Interobserver-Reliabilität beim funktionellen Prostata MRT: Evaluation eines Scoringsystems

Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3 T: Failure of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy to Provide Added Value

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging (MRSI) on the accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) at 3 T for prostate cancer detection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-four patients with prostate cancer were included in this retrospective study. All patients underwent preoperative mpMRI on a 3-T scanner before radical prostatectomy. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation was based on the prostate imaging-reporting and data system classification system. The accuracy of mpMRI with and without MRSI was determined using receiver operating characteristic analysis, with histology as the reference standard.

RESULTS

Multiparametric MRI including MRSI had a sensitivity of 57.0% and a specificity of 89.2% for sextant-based cancer detection. Multiparametric MRI without MRSI had a sensitivity of 58.1% and a specificity of 87.4%. There was no significant difference regarding the accuracy of mpMRI with and without MRSI (P = 0.48).

CONCLUSION

The addition of MRSI does not improve the accuracy of 3 T mpMRI for sextant localization of prostate cancer.

MRI-targeted prostate biopsy: a review of technique and results

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is of interest for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer and mpMRI-targeted biopsies are being used increasingly in clinical practice. Target acquisition is performed using a range of magnet strengths and varying combinations of anatomical and functional sequences. Target identification at the time of biopsy can be carried out in the MRI scanner (in-bore biopsy) or, more commonly, the MRI-target is biopsied under ultrasonographic guidance. Many groups use cognitive or visual registration, whereby the biopsy target is identified on MRI and ultrasonography is subsequently used to direct the needle to the same location. Other groups use registration software to show prebiopsy MRI data on real-time ultrasonography. The reporting of histological results in MRI-targeted biopsy studies varies greatly. The most useful reports compare the detection of clinically significant disease in standard cores versus mpMRI-targeted cores in the same cohort of men, as recommended by the STAndards of Reporting for MRI-Targeted biopsy studies (START) consensus panel. Further evidence is needed before an mpMRI-targeted strategy can be recommended as the standard intervention for men at risk of prostate cancer.