1
|
Huang XQ, Qiu JK, Wang CH, Pan L, Xu JK, Pan XH, Ji XB, Mao MJ. Sepsis secondary to multifocal Enterococcus faecium infection: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e19811. [PMID: 32629622 PMCID: PMC7337606 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000019811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Nosocomial Enterococcus faecium (E faecium) infections are common among immunocompromised patients; however, sepsis caused by E faecium is rarely encountered in the clinical setting. PATIENT CONCERNS A 69-year-old woman with a previous history of tuberculosis (TB), developed symptoms of recurrent fever, paroxysmal cough, and exertional dyspnea for over 2 months before she presented to the hospital. DIAGNOSIS The patient was initially misdiagnosed with recurrent TB, and did not respond to anti-TB therapy. Culture results of blood, endotracheal necrotic tissue, and urine confirmed a diagnosis of multifocal E faecium infection. INTERVENTIONS On definitive diagnosis, the patient received intensive antimicrobial combination treatment with linezolid, teicoplanin, caspofungin, and voriconazole on the basis of antimicrobial susceptibility results. OUTCOMES After transient improvement, the patient's condition deteriorated due to secondary infections, and the patient died after discharge against medical advice. CONCLUSION E faecium bacteremia may cause sepsis in immunocompromised patients, and has a high mortality rate. Careful pathogen detection and early initiation of treatment is crucial to good patient outcome.
Collapse
|
2
|
Lübbert C, Wendt K, Feisthammel J, Moter A, Lippmann N, Busch T, Mössner J, Hoffmeister A, Rodloff AC. Epidemiology and Resistance Patterns of Bacterial and Fungal Colonization of Biliary Plastic Stents: A Prospective Cohort Study. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0155479. [PMID: 27171497 PMCID: PMC4865241 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2016] [Accepted: 04/29/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Plastic stents used for the treatment of biliary obstruction will become occluded over time due to microbial colonization and formation of biofilms. Treatment of stent-associated cholangitis is often not effective because of inappropriate use of antimicrobial agents or antimicrobial resistance. We aimed to assess the current bacterial and fungal etiology of stent-associated biofilms, with particular emphasis on antimicrobial resistance. Methods Patients with biliary strictures requiring endoscopic stent placement were prospectively enrolled. After the retrieval of stents, biofilms were disrupted by sonication, microorganisms were cultured, and isolates were identified by matrix-associated laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry and/or biochemical typing. Finally, minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined for various antimicrobial agents. Selected stents were further analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Results Among 120 patients (62.5% males, median age 64 years) with biliary strictures (35% malignant, 65% benign), 113 double pigtail polyurethane and 100 straight polyethylene stents were analyzed after a median indwelling time of 63 days (range, 1–1274 days). The stent occlusion rate was 11.5% and 13%, respectively, being associated with a significantly increased risk of cholangitis (38.5% vs. 9.1%, P<0.001). Ninety-five different bacterial and 13 fungal species were detected; polymicrobial colonization predominated (95.8% vs. 4.2%, P<0.001). Enterococci (79.3%), Enterobacteriaceae (73.7%), and Candida spp. (55.9%) were the leading pathogens. Candida species were more frequent in patients previously receiving prolonged antibiotic therapy (63% vs. 46.7%, P = 0.023). Vancomycin-resistant enterococci accounted for 13.7%, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae with co-resistance to ciprofloxacin accounted for 13.9%, and azole-resistant Candida spp. accounted for 32.9% of the respective isolates. Conclusions Enterococci and Candida species play an important role in the microbial colonization of biliary stents. Therefore, empirical antimicrobial treatment of stent-associated cholangitis should be guided toward enterococci, Enterobacteriaceae, streptococci, anaerobes, and Candida. To determine causative pathogens, an accurate microbiological analysis of the extracted stent(s) may be helpful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Lübbert
- Interdisciplinary Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology and Rheumatology, Leipzig University Hospital, Liebigstr. 20, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany.,Division of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology and Rheumatology, Leipzig University Hospital, Liebigstr. 20, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany.,Interdisciplinary Center for Infectious Diseases, Leipzig University Hospital, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Karolin Wendt
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology and Rheumatology, Leipzig University Hospital, Liebigstr. 20, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Jürgen Feisthammel
- Interdisciplinary Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology and Rheumatology, Leipzig University Hospital, Liebigstr. 20, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Annette Moter
- Biofilm Center, German Heart Institute (Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, DHZB), Hindenburgdamm 30, D-12203 Berlin, Germany
| | - Norman Lippmann
- Interdisciplinary Center for Infectious Diseases, Leipzig University Hospital, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany.,Institute for Medical Microbiology and Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases, Leipzig University Hospital, Liebigstr. 21, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Thilo Busch
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Leipzig University Hospital, Liebigstr. 20, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Joachim Mössner
- Interdisciplinary Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology and Rheumatology, Leipzig University Hospital, Liebigstr. 20, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Albrecht Hoffmeister
- Interdisciplinary Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology and Rheumatology, Leipzig University Hospital, Liebigstr. 20, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Arne C Rodloff
- Interdisciplinary Center for Infectious Diseases, Leipzig University Hospital, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany.,Institute for Medical Microbiology and Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases, Leipzig University Hospital, Liebigstr. 21, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lübbert C, Rodloff AC, Hamed K. Real-World Treatment of Enterococcal Infections with Daptomycin: Insights from a Large European Registry (EU-CORE). Infect Dis Ther 2015; 4:259-71. [PMID: 26168986 PMCID: PMC4575293 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-015-0072-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Evolution of antibacterial resistance in pathogenic enterococcal strains poses a growing therapeutic challenge. Daptomycin, a cyclic lipopeptide, exhibits broad antibiotic activity against Gram-positive bacteria. Methods The European Cubicin® Outcomes Registry and Experience, a multicenter, retrospective, non-interventional study, recorded clinical outcomes following daptomycin treatment. Results Overall, 472 patients (predominantly elderly Caucasian males) were treated for enterococcal infections. Of those, 72.7% received antibiotics prior to daptomycin treatment, whereas 77.1% received other antibiotics concomitantly. Failure of previous therapy, resistant or non-susceptible pathogen, and narrowing of antibiotic therapy were the main reasons for switching to daptomycin treatment. Nosocomial infections comprised 55.8% of the cohort. Bacteremia (29.9%), complicated skin and soft tissue infection (29.2%) and endocarditis (12.3%) were the most common primary infections. Clinical success was achieved in 77.1% of patients, with similar success rates across all primary infection categories. The overall clinical success rate was marginally higher (82.5% vs 74.6%, p = 0.09) with daptomycin use as first-line versus second-line therapy. Patients receiving higher doses of daptomycin exhibited the highest clinical success rates (85.7% for ≥8 mg/kg/day vs 75.8% for <8 mg/kg/day, p = 0.08). While 81 (17.2%) patients reported at least one adverse event (AE), only 11 (2.3%) and 3 (0.6%) had treatment-related AEs and serious AEs, respectively. Separate microbiologic findings from Leipzig University Hospital demonstrate small proportions of Enterococcus faecium isolates with daptomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations = 4 mg/L (4%) or ≥8 mg/L (0.8%), which are regarded as non-susceptible. Conclusion For enterococcal infections, daptomycin appears to be an effective and well-tolerated treatment option, exhibiting highest clinical success rates at higher doses. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40121-015-0072-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Lübbert
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology and Rheumatology, Leipzig University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Arne C Rodloff
- Institute for Medical Microbiology and Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases, Leipzig University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Kamal Hamed
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
| |
Collapse
|