1
|
Masgnaux LJ, Grimaldi J, Jacques J, Rivory J, Pioche M. Technical Advances in Endoscopic Resection Techniques for Lower GI Malignancies. Visc Med 2024; 40:128-143. [PMID: 38873630 PMCID: PMC11166901 DOI: 10.1159/000538041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The management of bulky neoplastic lesions in the digestive tract has historically been a surgical pursuit. With advancements in endoscopic techniques, particularly endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), a paradigm shift toward organ preservation has been initiated. These endoscopic methods, developed incrementally since the 1980s, have progressively enabled curative management of lesions with minimal morbidity, challenging the previously unchallenged domain of surgery. Summary This review traces the evolution of endoscopic resection from snare polypectomy and EMR to sophisticated ESD, highlighting the technological innovations that have expanded the scope of endoscopic resection. It discusses the intricacies of various EMR techniques like underwater EMR, anchoring EMR, and hybrid EMR, alongside traction-assisted methods and the use of viscous solutions for submucosal injection. Additionally, the manuscript delves into the advancements in ESD, emphasizing traction strategies, knife technology, and the optimization of endoscopes. The benefits of these advancements are weighed against the challenges in anatomopathological interpretation posed by piecemeal resections. Key Messages The continuous amelioration of endoscopic resection techniques has significantly improved the outcomes of digestive tract lesion management, particularly in achieving R0 resections and reducing recurrence rates. These advancements represent a monumental step toward minimizing the invasiveness of lesion management. However, despite the progress, the necessity for early follow-up post-EMR remains due to the non-negligible recurrence rates, underscoring the need for a rigorous postoperative surveillance regimen. Furthermore, our review suggests that while ESD has transformed the therapeutic landscape, its widespread adoption hinges on further simplification, safety enhancement, and acceleration of the procedure, possibly through innovations like adaptive traction devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis Jean Masgnaux
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Pavillon L, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Jean Grimaldi
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Pavillon L, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Jérémie Jacques
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology, Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | - Jérôme Rivory
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Pavillon L, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Mathieu Pioche
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Pavillon L, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Morikawa T, Nemoto D, Kurokawa T, Yamashina T, Hayashi Y, Kitamura M, Okada M, Takezawa T, Nakajima Y, Kowazaki Y, Fukuda H, Nomura T, Lazaridis N, Fukushima N, Sunada K, Yamamoto H. Multicenter prospective randomized controlled clinical trial comparing the pocket-creation method with and without single-clip traction of colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endoscopy 2024. [PMID: 38408594 DOI: 10.1055/a-2276-0546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The pocket-creation method (PCM) was developed to overcome the technical difficulties of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), although opening the pocket remains challenging. We developed a novel technique of PCM with single-clip traction (PCM-CT), which uses a reopenable clip as a traction device to maintain stability during the procedure. No prospective study has compared the efficacy of PCM-CT and PCM. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of PCM-CT vs. PCM in a randomized controlled trial. METHODS This randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted at four Japanese institutions. Patients with superficial colorectal neoplastic lesions were included following Japanese guidelines for colorectal cancer. Seven moderately experienced endoscopists performed the ESD procedures using either PCM-CT or PCM. RESULTS 100 patients were enrolled in the study. Compared with PCM, PCM-CT achieved significantly faster mean (SD) dissection speed (21.4 [10.8] vs. 27.0 [14.5] mm2/min [95%CI 0.5 to 10.7], P = 0.03), and reduced the mean procedure time (81.8 [57.9] vs. 64.8 [47.6] minutes [95%CI -38.2 to 4.3], P = 0.12) and pocket-opening time (37.8 [33.0] vs. 30.0 [28.9] minutes [95%CI -20.2 to 4.6], P = 0.22). En bloc and R0 resection rates were not significantly different between the two groups (100% vs. 100%, P >0.99; 100% vs. 96%, P = 0.50, respectively). No significant differences were observed in adverse events between the two groups. CONCLUSION ESD facilitated by the novel PCM-CT method appeared to be significantly faster than PCM. Both methods achieved high R0 resection rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takaaki Morikawa
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Jyoban Hospital of Tokiwa Foundation, Iwaki, Japan
| | - Daiki Nemoto
- Department of Coloproctology, Fukushima Medical University Aizu Medical Center, Fukushima, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Takeda General Hospital, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Kurokawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Jyoban Hospital of Tokiwa Foundation, Iwaki, Japan
| | - Takeshi Yamashina
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology,, Kansai Medical University Medical Center, Moriguchi, Japan
| | - Yoshikazu Hayashi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan
| | - Masafumi Kitamura
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan
| | - Masahiro Okada
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan
| | - Takahito Takezawa
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan
| | - Yuki Nakajima
- Department of Coloproctology, Fukushima Medical University Aizu Medical Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Yuka Kowazaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Jyoban Hospital of Tokiwa Foundation, Iwaki, Japan
| | - Hisashi Fukuda
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Jyoban Hospital of Tokiwa Foundation, Iwaki, Japan
| | - Tatsuma Nomura
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Mie Prefectural Shima Hospital, Shima, Japan
| | - Nikolaos Lazaridis
- Royal Free Unit for Endoscopy, The Royal Free Hospital and University College London (UCL) Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, London, UK
| | | | - Keijiro Sunada
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan
| | - Hironori Yamamoto
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pioche M, Masgnaux LJ, Legros R, Wallenhorst T, Albouys J, Rivory J, Jacques J. Innovations for colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection: combination of the latest game changers. Endoscopy 2024; 56:242-243. [PMID: 38417429 PMCID: PMC10901623 DOI: 10.1055/a-2224-8465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Mathieu Pioche
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Louis Jean Masgnaux
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Romain Legros
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | | | - Jérémie Albouys
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | - Jérôme Rivory
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Jeremie Jacques
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yahagi N. Is a traction device an almighty tool for overcoming the difficulties of endoscopic submucosal dissection? Endoscopy 2024; 56:212-213. [PMID: 38253265 DOI: 10.1055/a-2234-8492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Naohisa Yahagi
- Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Keio University School of Medicine Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Singh S, Mohan BP, Chandan S, Sharma N, Vinayek R, Dutta S, Kantsevoy SV, Le M, Adler DG. Conventional Versus Traction Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Tumors: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Clin Gastroenterol 2024:00004836-990000000-00258. [PMID: 38252678 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Compared with conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection (C-ESD) for colorectal lesions, the traction method (T-ESD) allows the lesion to be stabilized with easier dissection. However, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reported conflicting results on the clinical outcomes of T-ESD as compared with C-ESD. We conducted a meta-analysis to compile the data. METHODS Multiple databases were searched for RCTs evaluating C-ESD versus T-ESD for colorectal tumors. The end points of interest were procedure time (min), resection speed (mm²/min), R0 resection, en bloc resection, delayed bleeding, and perforation. Standard meta-analysis methods were employed using the random-effects model. RESULTS Six RCTs with a total of 566 patients (C-ESD n=284, T-ESD n=282) were included. The mean age was 67±10 y and 60% were men. As compared with the T-ESD technique, the C-ESD group was associated with longer procedure time (SMD 0.91, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.23, P<0.00001) and lesser resection speed (SMD -1.03, 95% CI -2.01 to -0.06, P=0.04). No significant difference was found in the 2 groups with respect to R0 resection rate (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.06, P=0.87), en bloc resection (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.01, P=0.35), delayed bleeding (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.17 to 2.59, P=0.55) and perforation (RR 2.16, 95% CI 0.75 to 6.27, P=0.16). DISCUSSION On meta-analysis, pooled procedure time was significantly faster with T-ESD compared with C-ESD. The clinical outcomes, however, were comparable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sahib Singh
- Internal Medicine, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD
| | - Babu P Mohan
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Orlando Gastroenterology PA, Orlando, FL
| | - Saurabh Chandan
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, CHI Creighton Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - Neil Sharma
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, IN
| | - Rakesh Vinayek
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD
| | - Sudhir Dutta
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Michelle Le
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - Douglas G Adler
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Peak Gastroenterology Associates, Colorado Springs, CO
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pioche M, Masgnaux LJ, Legros R, Wallenhorst T, Albouys J, Rivory J, Jacques J. Innovations for colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection: combination of the latest game changers. Endoscopy 2023; 55:E1172-E1173. [PMID: 37984396 PMCID: PMC10659825 DOI: 10.1055/a-2191-5546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Mathieu Pioche
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Louis Jean Masgnaux
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Romain Legros
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | | | - Jérémie Albouys
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | - Jérôme Rivory
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Jeremie Jacques
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France
| |
Collapse
|