1
|
Khan DZ, Ali AMS, Koh CH, Dorward NL, Grieve J, Layard Horsfall H, Muirhead W, Santarius T, Van Furth WR, Zamanipoor Najafabadi AH, Marcus HJ. Skull base repair following endonasal pituitary and skull base tumour resection: a systematic review. Pituitary 2021; 24:698-713. [PMID: 33973152 PMCID: PMC8416859 DOI: 10.1007/s11102-021-01145-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhoea (CSFR) remains a frequent complication of endonasal approaches to pituitary and skull base tumours. Watertight skull base reconstruction is important in preventing CSFR. We sought to systematically review the current literature of available skull base repair techniques. METHODS Pubmed and Embase databases were searched for studies (2000-2020) that (a) reported on the endonasal resection of pituitary and skull base tumours, (b) focussed on skull base repair techniques and/or postoperative CSFR risk factors, and (c) included CSFR data. Roles, advantages and disadvantages of each repair method were detailed. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed where possible. RESULTS 193 studies were included. Repair methods were categorised based on function and anatomical level. There was absolute heterogeneity in repair methods used, with no independent studies sharing the same repair protocol. Techniques most commonly used for low CSFR risk cases were fat grafts, fascia lata grafts and synthetic grafts. For cases with higher CSFR risk, multilayer regimes were utilized with vascularized flaps, gasket sealing and lumbar drains. Lumbar drain use for high CSFR risk cases was supported by a randomised study (Oxford CEBM: Grade B recommendation), but otherwise there was limited high-level evidence. Pooled CSFR incidence by approach was 3.7% (CI 3-4.5%) for transsphenoidal, 9% (CI 7.2-11.3%) for expanded endonasal, and 5.3% (CI 3.4-7%) for studies describing both. Further meaningful meta-analyses of repair methods were not performed due to significant repair protocol heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS Modern reconstructive protocols are heterogeneous and there is limited evidence to suggest the optimal repair technique after pituitary and skull base tumour resection. Further studies are needed to guide practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danyal Z Khan
- Division of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ahmad M S Ali
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre, Liverpool, UK
| | - Chan Hee Koh
- Division of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Neil L Dorward
- Division of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Joan Grieve
- Division of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Hugo Layard Horsfall
- Division of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - William Muirhead
- Division of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Thomas Santarius
- Division of Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK
| | - Wouter R Van Furth
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Neurosurgical Centre Holland, Leiden University Medical Centre, Haaglanden Medical Centre and Haga Teaching Hospital, Leiden and The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Amir H Zamanipoor Najafabadi
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Neurosurgical Centre Holland, Leiden University Medical Centre, Haaglanden Medical Centre and Haga Teaching Hospital, Leiden and The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Hani J Marcus
- Division of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK.
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dorismond C, Santarelli GD, Thorp BD, Kimple AJ, Ebert CS, Zanation AM. Heterogeneity in Outcome Reporting in Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2021; 82:506-521. [PMID: 34513556 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1714108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2020] [Accepted: 05/17/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Presently, there are no standards for reporting outcomes of endoscopic endonasal skull base reconstruction (ESBR). This is problematic as a lack of consistent reporting makes synthesizing findings in systematic reviews and meta-analysis challenging. Thus, the aim of this study was to systematically review and describe the patterns of reporting outcomes in ESBR as a foundation for developing reporting guidelines. Study Design Present study is a systematic review. Methods Embase, PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched for all publications with ≥25 patients and a focus on ESBR. The reporting patterns of each study's variables and outcomes were assessed. Results A total of 112 studies were included in the review. The most commonly reported demographic variables were the number of included patients ( n = 112, 100%) and types of pathologies treated ( n = 104, 92.9%). Meanwhile, the most routinely described preoperative variable was history of prior treatment ( n = 48, 42.9%). Type of reconstruction was a commonly reported intraoperative variable ( n = 110, 98.2%), though the rate of intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak was noted in only 76 studies (67.9%). With regard to postoperative outcomes, postoperative CSF leak rate was routinely provided ( n = 101, 90.2%), but reporting of other surgical complications was more inconsistent. Ultimately, of the 43 variables and outcomes reviewed, a median of 12 (range: 4-22) was reported in each study. Conclusion There is significant heterogeneity in the outcomes reported in studies relating to ESBR. This highlights the need for the development of standard reporting guidelines to minimize bias and improve interstudy comparability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Dorismond
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
| | - Griffin D Santarelli
- Department of Otolaryngology, Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
| | - Brian D Thorp
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
| | - Adam J Kimple
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
| | - Charles S Ebert
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
| | - Adam M Zanation
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Slot EM, Sabaoglu R, Voormolen EH, Hoving EW, van Doormaal TP. Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak after Transsphenoidal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2021; 83:e501-e513. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1733918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 07/01/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak is widely recognized as a challenging and commonly occurring postoperative complication of transsphenoidal surgery (TSS).The primary objective of this study is to benchmark the current prevalence of CSF leak after TSS in the adult population.
Methods The authors followed the PRISMA guidelines. The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for articles reporting CSF leak after TSS in the adult population. Meta-analysis was performed using the Untransformed Proportion metric in OpenMetaAnalyst. For two between-group comparisons a generalized linear mixed model was applied.
Results We identified 2,408 articles through the database search, of which 70, published since 2015, were included in this systematic review. These studies yielded 24,979 patients who underwent a total of 25,034 transsphenoidal surgeries. The overall prevalence of postoperative CSF leak was 3.4% (95% confidence interval or CI 2.8–4.0%). The prevalence of CSF leak found in patients undergoing pituitary adenoma resection was 3.2% (95% CI 2.5–4.2%), whereas patients who underwent TSS for another indication had a CSF leak prevalence rate of 7.1% (95% CI 3.0–15.7%) (odds ratio [OR] 2.3, 95% CI 0.9–5.7). Patients with cavernous sinus invasion (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.1–8.7) and intraoperative CSF leak (OR 5.9, 95% CI 3.8–9.0) have increased risk of postoperative CSF leak. Previous TSS and microscopic surgery are not significantly associated with postoperative CSF leak.
Conclusion The overall recent prevalence of CSF leak after TSS in adults is 3.4%. Intraoperative CSF leak and cavernous sinus invasion appear to be significant risk factors for postoperative CSF leak.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma M.H. Slot
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Translational Neuroscience, University Medical Center, Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rengin Sabaoglu
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Eduard H.J. Voormolen
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Eelco W. Hoving
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Neuro-oncology, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Tristan P.C. van Doormaal
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Translational Neuroscience, University Medical Center, Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Assessing the association of tumor consistency and gland manipulation on hormonal outcomes and delayed hyponatremia in pituitary macroadenoma surgery. INTERDISCIPLINARY NEUROSURGERY-ADVANCED TECHNIQUES AND CASE MANAGEMENT 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.inat.2019.100628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
5
|
Fnais N, Di Maio S, Edionwe S, Zeitouni A, Sirhan D, Valdes CJ, Tewfik MA. Response by the Authors of Original Article. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2019; 80:332. [PMID: 31144681 DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1676834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Naif Fnais
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Susan Edionwe
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Anthony Zeitouni
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Denis Sirhan
- Department of Cerebrovascular and Skull Base Surgery, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Constanza J Valdes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Marc A Tewfik
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: comparison of two sellar reconstruction techniques and their effect on postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage. Neurosurg Rev 2018; 41:1053-1058. [PMID: 29388119 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-018-0949-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2017] [Revised: 12/18/2017] [Accepted: 01/22/2018] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Transsphenoidal surgery is a common procedure in patients with pituitary adenomas. Several techniques have been previously postulated to achieve sufficient sellar reconstruction to avoid cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage. We analyzed our institutional database concerning two sellar reconstruction techniques and development of postoperative CSF leakage. From 2009 to 2015, 255 patients underwent transsphenoidal pituitary surgery at our institution. According to the technique used for sellar reconstruction, patients were divided into two groups: (1) with muscle patch and fibrin glue and (2) with fibrin glue alone. Postoperative CSF leakage occurred in 7% of the patients. Occurrence of postoperative CSF leakage did not differ significantly between both sellar reconstruction techniques (p = 0.2). Patients who underwent sellar reconstruction with fibrin glue alone had significantly shorter operating time (p < 0.0001), as well as shorter length of hospital stay (p = 0.01). On multivariate analysis, occurrence of intraoperative CSF leakage was the only predictor for postoperative CSF leakage (p < 0.0001). The present data suggests that sellar reconstruction after transsphenoidal pituitary surgery seems to be equally effective in preventing postoperative CSF leakage. However, the use of fibrin glue alone results in shorter hospital stay and operating time without exposing patients to more frequent CSF leakage.
Collapse
|