The value of immunoassays for metanephrines in the biochemical diagnosis of pheochromocytomas

Metastatic Pheochromocytomas and Abdominal Paragangliomas

CONTEXT

Pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs) are believed to harbor malignant potential; about 10% to 15% of pheochromocytomas and up to 50% of abdominal paragangliomas will exhibit metastatic behavior.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Extensive searches in the PubMed database with various combinations of the key words pheochromocytoma, paraganglioma, metastatic, malignant, diagnosis, pathology, genetic, and treatment were the basis for the present review.

DATA SYNTHESIS

To pinpoint metastatic potential in PPGLs is difficult, but nevertheless crucial for the individual patient to receive tailor-made follow-up and adjuvant treatment following primary surgery. A combination of histological workup and molecular predictive markers can possibly aid the clinicians in this aspect. Most patients with PPGLs have localized disease and may be cured by surgery. Plasma metanephrines are the main biochemical tests. Genetic testing is important, both for counseling and prognostic estimation. Apart from computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, molecular imaging using 68Ga-DOTATOC/DOTATATE should be performed. 123I-MIBG scintigraphy may be performed to determine whether 131I-MIBG therapy is a possible option. As first-line treatment in patients with metastatic disease, 177Lu-DOTATATE or 131I-MIBG is recommended, depending on which shows best expression. In patients with very low proliferative activity, watch-and-wait or primary treatment with long-acting somatostatin analogues may be considered. As second-line treatment, or first-line in patients with high proliferative rate, chemotherapy with temozolomide or cyclophosphamide + vincristine + dacarbazine is the therapy of choice. Other therapies, including sunitinib, cabozantinib, everolimus, and PD-1/PDL-1 inhibitors, have shown modest effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Metastatic PPGLs need individualized management and should always be discussed in specialized and interdisciplinary tumor boards. Further studies and newer treatment modalities are urgently needed.

A Rare Case of Adrenal Pheochromocytoma with Unusual Clinical and Biochemical Presentation: A Case Report and Literature Review

A 50-year-old Omani woman presented to the Outpatient Clinic, Royal Hospital, Oman with right upper abdominal pain and backache that had lasted 10 days. She had no palpitation, sweating, or hypertension (blood pressure 122/78mmHg). The patient's history revealed that she had a similar incidence of abdominal pain two months prior, which was a "dull ache" in nature and somewhat associated with headache. The pain was relieved using a mild analgesic drug. Abdominal ultrasonography showed a right adrenal mass, and both computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the adrenal glands confirmed a right adrenal mass consistent with adrenal pheochromocytoma. However, clinical biochemistry tests revealed normal levels of plasma catecholamines (dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine) and metanephrine, which are unusual findings in adrenal pheochromocytoma. Meanwhile, the patient had markedly raised plasma normetanephrine (10-fold) which, together with the normal metanephrine, constitutes a metabolic profile that is compatible with extra-adrenal pheochromocytoma. The patient also had markedly raised chromogranin A (16-fold), consistent with the presence of a neuroendocrine tumor. Laparoscopic right adrenalectomy was done and the adrenal tumor was excised and retrieved in total. Histopathology and immunohistochemistry confirmed the diagnosis of adrenal pheochromocytoma; the tumor cells being positive for chromogranin, synaptophysin, and S-100 protein. Following surgery, the patient did well and showed full recovery at follow-up after three months. Molecular genetic testing showed no pathogenic mutation in pheochromocytoma genes: MAX, SDHA, SDHAF2, SDHB, SDHC, SDHD, VHL, and PRKAR1A. A review of the literature was conducted to identify the pathophysiology and any previous reports of such case. To our knowledge, this is the first report in Oman of the extremely rare entity of pheochromocytoma with an unusual clinical and biochemical scenario.

Radioimmunoassay of free plasma metanephrines for the diagnosis of catecholamine-producing tumors

BACKGROUND

The determination of plasma metanephrines (MNs) provides a highly sensitive test for the diagnosis of catecholamine producing tumors. Chromatographic determinations with electrochemical or mass spectrometric detections are the methods of choice, but immunological assays have been developed. This study evaluated the clinical performances of a radioimmunoassay for free MNs in plasma.

METHODS

MNs, normetanephrine (NMN) and metanephrine (MN) and catecholamines, norepinephrine (NE) and epinephrine (E) were determined in plasma and urine of 533 patients suspected of catecholamine producing tumor. Urinary and plasma catecholamines and urinary MNs were determined by HPLC using amperometric detection. Plasma MNs were purified by solid phase chromatography and quantified by a specific radioimmunoassay.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients had tumors (13 paraganglioma and 46 pheochromocytoma) and the diagnosis was excluded in 474 patients. Receiver operator characteristic curves have identified optimal thresholds at 100 pg/mL for plasma NMN (sensitivity 96.6% and specificity 95.8%) and 70 pg/mL for plasma MN (sensitivity 61.0% and specificity 96.8%). These cut-off values were lower than those suggested by the manufacturer (170 and 100 pg/mL, respectively). The sensitivity of combined MNs was similar in plasma (100%) and urine (98%) but higher than that of urinary catecholamines (85%, p<0.001). The specificity of combined MNs in plasma (95%) was higher than urinary MNs (85%, p<0.001) and plasma catecholamines (75%, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma-free and urinary-total MNs have a better discriminative power than catecholamines in the diagnosis of catecholamines producing tumors. Using these established cut-offs, measurement of plasma-free MN by radioimmunoassay represents an effective alternative to chromatographic methods.

Analysis of plasma 3-methoxytyramine, normetanephrine and metanephrine by ultraperformance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry: utility for diagnosis of dopamine-producing metastatic phaeochromocytoma

BACKGROUND

Measurements of plasma normetanephrine (NMN) and metanephrine (MN) provide a sensitive test for diagnosis of phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs), but do not allow detection of dopamine-producing tumours. Here we introduce a novel mass spectrometric based method coupled to ultraperformance liquid chromatography (LC-MS/MS) for measuring NMN, MN and 3-methoxytyramine (MTY), the O-methylated metabolite of dopamine.

METHODS

Specific collision-induced fragment ions assessed by multireaction monitoring transitions were used for identification, with quantification according to signal intensities of analytes relative to stable isotope labelled internal standards. Results for solid-phase extracted samples from 196 subjects analysed by LC-MS/MS were compared with those analysed by liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection (LC-ECD). Concentration ranges in 125 volunteers were compared with those from 63 patients with PPGLs, including 14 with metastatic disease.

RESULTS

The LC-MS/MS method showed linearity over four orders of magnitude with analytical sensitivity sufficient to measure to 0.02 nmol/L. Intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation ranged from 2.8% to 13.5%. NMN and MN were respectively measured 17% and 10% higher and MTY 26% lower by LC-MS/MS than by LC-ECD. Medians and ranges for 3-methoxytramine, NMN and MN were respectively 0.08 (0.03-0.13), 0.35 (0.13-0.95) and 0.15 (0.07-0.33) nmol/L in volunteers. Among patients with PPGLs, plasma methoxytyramine was six-fold higher in patients with than without metastastases (1.09 versus 0.19 nmol/L) and in three patients was the only metabolite increased.

CONCLUSIONS

The LC-MS/MS method enables accurate, selective and sensitive measurements of catecholamine O-methylated metabolites that should be particularly useful for screening and management of dopamine-producing metastatic PPGLs.

Evaluation and management of adrenal incidentaloma

Adrenal incidentaloma is the most common adrenal neoplasm encountered in clinical practice. The timely, accurate, and cost-effective evaluation and management of adrenal lesions found incidentally can be challenging for clinicians. Evaluation begins with biochemical screening and additional imaging. Management strategies vary by patient factors and tumor characteristics. Adrenalectomy is indicated for lesions that are hormonally active, larger than 4-5 cm, symptom-related, and have an imaging appearance that is atypical of a benign lesion.

Catecholamine metabolomic and secretory phenotypes in phaeochromocytoma

Phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs) are highly heterogeneous tumours with variable catecholamine biochemical phenotypes and diverse hereditary backgrounds. This analysis of 18 catecholamine-related plasma and urinary biomarkers in 365 patients with PPGLs and 846 subjects without PPGLs examined how catecholamine metabolomic profiles are impacted by hereditary background and relate to variable hormone secretion. Catecholamine secretion was assessed in a subgroup of 156 patients from whom tumour tissue was available for measurements of catecholamine contents. Among all analytes, the free catecholamine O-methylated metabolites measured in plasma showed the largest tumour-related increases relative to the reference group. Patients with tumours due to multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 and neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) showed similar catecholamine metabolite and secretory profiles to patients with adrenaline-producing tumours and no evident hereditary background. Tumours from these three patient groups contained higher contents of catecholamines, but secreted the hormones at lower rates than tumours that did not contain appreciable adrenaline, the latter including PPGLs due to von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) and succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) gene mutations. Large increases of plasma dopamine and its metabolites additionally characterised patients with PPGLs due to the latter mutations, whereas patients with NF1 were characterised by large increases in plasma dihydroxyphenylglycol and dihydroxyphenylacetic acid, the deaminated metabolites of noradrenaline and dopamine. This analysis establishes the utility of comprehensive catecholamine metabolite profiling for characterising the distinct and highly diverse catecholamine metabolomic and secretory phenotypes among different groups of patients with PPGLs. The data further suggest developmental origins of PPGLs from different populations of chromaffin cell progenitors.