CEUS and HCC: are the 2008 EFSUMB guidelines still valid or has their wash-out already started?

Integrating contrast-enhanced sonography in the follow-up algorithm of hepatocellular carcinoma treated with radiofrequency ablation: single cancer center experience

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with percutaneous ablation require close follow-up for early detecting and treating tumor recurrence.

PURPOSE

To illustrate our single-center prospective experience on using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) as a follow-up tool alternated with computed tomography (CT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In a 7-year period 588 patients with one to three HCCs were treated with radiofrequency ablation (alone or combined with ethanol injection). Patients with completely ablated tumors at 1-month CT scan were followed up serially, using alternated CEUS (one microbubbles injection per lobe) and CT every 3 months for 2 years. In few cases magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was employed instead of or in addition to CT. The following patterns of recurrence were considered: A, enhancing tissue within the lesion; B, enhancing tissue adherent to the lesion; C, enhancing tissue within the same liver segment of the treated nodule; and D, enhancing tissue within a different segment. Patients with positive CEUS underwent confirmatory CT/MRI (standard reference).

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 19 months. There were 221 recurrences. Three pattern A recurrences (2 detected by CEUS and 1 by CT), 86 pattern B recurrences (44 detected by CEUS and 42 by CT), 70 pattern C recurrences (32 detected by CEUS and 38 by CT), and 62 pattern D recurrences (23 detected by CEUS and 39 by CT). CT detected additional nodules in 16/101 patients with positive CEUS.

CONCLUSION

CEUS follow-up of HCC patients after ablation is feasible. Since 72% recurrences develop in the same segment of the necrotic nodule, CEUS proves to be effective despite the minor visualization of the entire liver during the arterial phase when compared to CT and MRI. Including CEUS in patient follow-up may reduce the number of CT and MRI examinations.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: advance and current status in abdominal imaging

In the field of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (US), contrast agents are classified as either first- or second-generation agents depending on the gas within the microbubbles. In the case of first-generation contrast agents, a high-mechanical-index technique is used and only intermittent scanning is possible due to the early destruction of the microbubbles during the scanning. The use of second-generation contrast agents in a low-mechanical-index technique enables continuous scanning. Besides the detection and characterization of focal liver lesions, contrastenhanced US is helpful in the monitoring of radiofrequency ablation therapy and in the targeting step of an US-guided biopsy. Recently, there has been a demand for new criteria to evaluate the treatment response obtained using anti-angiogenic agents because morphologic criteria alone may not reflect the treatment response of the tumor and contrast-enhanced US can provide quantitative markers of tissue perfusion. In spite of the concerns related to its cost-effectiveness, contrast-enhanced US has the potential to be more widely used as a complimentary tool or to substitute the current imaging modalities in some occasions.

Fortuitously discovered liver lesions

The fortuitously discovered liver lesion is a common problem. Consensus might be expected in terms of its work-up, and yet there is none. This stems in part from the fact that there is no preventive campaign involving the early detection of liver tumors other than for patients with known liver cirrhosis and oncological patients. The work-up (detection and differential diagnosis) of liver tumors comprises theoretical considerations, history, physical examination, laboratory tests, standard ultrasound, Doppler ultrasound techniques, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, as well as image-guided biopsy. CEUS techniques have proved to be the most pertinent method; these techniques became part of the clinical routine about 10 years ago in Europe and Asia and are used for a variety of indications in daily clinical practice. CEUS is in many cases the first and also decisive technical intervention for detecting and characterizing liver tumors. This development is reflected in many CEUS guidelines, e.g., in the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) guidelines 2004, 2008 and 2012 as well as the recently published World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology-EFSUMB guidelines 2012. This article sets out considerations for making a structured work-up of incidental liver tumors feasible.