Endoscopic therapy using novel fan devices

Use of current automatic smoke evacuation system in flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy: Its feasibility and potential usefulness

Objectives

Flexible endoscopy does not have a system that can automatically evacuate surgical smoke generated in the gastrointestinal lumen. We aimed to investigate the feasibility and potential usefulness of automatic smoke evacuation systems in flexible endoscopy.

Methods

[Bench] After surgical smoke generated in the stomach was evacuated by the evacuator, the degree of residual smoke and gastric luminal collapse were evaluated to optimize the evacuator settings. [Animal] Insufflation, suction, and total operation time to complete the protocol of 10 cauterizations of the gastric mucosa were measured in three groups: "manual suction only," "manual suction with automatic evacuation (50% force)," and "manual suction with automatic evacuation (70% force)." The stability of endoscopic visualization and operability was evaluated by 10 endoscopists blinded to those suction settings, and the number of manual suctions, insufflations, and total operation time were measured.

Results

[Bench] The degree of residual smoke and gastric luminal collapse were inversely correlated. [Animal] When the automatic evacuator was partially used, there was no difference in the insufflation time, but the suction time (vs 50%; p = 0.011, vs. 70%; p = 0.011) and total operation time (vs. 50%; p = 0.012, vs. 70%; p = 0.036) were significantly reduced compared to manual operation only. Furthermore, manual suction with automatic evacuation (50% force) significantly improved the stability of endoscopic visualization and operability compared to manual operation only (p = 0.041, p = 0.0085).

Conclusions

The automatic smoke evacuation in flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy was potentially feasible and useful by improving the device setting.

[Ongoing Development and Directions in Flexible Robotic Endoscopy]

The robotic system for flexible endoscopy was first developed as a platform enabling tissue triangulation in natural-orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Then endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was introduced and has widely been employed for the treatment of early gastrointestinal carcinoma. Subsequently, endoscopists became well aware of the limitations of their endoscopic manipulations with the conventional flexible endoscopes developed for diagnostic use, which led to the development of robotic systems for upper/lower gastrointestinal tract endoscopes intended for therapeutic use. Most flexible robotic endoscopes have 2 mechanical arms attached to the head, allowing surgeons to perform endoscopic manipulations, such as grasping, traction, incision, excision, and hemostasis. However, there are still many challenges that remain to be addressed: the ideal robotic endoscope has not yet been realized. This article reviews the ongoing developments and our own efforts in the area of flexible robotic endoscopy.

Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: Current and original devices

Compared with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is easier to perform and requires less time for treatment. However, EMR has been replaced by ESD, because achieving en bloc resection of specimens > 20 mm in diameter is difficult with EMR. The technique of ESD was introduced to resect large specimens of early gastric cancer in a single piece. ESD can provide precise histological diagnosis and can also reduce the rate of recurrence, but has a high level of technical difficulty, and is consequently associated with a high rate of complications, a need for advanced endoscopic techniques, and a lengthy procedure time. To overcome disadvantages in both EMR and ESD, various advances have been made in submucosal injections, knives, other accessories, and in electrocoagulation systems.