Biomaterials in the treatment of anal fistula: hope or hype?

Laser technology in proctological diseases: is it really the wave of the future?

Different types of lasers have been applied for various proctological conditions. We discuss about published articles regarding the application of lasers, with concern about evidence-based use of these techniques and technologies. We performed a literature search about laser treatments for proctological conditions. 55 studies were included for the final revision. Meta-analysis of data was not performed because of heterogeneity of study designs and outcome measures. A scoping review was performed. Laser treatments for hemorrhoids require a shorter operative time and show less postoperative pain and bleeding compared to conventional hemorrhoidectomy, but are more expensive. Studies are heterogeneous in design, endpoints, postoperative assessment, length of follow-up and outcome measures. Only 3 RCTs are available and only three studies evaluate long-term outcomes. FiLaC (fistula laser closure) was initially described in 2011 for the treatment of anal fistula. In the published studies the reported healing rates vary between 20 and 82%, and the ideal indication is yet to be defined. Studies with long-term follow-up are lacking. SiLaT (sinus laser treatment) applied the technology used for FiLaC to the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease. This technique had less perioperative pain and shorter hospital stay, but a lower primary healing rate when compared to traditional techniques. Available data is very limited, and no randomized trials are published to date. Laser assisted techniques are a viable, minimally invasive, but expensive option for the treatment of several proctological conditions. Further researches are needed to assess if patients could benefit of their use, and for what indication.

A comparative study between high ligation of the inter-sphincteric fistula tract via lateral Approach Versus Fistulotomy and primary sphincteroplasty in High Trans-Sphincteric Fistula-in-Ano: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Trans-sphincteric fistula management is very challenging and everyday new techniques are introduced to reach the safest and the most effective technique. In this study two of the most effective techniques are compared based on their post-operative outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of high ligation of the inter-sphincteric fistula tract by lateral approach (modified LIFT) and Fistulotomy and primary sphincteroplasty (FIPS) in the management of high trans-sphincteric fistula regarding their post-operative outcomes in the form of post-operative pain, time of wound healing in weeks, wound infection, incontinence and recurrence within one year.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The current study is single-blind, prospective, randomized, controlled, single-center trial conducted from June 2020 to June 2022 in the colorectal surgical unit of Ain Shams University Hospitals, which included 80 patients presented with high trans-sphincteric perianal fistula 55 (68.75%) males and 25 (31.25%) including a one-year follow-up postoperative.

RESULTS

There were 80 patients in our study 40 patients in each group. The mean age of group (I) is 46.65 with standard deviation 6.6. while, in group (II) the mean age is 45.85 with standard deviation 6.07 (p = 0.576). From the included 80 patients 55(68.7%) were males and 25 (31.25%) were females (p = 0.469). Regarding, postoperative wound infection occurred in 2(5%) Patients in group (I) and 7(17.5%) patients in group (II) (p = 0.154). There were no cases of incontinence in group I. However, there were 6(15%) cases of incontinence to gases only scored by Wexner score 3/20 in group II (p = 0.026) and its significant difference between the two techniques. Postoperative pain was assessed for one week duration by the visual analogue score (VAS) from 0 to 10 in which, zero is the least and 10 is the maximum. In group (I) 18(45%) patients scored their pain mild from 1 to 3, 20(50%) patients scored their pain moderate from 4 to 6 and 2(5%) patients scored severe pain from 7 to 9. While, in group (II) 14(35%) patients scored their pain mild from 1 to 3, 22(55%) patients their pain moderate from 4 to 6 and 4(10%) patients scored their pain severe from 7 to 9 (p = 0.275). Recurrence in one-year follow-up occurred in 13(32.5%) patients in group (I) about 7 patients had recurrence in the form of inter-sphincteric fistula and 6 patients in the form of trans-sphincteric fistula. While, in group II recurrence occurred in 1 (2.5%) patient in the form of subcutaneous fistula at the healing site (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Fistulotomy and primary sphincteroplasty is an effective and preferred technique for the trans-sphincteric fistula repair with high statistically significant lower incidence of recurrence in one-year follow-up as compared to modified LIFT technique. Although, there is higher incidence regarding incontinence to gases only post-operative. This work recommends fistulotomy and primary sphincter reconstruction procedure in high trans-sphincteric perianal fistulas to be more popular, to be implemented as a corner stone procedure along various and classic operations for such cases as it's easy, feasible.

Minimally Invasive Treatment of Recurrent Anal Fistulas with Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma Combined With Internal Orifice Closure

AIM

Minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of anal fistulas are gaining more and more popularity. For this purpose, Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) are administered to accelerate the healing process of various difficult wounds or lesions. The aim of this study was to evaluate preliminary results of PRP injection into the tissues adjacent to anal fistulas.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A cohort of 42 patients with recurrent anal fistula, who underwent at least one cutting procedure previously, were enrolled into this preliminary and prospective trial. Closure of internal orifice was performed in all investigated patients, however, in 22 patients from group I, that procedure was combined with topical injection of PRP. In the postoperative period, the PRP administration could be repeated in case of incomplete fistula closure. Follow-up consisted of out-patient visits in a fortnight, 1, 2, and 12 months.

RESULTS

Complete closure of anal fistulas was achieved in 16 (75%) patients from group I and 10 (45,5%) patients from group II. The fistulas were healed in 9 patients from group I after single application of PRP. In the next 9 patients with incomplete fistula closure, the injection was repeated 2 to 4 times every fortnight leading finally to complete recovery in 6 of them.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical fistula closure with local PRP application spares the anal sphincter and gives the opportunity to repeat the procedure several times if necessary. Treatment of recurrent anal fistulas with PRP can be considered as last resort therapy.

A Comparison of Different Surgical Treatments for Complex Anal Fistula: A Systematic Review

Fistula-in-ano is a common proctological condition that primarily affects younger people and leads to chronic morbidity. An anal fistula is divided into simple and complex fistulas. A complex fistula is a challenging problem due to higher recurrence rates and incontinence associated with surgery. Many new methods have been developed for the closure of complex fistula-in-ano, but there is no single best method. The aim of this study is to identify a superior surgical technique for treating complex/high cryptoglandular perianal fistulas (HCPFs). A literature search was done using PubMed and Google Scholar for the period of 2012-2021. Articles that contain surgical treatment for complex anal fistula in the English language published in the last 10 years were included. The types of studies included were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), meta-analyses, systematic reviews, cohort studies, and traditional reviews. Articles excluded were those done more than 10 years ago, in other languages, and containing simple fistula management only. Nine studies were included in the review; a systematic review and meta-analysis concluded that no single method is effective. The ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) procedure seems to be a promising and effective technique as it has a low rate of fecal incontinence as compared to other methods. Biological techniques give variable success rates so does fistula plug (FP). Mucosal advancement flap (MAF) and rerouting seton give good results according to one study. Fistula plug gives variable results and is not a preferred method. Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) seems to be a promising new technique for complex anal fistulas, but the data available is not enough to determine the best method. More randomized trials are required to compare traditional techniques and emerging new biological methods to see the best technique available.

Fibrin glue versus autologous platelet-rich fibrin - comparison of effectiveness on the cohort of patients with fistula-in-ano undergoing video-assisted anal fistula treatment

Context:

Minimally invasive sphincter preserving procedures like ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) and video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) are being increasingly used in the treatment of fistula-in-ano. The addition of adjuncts like fibrin glue has improved the results for VAAFT. Our unit has used platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) as an innovative adjunct for VAAFT.

Aims:

To compare the effectiveness of two different adjuncts, fibrin glue and autologous PRF, used to fill the treated fistula tracts following VAAFT.

Settings and Design:

Retrospective observational study on a cohort of patients undergoing VAAFT at a tertiary centre between 2015 and 2020 comparing two adjuncts used with VAAFT procedure.

Subjects and Methods:

Data of patients who underwent VAAFT for fistula-in-ano were obtained from the hospital database. Group A included patients treated with fibrin as adjunct and PRF as adjunct in Group B. Patients were followed up at 1, 3 and 6 months post-operatively and by a telephonic interview in 2020 to ascertain recent status. All data were entered into an excel sheet.

Statistical Analysis Used:

Data were analysed using SPSS V20 to test the statistical significance of the difference in the mean healing time between two groups, Mann–Whitney U-test was used and for age, Student's t-test was used.

Results:

There were 41 patients in Group A and 24 in Group B. There was a significant reduction in recurrence rate in Group B (P = 0.032) and in those patients who had a single internal opening (P = 0.045), single external opening (P = 0.03) and complex tracts (P = 0.033). PRF was cheaper than Fibrin glue.

Conclusions:

PRF is more effective and economical with lower recurrence rates.

Long-term Evaluation of Fistulotomy and Immediate Sphincteroplasty as a Treatment for Complex Anal Fistula

BACKGROUND

Fistulotomy with immediate sphincteroplasty is a technique that can heal fistulas and decrease fecal incontinence more effectively than fistulotomy alone, in selected patients.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to perform a long-term evaluation of fecal incontinence after fistulotomy and immediate sphincteroplasty in patients with complex anal fistula.

DESIGN

This prospective study included patients undergoing fistulotomy and immediate sphincteroplasty for complex anal fistula from January 2000 to December 2010.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted by 2 colorectal surgeons in the coloproctology unit of the General Hospital of Elche.

PATIENTS

We included patients aged ≥18 years with complex anal fistulas of cryptoglandular origin.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Main outcomes were recurrence and continence after fistulotomy and immediate sphincteroplasty, according to fistula tract height and preoperative continence status.

RESULTS

A total of 107 patients were included; 68.2% were men, with a mean age of 48 years and mean fistula duration of 12.8 months. The range and median follow-up period were 84 to 204 and 96 months. Thirty-seven fistulas were not primary. The overall healing rate was 84.1%. Primary fistulas healed by the end of follow-up in 58 (82.9%) of 70 patients; recurrent fistulas healed in 32 (86.5%) of 37; high tracts healed in 31 (83.8%) of 37, and nonhigh fistulas healed in 59 (84.3%) of 70. Male sex (OR = 0.66 (95% CI, 0.20-2.13); p > 0.05) and recurrent fistulas (OR = 0.43 (95% CI, 0.11-1.68); p > 0.05) could have a protective effect against postoperative fecal incontinence; however, more studies with larger sample sizes are necessary to confirm this result, whereas high fistulas showed a 4-fold increased risk of incontinence (range, 1.22-13.06; p < 0.01). One in 5 high-tracts patients experienced continence deterioration.

LIMITATIONS

This was a prospective study, and randomized clinical trials with more patients and longer follow-up are needed to compare fistulotomy and immediate sphincteroplasty with other sphincter-preserving techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Fistulotomy and immediate sphincteroplasty are good options for treating complex anal fistulas, especially for recurrent fistulas, men, and patients with nonhigh tracts, with acceptable recurrence and incontinence rates. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B498.

EVALUACIN A LARGO PLAZO DE LA FISTULOTOMA Y LA ESFINTEROPLASTIA INMEDIATA COMO TRATAMIENTO PARA LA FSTULA ANAL COMPLEJA

ANTECEDENTES:La fistulotomía y la esfinteroplastia inmediata es una técnica que puede curar las fístulas y disminuir la incontinencia fecal de manera más efectiva que la fistulotomía sola, en pacientes seleccionados.OBJETIVO:Nuestro objetivo fue realizar una evaluación a largo plazo de la incontinencia fecal después de la fistulotomía y la esfinteroplastia inmediata en pacientes con fístula anal compleja.DISEÑO:Este estudio prospectivo incluyó pacientes sometidos a fistulotomía y esfinteroplastia inmediata por fístula anal compleja, desde enero de 2000 hasta diciembre de 2010.ENTORNO CLINICO:El estudio fue realizado por dos cirujanos colorrectales de la Unidad de Coloproctología del Hospital General de Elche.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron pacientes ≥ 18 años con fístulas anales complejas de origen criptoglandular.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACION:Los principales resultados fueron la recurrencia y la continencia después de la fistulotomía y la esfinteroplastia inmediata, de acuerdo con la altura del trayecto de la fístula y el estado de continencia preoperatoria.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron un total de 107 pacientes; El 68,2% eran varones, con una edad media de 48 años y una duración media de la fístula de 12,8 meses. El rango y la mediana del período de seguimiento fue de 84-204 y 96 meses, respectivamente. Treinta y siete fístulas no fueron primarias. La tasa de curación general fue del 84,1%. Las fístulas primarias cicatrizaron al final del seguimiento en 58/70 (82,9%) pacientes; las fístulas recurrentes cicatrizaron en 32/37 (86,5%); los tractos altos cicatrizaron en 31/37 (83,8%) y las fístulas no altas cicatrizaron en 59/70 (84,3%). El sexo masculino (razón de posibilidades: 0,66 [0,20-2,13], p > 0,05) y las fístulas recurrentes (razón de posibilidades: 0,43 [0,11-1,68], p > 0,05) podrían tener un efecto protector contra la incontinencia fecal postoperatoria, sin embargo, más estudios con una muestra más grande son necesarios para confirmar este resultado. Fistulas altas mostraron un riesgo cuatro veces mayor de incontinencia ([1.22-13.06], p < 0.01). Uno de cada cinco pacientes con tractos altos experimentó un deterioro de la continencia.LIMITACIONES:Este fue un estudio prospectivo y se necesitan ensayos clínicos aleatorios con más pacientes y un seguimiento más prolongado para comparar la fistulotomía y la esfinteroplastia inmediata con otras técnicas de preservación del esfínter.CONCLUSIÓN:La fistulotomía y la esfinteroplastia inmediata son buenas opciones para el tratamiento de fístulas anales complejas, especialmente para fístulas recurrentes, varones y pacientes con tractos no altos, con tasas aceptables de recurrencia e incontinencia. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B498.

Management of cryptoglandular fistula-in-ano among gastrointestinal surgeons in the Netherlands

BACKGROUND

Management of cryptoglandular fistula-in-ano (FIA) can be challenging. Despite Dutch and international guidelines determining optimal therapy is still quite difficult. The aim of this study was to report current practices in the management of cryptoglandular FIA among gastrointestinal surgeons in the Netherlands.

METHODS

Dutch surgeons and residents who are treating FIA regularly were sent a survey invitation by email. The survey was available online from September 19 to December 1 2019. The questionnaire consisted of 28 questions concerning diagnostic and surgical techniques in the treatment of intersphincteric and transsphincteric FIA.

RESULTS

In total, 147 (43%) surgeons responded and completed the survey. Magnetic resonance imaging was the preferred diagnostic imaging modality (97%) followed by the endo-anal ultrasound (12%). In case of a high FIA, 86% used a non-cutting seton. Most respondents removed a seton between 6 weeks and 3 months (n = 84, 58%). Fistulotomy was the procedure of preference in low transsphincteric (86%) and low intersphincteric FIA (92%). Mucosal advancement flap (MAF) and ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT), with 78% and 46%, respectively, were the procedures that were applied most often in high transsphincteric FIA. In high intersphincteric FIA 67% performed a MAF and 33% a fistulotomy. Thirty-three percent of all respondents stated that they habitually closed the internal fistula opening, half of them used a Z-plasty. For debridement of the fistula tract the preferred method was curettage (78%).

CONCLUSIONS

Dutch gastrointestinal surgeons use various techniques in the management of FIA. Novel promising techniques should be investigated adequately in sufficient large trials to increase consensus. A core outcome measurement and a prospective international database would help in comparing results. Until then, treatment should be adjusted to the individual patient, governed by fistula characteristics and patient choice.

Chinese herbal fumigant and lotion for postoperative complication in surgical wound of anal fistula: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgery is the most common and effective therapy for anal fistula, while the postoperative complication, such as pain, edema, pruritus, turgescence, and exudation in surgical wound, can have serious impact on wound healing and patients' quality of life. Chinese herbal fumigant and lotion have been commonly used in postoperative treatment and achieved satisfied effect in China. However, clinical evidence-based literature of Chinese herbal fumigant and lotion for postoperative anal fistula is not sufficient. This protocol is described for a systematic review to investigate the beneficial effects.

METHODS

A systematic search will be conducted in database involving PubMed, the Cochrane library, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, SinoMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI), VIP, Wanfang Database, CiNii(National Institute of Informatics), and KISS(Koreanstudies Information Service System) from inceptions to December 31, 2019. We will include randomized controlled trials (RCT) regarding Chinese herbal fumigant and lotion in the treatment of complication in surgical wound of anal fistula. Quality of included RCTs will be assessed according to the Cochrane Handbook 5.1.0. GRADE will be used to assess the quality of evidence. The summary results will be pooled using the random-effects model or fixed-effects model according to the heterogeneity of included studies.

RESULTS

After peer-review, the study will be disseminated in scientific journals and conferences.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review will provide evidence for the efficacy of Chinese herbal fumigant and lotion for curing postoperative complication of anal fistula. In addition, it might provide suggestions for Chinese medicine clinical practice or guideline.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION

CRD42020164975.

Sphincter-saving therapy for fistula-in-ano: long-term follow-up after FiLaC®

BACKGROUND

The treatment of anal fistula remains a challenge between maintaining continence and radical surgery to prevent recurrence. Fistula-tract Laser Closure (FiLaC^®) is a sphincter-saving technique using a radial emitting laser fibre to close the fistula tract. The aim of this study was to report long-term outcomes in patients who received FiLaC^® therapy for transsphincteric and intersphincteric anal fistula between January 2011 and December 2017.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed on patients who were treated with FiLaC^®- for a transsphincteric and intersphincteric anal fistula at our institution between January 2011 and December 2017. In all patients, the FiLaC^® procedure was combined with a closure of the internal orifice using a simple 3-0 Z stitch. Patient characteristics, previous proctological history, healing rates, failures and postoperative continence were investigated.

RESULTS

The study included 83 patients [mean age 50.01 ± 14.59 years. 64 (77.1%) males] with a mean follow-up period of 41.99 (± 21.59) months (range 4-87 months). Thirteen patients (15.7%) had a recurrent fistula. 65 patients (78.3%) had undergone prior abscess drainage with insertion of a seton. The primary healing rate was 74.7% (62 of 83 patients) overall. Eleven (13.3%) of the 21 patients (25.3%) who failed FiLaC^®-therapy underwent a second operation. In eight cases, Re-FiLaC^® and in three cases, fistulectomy with closure of the internal orifice was performed. Afterwards 6 (54.5%) of these 11 patients could be considered cured: 3 who had fistulectomy and three who had Re-FiLaC^® treatment. The overall healing rate after second FiLaC^® was 78.3% (65 of 83 patients) while the overall healing rate for FiLaC^® therapy combined with any second procedure was 81.9% (68 of 83 patients). The follow-up period in this group of 11 patients who received re-operation was 38 months (range 13-84 months). Changes in continence occurred in eight patients (9.6%). No patient reported major incontinence postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The FiLaC^® procedure is associated with good healing rates in long-term follow-up and should be considered as a treatment option for transsphincteric and intersphincteric anal fistulae, especially due to the low complication rate and low risk of sphincter injury.

Comparison of Ligation of the Intersphincteric Fistula Tract and BioLIFT for the Treatment of Transsphincteric Anal Fistula: A Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND

Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract is a sphincter-preserving technique for the treatment of anal fistulas. The BioLIFT modification involves the placement of a biologic mesh in the intersphincteric plane. Advocates of this modification state improved healing rates, however evidence for this is lacking, and this approach costs significantly more.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the healing rates of the ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract with the BioLIFT.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital from April 2008 to April 2018.

PATIENTS

All adult patients with transsphincteric anal fistulas were included. Patients were excluded if they had IBD, more than 1 fistula tract operated on simultaneously, or a previous attempt at repair.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was primary healing of the fistula tract, and secondary outcomes included overall success, complications, and time to recurrence.

RESULTS

There were 119 cases (75 ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract and 44 BioLIFTs). One surgeon performed 84% of the BioLIFT cases. The primary healing rate was 75.0% versus 58.7% (p = 0.08), and the complication rate was 22.7% versus 17.3% (p = 0.48; BioLIFT vs ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract). After multivariate logistic regression, the BioLIFT had a significantly better healing rate (OR = 2.38 (95% CI, 1.01-5.62); p = 0.048). Median follow-up was 9 versus 29 weeks (BioLIFT vs ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated no difference in the time to recurrence (p = 0.48).

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by the retrospective nature, different lengths of follow-up, and varying case numbers between the surgeons.

CONCLUSIONS

The BioLIFT modification is safe and effective for the treatment of anal fistulas but has a higher cost. This modification warrants additional prospective studies to establish its benefits over the ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract procedure. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B139. COMPARACIÓN DE LIFT VERSUS BIOLIFT PARA EL TRATAMIENTO DE LA FÍSTULA ANAL TRANSFINTERÉRICA: UN ANÁLISIS RETROSPECTIVO: Ligadura del tracto de la fístula interesfintérica es una técnica para preservación del esfínter en el tratamiento de las fístulas anales. La modificación BioLIFT implica la colocación de una malla biológica en el plano interesfintérico. Protagonistas de la modificación mejoraron las tasas de curación, sin embargo, carecen evidencias definitivas y la técnica eleva costos significativamente.Comparar las tasas de curación de ligadura del tracto de la fístula interesfintérica con el BioLIFT.Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.Hospital de atención de tercer nivel desde abril de 2008 hasta abril de 2018.Se incluyeron todos los pacientes adultos con fístulas anales transfinteréricas. Los pacientes fueron excluidos si tenían enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal, más de un tracto fistuloso operado simultáneamente o con un intento previo de reparación.El resultado principal fue la curación primaria del tracto fistuloso y los resultados secundarios incluyeron el éxito en general, las complicaciones y tiempo hasta recurrencia.Se registraron 119 casos (75 ligaduras del tracto de la fístula interesfintérica y 44 BioLIFT). Un cirujano realizó el 84% de los casos de BioLIFT. La tasa de curación primaria fue del 75.0% vs 58.7%, p = 0.08, y la tasa de complicaciones fue del 22.7% vs 17.3%, p = 0.48 comparando BioLIFT vs ligadura del tracto de la fístula interesfintérica. Después de la regresión logística multivariada, el BioLIFT tuvo una tasa de curación significativamente mejor (OR 2.38 [IC 95% 1.01-5.62], p = 0.048). La mediana de seguimiento fue de 9 vs 29 semanas (BioLIFT vs ligadura del tracto de la fístula interesfintérica). El análisis de Kaplan-Meier no demostró diferencias en el tiempo hasta la recurrencia (p = 0,48).Este estudio estuvo limitado por ser retrospectivo, las diferentes duraciones de seguimiento y el número variable de casos entre los cirujanos.La modificación BioLIFT es segura y efectiva para el tratamiento de las fístulas anales pero tiene un costo más alto. Esta modificación amerita más estudios prospectivos para establecer los beneficios sobre ligadura del tracto de la fístula interesfintérica. Consulte Video Resumen en hhttp://links.lww.com/DCR/B139.

Initial Experience with Fibrin Glue Treatment of Anal Fistulae in Children

Pediatric anal fistulae commonly result from recurrent perianal abscesses, of which nearly 50 per cent develop an anal fistula. The purpose of this study was to report the results of using fibrin glue to treat anal fistula in pediatric patients. Infants and children with recurrent perianal abscesses and anal fistulae were treated with either fistulectomy or fibrin glue. Demographic and clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared between the groups. A total of 34 children were included; 27 received fistulectomy (median age eight months) and seven received fibrin glue treatment (median age 14 months). No significant differences in demographic or clinical characteristics were found between the two groups (all, P > 0.05). Median follow-up duration was significantly higher in the fibrin glue group compared with that in the fistulectomy group (five months vs one month, P = 0.003). There was one recurrence in the fistulectomy group, and no recurrences in the fibrin glue group (P = 1.0). No complications occurred in either group. Fibrin glue treatment is a simple and effective treatment alternative in the management of anal fistula in children, offering the advantage of sphincter muscle-sparing and reduced risk of fecal incontinence.

Root extractive from Daphne genkwa benefits in wound healing of anal fistula through up-regulation of collagen genes in human skin fibroblasts

Wound healing is the main problem in the therapy of anal fistula (AF). Daphne genkwa root has been traditionally used as an agent to soak sutures in operation of AF patients, but its function in wound healing remains largely unclear. The aim of the present study was to illuminate mechanisms of D. genkwa root treatment on AF. In the present study, 60 AF patients after surgery were randomly divided into two groups, external applied with or without the D. genkwa extractive. Wound healing times were compared and granulation tissues were collected. In vitro, we constructed damaged human skin fibroblasts (HSFs) with the treatment of TNF-α (10 μg/ml). Cell Count Kit-8 (CCK-8) and flow cytometry analysis were used to determine the effects of D. genkwa root extractive on cell viability, cell cycle and apoptosis of damaged HSFs. Furthermore, protein levels of TGF-β, COL1A1, COL3A1, Timp-1, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-3 (MMP-3) and MEK/ERK signalling pathways were investigated both in vivo and in vitro Results showed that D. genkwa root extractive greatly shortens the wound healing time in AF patients. In granulation tissues and HSFs, treatment with the extractive significantly elevated the expressions of COL1A1, COL3A1, Timp-1, c-fos and Cyclin D1, while reduced the expression of MMP-3 Further detection presented that MEK/ERK signalling was activated after the stimulation of extractive in HSFs. Our study demonstrated that extractive from D. genkwa root could effectively improve wound healing in patients with AF via the up-regulation of fibroblast proliferation and expressions of COL1A1 and COL3A1.

Factibility and security study of the PICS-AF™ plug for the treatment of cryptoglandular anal fistula

INTRODUCTION

The PICS-AF™ (Curaseal Inc.) device is a new plug made of collagen that has a retention system in the internal orifice. This pilot study was designed to assess both the feasibility and safety of this plug in the treatment of trans-sphincteric anal fístulas.

METHODS

A total of 44 patients (34 men), with a mean age of 54.68±7.3, with trans-sphincteric anal fístulas were included in the study; 34 of them were analyzed. All patients were examined according to a strict preoperative protocol and until 6 months after surgery. The feasibility of the procedure and the adverse events were analyzed.

RESULTS

Finally, 34 patients were operated on, and in 30 of them the plug was used. Therefore, the feasibility was calculated at 88%. There was a total of 16 adverse events, 4recorded as not related (3 mild and one moderate) and 12 related to the procedure or to the device implanted. Of these, 5were mild, 5moderate and 2severe. The majority of the events reported were related to proctalgia (4 patients) or infection at the implant site (4 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study indicates that the new collagen plug can be placed effectively and with an acceptable complication rate.

Five years of experience with the FiLaC™ laser for fistula-in-ano management: long-term follow-up from a single institution

Background

There are limited data available concerning endofistular therapies for fistula-in-ano, with our group reporting the first preliminary outcomes of the use of the radial fibre Fistula laser Closing (FiLaC ™) device.

Methods

The aim of this study was to assess a cohort of anal fistulae managed with laser ablation plus definitive flap closure of the internal fistula opening over a long-term follow-up. Factors governing primary healing success and secondary healing success (i.e. success after one or two operations) were determined.

Results

The study analysed 117 patients over a median follow-up period of 25.4 months (range 6–60 months) with 13 patients (11.1%) having Crohn’s-related fistulae. No incontinence to solid and liquid stool was reported. Minor incontinence to mucus and gas was observed in two cases (1.7%), and a late abscess treated in one case (0.8%). The primary healing rate was 75/117 (64.1%) overall, and 63.5% for cryptoglandular fistulae versus 69.2% for Crohn’s fistulae, respectively. Of the 42 patients who failed FiLaC™ 31 underwent a second operation (“Re-FiLaC™”, fistulectomy with sphincter reconstruction or fistulotomy). The secondary healing rate, defined as healing of the fistula at the end of the study period, was 103/117 (88.0%) overall and 85.5% for cryptoglandular fistulae versus 92.3% for Crohn’s fistulae. A significantly higher primary success rate was observed for intersphincteric-type fistulae with primary and secondary outcome unaffected by age, gender, presence of Crohn’s disease, number of prior surgeries and the type of flap designed to close the internal fistula opening.

Conclusions

There is a moderate primary success rate using first-up FiLaC™ treatment. If FiLaC™ fails, secondary success with repeat FiLaC™ or other approaches was high. The minimally invasive FiLaC™ approach may therefore represent a sensible first-line treatment option for anal fistula repair.