Operative intercostal chest drain is not required following extrapleural or transpleural esophageal atresia repair

Outcome of Newborns with Tracheoesophageal Fistula: An Experience from a Rapidly Developing Country: Room for Improvement

Methods

This is a retrospective review of the medical electronic charts of patients with TEF that were followed at Sidra Medicine in the state of Qatar. The review included the patients who were operated upon in the period of 2011-2021 but continued to follow at our institution in the period of 2018-2021. Demographic data, associated anomalies, preoperative, operative, and postoperative courses, and growth parameters were collected.

Results

A total of 35 patients with TEF (24 males and 11 females) were collected. 49% were full term. We identified seven patients (20%) with isolated TEF, TEF with VACTERL association in 29% of our patients, other chromosomal anomalies in 17%, or associated with other anomalies (not related to VACTERL) in 34% of the patients. The majority of the patients (94%) were of type C-TEF (TEF with esophageal atresia-EA/TEF). All patients were operated except for one patient who died at 2 days of life due to cardiac complications. Median age at which surgery was performed was 2 days (range 1-270 days). Median follow-up was 32 months (range 7-115 months). Immediate postoperative complications were encountered in eleven patients (33%) and included anastomosis leak in 12%, air leak in 6%, sepsis in 6%, chylothorax in 3%, vocal cord palsy and fistula recurrence (combined) in 3%, and failure of TEF closure in 3% of the patients. Long-term respiratory complications were encountered in 43% of our patients. Long-term gastrointestinal complications included gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) in 63%, dysphagia in 31%, and anastomotic stricture in 34% of the patients. Growth was affected in around a quarter of the patients at 6 months after surgery and 22% at 12-month assessment postoperatively. While only five patients died at our institution, only one was directly related to failure of TEF closure and postoperative complications.

Conclusion

This descriptive study reports the clinical outcome of TEF from a rapidly developing country. The distribution of the patients' characteristics and postoperative complications was almost comparable to those from developed countries. This study would aid in addressing the prognostic factors and establishment of evidence-based management pathways of newborns with TEF to improve the clinical outcome in our center and other pediatric tertiary centers in developing countries.

Necessity of Prophylactic Extrapleural Chest Tube During Primary Surgical Repair of Esophageal Atresia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Esophageal atresia is corrected surgically by anastomosing and recreating esophageal continuity. To allow the removal of excess fluid and air from the anastomosis, a prophylactic and temporary intraoperative chest tube (IOCT) has traditionally been placed in this area during surgery. However, whether the potential benefits of this prophylactic IOCT overweigh the potential harms is unclear.

Objective

To assess the benefits and harms of using a prophylactic IOCT during primary surgical repair of esophageal atresia.

Data Sources

We conducted a systematic review with a meta-analysis. We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (2021, Issue 12), MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Ovid, CINAHL, and Science Citation Index Expanded and Conference Proceedings Citation Index-(Web of Science). Search was performed from inception until December 3rd, 2021.

Study Selection

Randomized clinical trials (RCT) assessing the effect of a prophylactic IOCT during primary surgical repair of esophageal atresia and observational studies identified during our searches for RCT.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Two independent reviewers screened studies and performed data extraction. The certainty of the evidence was assessed by GRADE and ROBINS-I.

PROSPERO Registration

A protocol for this review has been registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021257834).

Results

We included three RCTs randomizing 162 neonates, all at overall "some risk of bias." The studies compared the placement of an IOCT vs. none. The meta-analysis did not identify any significant effect of profylacitic IOCT, as confidence intervals were compatible with no effect, but the analyses suggests that the placement of an IOCT might lead to an increase in all-cause mortality (RR 1.66, 95% CI 0.76-3.65; three trials), serious adverse events (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.58-2.00; three trials), intervention-requiring pneumothorax (RR 1.65, 95% CI 0.28-9.50; two trials), and anastomosis leakage (RR 1.66, 95% CI 0.63-4.40). None of our included studies assessed esophageal stricture or pain. Certainty of evidence was very low for all outcomes.

Conclusions

Evidence from RCTs does not support the routine use of a prophylactic IOCT during primary surgical repair of esophageal atresia.

Retrospective analysis of pneumothorax after repair of esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula

Background

To analyze the possible causes, treatment and outcomes of postoperative pneumothorax in patients with Gross type C esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF).

Methods

Medical records of patients with Gross type C EA/TEF who were diagnosed and treated in Beijing Children’s Hospital from January 2007 to January 2020 were retrospectively collected. They were divided into 2 groups according to whether postoperative pneumothorax occurred. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to identify risk factors for pneumothorax.

Results

A total of 188 patients were included, including 85 (45 %) in the pneumothorax group and 103 (55 %) in the non-pneumothorax group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that postoperative anastomotic leakage [P < 0.001, OR 3.516 (1.859, 6.648)] and mechanical ventilation [P = 0.012, OR 2.399 (1.210, 4.758)] were independent risk factors for pneumothorax after EA/TEF repair. Further analysis of main parameters of mechanical ventilation after surgery showed that none of them were clearly related to the occurrence of pneumothorax. Among the 85 patients with pneumothorax, 33 gave up after surgery and 52 received further treatment [conservative observation (n = 20), pleural puncture (n = 11), pleural closed drainage (n = 9), both pleural puncture and closed drainage (n = 12)]. All of the 52 patients were cured of pneumothorax at discharge.

Conclusions

Anastomotic leakage and postoperative mechanical ventilation were risk factors for pneumothorax after repair of Gross type C EA/TEF, but the main parameters of mechanical ventilation had no clear correlation with pneumothorax. After symptomatic treatment, the prognosis of pneumothorax was good.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12887-021-02948-x.

The value of prophylactic chest tubes in tracheoesophageal fistula repair

PURPOSE

Intraoperative chest tubes (IOCTs) can be placed during esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF) repair to control pneumothoraces and detect esophageal leaks, potentially preventing the need for postoperative chest tubes (POCTs). However, data are lacking regarding IOCTs' effect. We hypothesized that IOCT placement would not reduce the risk of POCT placement and would increase hospital length of stay (LOS).

METHODS

This was a single-center case-control study of type C EA/TEF patients repaired at a tertiary referral center between 2006 and 2017. Postoperative complications of patients who received IOCTs (n = 83) were compared to that of patients who did not receive IOCTs (n = 26). Patients were compared via propensity score matching. Additionally, sensitivity analyses excluding low birth weight (LBW) patients and patients undergoing delayed esophageal anastomosis were also performed.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in rates of pneumothoraces or esophageal leaks between the IOCT and no-IOCT groups, nor were either of these complications detected earlier in the IOCT group. Rates of POCT placement and mortality also did not differ between groups. IOCT patients were associated with increased hospital LOS (28 vs 15.5 days, p < 0.001) and esophageal strictures (30% vs 8%, p = 0.04) requiring a return to the operating room (RTOR).

CONCLUSION

IOCTs did not improve outcomes in EA/TEF repair. IOCTs seem associated with increased LOS and ROTR for esophageal stricture, suggesting that IOCTs may not be beneficial after EA/TEF repair.

Repair of oesophageal atresia by consultants and supervised trainees results in similar outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Consultants and trainees require exposure to complex cases for maintaining and gaining operative experience. Oesophageal atresia (OA) repair is a neonatal surgical procedure with indicative numbers for completion of training. A conflict of interest may exist between adequate training, maintaining consultant experience and achieving good outcomes. We aimed to review outcomes of procedures performed primarily by trainees and those performed by consultants.

METHODS

We carried out a retrospective case note review of all consecutive infants who underwent surgical repair of OA with distal tracheooesophageal fistula (TOF) between January 1994 and December 2014 at our institution. Only cases that underwent primary oesophageal anastomosis were included. Surgical outcomes were compared between cases that had a trainee and those that had a consultant listed as the primary operator.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-two cases were included. A total of 52 procedures were performed by trainees, and 68 by consultants. Two cases were undeterminable and excluded. Infant demographics, clinical characteristics and duration of follow-up were similar between groups. All infants survived to discharge. Procedures performed by trainees and those performed by consultants as primary operators had a similar incidence of postoperative pneumothorax (trainees 4, consultants 3; p=0.46), anastomotic leak (trainees 5, consultants 3; p=0.29) and recurrent TOF (trainees 0, consultants 2; p=0.5). Overall 52% of cases had an anastomotic dilatation during follow-up, with no difference between the trainee and consultant groups (50% vs 53%; p=0.85).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical outcomes for repair of OA/TOF are not adversely affected by trainee operating. Trainees with appropriate skills should perform supervised OA/TOF repair. These data are important for understanding the interrelationship between provision of training and surgical outcomes.

Immediate primary anastomosis for isolated oesophageal atresia: A single-centre experience

BACKGROUND

Isolated oesophageal atresia without tracheo-oesophageal fistula represents a major challenge for most paediatric surgeons. Here, we present our experience with six neonates with isolated oesophageal atresia who successfully underwent immediate primary anastomosis using multiple Livaditis circular myotomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All six neonates were gross type A isolated oesophageal atresia (6%), from among 102 neonates with oesophageal atresia, treated between January 2009 and December 2013. Five neonates were female; one was male. The mean birth weight was 2300 (range 1700-3100) g.

RESULTS

All six neonates successfully underwent immediate primary anastomosis using multiple myotomies (mean 3; range 2-4) within 10 (median 3) days after birth. The gap under traction ranged from 6 to 7 cm. One neonate died of a major cardiac anomaly. Another neonate was lost to follow-up after being well for 3 months. Three anastomotic strictures were treated with balloon dilatation, and four anastomotic leaks were treated conservatively. The mean duration of follow-up was 33 months.

CONCLUSIONS

To treat isolated oesophageal atresia, an immediate primary anastomosis can be achieved using multiple myotomies. Although, this approach is associated with high complication rates, as are other similar approaches, these complications can be overcome.