Implantation of XEN After Failed Trabeculectomy: an Efficient Therapy?

[Real-world outcomes of glaucoma surgical procedures for open-angle glaucoma]

This article provides an overview of real-world outcomes in glaucoma surgical procedures. While randomized clinical trials provide valuable insights, they do not fully reflect real-world clinical practice. Real-world studies enable the evaluation of outcomes in uncontrolled settings and play a crucial role in counselling and decision-making for glaucoma treatment. By examining real-world data the article aims to identify rare adverse events that may go unnoticed in controlled clinical trials. The focus is on assessing the effectiveness and safety of glaucoma surgical procedures beyond the controlled trial setting.

Effectiveness and Safety of Xen Gel Stent in Glaucoma Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Although topical medical therapy and selective-laser-trabeculoplasty represent the treatments of choice to reduce intraocular pressure, many patients do not achieve adequate glaucoma control; therefore, they require further options and eventually surgery. Trabeculectomy is still considered the gold standard, but the surgical management of glaucoma has undergone continuous advances in recent years, XEN-gel-stent has been introduced as a safer and less traumatic means of lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG). This study aimed to review the effectiveness and safety of clinical data on XEN-stent in OAG patients with a Synthesis-Without-Meta-analysis (SWiM) methodology. A total of 339 studies were identified following a literature search adhering to PRISMA guidelines and, after evaluation, 96 studies are discussed. XEN63 and XEN45 device data were collected both short and long term. In addition, this document has evaluated different aspects related to the XEN implant, including: its role compared to trabeculectomy; the impact of mitomycin-C dose on clinical outcomes; postoperative management of the device; and the identification of potential factors that might predict its clinical outcomes. Finally, current challenges and future perspectives of XEN stent, such as its use in fragile or high myopia patients, were discussed.

Comparison of surgical outcomes with and without Ologen collagen matrix augmentation during XEN gel stent implantation

Background

To compare the surgical outcomes and postoperative complications with and without Ologen collagen matrix augmentation during XEN gel stent implantation.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent XEN gel stent implantation with an ab externo technique. The amount of intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction, percentage of postoperative complications and additional management, and surgical success defined as IOP reduction greater than 20% compared with the preoperative IOP measurement were compared between Ologen-augmented and non-augmented groups. Groups of patients who underwent XEN gel stent implantation alone and combined with phacoemulsification were analyzed separately.

Results

A total 103 eyes of 103 participants were included. Of those, 72 eyes underwent standalone XEN gel stent implantation: 42 eyes with Ologen augmentation (Oloxen group) and 30 eyes without Ologen augmentation (Xen group). Thirty-one eyes underwent XEN gel stent implantation with phacoemulsification: 19 eyes with Ologen augmentation (Phaco-Oloxen group) and 12 eyes without Ologen augmentation (PhacoXen group). The surgical success rate at six months postoperatively was not different between the Oloxen and Xen groups (56.4% vs 43.3%, P > 0.05) or between the Phaco-Oloxen group and PhacoXen group (57.9% vs 41.7%, P > 0.05). The prevalence of postoperative hypotony, 5-fluorouracil injections, use of anti-glaucoma medications, bleb needling, and additional glaucoma surgeries was not different between the Oloxen and Xen groups or between the Phaco-Oloxen and PhacoXen groups when assessed six months postoperatively.

Conclusions

All groups showed significant IOP reduction after XEN gel stent implantation, but there was no significant difference between the Ologen collagen matrix augmented and non-augmented groups in surgical outcomes.

Ab Interno XEN Gel Stent Implantation in Eyes with Previous Tube Shunt Surgery

Purpose

After tube shunt surgery, many factors may contribute to insufficient filtration over time, prompting further intervention to achieve optimal intraocular pressure (IOP) control. This study explores whether ab interno XEN gel stent implantation could be a viable approach in eyes that need further IOP reduction after tube shunt surgery.

Methods

This is a retrospective, single-surgeon case series on ab interno XEN45 gel stent implantation in eyes that had previous tube shunt surgery. Main outcome measures were IOP and number of glaucoma medications at the pre-operative visit, post-operative week (POW) 1, and post-operative month (POM) 1, 3, 6, and 12. Adverse events and further interventions were noted. Surgery outcome was qualified as absolute success (IOP ≤ 18mmHg or ≥ 20% IOP reduction without glaucoma medications), qualified success (IOP ≤ 18mmHg or ≥ 20% IOP reduction with glaucoma medications), or failure (IOP > 18mmHg and < 20% IOP reduction with maximum tolerated glaucoma medications).

Results

7 eyes from 6 patients were included in this study. IOP was reduced from 23.9 ± 5.3 mmHg (mean ± standard deviation) pre-operatively to 14.0 ± 5.3 mmHg at POM12 (p < 0.05). Number of glaucoma medications was reduced from 4.3 ± 1.3 pre-operatively to 1.6 ± 1.6 at POM12 (p < 0.05). Hypotony and choroidal effusion were noted in one case which resolved before POM1. Bleb needling was required in 3 of the 7 eyes (43%), with one eye requiring needling twice. By POM12, 2 of 7 eyes (29%) achieved absolute success, 4 eyes (57%) qualified success, and 1 eye (14%) was qualified as failure.

Conclusion

Ab interno XEN gel stent can effectively reduce IOP and number of glaucoma medications after failed tube shunt surgery. Nonetheless, further interventions such as bleb needling may still be required to optimize IOP control.

The Outcomes of XEN Gel Stent Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose

XEN gel stents are used for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma (OAG), including primary and secondary glaucoma that are uncontrolled by previous medical therapy and cases with previous failed surgery. Our aim was to systematically review of the clinical data of currently published ab-interno XEN gel stents with an emphasis on intraocular pressure (IOP), antiglaucoma medication outcomes, and safety profiles.

Methods

We analyzed all of the publications (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library) on the ab-interno XEN gel stent to evaluate the reduction in IOP and antiglaucoma medications following the procedure. The primary outcomes measured for the meta-analysis were reduction in IOP and anti-glaucoma medications. The secondary outcome were adverse events. For each study, we used a random effects analysis model to calculate the mean difference and 95% confidence intervals for the continuous results (reduction in IOP and antiglaucoma medications) using the inverse variance statistical method.

Results

Five hundred twenty-seven articles were checked and 56 studies were found to be relevant with a total of 4,410 eyes. There was a significant reduction in IOP as well as in the number of medications required in patients treated with ab-interno XEN implant either alone or combined with cataract surgery. This new treatment for various types of glaucoma reduced the IOP by 35% to a final average close to 15 mmHg. This reduction was accompanied by a decrease in the number of antiglaucoma medications in all the studies, approximately 2 classes of medication at the price of more needlings. The overall complete success rate was 21.0–70.8% after 2 years using strict criteria originally designed to record success rate in filtration surgery. The incidence of complications vision-threatening was low at <1%.

Conclusions

XEN gel stent was effective and safe for primary and secondary OAG. Further studies should be performed to investigate the impact of ethnicity on the success and failure rate after XEN implantation.