1
|
Hardtstock F, Krieger J, Wilke T, Lukas M, Ultsch B, Welte R, Quinzler R, Maywald U, Timmermann H. Epidemiology, Treatment and Health Care Resource Use of Patients with severe Asthma in Germany – a retrospective Claims Data Analysis. J Asthma 2022; 60:1280-1289. [PMID: 36373984 DOI: 10.1080/02770903.2022.2144350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Asthma causes various clinical symptoms, including unpredictable severe exacerbations, and even though most patients can achieve a reasonable disease control due to adequate treatment, some patients do not. This study seeks to describe healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and treatment of asthma and severe asthma patients in Germany. METHOD A retrospective claims data analysis has been conducted on adult asthma patients and a subset of patients with severe asthma, identified during July 2017 - June 2018. A proxy was used to identify severe asthma patients based on therapy options recommended within the German treatment guideline for treating these patients. These include (i) biologics, (ii) medium/high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in conjunction with LABA/montelukast and antibiotics/oral corticosteroids (OCS), and (iii) long-term OCS therapy. HCRU and treatment of patients were observed during a 1-year follow-up period (July 2018 - June 2019). RESULTS The study included 388 932 adult asthma patients (prevalence: 7.90%), with 2.51%-12.88% affected by severe asthma (depending on the definition). 22.60% of all asthma patients experienced hospitalizations (severe asthma: 36.11%). Furthermore, 13.59% received OCS (severe asthma: 39.91%), but only 0.18% (severe asthma: 1.25%) received biologics. Only 23.95% (severe asthma: 41.17%) visited a pulmonologist. CONCLUSIONS A considerable proportion of severe asthma patients receive long-term OCS therapy. However, less than 50% have seen a pulmonologist who would typically seek a change in treatment to avoid the long-term consequences of OCS. To optimize the treatment of severe asthma in Germany, better referral of these patients to specialists is needed and considering potential treatment alternatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Marco Lukas
- GlaxoSmithKline GmbH & Co. KG, München, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Milan V, Fetzer S, Hagist C. Healing, surviving, or dying? - projecting the German future disease burden using a Markov illness-death model. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:123. [PMID: 33430836 PMCID: PMC7799167 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09941-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 11/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In view of the upcoming demographic transition, there is still no clear evidence on how increasing life expectancy will affect future disease burden, especially regarding specific diseases. In our study, we project the future development of Germany's ten most common non-infectious diseases (arthrosis, coronary heart disease, pulmonary, bronchial and tracheal cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cerebrovascular diseases, dementia, depression, diabetes, dorsal pain and heart failure) in a Markov illness-death model with recovery until 2060. METHODS The disease-specific input data stem from a consistent data set of a major sickness fund covering about four million people, the demographic components from official population statistics. Using six different scenarios concerning an expansion and a compression of morbidity as well as increasing recovery and effective prevention, we can show the possible future range of disease burden and, by disentangling the effects, reveal the significant differences between the various diseases in interaction with the demographic components. RESULTS Our results indicate that, although strongly age-related diseases like dementia or heart failure show the highest relative increase rates, diseases of the musculoskeletal system, such as dorsal pain and arthrosis, still will be responsible for the majority of the German population's future disease burden in 2060, with about 25-27 and 13-15 million patients, respectively. Most importantly, for almost all considered diseases a significant increase in burden of disease can be expected even in case of a compression of morbidity. CONCLUSION A massive case-load is emerging on the German health care system, which can only be alleviated by more effective prevention. Immediate action by policy makers and health care managers is needed, as otherwise the prevalence of widespread diseases will become unsustainable from a capacity point-of-view.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valeska Milan
- AOK Baden-Württemberg, Stuttgart / WHU Otto Beisheim School of Management, Burgplatz 2, 56179, Vallendar, Germany.
| | - Stefan Fetzer
- Hochschule Aalen - Technik und Wirtschaft, Aalen, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ibáñez L, Sabaté M, Vidal X, Ballarin E, Rottenkolber M, Schmiedl S, Heeke A, Huerta C, Martin Merino E, Montero D, Leon-Muñoz LM, Gasse C, Moore N, Droz C, Lassalle R, Aakjaer M, Andersen M, De Bruin ML, Groenwold R, van den Ham HA, Souverein P, Klungel O, Gardarsdottir H. Incidence of direct oral anticoagulant use in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and characteristics of users in 6 European countries (2008-2015): A cross-national drug utilization study. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2019; 85:2524-2539. [PMID: 31318059 PMCID: PMC6848911 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2019] [Revised: 06/20/2019] [Accepted: 07/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims To estimate the incidence of direct oral anticoagulant drug (DOAC) use in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and to describe user and treatment characteristics in 8 European healthcare databases representing 6 European countries. Methods Longitudinal drug utilization study from January 2008 to December 2015. A common protocol approach was applied. Annual period incidences and direct standardisation by age and sex were performed. Dose adjustment related to change in age and by renal function as well as concomitant use of potentially interacting drugs were assessed. Results A total of 186 405 new DOAC users (age ≥18 years) were identified. Standardized incidences varied from 1.93–2.60 and 0.11–8.71 users/10 000 (2011–2015) for dabigatran and rivaroxaban, respectively, and from 0.01–8.12 users/10 000 (2012–2015) for apixaban. In 2015, the DOAC incidence ranged from 9 to 28/10 000 inhabitants in SIDIAP (Spain) and DNR (Denmark) respectively. There were differences in population coverage among the databases. Only 1 database includes the total reference population (DNR) while others are considered a population representative sample (CPRD, BIFAP, SIDIAP, EGB, Mondriaan). They also varied in the type of drug data source (administrative, clinical). Dose adjustment ranged from 4.6% in BIFAP (Spain) to 15.6% in EGB (France). Concomitant use of interacting drugs varied between 16.4% (SIDIAP) and 70.5% (EGB). Cardiovascular comorbidities ranged from 25.4% in Mondriaan (The Netherlands) to 82.9% in AOK Nordwest (Germany). Conclusion Overall, apixaban and rivaroxaban increased its use during the study period while dabigatran decreased. There was variability in patient characteristics such as comorbidities, potentially interacting drugs and dose adjustment. (EMA/2015/27/PH).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luisa Ibáñez
- Fundació Institut Català de Farmacologia (FICF), Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Therapeutics, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mònica Sabaté
- Fundació Institut Català de Farmacologia (FICF), Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Therapeutics, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xavier Vidal
- Fundació Institut Català de Farmacologia (FICF), Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Therapeutics, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
| | - Elena Ballarin
- Fundació Institut Català de Farmacologia (FICF), Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marietta Rottenkolber
- Diabetes Research Group, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Sven Schmiedl
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.,Philipp Klee-Institute for Clinical Pharmacology, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
| | | | - Consuelo Huerta
- Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance Division, Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Devices (AEMPS), Madrid, Spain
| | - Elisa Martin Merino
- Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance Division, Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Devices (AEMPS), Madrid, Spain
| | - Dolores Montero
- Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance Division, Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Devices (AEMPS), Madrid, Spain
| | - Luz María Leon-Muñoz
- Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance Division, Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Devices (AEMPS), Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Nicholas Moore
- Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, INSERM CIC1401, Université de Bordeaux, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Cécile Droz
- Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, INSERM CIC1401, Université de Bordeaux, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Régis Lassalle
- Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, INSERM CIC1401, Université de Bordeaux, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Mia Aakjaer
- Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Morten Andersen
- Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marie Louise De Bruin
- Copenhagen Centre for Regulatory Science (CORS), Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Rolf Groenwold
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Hendrika A van den Ham
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Science, Universiteit Utrecht, David de Wiedgebouw, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Patrick Souverein
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Science, Universiteit Utrecht, David de Wiedgebouw, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Olaf Klungel
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Science, Universiteit Utrecht, David de Wiedgebouw, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Julius Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Helga Gardarsdottir
- Julius Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| |
Collapse
|