Probleme und Komplikationen chirurgischer Verfahren zur Behandlung vollschichtiger Knorpeldefekte am Kniegelenk

Cell-based treatment options facilitate regeneration of cartilage, ligaments and meniscus in demanding conditions of the knee by a whole joint approach

PURPOSE

This article provides an update on the current therapeutic options for cell-based regenerative treatment of the knee with a critical review of the present literature including a future perspective on the use of regenerative cell-based approaches. Special emphasis has been given on the requirement of a whole joint approach with treatment of comorbidities with aim of knee cartilage restoration, particularly in demanding conditions like early osteoarthritis.

METHODS

This narrative review evaluates recent clinical data and published research articles on cell-based regenerative treatment options for cartilage and other structures around the knee RESULTS: Cell-based regenerative therapies for cartilage repair have become standard practice for the treatment of focal, traumatic chondral defects of the knee. Specifically, matrix-assisted autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACT) shows satisfactory long-term results regarding radiological, histological and clinical outcome for treatment of large cartilage defects. Data show that regenerative treatment of the knee requires a whole joint approach by addressing all comorbidities including axis deviation, instability or meniscus pathologies. Further development of novel biomaterials and the discovery of alternative cell sources may facilitate the process of cell-based regenerative therapies for all knee structures becoming the gold standard in the future.

CONCLUSION

Overall, cell-based regenerative cartilage therapy of the knee has shown tremendous development over the last years and has become the standard of care for large and isolated chondral defects. It has shown success in the treatment of traumatic, osteochondral defects but also for degenerative cartilage lesions in the demanding condition of early OA. Future developments and alternative cell sources may help to facilitate cell-based regenerative treatment for all different structures around the knee by a whole joint approach.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

CD271-selected mesenchymal stem cells from adipose tissue enhance cartilage repair and are less angiogenic than plastic adherent mesenchymal stem cells

CD271 is a marker of bone marrow MSCs with enhanced differentiation capacity for bone or cartilage repair. However, the nature of CD271+ MSCs from adipose tissue (AT) is less well understood. Here, we investigated the differentiation, wound healing and angiogenic capacity of plastic adherent MSCs (PA MSCs) versus CD271+ MSCs from AT. There was no difference in the extent to which PA MSCs and CD271+ MSCs formed osteoblasts, adipocytes or chondrocytes in vitro. In contrast, CD271+ MSCs transplanted into athymic rats significantly enhanced osteochondral wound healing with reduced vascularisation in the repair tissue compared to PA MSCs and control animals; there was little histological evidence of mature articular cartilage formation in all animals. Conditioned medium from CD271+ MSC cultures was less angiogenic than PA MSC conditioned medium, and had little effect on endothelial cell migration or endothelial tubule formation in vitro. The low angiogenic activity of CD271+ MSCs and improved early stage tissue repair of osteochondral lesions when transplanted, along with a comparable differentiation capacity along mesenchymal lineages when induced, suggests that these selected cells are a better candidate than PA MSCs for the repair of cartilaginous tissue.

[Operative treatment of cartilage lesions]

Cartilage damage is often associated with pain, reduced quality of life and decreased physical performance. In addition, even small cartilage lesions can lead to osteoarthritis. Since young active people are particularly affected, the correct treatment of cartilage damage plays an important role. Operative treatment includes bone marrow-stimulating procedures with or without a matrix, cell-based procedures and osteochondral graft transplantation. The choice of the best procedure depends on the localization, the size and the extent of the cartilage damage. In addition, especially in the treatment of cartilage damage to the lower limbs, the leg axis and loading relationships should be taken into account and possibly treated as well as additional joint instabilities. The following article gives an overview of the available surgical treatment possibilities as well as the correct indications and implementation. It also gives a brief projection of possible further treatment options associated with stem cells.

[Therapeutic utilization of stem cells in orthopedics]

Stem cells are becoming increasingly more important in the field of regenerative medicine. Adult mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are harvested predominantly from bone marrow or adipose tissue, are already being used in the clinical setting and have a low potential for side effects. In orthopedics, experience has been gained in the treatment of bone defects, non-unions, cartilage defects, osteoarthritis and tendon pathologies. The current data are derived from case studies and randomized controlled trials are missing; therefore, there are many open questions concerning the optimal cell source, number of cells, administration technique (e.g. injections and matrices) or combinations with growth factors; however, it is evident from the data that MSCs have a positive effect on tissue regeneration and are safe to use.

Clinical outcome and T2 assessment following autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis in osteochondral lesions of the talus

PURPOSE

Scientific evidence for the treatment of osteochondral lesions (OCLs) of the talus is limited. The aim of this study was an evaluation of the clinical outcome after a one-step autologous subchondral cancellous bone graft and autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) in medial OCLs of the talus and the assessment of the repair tissue (RT).

METHODS

Seventeen patients (eight women, nine men; mean age, 38.8 ± 15.7 years) with an OCL of the medial talus underwent surgery. Clinical and radiological assessment was performed after a mean follow-up of 39.5 ± 18.4 months, including established scoring systems (American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society [AOFAS] Score, Foot Function Index [FFI], visual analogue scale [VAS]), evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue scoring system (MOCART Score) and T2 mapping.

RESULTS

Preoperative pain (7.8 ± 2.1) significantly improved to an average of 3.2 ± 2.4 postoperatively. AOFAS Score averaged 82.6 ± 13.4, MOCART Score 52.7 ± 15.9. Mean T2 relaxation time of the RT was 41.6 ± 6.3 ms and showed no significant differences to the surrounding cartilage (mean, 38.8 ± 8.5; p = 0.58). MOCART Score significantly correlated with the AOFAS Score (rho = 0.574, p = 0.040). T2 relaxation time of the RT significantly correlated with the MOCART Score (rho = 0.593, p = 0.033).

CONCLUSIONS

The one-step autologous subchondral cancellous bone grafting and AMIC leads to a significant reduction in postoperative pain and satisfying postoperative functional outcome in mid-term follow-up. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment demonstrated a good quality of regenerative tissue similar to the MRI ultrastructure of the surrounding cartilage.

Combination of ADMSCs and chondrocytes reduces hypertrophy and improves the functional properties of osteoarthritic cartilage

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of Adipose derived MSCs (ADMSCs) in combination with chondrocytes in counteracting oxidative stress in chondrocytes in vitro and in rat model of osteoarthritis (OA).

METHOD

Cultured chondrocytes were exposed to oxidative stress with 200 μM Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), followed by co-culture with ADMSCs or chondrocytes or combination of both cell types in a transwell culture system for 36 h. The cytoprotective effect was assessed by immunocytochemistry and gene expression analysis. In vivo study evaluated therapeutic effect of the above mentioned three treatments after transplantation in OA rats.

RESULTS

The Combination of ADMSCs + Chondrocytes decreased the extent of oxidative stress-induced damage of chondrocytes. Enhanced expression level of Acan and Collagen type-II alpha (Col2a1) with a correspondingly decreased expression of Collagen type-I alpha (Col1a1) and Matrix metallopeptidase 13 (Mmp13) was maximally observed in this group. Moreover, reduced count of annexin-V positive cells, Caspase (Casp3) gene expression and Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release with concomitantly enhanced viability and expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) gene was observed. In vivo study showed that homing of cells and proteoglycan contents of knee joints were significantly better in ADMSCs + Chondrocytes transplanted rats. Increased expression of Acan and Col2a1 along with decreased expression of Col1a1 and Mmp13 indicated formation of hyaline cartilage in this group. These rats also demonstrated significantly reduced expression of Casp3 while increased expression of PCNA genes than the other cell transplanted groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrated that a combination of ADMSCs and chondrocytes may be a more effective therapeutic strategy against OA than the use of ADMSCs or chondrocytes separately.

Arthroscopic fixation of cell free polymer-based cartilage implants with a bioinspired polymer surface on the hip joint: a cadaveric pilot study

This study investigates the adhesion capacity of a polyglycolic acid- (PGA-) hyaluronan scaffold with a structural modification based on a planar polymer (PM) surface in a cadaver cartilage defect model. Two cadaver specimens were used to serially test multiple chondral matrices. In a cadaver hip model, cell free polymer-based cartilage implants with a planar bioinspired PM surface (PGA-PM-scaffolds) were implanted arthroscopically on 10 mm × 15 mm full-thickness femoral hip cartilage lesions. Unprocessed cartilage implants without a bioinspired PM surface were used as control group. The cartilage implants were fixed without and with the use of fibrin glue on femoral hip cartilage defects. After 50 movement cycles and removal of the distraction, a rearthroscopy was performed to assess the outline attachment and integrity of the scaffold. The fixation techniques without and with fibrin fixation showed marginal differences for outline attachment, area coverage, scaffold integrity, and endpoint fixation after 50 cycles. The PGA-PM-scaffolds with fibrin fixation achieved a higher score in terms of the attachment, integrity, and endpoint fixation than the PGA-scaffold on the cartilage defect. Relating to the outline attachment, area coverage, scaffold integrity, and endpoint fixation, the fixation with PGA-PM-scaffolds accomplished significantly better results compared to the PGA-scaffolds (P = 0.03752, P = 0.03078, P = 0.00512, P = 0.00512). PGA-PM-scaffolds demonstrate increased observed initial fixation strength in cadaver femoral head defects relative to PGA-scaffold, particularly when fibrin glue is used for fixation.

[Lateral ligament injuries of the ankle joint]

Lateral ligament injuries are the most common sports injury and have a high incidence even in non-sportive activities. Although lateral ligament injuries are very common there is still a controversial debate on the best management. The diagnosis is based on clinical examination and X-ray images help to rule out fractures. Further imaging, especially magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used to diagnose associated injuries. According to the recommendations of the various scientific societies the primary therapy of lateral ligament injuries is conservative. Chronic ankle instability develops in 10-20 % of patients and the instability can be a result of sensomotoric deficits or insufficient healing of the lateral ligament complex. If the patient does not respond to an intensive rehabilitation program an operative reconstruction of the lateral ligaments has to be considered. Most of the procedures currently performed are anatomical reconstructions due to better long-term results compared to tenodesis procedures.

Is the transplant quality at the time of surgery adequate for matrix-guided autologous cartilage transplantation? A pilot study

BACKGROUND

Matrix-guided autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACT) has been proposed as an option for treating large full-thickness cartilage defects. However, little is known about the chondrogenic potential of transplants for MACT at the time of implantation, although cell quality and chondrogenic differentiation of the implants are crucial for restoration of function after MACT.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We therefore asked: (1) Do MACT implants allow deposition of extracellular cartilage matrix in an in vitro culture model? (2) Are these implants associated with improved knee function 1 year after MACT in large cartilage defects?

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all 125 patients with large localized cartilage defects (mean defect size 5 cm(2)) of the knee who were treated with MACT from 2005 to 2010. The mean age was 31 years (range, 16-53 years). Portions of the cell-matrix constructs (n = 50) that were not implanted in the cartilage defects were further cultured and tested for their potential to form articular cartilage. Knee function of all patients was analyzed preoperatively, 3 months, and 1 year postoperatively with the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score.

RESULTS

In vitro assessment of the cell-matrix implants showed chondrogenic differentiation with positive staining for glycosaminoglycans and collagen II in all cultures. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay showed an increase of collagen II production. We observed an improvement in median IKDC score from 41 to 67 points at last followup.

CONCLUSIONS

Cartilage extracellular matrix deposition shows adequate implant quality for MACT at the time of implantation and justifies the use for treatment of large cartilage defects.

Reviewing subchondral cartilage surgery: considerations for standardised and outcome predictable cartilage remodelling: a technical note

PURPOSE

The potential of subchondral mesenchymal stem cell stimulation (MSS) for cartilage repair has led to the widespread use of microfracture as a first line treatment for full thickness articular cartilage defects. Recent focus on the effects of subchondral bone during cartilage injury and repair has expanded the understanding of the strengths and limitations in MSS and opened new pathways for potential improvement. Comparative studies have shown that bone marrow access has positive implications for pluripotential cell recruitment, repair quality and quantity, i.e. deeper channels elicited better cartilage fill, more hyaline cartilage character with higher type II collagen content and lower type I collagen content compared to shallow marrow access.

METHODS

A subchondral needling procedure using standardised and thin subchondral perforations deep into the subarticular bone marrow making the MSS more consistent with the latest developments in subchondral cartilage remodelling is proposed.

RESULTS

As this is a novel method clinical studies have been initiated to evaluate the procedure especially compared to microfracturing. However, the first case studies and follow-ups indicate that specific drills facilitate reaching the subchondral bone marrow while the needle size makes perforation of the subchondral bone easier and more predictable. Clinical results of the first group of patients seem to compare well to microfracturing.

CONCLUSION

The authors suggest a new method for a standardised procedure using a new perforating device. Advances in MSS by subchondral bone marrow perforation are discussed. It remains to be determined by clinical studies how this method compares to microfracturing. The subchondral needling offers the surgeon and the investigator a method that facilitates comparison studies because of its defined depth of subchondral penetration and needle size.

Reoperative characteristics after microfracture of knee cartilage lesions in 454 patients

PURPOSE

There is only limited information on those patients who fail following microfracture treatment at the knee joint. Evaluation was made of factors associated with treatment failure and clinical outcome assessment among this collective.

METHODS

The study included a total of 560 patients who had previously undergone microfracture for the treatment of symptomatic knee joint cartilage lesions. For the remainder of this study, inclusion criteria were patients that underwent reoperation at the initially operated knee joint (index knee) due to symptoms related to the primary site of microfracture intervention (failure patients) with a minimum postoperative follow-up of 2 years. The remaining cohort of patients served as internal control (non-failure patients). Chart reviews were performed to identify patient and defect characteristics. Patients were evaluated for postoperative Lysholm knee scores, Tegner activity scale, as well as preoperative and postoperative numeric analogue scales (NAS) for function and pain (10 = highest possible function, no pain).

RESULTS

A total of 454/560 (81.1 %) subjects were completely evaluated. Overall, 123/454 patients (26.9 %) (age at operation 43.9 ± 14.1 years, 56 female, BMI 25.8 ± 3.6, 30 smokers, 61.1 ± 68.3 month symptom duration, postoperative follow-up 5.0 ± 2.1) met the inclusion criteria. The postoperative Lysholm score was 63.0 ± 24.6 and the Tegner score was 4.0; NAS function improved from 2.8 ± 1.8 to 4.8 ± 2.2 (P < 0.001), and NAS pain improved from 3.2 ± 2.1 to 5.0 ± 2.4 (P < 0.001). Exclusively, the overall defect size/knee joint was smaller (P = 0.006), postoperative follow-up was longer (P = 0.002), and existense of previous surgery (77.2 vs. 51.6 %, P < 0.001) was more frequent in failure subjects when comparing to non-failure patients (n = 331). The overall clinical outcome among failure subjects was significantly worse when comparing to non-failure subjects. Regression analysis identified that lower preoperative NAS values, being a smoker, and patello-femoral lesions were associated with a higher probability of reoperation.

CONCLUSION

Within the collective presented here, microfracturing was associated with a high frequency of reoperation. Clinical outcome is worse when compared with that of patients without reoperation. Specific parameters can be identified that increase the eventuality of failure following microfracture treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Maintenance of "stem cell" features of cartilage cell sub-populations during in vitro propagation

Background

The discovery of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) or MSC-like cells in cartilage tissue does not tie in well with the established view that MSCs derive from a perivascular niche. The presence of MSCs may raise concerns about specificity and application safety, particularly in terms of the regulatory site. The aim of the present study was to investigate the benefits or possible risks of the MSC-like properties of cells isolated from cartilage in the context of autologous chondrocyte implantation.

Methods

Chondrocytic cells were isolated from cartilage or intervertebral disc tissue. Flow cytometry was used to analyze the expression of cell surface antigens. MSC-like cells were either enriched or depleted by means of magnetic cell sorting (MACS) involving the monoclonal antibodies W5C5/SUSD2 and W8B2/MSCA-1. We addressed the issues of prolonged expansion of such cells as well as the influence of culture medium as a trigger for selecting a single cell type. Established protocols were used to study in vitro differentiation. In addition to histological and biochemical assessment, the acquired phenotypes were also evaluated on the mRNA transcript level.

Results

In the studied cells, we found strongly analogous expression of antigens typically expressed on MSCs, including CD49e, CD73, CD90, CD105, CD140b and CD166. The expression of W5C5 and W8B2 antigens in cartilage cell sub-populations did not correlate with multi-potency. We demonstrated that a chondroid precursor, but not a bona fide multipotent mesenchymal, cell type can be obtained under established in vitro culture conditions. The culture media used for expansion influenced the cell phenotype.

Conclusions

The risk of adverse adipose or osseous differentiation is not posed by expanded chondrocyte cultures, even after enrichment of putative MSC-like cell populations by MACS. It is possible that this limited “stemness” in chondrocytes, expanded for use in ACI, may instead be beneficial as it allows re-differentiation under appropriate conditions despite prolonged times in culture.

[Cell-based therapy options for osteochondral defects. Autologous mesenchymal stem cells compared to autologous chondrocytes]

Cartilage defects are multifactorial and site-specific and therefore need a clear analysis of the underlying pathology as well as an individualized therapy so that cartilage repair lacks a one-for-all therapy. The results of comparative clinical studies using cultured chondrocytes in autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) have shown some superiority over conventional microfracturing under defined conditions, especially for medium or large defects and in long-term durability. Adult mesenchymal stem cells can be isolated from bone marrow, have the potency to proliferate in culture and are capable of differentiating into the chondrogenic pathway. They represent a promising versatile cell source for cartilage repair but the ideal conditions for cultivation and application in cartilage repair are not yet known or have not yet been characterized. Adding a scaffold offers mechanical stability and advances chondrogenic differentiation for both possible cell sources.

Five-year outcome of characterized chondrocyte implantation versus microfracture for symptomatic cartilage defects of the knee: early treatment matters

BACKGROUND

Characterized chondrocyte implantation (CCI) results in significantly better early structural tissue regeneration than microfracture (MF), and CCI has a midterm clinical benefit over microfracture.

PURPOSE

This study was undertaken to evaluate the 5-year clinical outcome of CCI in a randomized comparison with MF for the treatment of symptomatic cartilage defects of the femoral condyles of the knee.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

METHODS

Participants aged 18 to 50 years with a symptomatic isolated International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grade III or IV cartilage lesion of the femoral condyles between 1 and 5 cm(2) were randomized to either CCI or MF. Clinical outcomes were measured up to 60 months after surgery using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). The main outcome parameter was change from baseline in overall KOOS (oKOOS). Adverse events were monitored.

RESULTS

Fifty-one participants were treated with CCI and 61 with MF. On average, clinical benefit was maintained through the 60-month follow-up period. The average change from baseline in oKOOS was not different between both groups (least squares [LS] mean ± standard error [SE] 18.84 ± 3.58 for CCI vs 13.21 ± 5.63 for MF; P = .116). Treatment failures were comparable (n = 7 in CCI vs n = 10 in MF), although MF failures tended to occur earlier. Subgroup analysis revealed that CCI resulted in better outcome in participants with time since symptom onset of less than 3 years, which was statistically significant and clinically relevant (change in oKOOS <3 years mean ± SE 25.96 ± 3.45 for CCI vs 15.28 ± 3.17 for MF; P = .026 vs oKOOS >3 years mean ± SE 13.09 ± 4.78 for CCI vs 17.02 ± 4.50 for MF, P = .554). Other subgroup analyses such as age (cutoff 35 years) did not show a difference. Female patients showed more failures irrespective of treatment.

CONCLUSION

At 5 years after treatment, clinical outcomes for CCI and MF were comparable. In the early treatment group, CCI obtained statistically significant and clinically relevant better results than MF. Delayed treatment resulted in less predictable outcomes for CCI. These results provide strong evidence that time since onset of symptoms is an essential variable that should be taken into account in future treatment algorithms for cartilage repair of the knee.