Fehler bei der Behandlung suprakondylärer Humerusfrakturen bei Kindern – Erfahrungen der Norddeutschen Schlichtungsstelle

3D-printed model and osteotomy template technique compared with conventional closing-wedge osteotomy in cubitus varus deformity

Cubitus varus deformity is the most common late complication of malunited supracondylar fracture that requires corrective osteotomy and fixation. From 2009 to 2017, 40 consecutive patients with cubitus varus deformity were included. Twenty patients underwent the conventional closing-wedge osteotomy (conventional group), while the other twenty patients underwent the 3D-printed model and osteotomy template osteotomy (3D-printed template group). The functional outcome was evaluated using the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) Score and Flynn criteria. There were no statistically significant differences were observed regarding the humerus-elbow-wrist angle and tilting angle between the two groups, both preoperatively and postoperatively at 24 months. No statistically significant differences were observed regarding the elbow ROM (127.0 ± 4.7° VS 128.9 ± 3.8°) and MEPI score (93.5 ± 3.3 VS 94.3 ± 4.1) between the groups. All patients were satisfied both cosmetically and functionally as per the Flynn criteria and MEPI score. The conventional osteotomy and 3D-printed model and osteotomy template techniques both met the treatment requirements of cubitus varus deformity. The 3D-printed template technique showed better osteotomy accuracy, but no significant advantage regarding the functional and cosmetic results than conventional osteotomy.

[Typical liability damages of the upper extremities in childhood and their evaluation]

Legal appraisals of possible treatment errors in childhood and adolescence are rare, often refer to the treatment of trauma of the upper limbs and are frequently recognized. From the activity of the first author as an expert witness 31 expert opinions (25%) referred to the upper limbs. Supracondylar humeral fractures, radius neck fractures, radial condyle fractures and distal radius fractures were predominant. A primary treatment error was determined in 14 patients and a secondary error in 7 patients. This corresponds to a recognition rate of 68%. The aim of this study was the reflection and the development of a prevention strategy. Insufficient recognition of instability (radial condyle), inadequate reduction and inadequate stabilization (radius neck, supracondylar) as well as untreated malalignments and secondary dislocations (wrist) were the main reproaches. Poor communication and deficient documentation often aggravate the situation. Working along clear algorithms can help to avoid legal proceedings and assignment of guilt.

Comparison of internal fixation vs. external fixation after corrective osteotomy in children with cubitus varus

BACKGROUND

Cubitus varus deformity is a well-known late complication of supracondylar fractures in children. In this retrospective study, the primary objective was to compare clinical and radiologic outcomes of lateral closing-wedge osteotomy with either internal fixation or external fixation in pediatric patients with cubitus varus deformities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2010 to 2017, 35 consecutive patients with cubitus varus deformities secondary to supracondylar fractures were included in this study. After corrective osteotomy was performed via a limited lateral approach, the method of definitive fixation was chosen between internal and external. Retrospectively, patients who underwent external fixation on the lateral aspect of the elbow were defined as group I (n = 16) whereas patients with unilateral single-plate fixation were defined as group II (n = 19). The functional outcome was evaluated using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score and Flynn criteria.

RESULTS

No significant difference in age was found between the 2 groups (P = .15). Significantly lower costs, a shorter operation duration, smaller scars, and a shorter time for plaster cast use postoperatively were found in group I (P < .001). No nonunion or failure of fixation was found. No significant difference was noted in postoperative elbow range of motion or Mayo Elbow Performance Score (P = .64). Both groups achieved satisfactory functional and cosmetic results.

CONCLUSIONS

In pediatric patients with cubitus varus, both methods of fixation after lateral closing-wedge corrective osteotomy are reliable, with a low rate of complications and satisfactory functional results. External fixation is more advantageous in terms of easier preoperative planning, shorter operative times, lower costs, and easier postoperative fixation removal.

Correction of Cubitus Varus After Pediatric Supracondylar Elbow Fracture: Alternative Method Using the Taylor Spatial Frame

BACKGROUND

Cubitus varus is a well-reported complication of supracondylar fracture of the humerus potentially resulting in cosmetic problems, impaired function, and malpractice claims. Traditional methods of correcting malunited distal humeral fractures involve complex osteotomies that have a high complication rate, require a large exposure, and challenging fixation. We present a technique of gradual correction using a percutaneous transverse osteotomy and 3 dimensional correction with a Taylor Spatial Frame.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, IRB-approved study of 12 patients between 2006 and 2010, with cubitus varus after a malunited pediatric supracondylar fracture. The average age at initial injury was 5+8 years. The average age of the patients at surgery was 8+8 years. We measured technical (radiographic parameters and complications), functional (clinical carrying angle, range of motion, QuickDash), and satisfaction domain (questionnaire) outcomes at a minimum follow-up of 6 months.

RESULTS

The osteotomy healed in all patients by 10 weeks after the index surgery. The mean external fixator time was 10 weeks. The average preoperative and postoperative humeroulnar angles for the affected elbow were 23 degrees varus and 5.8 degrees valgus, respectively. This was statistically significant (P<0.001). The mean preoperative and postoperative carrying angles were 22 degrees of varus and 5.8 degrees of valgus. This was statistically significant (P<0.001). The results of the QuickDash assessment showed that patients were doing very well with regard to the use of their upper extremity. The mean symptom/disability score was 0.80. No major complications or neurovascular complications were encountered. Overall satisfaction with the procedure was high.

CONCLUSIONS

The Taylor Spatial Frame as used in this case series provides the experienced surgeon another safe, accurate, and reliable method to correct cubitus varus after pediatric supracondylar fracture. We used in 7 of our 12 cases, a previously unreported pattern of distal humeral pin fixation that allows for a very distal metaphyseal osteotomy, close to the deformity apex. This is a biplanar delta configuration that straddles the olecranon fossa and is appropriate for both children and adults.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.