Reproducibility of Elecsys anti-TSHR test results in a lot-to-lot comparison

Predicting the Relapse of Hyperthyroidism in Treated Graves' Disease with Orbitopathy by Serial Measurements of TSH-Receptor Autoantibodies

The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of the new TSH-receptor antibody (TRAb) assays to predict remission or relapse of hyperthyroidism in patients with Graves' disease (GD) and Graves' orbitopathy (GO). TRAbs were measured retrospectively in sera from a cohort of GD patients with GO (n=117; remission n=38 and relapse n=79-Essen GO biobank) with automated binding immunoassays: TRAb Elecsys (Cobas Roche) and TRAb bridge assay (IMMULITE, Siemens), and the TSAb (thyroid stimulating Ab) cell-based bioassay (Thyretain, Quidel Corp.). To identify relapse risk/remission of hyperthyroidism patients were followed up at least 10 months after the end of antithyroid drug therapy (ATD) therapy. ROC plot analysis was performed to calculate cut-off levels of TRAb and TSAb for prediction of relapse and remission of hyperthyroidism. Cut-off serum levels are provided for timepoints around 3, 6, 10, and 15 months after the beginning of ATD. Repeated measurements of TRAb increase the rate of relapses predictions to 60% (Elecsys), 70% (IMMULITE), and 55% (Thyretain). Patients with remission have consistently TRAb levels below the cut off for relapse in repeated measurements. The cell-based bioassay was the most sensitive - and continued to be positive during follow up [at 15 months: 90% vs. 70% (IMMULITE) and 65% (Elecsys)]. Identification of relapsing hyperthyroidism is possible with automated immunoassays and cell-based bioassay especially with serial TRAb measurements during the course of ATD therapy. Patient who need eye surgery may profit from an early decision towards definitive treatment.

Analytical performance and clinical utility of a bioassay for thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulins

The analytical performance and the clinical utility of a thyrotropin receptor (TSHR)-stimulating immunoglobulin (TSI) bioassay were compared with those of a TSHR-binding inhibitory immunoglobulin (TBII) assay. Limits of detection (LoD) and quantitation (LoQ), assay cutoff, and the half-maximal effective concentration (EC(50)) were measured. Dilution analysis was performed in sera of hyperthyroid patients with Graves disease (GD) during antithyroid treatment (ATD). Titer was defined as the first dilution step at which measurement of TSI or TBII fell below the assay cutoff. The LoD, LoQ, cutoff, and EC(50) of the bioassay were 251-, 298-, 814-, and 827-fold lower than for the TBII assay. There were 22%, 42%, 23%, and 14% more positive samples in the TSI bioassay at dilutions of 1:3, 1:9, 1:27, and 1:81 (P < .0001), respectively. Responders to ATD demonstrated marked differences in titers compared with nonresponders. The bioassay detected lower levels of TSHR autoantibodies, and the dilution analysis provided similar predictive values of both assays in GD.

Clinical review about TRAb assay's history

Commercial assays to measure thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) receptor (TSHR) autoantibodies (TRAb) have been available for the serological diagnosis of autoimmune thyroid diseases (AITD) for several years. The widespread assessment of this parameter has identified Graves' disease (GD) as a common organ-specific autoimmune disease. Within the present article we aim to review immunobiological and epidemiological aspects as well as diagnostic methods available for the detection of TRAb. Over the last decade, TRAb detection in GD became more sensitive since TRAb assays were being largely improved by named research groups. Therefore, functional assay (fas) and diagnostic sensitivity of current TRAb assays will be discussed. Within the second part of this review we will focus on clinical applications of TRAb measurement for outcome prediction of GD as well as the importance of this method to distinguish GD from other AITD.