What is the Best Route to the Meckel Cave? Anatomical Comparison between the Endoscopic Endonasal Approach and a Lateral Approach

Treating Trigeminal Schwannoma through a Transorbital Approach: A Systematic Review

Background: Trigeminal schwannomas (TSs) are uncommon tumors found along any segment of the fifth cranial nerve (CN V). Typically located at the skull base, these benign tumors carry substantial morbidity due to the extent of traditional surgical methods. Minimally invasive endoscopic surgery such as the endoscopic transorbital approach (ETOA) presents promising new avenues for treatment, with the transorbital approach emerging as a potentially successful alternative. Methods: This review systematically assesses the application of the ETOA in treating TSs. PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Embase were thoroughly searched for articles detailing the use of the ETOA in clinical case studies. The outcomes of interest encompassed epidemiological profiling, surgical results, and complication rates. Results: This study included 70 patients with TSs (from six studies), with 22 males (31.4%) and 58 females (68.6%). Patients averaged 55 years and were monitored for around 16.4 months (on average). In most tumors, the middle cranial fossa was involved to some degree. The majority (87.2%) were large (3-6 cm) and underwent gross total resection (GTR) or near-total resection in 87.2% of patients. Preoperatively, sensory alterations were common, along with proptosis, neuropathic pain, and diplopia. Postoperatively, complications included ptosis, diplopia, sensory impairment, corneal keratopathy, masticatory difficulty, and neuralgia. The pure ETOA was the primary surgical technique used in 90% of cases, with no recurrence observed during the follow-up period. Conclusions: Using the ETOA to treat TSs demonstrated an oncologic control rate of 87.2%. Postoperative complications including ptosis, diplopia, and sensory disturbances have been observed, but careful monitoring and management can mitigate these problems. The ETOA emerges as a viable surgical option, especially for tumors involving the middle cranial fossa, capable of adapting to individual patient needs and demonstrating efficacy in TS management.

Quantitative Anatomical Comparison of Surgical Approaches to Meckel's Cave

BACKGROUND

Meckel's cave is a challenging surgical target due to its deep location and proximity to vital neurovascular structures. Surgeons have developed various microsurgical transcranial approaches (MTAs) to access it, but there is no consensus on the best method. Newer endoscopic approaches have also emerged. This study seeks to quantitatively compare these surgical approaches to Meckel's cave, offering insights into surgical volumes and exposure areas.

METHODS

Fifteen surgical approaches were performed bilaterally in six specimens, including the pterional approach (PTA), fronto-temporal-orbito-zygomatic approach (FTOZA), subtemporal approach (STA), Kawase approach (KWA), retrosigmoid approach (RSA), retrosigmoid approach with suprameatal extension (RSAS), endoscopic endonasal transpterygoid approach (EETPA), inferolateral transorbital approach (ILTEA) and superior eyelid approach (SEYA). All the MTAs were performed both with 10 mm and 15 mm of brain retraction, to consider different percentages of surface exposure. A dedicated navigation system was used to quantify the surgical working volumes and exposure of different areas of Meckel's cave (ApproachViewer, part of GTx-Eyes II, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada). Microsurgical transcranial approaches were quantified with two different degrees of brain retraction (10 mm and 15 mm). Statistical analysis was performed using a mixed linear model with bootstrap resampling.

RESULTS

The RSAS with 15 mm of retraction offered the maximum exposure of the trigeminal stem (TS). If compared to the KWA, the RSA exposed more of the TS (69% vs. 46%; p = 0.01). The EETPA and ILTEA exposed the Gasserian ganglion (GG) mainly in the anteromedial portion, but with a significant 20% gain in exposure provided by the EETPA compared to ILTEA (42% vs. 22%; p = 0.06). The STA with 15 mm of retraction offered the maximum exposure of the GG, with a significant gain in exposure compared to the STA with 10 mm of retraction (50% vs. 35%; p = 0.03). The medial part of the three trigeminal branches was mainly exposed by the EETPA, particularly for the ophthalmic (66%) and maxillary (83%) nerves. The EETPA offered the maximum exposure of the medial part of the mandibular nerve, with a significant gain in exposure compared to the ILTEA (42% vs. 11%; p = 0.01) and the SEY (42% vs. 2%; p = 0.01). The FTOZA offered the maximum exposure of the lateral part of the ophthalmic nerve, with a significant gain of 67% (p = 0.03) and 48% (p = 0.04) in exposure compared to the PTA and STA, respectively. The STA with 15 mm of retraction offered the maximum exposure of the lateral part of the maxillary nerve, with a significant gain in exposure compared to the STA with 10 mm of retraction (58% vs. 45%; p = 0.04). The STA with 15 mm of retraction provided a significant exposure gain of 23% for the lateral part of the mandibular nerve compared to FTOZA with 15 mm of retraction (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

The endoscopic approaches, through the endonasal and transorbital routes, can provide adequate exposure of Meckel's cave, especially for its more medial portions, bypassing the impediment of major neurovascular structures and significant brain retraction. As far as the most lateral portion of Meckel's cave, MTA approaches still seem to be the gold standard in obtaining optimal exposure and adequate surgical volumes.

Minipterional Approach for Middle Fossa Skull Base Lesions: Technical Note

Surgical access to the middle fossa can be technically challenging. As neurosurgery evolves to minimally invasive approaches, the objective of this study is to demonstrate the extension of the Minipterional approach to access the middle fossa. We present a new surgical approach to the middle fossa for the treatment of secondary trigeminal neuralgia. Three cases are reported to illustrate the following techniques: a patient with petrotentorial meningioma and trigeminal neuralgia, a patient with an arachnoid cyst compressing the fifth nerve, and a patient with a middle cerebral artery aneurysm and a long history of TN (trigeminal neuralgia) refractory to medical and surgical treatments. All three experienced full symptom controls with no permanent neurological deficits. Therefore, the Minipterional technique might represent a feasible, effective, and safe option to treat refractory secondary TN. It also allows approaching these lesions when the posterior fossa approach is compromised by anatomical distortion and enables the simultaneous treatment of secondary trigeminal neuralgia and other lesions, such as aneurysms and meningiomas.

Morbidities Associated with the Endoscopic Transnasal Transpterygoid Approach: Focusing on Postoperative Sequelae

OBJECTIVE

Although the endoscopic transpterygoid approach has been popularized, there are no studies about anatomy-specific morbidities of this approach. The objective of this study is to investigate the surgical morbidities associated with the endoscopic transpterygoid approach for resection of anatomic structures.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was carried out of prospectively collected data of patients who underwent the endoscopic transpterygoid approach for skull base tumor by a single ear nose and throat surgeon in a tertiary-care center from November 2013 to January 2019. Postoperative patient symptom prevalence associated with surgical findings and SNOT-22 (Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22) score were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven consecutive patients were enrolled. The mean follow-up period was 12.4 months (range, 1-39 months). Twenty-six (70.3%) vidian nerves were sacrificed, but only 38.5% of those patients (10/26) reported mild dry eye symptoms. Fourteen nasolacrimal ducts (37.8%) were resected, with only 1 patient (7.1%) who had undergone previous radiation therapy reporting transient epiphora. SNOT-22 scores before and after surgery did not present statistical difference in inferior turbinate sacrifice group and preservation group.

CONCLUSIONS

Sacrifice of sinonasal structures such as the inferior turbinate or vidian nerve is sometimes inevitable for safe tumor resection with the endoscopic transpterygoid approach. Subjective symptoms were not apparent in most patients, despite the structural sacrifice.

Quantitative Anatomical Comparison of Anterior, Anterolateral and Lateral, Microsurgical and Endoscopic Approaches to the Middle Cranial Fossa

OBJECTIVE

To quantitatively compare different microsurgical and endoscopic approaches to the middle cranial fossa in a preclinical setting with a novel, computer-based research method.

METHODS

Different approaches were performed bilaterally in 5 head and neck specimens that underwent high-resolution computed tomography scans: 5 transcranial anterolateral (supraorbital, mini-pterional, pterional, pterional-transzygomatic, fronto-temporal-orbito-zygomatic) without and with anterior clinoidectomy; 2 transcranial lateral (subtemporal and subtemporal-transzygomatic); 2 endoscopic transnasal (transpterygoid, transpterygoid to infratemporal fossa); 2 endoscopic transorbital (superior eyelid and inferolateral), and endoscopic transmaxillary. A dedicated navigation system was used to quantify surgical working volumes and exposure of different areas of the middle cranial fossa (ApproachViewer, part of GTx-Eyes II, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada). Statistical analysis was performed using a mixed linear model with bootstrap resampling.

RESULTS

Endoscopic transnasal and fronto-temporal-orbito-zygomatic approaches with anterior clinoidectomy showed the largest surgical volumes. Endoscopic approaches allowed a wider exposure of medial anatomical surfaces (e.g., the petrous apex) compared with transcranial ones. Transcranial approaches with larger craniotomies allowed the widest exposure of superomedial anatomical structures (e.g., roof of cavernous sinus). The resection of the zygomatic arch allowed exposure of more medial surfaces with an inferior to superior trajectory.

CONCLUSIONS

This study implemented a novel neuronavigation-based research method to quantitatively compare different approaches to the middle cranial fossa; its results might guide, after consideration of clinical implications, the choice of the neurosurgical approach to different areas of this complex skull base region.

The Endoscopic Endonasal Transmaxillary Approach to Meckel's Cave Through the Inferior Orbital Fissure

BACKGROUND

Surgical access to Meckel's Cave (MC) is challenging due to its deep location and surrounding important neurovascular structures. Currently existing endoscopic endonasal (EE) approaches require dissecting near the internal carotid artery (ICA) or require transposition of the pterygopalatine neurovascular bundle.

OBJECTIVE

To describe a novel approach to access the anterolateral aspect of the MC using a minimally invasive EE route.

METHODS

The EE transmaxillary transinferior orbital fissure approach was simulated in 10 specimens. The approach included an ethmoidectomy followed by an extended medial maxillectomy with transposition of the nasolacrimal duct. The infraorbital fissure was opened, and the infraorbital neurovascular bundle was transposed inferiorly. A quadrilateral space, bound by the maxillary nerve inferomedially, ophthalmic nerve superomedially, infraorbital nerve inferolaterally, and floor of the orbit superolaterally, was exposed. The distances from the foramen rotundum (FR) to the ICA, orbital apex (OA), and infratemporal crest (ITC) and from the OA to the ICA and ITC were measured.

RESULTS

The distances obtained were FR-ICA = 19.42 ± 2.03 mm, FR-ITC = 18.76 ± 1.75 mm, FR-OA = 8.54 ± 1.34 mm, OA-ITC = 19.78 ± 2.63 mm, and OA-ICA = 20.64 ± 142 mm. Two imaginary lines defining safety boundaries were observed between the paraclival ICA and OA, and between the OA and ITC (safety lines 1 and 2).

CONCLUSION

The reported approach provides a less invasive route compared to contemporary approaches, allowing expanded views and manipulation anteromedial and anterolateral to MC. It may be safer than the existing approaches as it does not require transposition of the ICA, infratemporal fossa, and pterygopalatine fossa, and allows access to tumors located anteriorly on the floor of the middle cranial fossa.

Endoscopic anterior transmaxillary "transalisphenoid" approach to Meckel's cave and the middle cranial fossa: an anatomical study and clinical application

OBJECTIVE Multiple approaches have been designed to reach the medial middle fossa (for lesions in Meckel's cave, in particular), but an anterior approach through the greater wing of the sphenoid (transalisphenoid) has not been explored. In this study, the authors sought to assess the feasibility of and define the anatomical landmarks for an endoscopic anterior transmaxillary transalisphenoid (EATT) approach to Meckel's cave and the middle cranial fossa. METHODS Endoscopic dissection was performed on 5 cadaver heads injected intravascularly with colored silicone bilaterally to develop the approach and define surgical landmarks. The authors then used this approach in 2 patients with tumors that involved Meckel's cave and provide their illustrative clinical case reports. RESULTS The EATT approach is divided into the following 4 stages: 1) entry into the maxillary sinus, 2) exposure of the greater wing of the sphenoid, 3) exposure of the medial middle fossa, and 4) exposure of Meckel's cave and lateral wall of the cavernous sinus. The approach provided excellent surgical access to the anterior and lateral portions of Meckel's cave and offered the possibility of expanding into the infratemporal fossa and lateral middle fossa and, in combination with an endonasal transpterygoid approach, accessing the anteromedial aspect of Meckel's cave. CONCLUSIONS The EATT approach to Meckel's cave and the middle cranial fossa is technically feasible and confers certain advantages in specific clinical situations. The approach might complement current surgical approaches for lesions of Meckel's cave and could be ideal for lesions that are lateral to the trigeminal ganglion in Meckel's cave or extend from the maxillary sinus, infratemporal fossa, or pterygopalatine fossa into the middle cranial fossa, Meckel's cave, and cavernous sinus, such as schwannomas, meningiomas, and sinonasal tumors and perineural spread of cutaneous malignancy.

Endoscopic endonasal approach to primitive Meckel's cave tumors: a clinical series

INTRODUCTION

Recently, an alternative endoscopic endonasal approach to Meckel's cave (MC) tumors has been proposed. To date, few studies have evaluated the results of this route. The aim of our study was to evaluate long-term surgical and clinical outcome associated with this technique in a cohort of patients with intrinsic MC tumors.

METHODS

All patients with MC tumors treated at out institution by endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) between 2002 and 2016 were included. Patients underwent brain MRI, CT angiography, and neurological evaluation before surgery. Complications were considered based on the surgical records. All examinations were repeated after 3 and 12 months, then annually. The median follow-up was of 44.1 months (range 16-210).

RESULTS

The series included 8 patients (4 F): 5 neuromas, 1 meningioma, 1 chondrosarcoma, and 1 epidermoid cyst. The median age at treatment was 54.5 years (range 21-70). Three tumors presented with a posterior fossa extension. Radical removal of the MC portion of the tumor was achieved in 7 out of 8 cases. Two patients developed a permanent and transitory deficit of the sixth cranial nerve, respectively. No tumor recurrence was observed at follow-up.

CONCLUSION

In this preliminary series, the EEA appeared an effective and safe approach to MC tumors. The technique could be advantageous to treat tumors located in the antero-medial aspects of MC displacing the trigeminal structures posteriorly and laterally. A favorable index of an adequate working space for this approach is represented by the ICA medialization, while tumor extension to the posterior fossa represents the main limitation to radical removal of this route.

The Pedicled Buccal Fat Pad: Anatomical Study of the New Flap for Skull Base Defect Reconstruction After Endoscopic Endonasal Transpterygoid Surgery

Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of using a buccal fat pad for endoscopic skull base defect reconstruction. Design Descriptive anatomical study with an illustrative case presentation. Setting Anatomical study was performed on 12 fresh human cadaver specimens with injected arteries (24 sides). Internal carotid artery was exposed in the coronal plane via the endoscopic transpterygoid approach. The pedicled buccal fat pad was used for reconstruction. Participants: 12 human cadaver head specimens; one patient operated using the proposed technique. Main outcome measures: Proximity of the buccal fat pad flap to the defect, compliance of the flap, comfort and safety of harvesting procedure, and compatibility with the Hadad-Bassagasteguy nasoseptal flap. Results: Harvesting procedure was performed using anterior transmaxillary corridor. The pedicled buccal fat pad flap can be used to pack the sphenoid sinus or cover the internal carotid artery from cavernous to upper parapharyngeal segment. Conclusion The buccal fat pad can be safely harvested through the same approach without external incisions and is compliant enough to conform to the skull base defect. The proposed pedicled flap can replace free abdominal fat in central skull base reconstruction. The volume of the buccal fat pad allows obliteration of the sphenoid sinus or upper parapharyngeal space.

Subtemporal Retrolabyrinthine (Posterior Petrosal) versus Endoscopic Endonasal Approach to the Petroclival Region: An Anatomical and Computed Tomography Study

Background The petroclival region seats many neoplasms. Traditional surgical corridors to the region can result in unacceptable patient morbidity. The combined subtemporal retrolabyrinthine transpetrosal (posterior petrosal) approach provides adequate exposure with hearing preservation; however, the facial nerve and labyrinth are put at risk. Approaching the petroclival region with an endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) could minimize morbidity. Objective To provide an anatomical and computed tomography (CT) comparison between the posterior petrosal approach and EEA to the petroclival region. Methods The petroclival region was approached transclivally with EEA. Different aspects of dissection were compared with the posterior petrosal approach. The two approaches were also studied using CT analysis. Results A successful corridor medial to the internal auditory canal (IAC) was achieved with EEA. Wide exposure was achieved with no external skin incisions, although significant sinonasal resection was required. The posterior petrosal was comparable in terms of exposure medially; however, the dissection involved more bone removal, greater skill, and a constricting effect upon deeper dissection. Importantly, access lateral to the IAC was obtained, whereas EEA could not reach this area. Conclusion An EEA to the petroclival region is feasible. This approach can be considered in lesions medial to the IAC.