1
|
Rogers JP, Oldham MA, Fricchione G, Northoff G, Ellen Wilson J, Mann SC, Francis A, Wieck A, Elizabeth Wachtel L, Lewis G, Grover S, Hirjak D, Ahuja N, Zandi MS, Young AH, Fone K, Andrews S, Kessler D, Saifee T, Gee S, Baldwin DS, David AS. Evidence-based consensus guidelines for the management of catatonia: Recommendations from the British Association for Psychopharmacology. J Psychopharmacol 2023; 37:327-369. [PMID: 37039129 PMCID: PMC10101189 DOI: 10.1177/02698811231158232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 43.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/12/2023]
Abstract
The British Association for Psychopharmacology developed an evidence-based consensus guideline on the management of catatonia. A group of international experts from a wide range of disciplines was assembled. Evidence was gathered from existing systematic reviews and the primary literature. Recommendations were made on the basis of this evidence and were graded in terms of their strength. The guideline initially covers the diagnosis, aetiology, clinical features and descriptive epidemiology of catatonia. Clinical assessments, including history, physical examination and investigations are then considered. Treatment with benzodiazepines, electroconvulsive therapy and other pharmacological and neuromodulatory therapies is covered. Special regard is given to periodic catatonia, malignant catatonia, neuroleptic malignant syndrome and antipsychotic-induced catatonia. There is attention to the needs of particular groups, namely children and adolescents, older adults, women in the perinatal period, people with autism spectrum disorder and those with certain medical conditions. Clinical trials were uncommon, and the recommendations in this guideline are mainly informed by small observational studies, case series and case reports, which highlights the need for randomised controlled trials and prospective cohort studies in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan P Rogers
- Division of Psychiatry, University College
London, London, UK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation
Trust, London, UK
| | - Mark A Oldham
- Department of Psychiatry, University of
Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Gregory Fricchione
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts
General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Georg Northoff
- Mind, Brain Imaging and Neuroethics Research
Unit, The Royal’s Institute of Mental Health Research, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON,
Canada
| | - Jo Ellen Wilson
- Veterans Affairs, Geriatric Research,
Education and Clinical Center, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral
Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | - Andrew Francis
- Penn State Medical School, Hershey Medical
Center, PA, USA
| | - Angelika Wieck
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS
Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Institute of Population Health, University
of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Lee Elizabeth Wachtel
- Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore,
Maryland, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Johns Hopkins
School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Glyn Lewis
- Division of Psychiatry, University College
London, London, UK
| | - Sandeep Grover
- Department of Psychiatry, Postgraduate
Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, CH, India
| | - Dusan Hirjak
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy,
Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg,
Mannheim, Germany
| | - Niraj Ahuja
- Regional Affective Disorders Service,
Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK
| | - Michael S Zandi
- Queen Square Institute of Neurology,
University College London, London, UK
- National Hospital for Neurology and
Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - Allan H Young
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation
Trust, London, UK
- Department of Psychological Medicine,
Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, UK
| | - Kevin Fone
- School of Life Sciences, Queen’s Medical
Centre, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - David Kessler
- Centre for Academic Mental Health,
University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Tabish Saifee
- National Hospital for Neurology and
Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - Siobhan Gee
- Pharmacy Department, South London and
Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine,
King’s College London, London, UK
| | - David S Baldwin
- Clinical Neuroscience, Clinical and
Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Anthony S David
- Institute of Mental Health, University
College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Clark SD, Van Snellenberg JX, Lawson JM, Abi-Dargham A. Opioid antagonists are associated with a reduction in the symptoms of schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Neuropsychopharmacology 2020; 45:1860-1869. [PMID: 32516800 PMCID: PMC7608351 DOI: 10.1038/s41386-020-0730-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2019] [Revised: 05/10/2020] [Accepted: 06/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Current treatments for the symptoms of schizophrenia are only effective for positive symptoms in some individuals, and have considerable side effects that impact compliance. Thus, there is a need to investigate the efficacy of other compounds in treating both positive and negative symptoms. We conducted a meta-analysis of English language placebo-controlled clinical trials of naloxone, naltrexone, nalmefene, and buprenorphine in patients with schizophrenia to determine whether opioid antagonists have therapeutic efficacy on positive, negative, total, or general symptoms. We searched online databases Ovid Medline and PsychINFO, PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane library/CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from 1970 through February 2019. Following PRISMA guidelines, Hedges g was calculated for each study. Primary study outcomes were the within-subject change on any symptom assessment scale for positive, negative, total, or general symptoms of schizophrenia between active drug and placebo conditions. Thirty studies were included with 434 total patients. We found a significant effect of all drugs on all scales combined with both a standard random effects model: (g = 0.26; P = 0.02; k = 22; CI = 0.03-0.49) and a more inclusive bootstrap model: (g = 0.26; P = 0.0002; k = 30; CI = 0.11-0.51) and a significant effect on total scales with the bootstrap model (g = 0.25288; P = 0.015; k = 19; CI = 0.04-0.35). We also observed a significant effect of all drugs on all positive scales combined with both the random effects (g = 0.33; P = 0.015; k = 17; CI = 0.07-0.60) and bootstrap models (g = 0.32; P < 0.0001; k = 21; CI = 0.13-1.38). This evidence provides support for further testing in randomized clinical trials of a new class of non-D2-receptor drugs, based on opioid mechanisms, for the treatment of positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel D Clark
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Terran Biosciences, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Jared X Van Snellenberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Stony Brook University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Anissa Abi-Dargham
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Stony Brook University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Radiology, Stony Brook University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
To test the hypothesis of the role for the opioid system in the pathogenesis of depersonalization, the effect of naloxone (an opioid receptor blocker) on the symptoms and corticosteroids secretion was studied in patients with depersonalization syndrome. Fourteen depersonalization patients were treated with naloxone: 11 patients received single doses (1.6 or 4 mg i.v.) and three others received multiple infusions, with the maximal dosage being 10 mg, and the effect of naloxone on symptom severity was determined. In eight patients, the cortisol, cortisone and corticosterone content in the blood plasma was determined prior to and after the 4 mg naloxone infusion. A reversed-phase microcolumn high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection was applied for assessment of glucocorticoids. In three of 14 patients, depersonalization symptoms disappeared entirely and seven patients showed a marked improvement. The therapeutic effect of naloxone provides evidence for the role of the endogenous opioid system in the pathogenesis of depersonalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y L Nuller
- Bekhterev Psychoneurological Research Institute, St-Petersburg, Russia.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Several lines of evidence suggest that the endogenous opioid peptides endorphins may play a role in the defensive response of the organism to stress. The present paper summarizes these findings as well as evidence linking endorphins to the anterior pituitary polypeptide hormone adrenocorticotropin (ACTH). Evidence is presented that endorphins may function as trophic hormones in peripheral target organs such as the adrenal medulla and the pancreas. As such they may be part of the physiological mechanisms that mediate adrenaline and glucagon release in response to stress. Endorphins (enkephalins) are also suggested to play a role in the control of the pituitary gland during stress. In such capacity they may act as hormone-releasing or inhibiting factors. Finally, endorphins appear to play a role in the behavioral concomitants of stress. In such capacity endorphins are suggested to function as modulators of neural systems that mediate the elaboration and expression of the reactive/affective components of stress. Speculations on the mode of interaction between endorphins and ACTH in the global response to stress are discussed.
Collapse
|