Diagnostic performance of three serologic tests in childhood celiac disease

ESPGHAN Position Paper on Management and Follow-up of Children and Adolescents With Celiac Disease

OBJECTIVES

To gather the current evidence and to offer recommendations for follow-up and management.

METHODS

The Special Interest Group on Celiac Diseases of the European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition formulated ten questions considered to be essential for follow-up care. A literature search (January 2010-March 2020) was performed in PubMed or Medline. Relevant publications were identified and potentially eligible studies were assessed. Statements and recommendations were developed and discussed by all coauthors. Recommendations were voted upon: joint agreement was set as at least 85%.

RESULTS

Publications (n = 2775) were identified and 164 were included. Using evidence or expert opinion, 37 recommendations were formulated on: The need to perform follow-up, its frequency and what should be assessed, how to assess adherence to the gluten-free diet, when to expect catch-up growth, how to treat anemia, how to approach persistent high serum levels of antibodies against tissue-transglutaminase, the indication to perform biopsies, assessment of quality of life, management of children with unclear diagnosis for which a gluten-challenge is indicated, children with associated type 1 diabetes or IgA deficiency, cases of potential celiac disease, which professionals should perform follow-up, how to improve the communication to patients and their parents/caregivers and transition from pediatric to adult health care.

CONCLUSIONS

We offer recommendations to improve follow-up of children and adolescents with celiac disease and highlight gaps that should be investigated to further improve management.

Anti-transglutaminase IgA antibody measurement in coeliac disease: Method comparison IDS-iSYS vs. Thermo Fisher Phadia

In coeliac disease, the diagnostic work-up is based on a combination of clinical, histopathological and serological evaluation. Among the serological tests, the presence of tissue transglutaminase (tTG) IgA antibodies is the cornerstone owed to a high sensitivity and specificity. Recently, Immunodiagnostic Systems Ltd (IDS) introduced the fully automated chemiluminescent autoimmune assays for use on the IDS-iSYS Multi-Discipline Automated System. In this study, we aimed to compare the performance of the IDS-iSYS assay to the Thermo Fisher Phadia assay and to establish the upper reference limit of tTG IgA in a healthy population from Denmark based on the IDS-iSYS assay. We discovered a total imprecision of CV = 12.2% (2.87 AU/mL) and CV = 10.6% (47.55 AU/mL). Moreover, we compared the performance of IDS-iSYS assay to Thermo Fisher Phadia assay in 236 samples from unselected patients submit for tTG IgA testing and found a concordance of 97% (p < .0001). Furthermore, in 150 healthy blood donors, we established the upper reference limit of 3.26 AU/mL (95% CI: 3.10 - 3.90) was identified. Our study validates the performance of the IDS-iSYS tTG IgA assay and demonstrates results in concordance with the established Thermo Fisher Phadia. Furthermore, it provides estimates for the upper reference interval limit of the tTG-IgA.