Distal Radius Isoelastic Resurfacing Prosthesis: A Preliminary Report

Hemiarthroplasty for irreparable distal radius fractures in the elderly: A comprehensive review

BACKGROUND

Elderly patients maintaining functional independence can now be candidates for primary wrist hemiarthroplasty to manage acute irreparable distal radius fractures (DRFs). However, further investigation with long-term follow-up is required to validate these initial findings.

AIM

To review the literature on the outcomes of distal radius hemiarthroplasty with available implants to assess its viability as a treatment option.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted using electronic databases, including PubMed, Medline, and Scopus. The search terms employed were "distal radius fracture" , "hemiarthroplasty" , "wrist arthroplasty" , and related terminology. The search was restricted to articles published in English from 1980 until June 2023. Inclusion criteria encompassed cases or case series of DRF treated with hemiarthroplasty, providing clinical or radiographic outcomes, and published in peer-reviewed journals.

RESULTS

A total of 2508 articles from PubMed and 883 from Scopus were identified initially. Following screening and removal of duplicates, 13 articles met the inclusion criteria. These articles, predominantly clinical retrospective studies, provided insights into hemiarthroplasty outcomes, including functional improvements and complications. Hemiarthroplasty was a treatment option for complex DRF, particularly those cases with severe comminution, intraarticular involvement, or severe osteoporosis. Functional outcomes demonstrated improvements in pain relief, wrist mobility, and grip strength, with variability across studies. Complications included implant loosening, infection, nerve injury, and stiffness, with varying incidence rates influenced by surgical techniques and implant choice. Long-term outcomes were inadequately documented, warranting further research.

CONCLUSION

Hemiarthroplasty is a promising treatment for irreparable DRF in the elderly. Long-term outcomes and complications require further study.

Wrist Hemiarthroplasty for Complex Intraarticular Distal Radius Fracture in a Patient with Manifest Osteoporosis

Distal radius fracture (DRF) is one of the most common fractures of the elderly. The higher the degree of joint surface destruction, and the more adverse factors are involved, the more challenging proper treatment becomes. In this regard, osteoporosis as underlying systemic disease, chondropathy or degeneration of adjacent wrist bones as well as incompliance significantly impair the success of the chosen primary therapy. Wrist hemiarthroplasty has already been reported as primary or secondary procedure for DRFs. In this case report, we present a patient with a severely comminuted DRF including posttraumatic degeneration of the lunate as well as manifest osteoporosis. Wrist hemiarthroplasty using the ReMotion radius component in combination with proximal row carpectomy was performed as secondary surgery. This procedure proved to be a viable treatment option in terms of achieving low pain levels, high range of motion values and stable osteointegration over a course of 6.5 follow-up years.

Isoelastic resurfacing prosthesis for distal radius fractures: Outcomes in 24 cases with at least 2 years' follow-up

BACKGROUND

Unicompartmental resurfacing prostheses have been reported to be useful for treating comminuted fractures involving the distal radial joint surface in elderly patients with osteoporosis. However, the data on this method remain scarce and further evaluations are needed. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes after unicompartmental resurfacing prosthesis implantation in patients with distal radius fractures and at least 2 years' follow-up.

HYPOTHESIS

Outcomes with Prosthelast® are as good in the mid-term as in the short term.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied 24 patients with type C fractures in the AO classification. The Prosthelast® prosthesis was implanted in each. Mean age was 78 years (60 to 91). There were 22 females. Three of the fractures were open. The patients were evaluated clinically using a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, ranges of motion at the wrist, and grip strength. In addition, functional scores were determined, and radiographs obtained.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 55.2 months (24-97). Mean tourniquet time was 61.9minutes (37-126). Mean motion ranges were 39° in flexion, 49° in extension, 74° in pronation, and 68° in supination. The mean VAS pain score was 2.1 (0-7). The mean Quick DASH was 39.8 (9.09-77), the mean PRWE was 42.7 (5-95), and mean grip strength was 38 (25-150). Painful motion limitation of the elbow was noted in a patient treated with total elbow prosthesis. Complex regional pain syndrome developed in 6 patients, and 5 patients required revision surgery. Asymptomatic perforation of the radial head occurred in 8 patients. No cases of peri-prosthetic osteolysis or osteoarthritis were noted. The prosthesis impinged on the lunate bone in 2 patients and on the scaphoid bone in one patient. Mean ulnar variance was +0.17mm (-1 to 7.5). Bone remodelling about the prosthesis was noted in all the patients, but 2.

DISCUSSION

Our data obtained after a mean follow-up of 55 months indicate that resurfacing prostheses have a role to play in the treatment of comminuted articular fractures in patients with osteoporosis. A long-term study is needed to further evaluate these results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; therapeutic.

[Revision surgery after total wrist arthroplasty]

BACKGROUND

Wrist arthroplasty is still an exceptional indication in the field of hand surgery. In recent years, it has become increasingly accepted as an alternative to wrist arthrodesis as the ultima ratio for panarthrosis or similar destruction of the wrist. In particular, the patient's desire for functional integrity also plays an important role.

COMPLICATIONS

While there were often complications with earlier prosthesis designs of the older generations and only a short survival rate could be achieved, this has improved, if the indication of the so-called fourth generation prostheses is done properly. Survival rates of over 10 years are no longer uncommon, even without revision operations. Currently, the indication for hemiarthroplasty has been increasing, particularly in the case of post-traumatic destruction. Those who are seriously interested in endoprosthesis should also be able to treat the associated complications. The present article is intended to provide an overview of common or potential complications in the context of wrist arthroplasty and to demonstrate possible solutions by presenting case studies. The basics of primary implantation are, therefore, not discussed. Reference is made to further literature.

[Total wrist arthroplasty-a review]

BACKGROUND

Total wrist arthroplasty is still a rare procedure. This issue is being discussed controversially, particular in German-speaking countries. Lately, its acceptance has risen, especially as an alternative to wrist fusion regarding treatment of panarthritis or similar pathologies. Previous arthroplasty designs had short survival spans and devastating complications.

THE CURRENT SITUATION

Currently, these problems have been reduced by the development of fourth generation arthroplasty systems. Nowadays, survival spans of 10 years and more can be seen on a regular basis. The development of hemi-arthroplasty may be of interest, especially for traumatic destruction of the distal radius. This review outlines the current state of wrist arthroplasty and is based on the author's 15 years of experience.

Emerging Technologies in Distal Radius Fracture Fixation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an overview of emerging fixation constructs and materials used in the operative management of distal radius fractures.

RECENT FINDINGS

The indications, advantages, and disadvantages of relatively new implants and devices used to treat distal radius fractures are discussed. These include the intramedullary nail, intramedullary cage, radiolucent volar locking plate, distal radius hemiarthroplasty, and bone graft substitutes. The spectrum of distal radius fracture patterns may make it impossible to depend on a single device for fixation, and surgeons managing distal radius fractures should be adept at using various surgical approaches, techniques, and hardware systems. Additional studies demonstrating the cost-effectiveness, biomechanical properties, and clinical outcomes will be useful in determining the utility of the described techniques.

Results of wrist hemiarthroplasty for comminuted distal radius fractures in independent elderly people: A retrospective study on eleven patients

The comminuted distal radius fractures among elderly people are usually linked to osteoporosis, and repairing them in this context is a therapeutical challenge. Several teams have reported good results of radius resurfacing. The goal of our study was to evaluate the usability of the wrist in a new series of patients after surgery. We performed a monocentric retrospective study on the data of the medical files. All the included patients were older than 65 years and received a wrist hemiarthroplasty according to the criteria that have been established by the in charge medical team. Eleven patients have been included, their average age was 80.4 years old, and the average follow-up was 18.3  months. The average QuickDASH Score was 59 (27-95). The Visual Analogue Scale for pain was in average 3.8/10 and the average mobility was: flexion 36° (12-50), extension 27° (12-50), radial deviation 15° (12-15), ulnar deviation 26° (12-40), pronation-supination range of motion 164° (150-170). The average measured strength was 44% (16-72%) of the strength of the unaffected hand. Our results are rather modest, probably because of insufficient follow-up and very severe fractures. Furthermore, the implant that has been used does not take into account the distal radioulnar joint. Another bound of this treatment is the complexity of surgical revision in case of bad result. So far, hemiarthroplasty cannot be considered as the standard treatment for complex fractures of the distal radius.

Surgical technique: about a new total and isoelastic wrist implant (Prosthelast®)

This study describes a new total wrist implant (Prosthelast^®) designed to reduce the risk of distal migration of the carpal component. The Prosthelast^® implant consists in a one-block radial implant replacing the metaphysis and the articular surface fixed to a radial elastic centromedullar wire and a carpal component in titanium with an articular condylar surface in polyethylene. We operated on five patients (three male patients and two female patients) and followed them up for 12 months on average. Two of the patients presented with rheumatoid arthritis of the wrist, and an ulnar osteotomy (Darrach procedure) was carried out at the same time of the arthroplasty. All clinical variables improved postoperatively (Quick DASH score, pain score, range of motion) except from wrist flexion which was reduced. No patients underwent revision surgery. Two patients presented with a periprosthetic radiolucent loosening around the radial component, but no implant migration was observed. Overall, the preliminary results of our case series show that the new Prosthelast^® implant presents comparable short-term results to those described in the literature. We will follow up the patients to verify that long-term results are as satisfactory as the short-term results.

Wrist hemiarthroplasty for irreparable DRF in the elderly

INTRODUCTION

The authors update their results of wrist hemiarthroplasty for irreparable distal radius fracture in the elderly, at a minimum of 2-year follow-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2011 and 2018, 25 consecutive independent elderly patients (24 female, 27 wrists) were treated with wrist hemiarthroplasty for distal radius fracture at a single institution. The average age was 77 years (range 65-88). They all were independent at home. A total of 19 wrists were treated at the acute stage, and 8 secondary procedures. The average follow-up was 32 months (range 24-44).

RESULTS

There was no dislocation, loosening, infection nor removal of the implants. We observed 3 CRPS. At final follow-up, the average VAS pain was 1/10, mean forearm pronation/supination arc was 150°, and mean active flexion-extension arc was 60°. Average wrist extension was 36°. Mean grip strength was 68% of contralateral side. Mean Lyon wrist score was 74%. Mean Quick DASH score was 26%, and mean PRWE score was 25%.

DISCUSSION

Our data suggest that treatment of acute irreparable distal radius fracture in the independent elderly patient with a bone-preserving primary wrist hemiarthroplasty may be a viable option. Longer-term follow-up are needed to confirm these preliminary data.

Patient-accident-fracture (PAF) classification of acute distal radius fractures in adults

There is not enough evidence in the literature to support the use of any classification system for distal radius fractures (DRF) in adults. However, there is a need for identification of more homogeneous groups of patients with DRF so that the extent of preoperative workup and sophistication of treatment would best match the needs of the patient. The authors propose an innovative method to analyse and stratify acute DRF in adults. A one-page chart includes criteria related to the patient (P), the energy of the accident (A) and the pathology of the fracture (F). Analysis of the pathology includes not only the distal radius itself but also the associated ulnar and carpal lesions. Radiological suspicion of associated carpal of distal radio-ulnar joint ligamentous injuries is included in the analysis. The preliminary results of the use of this chart in 1610 consecutive adult patients (16-102 years) with unilateral acute DRF are presented. A total of six homogeneous groups of patients are described, and the relevance of this classification regarding the therapeutic options is discussed.

Hemi-arthroplasty for distal radius fracture in the independent elderly

INTRODUCTION

The authors report their experience with hemi-arthroplasty in irreparable fresh distal radius fracture in independent elderly patients as first-line treatment (12 fractures in 11 women; mean age, 74 years) or in second line after clinically disabling primary failure (4 fractures in 4 women; mean age, 78 years).

RESULTS

In the 12 primary surgeries, at a mean 32 months' follow-up, there were no complications requiring implant ablation; mean pain score was 1/10, flexion-extension 62°, Lyon Wrist score 75%, and Patient-Related Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) 22 points. In 2 of the 4 secondary surgeries, at a mean 24 months' follow-up, there were no complications requiring implant ablation; mean pain score was 2.5/10, flexion-extension 62°, Lyon Wrist score 58%, and PRWE 50 points: i.e., slightly poorer results than in primary surgery.

CONCLUSION

Salvage of complex fracture in independent elderly patients by hemi-arthroplasty, whether primary or secondary to failure, seems to be a considerable progress, to be confirmed in larger series.

[What is the role of primary or secondary hemiarthroplasty for distal radius fractures in independent elderly patients?]

The authors report their experience with wrist hemiarthroplasty for acute irreparable distal radius fractures in independent elderly patients (12 women, mean age 76years) and following failed initial treatment in the same population (5 women, mean age 75years). The first 11 cases have a mean follow-up of 30months. No complications requiring implant removal were reported. At follow-up, the mean VAS for pain was 1/10, the mean flexion-extension arc was 60°, the Lyon Wrist score was 73 % and the PRWE (Patient-Related Wrist Evaluation) was 22 points. The five patients who had secondary procedures and were reviewed at mean of 16months' follow-up did not require implant removal but there was one complete forearm rotational ankylosis with ossification. At follow-up, the mean VAS for pain was 3/10, the mean flexion-extension arc was 56°, the Lyon Wrist score was 65 % and the PRWE was 45 points. The authors believe that hemiarthroplasty is a useful salvage procedure for irreparable wrist fractures in the emergency room and after failed initial treatment in active elderly patients.

Unicompartmental isoelastic resurfacing prosthesis for malignant tumor of the distal radius: A case report with a 3-year follow-up

We report a case of 74-year-old man in whom a unicompartmental isoelastic resurfacing prosthesis was used to reconstruct the distal radius after en-bloc resection of a malignant tumor. Thirty-nine months after the operation, on a visual analogic scale, pain score was 0/10 and range of motion was 25° of flexion, 5° of extension, 70° of pronation, 45° of supination, 20° of radial deviation, and 30° of ulnar deviation. The Quick DASH functional score was 72.72/100. With radiographic finding, the prosthesis was well-aligned, with no evidence of loosening but with slightly implant conflict with the lunate. This case report indicates that unicompartmental isoelastic resurfacing prosthesis seems a simple and reliable technique for distal radius reconstruction after en-bloc resection of malignant tumor.

Can Total Wrist Arthroplasty Be an Option for Treatment of Highly Comminuted Distal Radius Fracture in Selected Patients? Preliminary Experience with Two Cases

We present two case reports of successful primary shortening of the forearm and total wrist arthroplasty (TWA) using the new angle-stable Maestro Wrist Reconstructive System (WRS) for treatment of highly comminuted distal radius fracture in selected autonomous patients. In a 56-year-old male patient with adequate bone stock, insertion of the noncemented Maestro WRS was combined with ulnar shortening osteotomy. In an 84-year-old female patient with poor osteoporotic bone stock, insertion of the radial cemented Maestro WRS was combined with ulnar head resection. Both patients could resume their work without additional surgery after TWA. At the 1-year follow-up, there were no changes in position of either implant without signs of loosening, no impingement, and no instability of the distal radioulnar joint or the distal ulna stump. All clinical parameters (DASH score, pain through VAS, and grip strength) were satisfactory. Both patients reported that they would have the same procedure again. Further experience is needed to validate this concept.