Fulminant metastatic spread in a patient with an early gastric cancer

Long-term oncological outcomes of submucosal manipulation during non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection for submucosal invasive gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective study in Japan

BACKGROUND

Sufficient information is not available on the extent to which lymph node metastasis (LNM) and prognosis are affected by submucosal manipulation during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for submucosal invasive gastric cancer (SMGC). We aimed to identify the effects of submucosal manipulation during ESD on LNM and prognosis in patients with SMGC.

METHODS

From 19 institutions in Japan, 2526 patients who failed to meet the current curative criteria for ESD between 2000 and 2011 were recruited. After exclusion, 1969 patients were remained. Based on the treatment strategy after ESD, 1064 patients underwent additional radical surgery. A total of 890 of 1064 patients with SMGC, LNM and cancer recurrence, and prognosis were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration was 67 months. A total of 214 patients had SM1 (depth of tumor invasion from the muscularis mucosae <500 μm) invasive cancer and 676 patients had SM2 (depth of tumor invasion from the muscularis mucosae ≥500 μm) invasive cancer. LNM was found in 84 patients (9.4%), and 14 patients (1.6%) developed cancer recurrence. The 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates were 96.1 and 91.7%, respectively. The 3-year and 5-year disease-specific survival rates were 99.3 and 98.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The rates of LNM and cancer recurrence, and prognosis of patients who underwent additional radical surgery after non-curative ESD for SMGC were excellent. Submucosal manipulation during ESD for SMGC does not seem to enhance the risk for LNM or worsen the prognosis compared to surgical series.

Do we have enough evidence for expanding the indications of ESD for EGC?

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is the most advanced and representative technique in the field of therapeutic endoscopy and has been used for the treatment of gastrointestinal neoplasms, including early gastric cancer. The major difference and advantage of ESD compared to existing endoscopic resection techniques, such as endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and polypectomy, are the width and depth of the resection. Newly developed cutting devices, distal attachable endoscopic accessories, and an advanced electrosurgical unit have helped to overcome the limitations of therapeutic endoscopy in terms of lesion size, location, presence of fibrotic scarring, and accompanying ulcers. As a result, the indications for ESD have been expanded from the classical indication for EMR and polypectomy, and there is now support for a further expansion of ESD indications. At present, the most critical factor to consider in the decision of whether to perform ESD is the probability of unexpected lymph node metastasis. The guidelines for ESD are continually being updated and debated. In this review, we discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the expanded guidelines, based on evidence found in the literature.