Screening for Cushing's syndrome: new immunoassays require adequate normative data

Study of temporal variability of salivary cortisol and cortisone by LC-MS/MS using a new atmospheric pressure ionization source

There is a growing interest concerning the relevance of salivary cortisone levels in stress-related research. However, studies investigating morning patterns and day-to-day variability of cortisone versus cortisol levels are lacking. Cortisol and cortisone analysis by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectroscopy (LC-MS/MS) has been widely used for routine laboratory measurements in the last years. The aim of this study was to develop an ultra-performance LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous quantification of salivary cortisol and cortisone levels for assessing the temporal variability of these hormones. Saliva samples were collected from 18 healthy volunteers at 0, 15, and 30 min after awakening on each day for 1 week and analysed with the newly developed method. We used a novel atmospheric pressure ionization source, which resulted in high sensitivity and specificity for both cortisol and cortisone as well as higher peak values and signal-to-noise ratio as compared with the electrospray ionization source. Cortisone showed similar morning patterns as cortisol: a 25% and 49% increase in levels at 15 and 30 min after awakening, respectively. Most cortisone indices showed somewhat lower day-to-day variability and were less affected by state-related covariates. We recommend further exploration of the potential of salivary cortisone as a biomarker in stress-related research.

Specificity of late-night salivary cortisol measured by automated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay for Cushing's disease in an obese population

PURPOSE

Data about the specificity of late-night salivary cortisol (LNSC) in obese subjects are still conflicting. Therefore, with this study, we aimed to evaluate the specificity of LNSC measurement in an obese cohort with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) using an automated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA).

METHODS

A total number of 157 patients involving 40 healthy subjects (HS) with BMI < 25 kg/m², 83 obese subjects (OS) with BMI ≥ 35 kg/m², and 34 histopathologically proven Cushing's disease (CD) were included. All patients underwent LNSC testing. Salivary cortisol was measured at 11 p.m. for all groups using an ECLIA. Reference range was established using values of LNSCs of HS and ROC curves were used to determine diagnostic cutoffs.

RESULTS

In the HS group, mean LNSC was 4.7 nmol/l (SD ± 3.1), while the OS group had a mean value of 10.9 nmol/l (SD ± 7.5) and the CD group of 19.9 nmol/l (SD ± 15.4). All groups differed significantly (p < 0.001). The ROC analysis of CD against HS alone showed a sensitivity of 85.3% and a specificity of 87.5% with a cut-off value of 8.3 nmol/l. The ROC analysis between OS and CD showed a maximum sensitivity of 67.6% and specificity of 78.3% for a cut-off value of 12.3 nmol/l. Taken both (HS and OS) groups together against the CD group, ROC analysis showed a maximum sensitivity of 67.6% and specificity of 85.4% for a cut-off value of 12.3 nmol/l. No correlation was found between BMI, T2DM, and LNSC for all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In our obese cohort, we found that LNSC assayed by ECLIA had a low specificity in the diagnosis of CD.

Anthropometric factors have significant influence on the outcome of the GHRH-arginine test: establishment of normative data for an automated immunoassay specifically measuring 22 kDa human growth hormone

CONTEXT

Adult growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) is diagnosed by provocative testing of GH secretion.

OBJECTIVE

To improve the diagnostic accuracy of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) plus arginine (GARG) testing, we evaluated the influence of age, BMI and sex and established normative data for an automatic immunoassay specifically measuring 22 kDa human GH.

DESIGN/SETTING

Prospective multicenter study.

PARTICIPANTS

Eighty-seven patients with hypothalamic-pituitary disease and 200 healthy controls. Patients were classified according to the number of pituitary hormone deficiencies (PHD). GHD was assumed when ≥2 PHD (in addition to GH) were present (n = 51); 36 patients with <2 PHD were considered GH sufficient (GHS). ROC analysis identified cutoffs with ≥95% specificity for GHD. Controls were prospectively stratified for sex, age and BMI.

INTERVENTIONS

All participants received GHRH and l-arginine.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

GH was measured by immunoassay (iSYS, IDS).

RESULTS

In controls, multiple stepwise regression analysis showed that BMI (21%, P < 0.0001), sex (20%, P < 0.0001) and age (5%, P < 0.001), accounted for 46% of GH peak level variability during GARG. Comparison of peak GH during GARG (GHD vs GHS + controls) revealed an overall cutoff of 3.9 ng/mL (sensitivity 86%, specificity 95%). After adjustment for BMI and sex, optimal cutoffs (male vs female) were 6.5 vs 9.7 ng/mL in lean, 3.5 vs 8.5 ng/mL in overweight and 2.2 vs 4.4 ng/mL in obese subjects respectively.

CONCLUSION

BMI and sex account for most of the variability of peak GH levels during GARG. Consequently, diagnostic accuracy of the GARG test is significantly improved by use of adjusted cutoffs.

Validation of an LC-MS/MS salivary assay for glucocorticoid status assessment: Evaluation of the diurnal fluctuation of cortisol and cortisone and of their association within and between serum and saliva

Salivary steroid testing represents a valuable source of biological information; however, the proper measurement of low salivary levels is challenging for direct immunoassays, lacking adequate sensitivity and specificity and causing poor inter-laboratory reproducibility. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) has overcome previous analytical limits, often providing results deviating from previous knowledge. Nowadays, LC-MS/MS is being introduced in clinical laboratories for salivary cortisol testing; however, so far only a few studies have reported thorough biological validation based on LC-MS/MS data. In this study, we provide a thorough analytical, pre-analytical and biological validation of an LC-MS/MS method for the measurement of salivary cortisol (F) and of its inactive metabolite cortisone (E). Analytes were extracted from 50μl of saliva, were then separated in 7.5min LC-gradient and detected by negative electrospray ionization-multiple reaction monitoring. The reliability of a widely diffused collection device, Salivette(®), was assessed and the overall procedure was validated. The diurnal cortisol and cortisone fluctuation in saliva and serum was described by a four paired collection protocol (8 am, 12 am, 4 pm and 8 pm) in 19 healthy subjects. The assay allowed the quantitation of F and E down to 39.1 and 78.1pg/ml, with an imprecision range of 5.5-9.5%, 3.9-14.1% and 2.6-14.4%, and an accuracy range of 105.5-113.1%, 88.5-98.7% and 90.7-96.7% for both analytes at low, medium and high levels, respectively. Salivette(®) provided comparable results and better precision (CV<1.0%) as referred to direct spitting (CV<13.0%). A parallel diurnal rhythm in saliva and serum was observed for cortisol and cortisone, with values lowering from the morning to the evening time points (P<0.0001). While salivary E linearly correlated to total serum F (R(2)=0.854, P<0.001), salivary F showed an exponential relationship (R(2)=0.903, P<0.001) with serum F reflecting the free circulating fraction. A non linear association between E and F was observed in saliva (R(2)=0.941, p<0.001) consistent with the type II 11β-HSD activity. We concluded that our LC-MS/MS method allowed a sensitive evaluation of salivary levels of cortisol and cortisone. The simultaneous determination of both hormones in saliva allowed the differential estimation of the active and of the total glucocorticoid exposure over the daytime. The assay could provide further insight into the comprehension of normal and dysfunctional glucocorticoid circadian rhythm.

Determination of nighttime salivary cortisol during pregnancy: comparison with values in non-pregnancy and Cushing's disease

PURPOSE

Nighttime salivary cortisol (NSC) has been proposed for the diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome during pregnancy. However, reference values for NCS in pregnant women have not been adequately determined. The aim of this study was to determine the reference values of NSC in the three gestational trimesters in order to help distinguish physiological from pathological hypercortisolism during pregnancy.

METHODS

This prospective and retrospective study evaluated 85 pregnant women in whom samples were collected in the first, second and/or third gestational trimester (pregnancy group), 33 non-pregnant women (control group), and 25 non-pregnant women with Cushing's disease (CD group). NSC was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

NSC increased progressively during pregnancy, reaching maximum levels on the third trimester (median 2.1-fold increase compared with controls, p < 0.001). Reference values for NSC were determined and the upper limits on each gestational trimester were: first trimester 0.25 µg/dL (6.9 nmol/L), second trimester 0.26 µg/dL (7.2 nmol/L), and third trimester 0.33 µg/dL (9.1 nmol/L). Cutoff values that separated the CD group from the three trimesters in the pregnancy groups were, respectively, 0.255 µg/dL (7.0 nmol/L), 0.260 µg/dL (7.2 nmol/L), and 0.285 µg/dL (7.9 nmol/L). Comparison of NSC cutoff values in pregnant women with CD patients showed high sensitivity and specificity in all three trimesters.

CONCLUSIONS

We established cutoff values for determination of NSC which can be useful for pregnant women with a diagnostic suspicion of CD.

High evening salivary cortisol is an independent predictor of increased mortality risk in patients with systolic heart failure

AIMS

Serum cortisol independently predicts mortality risk in patients with systolic heart failure. Salivary cortisol may provide advantages as it better reflects the biologically active free compound. Furthermore, sampling is non-invasive and may easily be performed in outpatients. We comparatively evaluated associations of morning (MSC) vs. evening salivary cortisol (ESC) and all-cause mortality risk.

METHODS AND RESULTS

MSC (8 am) and ESC (9 pm) were determined in 229 patients with heart failure participating in the Interdisciplinary Network for Heart Failure program (66 ± 13 years; 21% female; 37% New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV, median left ventricular ejection fraction 33%). The association of cortisol with mortality risk was determined by univariate and Cox multivariable regression analyses adjusting for age, sex, NYHA class, and N-terminal pro-hormone B-type natriuretic peptide. Compared to ESC, MSC was significantly higher and exhibited a higher variance: median 0.59 ng/ml (interquartile range 0.41-0.93) vs. 0.25 ng/ml (0.15-0.48), p<0.001. During 18 months of follow-up, 25 (11%) patients died. In univariate and multivariable models mortality risk was not increased in the highest MSC quartile: crude hazard ratio (HR) 1.81 (95% confidence interval 0.79-4.14, p=0.160), adjusted HR 1.26 (0.51-3.13, p=0.616). However, patients in the highest ESC quartile had a significantly increased mortality risk, suggesting that associations of high ESC and increased mortality were independent of disease severity: crude HR 3.33 (1.50-7.42, p=0.003), adjusted HR 2.49 (1.01-6.14, p=0.047). ESC alone proved the best predictor of mortality.

CONCLUSION

High ESC but not MSC levels independently predict increased mortality risk in heart failure.

Late-night salivary cortisol has a better performance than urinary free cortisol in the diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome

CONTEXT

The comparison of variability, reproducibility, and diagnostic performance of late-night salivary cortisol (LNSF) and urinary free cortisol (UFC) using concurrent and consecutive samples in Cushing's syndrome (CS) is lacking. Objectives, Patients, and Methods: In a prospective study, we evaluated 3 simultaneous and consecutive samples of LNSF by RIA and UFC by liquid chromatography associated with tandem mass spectrometry in Cushing's disease (CD) patients (n = 43), adrenal CS patients (n = 9), and obese subjects (n = 18) to compare their diagnostic performances. In CS patients, we also performed a modified CS severity index.

RESULTS

There was no difference in the coefficient of variation (percentage) between LNSF and UFC among the 3 samples obtained for each patient with Cushing's disease (35 ± 26 vs 31 ± 24), adrenal CS (28 ± 14 vs 22 ± 14), and obesity (39 ± 37 vs 48 ± 20). LNSF confirmed the diagnosis of hypercortisolism even in the presence of normal UFC in 17.3% of CS, whereas the inverse situation was not observed for UFC. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves for LNSF was 0.999 (95% credible interval [CI] 0.990-1.00) and for UFC was 0.928 (95% CI 0.809-0.987). The ratio between areas under the curve was 0.928 (95% CI 0.810-0.988), indicating better performance of LNSF than UFC in diagnosing CS. There was no association between the CS severity index and the degree of biochemical hypercortisolism.

CONCLUSION

Our data show that despite similar variability between both methods, LNSF has a superior diagnostic performance than UFC and should be used as the primary biochemical diagnostic test for CS diagnosis.

Serum cortisol seems to be a more appropriate marker for adrenocortical reserve evaluation in ACTH test in comparison to salivary cortisol

Salivary cortisol reflects the free fraction of serum cortisol. Monitoring salivary cortisol may be a promising alternative method for assessing serum cortisol in some clinical situations. We aimed to compare the reliability of salivary vs. serum cortisol during ACTH test. 84 subjects (mean age 63.2; 24-89 years; n=66 males) suspected for adrenocortical insufficiency underwent an ACTH test. Patients were divided based on peak serum cortisol into hypocortical group with cortisol <500 nmol/l and to reference group cortisol >500 nmol/l. Median serum cortisol levels in reference group were 445, 766, and 902 nmol/l at 0, 30, and 60 minutes, respectively, and in hypocortical group were 256, 394, and 453 nmol/l. Median salivary cortisol levels were 19.02, 40.02, and 62.1 nmol/l in reference group, and 9.60, 14.08, and 13.28 nmol/l in hypocortical group. Obtained values showed good correlation between serum and salivary cortisol (p<0.0001). The percentage of explained variability R(2) (coefficient of determination for linear model) representing a measure of agreement between experimental values and predictions for repeated measures ANOVA, was significantly higher (p=0.021) for serum cortisol (R2=93.4 %) when compared to the salivary cortisol (R2=89.3 %). A stronger discriminating power of serum versus salivary cortisol suggests that it seems to be slightly, but statistically significantly more appropriate marker of adrenocortical reserve in ACTH test.