigern.

[Ten years of the National Reference Center for hepatitis B viruses and hepatitis D viruses in Giessen, Germany: activities and experiences]

The National Reference Center (NRC) for hepatitis B viruses (HBV) and hepatitis D viruses (HDV) has been located at the Institute of Medical Virology of the Justus Liebig University (JLU) in Giessen, Germany, since its establishment in 2011. This paper describes the NRC's areas of activity and related experience.The NRC offers comprehensive consulting services on all diagnostic and clinical aspects of acute and chronic HBV and HDV infections for the Public Health Service (ÖGD), diagnostic laboratories, clinics, research institutes, and physicians in private practice. Uncertain diagnostic findings can be analyzed and interpreted and epidemiological correlations clarified with the HBV/HDV special diagnostics established at the NRC using state-of-the-art molecular, biochemical, and genetic laboratory tools. The NRC has access to a strain collection of many well-characterized and cloned HBV/HDV isolates, allowing comparative analysis and evaluation of antiviral resistance mutations and immune escape variants. Together with its national and international partner institutions, the NRC initiates and supervises, among other things, interlaboratory studies for the diagnosis of HBV resistance and immune escape for the establishment and validation of international World Health Organization (WHO) standards and for the improvement of quantitative HDV genome determination. The NRC actively participates in current recommendations and guidelines on HBV and HDV and the recommendations of medical societies. It also highlights current HBV/HDV-relevant aspects with contributions in the form of national and international lectures as well as original articles and comments in national and international journals.

Rheumatologie und Hepatologie interdisziplinär

Rheumatologische und hepatologische Erkrankungen haben einige Überschneidungen, die für Behandler aus beiden Disziplinen relevant sind. In dieser Übersicht wird ein Schlaglicht auf 2 Erkrankungen geworfen, die sich an der Schnittstelle befinden: Arthropathie bei Hämochromatose und Systemische Sklerose bei Primär Biliärer Cholangitis. Daneben werden hepatologische Fragestellungen bei rheumatologischer Therapie beleuchtet.