Ambulante Versorgung von Demenzpatienten? Behandlungsrealität in Deutschland

[Implementation of the German S3 guidelines on dementia in clinical practice: wish or reality?]

BACKGROUND

Published in 2009, the German S3 guidelines on dementia define a milestone in quality improvement of the diagnostics and treatment of dementia. In clinical practice patients suffering from dementia are primarily treated by physicians in private practice; therefore, this study examined how the guidelines are implemented in outpatient clinical settings. Furthermore, it aimed at the identification of behavioral determinants that govern the actual diagnostic and therapeutic approach in clinical practice.

METHODS

Physicians involved in the primary care of dementia patients were asked to participate in a nationwide internet survey. The questionnaire covered aspects on the diagnostic and therapeutic care of dementia patients as recommended by the S3 guidelines. Behavioral determinants of the implementation of the guidelines (e. g. treatment decisions) were derived from an established psychological prediction model.

RESULTS

Out of a total of 2755 physicians contacted, the data of 225 participants could be used in this study. The diagnostic recommendations of the S3 guidelines were implemented in satisfactory measures (e.g. combined cognitive screening in at least 68%, cerebral neuroimaging in at least 93% and specific laboratory diagnostics in at least 27% of cases); however, only two thirds of the patients with indications for a guideline-conform therapy were treated in accordance with the S3 guidelines. There was a substantial prescription of non-recommended drugs and a notable long-term use of antipsychotic drugs (prescription by at least 14% of non-neurological medical specialists and by 8% of neurologists and psychiatrists). When considering the behavioral determinants in the implementation of the guidelines, normative assumptions ("my colleagues and patients expect me to comply with the guidelines") surprisingly had the highest impact, which was then followed by attitudes towards the behavior ("utilization of the guidelines improves diagnostics and therapy").

CONCLUSION

The German S3 guidelines on dementia were satisfactorily implemented in outpatient clinical practice; however, deficits existed in the frequency of the pharmaceutical treatment of patients with indications for therapy, the prescription of non-recommended drugs and the relatively common use of permanent neuroleptic medications. Interestingly, the motivation for implementation of the guidelines was not primarily influenced by the physicians' personal convictions but mainly stimulated by the expectations of others.

Risk of Long-Term Care Dependence for Dementia Patients is Associated with Type of Physician: An Analysis of German Health Claims Data for the Years 2006 to 2010

As the population ages, the numbers of people developing care- and cost-intensive forms of dementia are raising. We investigated the pathways of incident dementia patients to long-term care (LTC) dependence and death, and examined the effects of: (1) the type of the main treating physician, differentiated by neurologists/psychiatrists (NPs) and non-NPs; (2) the prescription of antidementive drugs on the risk of needing LTC, differentiated by the degree of care need. Longitudinal claims data of the largest German public sickness fund of 10,043 incident dementia cases aged 60 years and above were analyzed for the years 2006 to 2010. Cox proportional hazard models were performed to investigate the risk of LTC and death based on what type of physician was treating the patient, and whether the patient was prescribed antidementive drugs; adjusted for age, gender, cardiovascular comorbidities, and the previous LTC level. The patients who were primarily treated by NPs had a significantly lower risk of LTC than patients who were mainly treated by non-NPs (considerable LTC: RR = 0.72, p = 0.000, severe LTC: RR = 0.78, p = 0.000, extreme LTC: RR = 0.67, p = 0.001). They generally had a lower risk of death. Antidementive drug treatment was correlated with an increased risk of LTC (considerable LTC: RR = 1.66, p = 0.000, severe LTC: RR = 1.50, p = 0.000, extreme LTC: RR = 1.48, p = 0.000) but with a decreased risk of death. A higher rate of involvement of specialists in the treatment of dementia patients is associated with a reduced LTC dependence and increased survival of dementia patients. Antidementive drug treatments appear to extend live years with dementia.