1
|
Djinbachian R, Haumesser C, Taghiakbari M, Pohl H, Barkun A, Sidani S, Liu Chen Kiow J, Panzini B, Bouchard S, Deslandres E, Alj A, von Renteln D. Autonomous Artificial Intelligence vs Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Human Optical Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Gastroenterology 2024:S0016-5085(24)00131-8. [PMID: 38331204 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2024.01.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Artificial intelligence (AI)-based optical diagnosis systems (CADx) have been developed to allow pathology prediction of colorectal polyps during colonoscopies. However, CADx systems have not yet been validated for autonomous performance. Therefore, we conducted a trial comparing autonomous AI to AI-assisted human (AI-H) optical diagnosis. METHODS We performed a randomized noninferiority trial of patients undergoing elective colonoscopies at 1 academic institution. Patients were randomized into (1) autonomous AI-based CADx optical diagnosis of diminutive polyps without human input or (2) diagnosis by endoscopists who performed optical diagnosis of diminutive polyps after seeing the real-time CADx diagnosis. The primary outcome was accuracy in optical diagnosis in both arms using pathology as the gold standard. Secondary outcomes included agreement with pathology for surveillance intervals. RESULTS A total of 467 patients were randomized (238 patients/158 polyps in the autonomous AI group and 229 patients/179 polyps in the AI-H group). Accuracy for optical diagnosis was 77.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 69.7-84.7) in the autonomous AI group and 72.1% (95% CI, 65.5-78.6) in the AI-H group (P = .86). For high-confidence diagnoses, accuracy for optical diagnosis was 77.2% (95% CI, 69.7-84.7) in the autonomous AI group and 75.5% (95% CI, 67.9-82.0) in the AI-H group. Autonomous AI had statistically significantly higher agreement with pathology-based surveillance intervals compared to AI-H (91.5% [95% CI, 86.9-96.1] vs 82.1% [95% CI, 76.5-87.7]; P = .016). CONCLUSIONS Autonomous AI-based optical diagnosis exhibits noninferior accuracy to endoscopist-based diagnosis. Both autonomous AI and AI-H exhibited relatively low accuracy for optical diagnosis; however, autonomous AI achieved higher agreement with pathology-based surveillance intervals. (ClinicalTrials.gov, Number NCT05236790).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roupen Djinbachian
- Montreal University Hospital Research Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Claire Haumesser
- Montreal University Hospital Research Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Mahsa Taghiakbari
- Montreal University Hospital Research Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Heiko Pohl
- Section of Gastroenterology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire; Department of Gastroenterology, Veterans Affairs White River Junction, Vermont
| | - Alan Barkun
- Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University and McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Sacha Sidani
- Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jeremy Liu Chen Kiow
- Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Benoit Panzini
- Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Simon Bouchard
- Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Erik Deslandres
- Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Abla Alj
- Division of Internal Medicine, Montreal University Hospital Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Daniel von Renteln
- Montreal University Hospital Research Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Djinbachian R, Taghiakbari M, Haumesser C, Zarandi-Nowroozi M, Khalil MA, Sidani S, Liu J, Panzini B, von Renteln D. Comparing size measurement of colorectal polyps using a novel virtual scale endoscope, endoscopic ruler or forceps: A preclinical randomized trial. Endosc Int Open 2023; 11:E128-E135. [PMID: 36726860 PMCID: PMC9886501 DOI: 10.1055/a-2005-7548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Accurate polyp size measurement is important for guideline conforming choice of polypectomy techniques and subsequent surveillance interval assignments. Some endoscopic tools (biopsy forceps [BF] or endoscopic rulers [ER]) exist to help with visual size estimation. A virtual scale endoscope (VSE) has been developed that allows superimposing a virtual measurement scale during live endoscopies. Our aim was to evaluate the performance of VSE when compared to ER and BF-based measurement. Methods We conducted a preclinical randomized trial to evaluate the relative accuracy of size measurement of simulated colorectal polyps when using: VSE, ER, and BF. Six endoscopists performed 60 measurements randomized at a 1:1:1 ratio using each method. Primary outcome was relative accuracy in polyp size measurement. Secondary outcomes included misclassification of sizes at the 5-, 10-, and 20-mm thresholds. Results A total of 360 measurements were performed. The relative accuracy of BF, ER, and VSE was 78.9 % (95 %CI = 76.2-81.5), 78.4 % (95 %CI = 76.0-80.8), and 82.7 % (95 %CI = 80.8-84.8). VSE had significantly higher accuracy compared to BF ( P = 0.02) and ER ( P = 0.006). VSE misclassified a lower percentage of polyps > 5 mm as ≤ 5 mm (9.4 %) compared to BF (15.7 %) and ER (20.9 %). VSE misclassified a lower percentage of ≥ 20 mm polyps as < 20 mm (8.3 %) compared with BF (66.7 %) and ER (75.0 %). Of polyps ≥10mm, 25.6 %, 25.5 %, and 22.5 % were misclassified as <10 mm with ER, BF, and VSE, respectively. Conclusions VSE had significantly higher relative accuracy in measuring polyps compared to ER or BF assisted measurement. VSE improves correct classification of polyps at clinically important size thresholds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roupen Djinbachian
- Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada,Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Mahsa Taghiakbari
- Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada,Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Claire Haumesser
- Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada,University of Montreal Medical School, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Melissa Zarandi-Nowroozi
- Division of Internal Medicine, Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Maria Abou Khalil
- Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada,Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Sacha Sidani
- Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada,Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jeremy Liu
- Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada,Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Benoit Panzini
- Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada,Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Daniel von Renteln
- Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada,Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|