Deutschsprachige Fragebögen zur standardisierten Erfassung von Stuhlinkontinenz und Lebensqualität

Sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence and constipation in adult patients with anorectal malformation--a feasibility study in patients with or without sacral dysgenesis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate both the feasibility and effectiveness of sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence and constipation in adult patients who had undergone surgical repair of anorectal malformations (ARM).

METHODS

Patients with ARM with or without sacral dysgenesis who presented with fecal incontinence, constipation, or combined symptoms were treated with sacral nerve stimulation (SNS). Success of SNS was assessed by scores preoperatively and after a 3-week test period: Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score (CCI), Surgical Working Group for Coloproctology (CACP) continence score, German version of the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale, and Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score (CCCS). The follow-up results of the patients who received a definitive pacemaker were used to evaluate the long-term effect of SNS in patients with ARM.

RESULTS

Four patients with fecal incontinence and one patient with constipation (two males, three females; median age 24 years [13; 31]) were treated with SNS between May 2012 and May 2013. Four patients had a normal sacrum; one patient had a sacral dysgenesis. Preoperatively and after the test phase, median CACP continence scores were 8 [1; 10] and 11.5 [3; 16], median CCI 14 [12; 19] and 13 [11; 17], and median Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale improved in all categories. For constipation, CCCSs were 16 and 7.

CONCLUSION

Sacral neuromodulation is a feasible treatment modality for adult patients with ARM with a normally developed sacrum. Patients with sacrum dysgenesis are not suited for SNS because a definitive quadripolar electrode could not be anchored in the absence of a sacral bone.

Sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence and constipation in adult patients with anorectal malformation--a feasibility study in patients with or without sacral dysgenesis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate both the feasibility and effectiveness of sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence and constipation in adult patients who had undergone surgical repair of anorectal malformations (ARM).

METHODS

Patients with ARM with or without sacral dysgenesis who presented with fecal incontinence, constipation, or combined symptoms were treated with sacral nerve stimulation (SNS). Success of SNS was assessed by scores preoperatively and after a 3-week test period: Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score (CCI), Surgical Working Group for Coloproctology (CACP) continence score, German version of the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale, and Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score (CCCS). The follow-up results of the patients who received a definitive pacemaker were used to evaluate the long-term effect of SNS in patients with ARM.

RESULTS

Four patients with fecal incontinence and one patient with constipation (two males, three females; median age 24 years [13; 31]) were treated with SNS between May 2012 and May 2013. Four patients had a normal sacrum; one patient had a sacral dysgenesis. Preoperatively and after the test phase, median CACP continence scores were 8 [1; 10] and 11.5 [3; 16], median CCI 14 [12; 19] and 13 [11; 17], and median Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale improved in all categories. For constipation, CCCSs were 16 and 7.

CONCLUSION

Sacral neuromodulation is a feasible treatment modality for adult patients with ARM with a normally developed sacrum. Patients with sacrum dysgenesis are not suited for SNS because a definitive quadripolar electrode could not be anchored in the absence of a sacral bone.

[Anorectal diagnostics for proctological diseases]

The majority of proctological diseases can be defined by a structured evaluation of the symptoms and a physical examination. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and anal endosonography can detect complex anal fistulas with a high accuracy but MRI should be preferred because of its objective visualization. Functional anorectal disorders are multifactorial and show morphological and functional irregularities in different compartments of the pelvic floor which is why MR defecography is now one of the most important methods in diagnostic algorithms. Interpreting the results of anal endosonography, anal manometry and neurophysiological testing is highly demanding because of large interindividual variability. Scores are used for objective measurement of symptom severity and quality of life. In clinical practice, well validated scores evaluated in large patient groups with predetermined circumstances are needed. Bringing together morphological results with scores based on subjective perception is required to optimize diagnostics and therapy evaluation in proctology.

Triple-target treatment versus low-frequency electrostimulation for anal incontinence: a randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

In the nonsurgical treatment of anal incontinence, the combination of amplitude-modulated medium-frequency stimulation and electromyographic biofeedback (EMG-BF), known as triple-target treatment (3T), is superior to EMG-BF alone. The aim of this trial is to compare 3T with the standard treatment, low-frequency stimulation (LFS).

METHODS

80 patients with anal incontinence of Grade I or higher who presented to physicians or centers specialized in coloproctology were enrolled in this multicenter randomized trial with blinded observer. The trial had an open parallel-group design. Randomization was performed centrally by telephone. The primary endpoint was the Cleveland Clinic Score (CCS) after self-training at home with either 3T or LFS in two 20-minute sessions per day for 6 months. The secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients regaining continence, and the patients' quality of life (QoL). On completion of the trial as planned, the results were evaluated with an intention-to-treat analysis.

STUDY REGISTRATION

DRKS00000138 (http://register.germanctr.de).

RESULTS

39 patients were randomized to 3T, and 41 to LFS. After 6 months of treatment, the CCS (mean ± standard deviation) was 3.1 ± 4.2 in the 3T group and 9.6 ± 3.9 in the LFS group. The median improvement in the CCS at 6 months compared to baseline was 7 points greater in the 3T group than in the LFS group (95% CI: 5-9, p<0.001). Anal continence was regained by 54% of the 3T patients, but none of the LFS patients (95% CI for the difference: 37.18% - 69.91%, p<0.001). QoL scores were higher in all dimensions in the 3T group than in the LFS group. No major adverse effects occurred in either group.

CONCLUSION

3T is superior to LFS in the treatment of anal incontinence. The available evidence suggests that the success of 3T is based on the combined effect of biofeedback and medium-frequency stimulation. LFS of the type applied in this trial has no effect. 3T should be used in routine clinical practice instead of LFS.

Triple target treatment (3T) is more effective than biofeedback alone for anal incontinence: the 3T-AI study

PURPOSE

The efficacy of EMG-biofeedback and low-frequency electrical stimulation for the treatment of anal incontinence has not been proven. Our purpose was to evaluate a novel therapeutic concept, termed triple target treatment, which combines amplitude-modulated medium-frequency stimulation and EMG-biofeedback.

METHODS

Patients with anal incontinence were randomly assigned to the triple target regimen or EMG-biofeedback alone for a 9-month treatment period in a multicenter randomized clinical trial with blinded observers (ClincialTrials.gov registration number NCT00525291). Primary end points were changes in the Cleveland Clinic score and the adapted St. Mark's (Vaizey) score at 9 months compared with baseline. Secondary end points included therapy acceptance and proportion of patients achieving continence or improvement in grade or frequency of incontinence.

RESULTS

We enrolled 158 patients with anal incontinence. The median decrease in the Cleveland Clinic score from baseline to 9 months was 3 points greater for the triple target regimen than for EMG-biofeedback (95% CI, 1-4; P = .0024). The improvement was 8 points for the triple target regimen (95% CI, 7-9) and 5 points for EMG-biofeedback (95% CI, 4-7). Results were similar for the Vaizey score. Of patients treated for at least 3 months, continence was achieved by 50% of patients with the triple target regimen and 25.8% of those with EMG-biofeedback.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of amplitude-modulated medium-frequency electrostimulation with EMG-biofeedback in the triple target regimen is superior to EMG-biofeedback alone in the treatment of anal incontinence. Therapy programs for fecal incontinence are most effective if patients participate for longer than 2 to 3 months.